Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R B Lipton

Publications and source records attributed to R B Lipton.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Validity of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers.

The headache impact questionnaire (HImQ) is used to measure pain and activity limitations from headache over a 3-month recall period. In a prior study, the test-retest reliability of the eight-item HImQ score was found to be relatively high (0.86). In the current study, we examined the validity of the eight-item HImQ by comparing the overall score and individual items to equivalent measures from a 90-day diary. Pain and activity limitations due to headache were assessed in a population-based sample of 132 migraine headache sufferers enrolled in a 90-day daily diary study who completed the HImQ at the end of the study. The HImQ score was derived from four frequency-based questions (i.e. number of headaches, missed days of work, missed days of chores, or missed days of non-work activity) and four summary measures of average experience across headaches (i.e. average pain intensity, and average reduced effectiveness when having a headache at work, during household chores, and in non-work activity). Diary based measures were used as the gold standard in evaluating the HImQ score. Mean and median values of frequency-based HImQ items (e.g. number of headaches) were similar to equivalent diary measures, indicating no systematic bias. In contrast, HImQ measures of average experience across attacks (e.g. average pain intensity) overestimated equivalent diary measures and, in general, better approximated diary measures for migraine headaches, rather than all headaches. The highest correlations between HImQ and diary items were observed for headache frequency and average pain intensity, the two general headache measures, followed by measures of reduced effectiveness. Among frequency-based measures, the strength of the correlation was directly related to the magnitude of the mean. The higher the mean value, the higher the correlation. The correlation between the HImQ score and diary based score was 0.49. The HImQ score is moderately valid. Frequency-based items (e.g. number of missed work days) were found to be unbiased and the highest correlation coefficients were observed for frequency-based items with relatively high mean counts (number of headaches, number of missed non-work days). These findings have implications for measuring severity of chronic episodic conditions like headache, asthma, back pain, arthritis, epilepsy, and panic disorder, which can cause limitations to activities. The validity of illness severity measures may be improved by using frequency-based questions to assess both missed activity days and days with significantly reduced effectiveness or productivity (e.g. by 50% or more). By combining the count for both missed days and days where productivity is substantially reduced, the mean of the frequency-based measure will be increased, a factor which may improve the overall validity of the item. A severity measure can be derived from such items by simple addition and provides a scale with intuitively meaningful units.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Classification and epidemiology of headache.

Headache disorders are remarkably common. Like back pain, headache is a symptom that has a broad range of possible causes. Diagnosis of primary headache disorders (migraine, tension-type headache, cluster headache) depends on systematic exclusion of secondary disorders and systematic identification of the specific features of the primary disorders. Thus, migraine should be viewed as an episodic syndrome of pain, involving intracranial structures associated with other neurologic disturbances. Because of the large number of potential etiologies, clinicians must approach headache classification systematically. In this chapter, we provide an overview of headache classification followed by discussions of epidemiology.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

The migraine work and productivity loss questionnaire: concepts and design.

Our objectives were to: (1) develop a self-report questionnaire for measuring the impact of migraine headache on work; and (2) qualitatively assess aspects of its performance. Two samples of migraine sufferers provided the data. Sample 1 (n = 18) participated in a structured discussion group designed to elicit examples of migraine's on-the-job impact. Sample 2 (n = 11) completed a mail survey and participated in in-depth phone interviews. Interviews addressed item comprehensibility, consistency of interpretation, the cognitive processes by which certain answers were generated and response burden. The participants were currently employed men and women, at least 18 years of age, who met the International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for migraine headache [1]. Discussion group participants indicated that migraine attacks substantially diminished their job performance. Pain, photophobia, phonophobia, mental impairment and fatigue were perceived as interfering with even routine or relatively simple job tasks. The Migraine Work and Productivity Loss Questionnaire, Version 1.0 (MWPLQ) was written. Next, it was assessed in the context of the in-depth interviews. Result indicated that the MWPLQ was comprehended without difficulty, interpreted consistently and easy to complete. Thus, qualitative results provide initial support for the new questionnaire.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a population-based sample of headache sufferers.

BACKGROUND: The Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score is used to quantify headache-related disability. In a previous study, we showed that the MIDAS score was highly reliable in population-based samples of migraine headache sufferers in two countries. OBJECTIVES: To examine the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the five items comprising the MIDAS score and the overall MIDAS score in a population-based sample of both migraine and nonmigraine headache sufferers. METHODS: Using a clinically validated telephone interview, a population-based sample of migraine and nonmigraine headache sufferers was identified in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. A total of 97 migraine cases and 80 nonmigraine subjects completed the MIDAS questionnaire on two occasions an average of 3 weeks apart. The MIDAS score is derived from five questions about missed time from work (or school) and household work (one question each about missed days and days with at least 50% reduced productivity) and missed days of nonwork activities. RESULTS: Among all headache sufferers the test-retest Spearman's correlations of individual MIDAS questions ranged from 0.67 to 0.73. The Spearman's correlation for the MIDAS score (i.e., sum of lost days and reduced effectiveness days in each domain) was 0.84. Cronbach's alpha, a measure of internal consistency, was 0.83. Mean and median item values and the overall MIDAS scores differed between migraine and nonmigraine cases. Even after adjusting for differences in headache frequency, the mean MIDAS scores differed substantially (i.e., 10.3 points) between migraine cases and nonmigraine cases. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability and internal consistency of the MIDAS score are high, as tested in a population-based sample of headache sufferers. MIDAS scores are substantially higher in migraine cases than in non-migraine cases, supporting the validity of the measure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Treatment of severe, disabling migraine attacks in an over-the-counter population of migraine sufferers: results from three randomized, placebo-controlled studies of the combination of acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the benefits of acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine (AAC) in the treatment of severe, disabling migraine attacks, in a population of migraine sufferers for whom over-the-counter (OTC) medications are appropriate. BACKGROUND: Subjects (n = 1220) who met the International Headache Society criteria for migraine with or without aura were included in three independent clinical studies. DESIGN/METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of 172 subjects who met the criteria for severe, disabling migraine reported a history of migraine attacks characterized by at least severe pain and severe disability, and treated attacks with severe pain and at least severe disability. Subjects who usually vomited with 20% or more of their migraine attacks, and those with incapacitating disability (subjects who required bed rest for more than 50% of their attacks) were not eligible for enrollment. RESULTS: From 1 h and continuing through 6 h postdose, the proportion of responders was significantly greater (p< or =0.01) for AAC than placebo. The pain intensity difference from baseline was significantly greater (p< or =0.05) for AAC than placebo from 0.5 h through 6 h. The proportion of subjects reporting improvement in functional disability, photophobia, and phonophobia was significantly greater for AAC than placebo from 2 h through 6 h postdose. CONCLUSIONS: The nonprescription combination of AAC was well tolerated and effective.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1999

Headaches and face pains as a manifestation of Munchausen syndrome.

Virtually every psychological or physical symptom may be feigned in order to assume a sick role; the term Munchausen syndrome is applied when the physical features are predominant. Complaints of headache as a manifestation of this condition are rare. We report such a case and review the literature of similar cases. A 34-year-old man consulted several headache specialists in different cities. Many different diagnoses were made, consistent with the various histories the patient related. It seems most unlikely that any one individual could experience 14 distinct headache disorders. Dozens of medications were prescribed, and a dozen or more were taken by the patient daily. People with Munchausen syndrome consciously feign physical symptoms and signs because of the apparently senseless need to assume a sick role. This condition is distinguished from malingering in which the symptoms are consciously feigned for personal gain and from somatoform disorder in which development of symptoms for psychological purposes is unconscious. Primary headache disorders, once thought to have a psychological basis, are now recognized as biological disorders. Though psychogenic mechanisms have been largely discredited, rarely, as illustrated by the present case, psychological mechanisms are predominant.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features.

OBJECTIVE: Constipation is a common heterogeneous condition, possibly encompassing different clinical subtypes. Little is known about the comparative epidemiology of constipation subtypes. This study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of constipation subtypes and determine whether subtypes differ by sociodemographic factors. METHODS: Between June and September 1997, a telephone interview was conducted with individuals about their bowel habits in the preceding 3 months. Survey data on 15 constipation-related symptoms were used to identify individuals who met prespecified symptom criteria for the following mutually exclusive subgroups: functional constipation, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), outlet obstruction or delay (outlet), both IBS and outlet (IBS-outlet), and frequent laxative users (i.e., at least every other day). A total of 10,018 eligible individuals in the United States 18 yr of age or older completed the interview. Test-retest reliability of reporting symptoms was assessed in a separate national survey. The Spearman's correlation coefficient for reporting symptoms ranged from 0.54 to 0.83; all but three symptoms had correlations above 0.68. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of constipation was 14.7%. By subtype, prevalence was 4.6% for functional, 2.1% for IBS, 4.6% for outlet, and 3.4% for IBS-outlet. An additional 1.8% of respondents reported laxative use at least every other day. Outlet was the most common subtype among women, whereas functional constipation was the most common subtype among men. The gender ratio varied by subtype, with elevated ratios for outlet (F/M = 1.65) and IBS-outlet (F/M = 2.27) subtypes. The age pattern differed among each of the four subtypes. Prevalence of functional subtype decreased with increasing age. In contrast, outlet subtype did not seem to vary by age, and IBS (both men and women) and IBS-outlet (women only) subtypes increased to age 35 yr and declined thereafter. Prevalence of functional constipation increased with increasing education. Outlet type was more common in nonwhites compared to whites. Finally, 45% of individuals with constipation reported having the condition for 5 yr or more. CONCLUSIONS: Constipation is a heterogeneous condition. Differences in epidemiological profile by age, sex ratio, and relation to other sociodemographical factors support the distinction of two and possibly more symptom-based subtypes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Social environment and year of birth influence type 1 diabetes risk for African-American and Latino children.

OBJECTIVE: Credible epidemiological data, primarily from European-origin populations, indicate that environmental factors play an important role in the incidence of type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A population-based registry of incident cases of type 1 diabetes among African-American and Latino children in Chicago was used to explore the influence of individual and neighborhood characteristics on diabetes risk. New cases of insulin-treated diabetes in African-American and Latino Chicagoans aged 0-17 years for 1985-1990 (n = 400) were assigned to one of 77 community areas based on street address. Census tables provided denominators, median household income, percentage of adults > or = 25 years old who had completed high school and college, and a crowding variable for each community area individual-level data were birth cohort, sex, and ethnicity. Outcomes in Poisson regression were sex-, ethnic-, and birth cohort-specific incidence rates. RESULTS: Significant univariate associations between diabetes risk and ethnicity, birth cohort, crowding, and the percentage of adults in each community area who had completed high school and college were observed. African-Americans had a relative risk (RR) of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.14-1.76) compared with Latinos. Risk varied significantly by birth cohort in both ethnic groups. For every 10% increase in the proportion of adults who completed college, the RR for diabetes increased by 25% (RR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.09-1.44]). Social class variables were significant determinants of risk for African Americans, but not for Latinos. CONCLUSIONS: The strong birth cohort and social class associations observed in this study implicate an infectious exposure linked with age.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Epidemiology of tension-type headache.

CONTEXT: Tension-type headache is a highly prevalent condition. Because few population-based studies have been performed, little is known about its epidemiology. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the 1-year period prevalence of episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) and chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) in a population-based study; to describe differences in 1-year period prevalence by sex, age, education, and race; and to describe attack frequency and headache pain intensity. DESIGN: Telephone survey conducted 1993 to 1994. SETTING: Baltimore County, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 13 345 subjects from the community. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of respondentswith diagnoses of headache using International Headache Society criteria. Workdays lost and reduced effectiveness at work, home, and school because of headache, based on self-report. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ETTH in the past year was 38.3%. Women had a higher 1-year ETTH prevalence than men in all age, race, and education groups, with an overall prevalence ratio of 1.16. Prevalence peaked in the 30- to 39-year-old age group in both men (42.3%) and women (46.9%). Whites had a higher 1-year prevalence than African Americans in men (40.1% vs. 22.8%) and women (46.8% vs 30.9%). Prevalence increased with increasing educational levels in both sexes, reaching a peak in subjects with graduate school educations of 48.5% for men and 48.9% for women. The 1-year period prevalence of CTTH was 2.2%; prevalence was higher in women and declined with increasing education. Of subjects with ETTH, 8.3% reported lost workdays because of their headaches, while 43.6% reported decreased effectiveness at work, home, or school. Subjects with CTTH reported more lost workdays (mean of 27.4 days vs 8.9 days for those reporting lost workdays) and reduced-effectiveness days (mean of 20.4 vs 5.0 days for those reporting reduced effectiveness) compared with subjects with ETTH. CONCLUSIONS: Episodic tension-type headache is a highly prevalent condition with a significant functional impact at work, home, and school. Chronic tension-type headache is much less prevalent than ETTH; despite its greater individual impact, CTTH has a smaller societal impact than ETTH.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed1998

Efficacy and safety of acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine in alleviating migraine headache pain: three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of the nonprescription combination of acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine in alleviating migraine headache pain. DESIGN: Three double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, single-dose, placebo-controlled studies. SETTING: Private practice, referral centers, and general community. PATIENTS: Migraineurs with moderate or severe headache pain who met International Headache Society diagnostic criteria for migraine with aura or without aura. The most severely disabled segment of migraineurs, including those whose attacks usually required bed rest, or who vomited 20% or more of the time, were excluded. Of the 1357 enrolled patients, 1250 took study medication and 1220 were included in the efficacy-evaluable data set. INTERVENTION: Two tablets of the nonprescription combination of acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine or placebo taken orally as a single-dose treatment of 1 eligible acute migraine attack. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity difference from baseline; percentage of patients with pain reduced to mild or none. RESULTS: Significantly greater reductions in migraine headache pain intensity 1 to 6 hours after dose were seen in patients taking the acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine combination than in those taking placebo in each of the 3 studies. Pain intensity was reduced to mild or none 2 hours after dose in 59.3% of the 602 drug-treated patients compared with 32.8% of the 618 placebo-treated patients (P< .001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 55%-63% for drug, 29%-37% for placebo); at 6 hours after dose, 79% vs 52%, respectively, had pain reduced to mild or none (P<.001; 95% CI, 75%-82% vs 48%-56%). In addition, by 6 hours after dose, 50.8% of the drug-treated patients were pain free compared with 23.5% of the placebo-treated patients (P<.001; 95% CI, 47%-55% for drug, 20%-27% for placebo). Other migraine headache characteristics, such as nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, and functional disability, were significantly improved 2 to 6 hours after treatment with the acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine combination compared with placebo (P< or =.01). CONCLUSIONS: The nonprescription combination of acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine was highly effective for the treatment of migraine headache pain as well as for alleviating the nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, and functional disability associated with migraine attacks. This drug combination also has an excellent safety profile and is well tolerated.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1998

Emergency department evaluation of headache.

Headache is an extremely common complaint in the Emergency Department, accounting for up to 16% of all visits. Although there are more than 300 medical conditions which can produce headache, the vast majority of headache disorders are benign. This article outlines an orderly approach for evaluating patients who present with headaches; in addition, the authors discuss the emergency treatment of the more common types of headache.

Brain Diseases↗
PubMed1998

Reliability of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the reliability and related measurement properties of an illness severity measure for headache derived from responses to a 16-item self-administered questionnaire, the Headache Impact Questionnaire (HImQ), and to determine if there is support for combining measures of pain and disability into a single scaled measure of severity. METHODS: A population-based sample of migraine headache sufferers completed the HImQ twice, an average of 38 days apart. The HImQ included questions about number of headaches in the last 3 months, headache duration, last headache, pain intensity (two questions), need for bedrest (two questions), disability in specific domains of activity (seven questions about interference with ability to work, do household chores, and engage in non-work activity), and symptoms (two questions). RESULTS: Test-retest correlations of individual questions ranged from 0.65 to 0.93. In principal components analysis, a single factor with significant loading emerged. One measure of pain intensity (average pain score from 0 to 10) and items related to disability (i.e., missed days due to headache, and reduced effectiveness because of headache) in defined activity domains (work for pay, housework, nonwork activities) had the greatest weights on this single factor, supporting prior work on combining measures of pain and disability into a single scale. The HImQ score was derived as the sum of average pain intensity and total lost time in each of the three domains of activity, expressed as lost days. The latter was derived as the sum of actual missed days in each activity domain and reduced effectiveness day equivalents in each activity with a headache. The test-retest correlation was 0.77 for all eligible subjects and 0.85 when one influential outlier was removed. Cronbach's alpha was 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: The HImQ score, based on eight items, is a highly reliable and internally consistent measure of headache severity.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1998

Medical consultation for migraine: results from the American Migraine Study.

BACKGROUND: Migraine headaches are often disabling but usually responsive to treatment. Nonetheless, many people with migraine never consult a doctor for headaches. In a sample of the US population, we sought to determine the proportion of active migraineurs who ever consulted a doctor for headache and to identify the headache characteristics and sociodemographic factors associated with consulting. METHOD: A mailed questionnaire survey was sent to 15,000 US households, selected from a panel to be representative of the US population. Of 20,468 eligible respondents ranging in age from 12 to 80 years, 2479 met a case definition for migraine. We mailed a second questionnaire to all migraineurs identified on the first survey and achieved a 69.4% response rate. The second survey assessed headache characteristics, patterns of medical care use, medication use, and method of payment for health care. RESULTS: Sixty-eight percent of female and 57% of male migraineurs reported having ever consulted a doctor for headache. Consultation was more likely with increasing age and in women who ever married. In females, several headache characteristics including pain intensity, number of migraine symptoms, attack duration, and disability were associated with consultation. Of those who never consult, 61% report severe or very severe pain and 67% report severe disability or the need for bed rest with their headaches. CONCLUSION: The results of this survey indicate that a significant proportion of migraine sufferers never consult doctors for their headaches. Given that a large proportion of persons who never consult report high levels of pain and disability, these data suggest that there are opportunities to appropriately increase health care utilization for migraine. Given that 40% of migraineurs who have ever consulted do not report a physician diagnosis of migraine, there is a need to improve headache diagnosis and/or doctor-patient communication about migraine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Demographic influences on free and cued selective reminding performance in older persons.

This study evaluated the influence of age, gender, race, and education on learning and memory in older persons. Free and Cued Selective Reminding (FCSR) was administered to a community-based sample of 216 Caucasian and 50 African American seniors as part of a larger medical and neuropsychological battery. Although age, education, and gender influenced FCSR performance, race did not. The study suggests that memory performance is not influenced by race and that race-adjustment may not be necessary in the norming of memory tests.

Black or African American↗
PubMed1998

Migraine and reduced work performance: a population-based diary study.

OBJECTIVE: This article estimates lost work days and lost work day equivalents in a population sample of migraineurs, differentiating work loss due to headache episodes that met criteria for migraine from migrainous headaches not meeting full criteria and nonmigrainous headaches. METHODS: A random digit dialing survey of 5,071 adults identified 800 subjects with migraine headaches. By clinical examination, a subsample of 225 met migraine diagnostic criteria; 174 of these patients completed at least 11 weeks of daily diaries. This report concerns the subgroup of 122 individuals with regular paid employment. Subjects completed a daily diary over a 3-month period to assess the occurrence of headaches and International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for each headache occurrence. We report estimates of lost work days and lost work day equivalents by type of headache. RESULTS: Participants reported headaches on 8.1 work days, of which 2.2 headache days met criteria for migraine (IHS 1.1, 1.2), and an additional 2.1 headache days were migrainous without meeting full migraine criteria (IHS 1.7). On average, migraineurs missed 1.1 days of work due to headache in 3 months, of which 0.7 lost work days were due to migraine and 0.3 were due to migrainous headaches. When at work with headache, work effectiveness was reduced 41% for migraine headaches, 28% for migrainous headaches, and 24% for other headaches. Over 3 months, migraineurs experienced an average of 3.0 lost work day equivalents, of which 1.4 were due to migraine and an additional 0.7 were due to migrainous headaches. The most disabled 20% of the participants accounted for 77% of the lost work days; 40% of subjects accounted for 75% of the lost work day equivalents. CONCLUSIONS: Employed migraine sufferers experienced considerable work loss and reduced work performance due to headache. The most severely affected migraineurs accounted for most of the reduced work performance. Targeting the most severely affected persons may be necessary to reduce work loss among migraineurs substantially.

Absenteeism↗
PubMed1998

A pilot study of oral sumatriptan as intermittent prophylaxis of menstruation-related migraine.

Headaches associated with menstruation are often resistant to abortive and preventative medications. We performed an open-label study in 20 female migraineurs, employing oral sumatriptan perimenstrually as short-term prophylaxis of menstrual migraine. In 126 sumatriptan-treated cycles, headache was absent in 52.4% and reduced in severity by 50% or greater in 42%. Breakthrough headaches were rare and significantly reduced in severity compared with baseline headaches.

Adult↗