Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R A Hatcher

Publications and source records attributed to R A Hatcher.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Facilitating condom use with clients during commercial sex in Nevada's legal brothels.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined condom use in legal Nevada brothels. METHODS: Forty female prostitutes in two brothels were interviewed about client resistance to condoms and techniques for facilitating condom use. RESULTS: Of 3290 clients in the previous month, 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2%,3.4%) were reluctant to use condoms. Of these individuals, 72% ultimately used condoms, while 12% chose nonpenetrative sex without condoms. The remaining 16% left the brothels without services. Condom use rates were markedly lower with nonpaying sex partners (lowers) than with clients. CONCLUSIONS: Brothel prostitutes may be at greater risk for acquiring HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases from lovers than from clients.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Condom use among female commercial sex workers in Nevada's legal brothels.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate condom use and the incidence of breakage and slippage during vaginal intercourse among female prostitutes in legal Nevada brothels, where use of condoms is required by law. METHODS: Forty-one licensed prostitutes in three brothels were enrolled in a prospective trial in August 1993. Used condoms were collected to verify reported breaks visually. Retrospective breakage and slippage rates were obtained in a standardized interview. RESULTS: Condoms were used for every act of vaginal intercourse with a brothel client during the study period, as well as in the previous year. In the prospective study phase, condoms were used in 353 acts of vaginal intercourse with clients. No condoms broke, and none fell off the penis during intercourse. Only twice (0.6%) did condoms completely fall off during withdrawal. Twelve times (3.4%) during intercourse and 15 times (4.3%) during withdrawal, condoms slipped down the penis but did not fall off. CONCLUSIONS: These findings, among the lowest breakage and slippage rates published, suggest that regular condom use may lead to condom mastery and the development of techniques to reduce the likelihood of breakage and slippage.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Women's reproductive cancers in evolutionary context.

Reproductive experiences for women in today's affluent Western nations differ from those of women in hunting and gathering societies, who continue the ancestral human pattern. These differences parallel commonly accepted reproductive risk factors for cancers of the breast, endometrium and ovary. Nutritional practices, exercise requirements, and body composition are nonreproductive influences that have been proposed as additional factors affecting the incidence of women's cancers. In each case, these would further increase risk for women in industrialized countries relative to forager women. Lifestyles and reproductive patterns new from an evolutionary perspective may promote women's cancers. Calculations based on a theoretical model suggest that, to age 60, modern Western women have a breast cancer risk as much as 100 times that of preagricultural women.

Biological Evolution↗
PubMed1992

New condoms for men and women, diaphragms, cervical caps, and spermicides: overcoming barriers to barriers and spermicides.

Barriers and spermicides are being developed for the prevention of unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection. The inconvenience of current methods limits their acceptability and leads to higher user failure rates. New methods, such as female condoms, nonlatex male condoms, and new cervical caps are being developed: the Reality (Wisconsin Pharmacal, Jackson, WI) polyurethane vaginal pouch has already received conditional Food and Drug Administration approval for use in the United States. The material used in a Food and Drug Administration-approved nonallergenic glove is being tested for its effectiveness as a condom. In addition, the Fem Cap, a cervical cap that had a life table probability of failure within 1 year of 4.8%, is expected to be available within the next 2 years. It is important for clinicians to be informed of new options becoming available for those patients who may be good candidates for these barrier methods.

Contraceptive Devices↗
PubMed1991

Condom use and breakage among women in a municipal hospital family planning clinic.

For those who choose to be sexually active, condoms are the best available means of protection against sexually transmitted diseases including the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), which causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Condoms are also an effective method for preventing pregnancy. Unfortunately, condoms are not 100% effective at preventing pregnancy or the spread of infection, in part because condoms do break. In order to gain insight into condom breakage, a questionnaire was administered to women attending a municipal hospital family planning clinic. Thirty-six percent of the 106 subjects had experienced at least one condom breakage. Condom breakage occurred in approximately 1 out of 100 acts of intercourse using condoms, with a lifetime breakage rate of 10 per 1000 condom uses and a past year breakage rate of 8 per 1000 condom uses. Breakage rates did not differ substantially by age. Five percent of the women's unplanned pregnancies were attributed to broken condoms. The results of this study corroborate previously reported rates. Factors associated with these women's most recent breakage experiences included: vaginal intercourse, minimal foreplay, and breakage prior to ejaculation. Controlled studies will be needed to determine how the condom can be used to reduce the likelihood of breakage.

Contraceptive Devices, Male↗
PubMed1990

A guide to interpreting contraceptive efficacy studies.

Results of trials of various birth control methods and contraceptive products may provide misleading data and engender unrealistic expectations regarding efficacy. An analysis of published efficacy-trials reveals numerous fallacies in their design, performance, and reporting. Consequently, family planning clinicians find it virtually impossible to make valid comparisons among the methods or products. This article reviews the definitions and measures that have been used to assess contraceptive efficacy, describes and illustrates some of the flaws that confound interpretation and comparison of studies, and presents a set of recommendations for future studies. A summary table providing comparative failure rates for all methods of contraception is included.

Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic↗
PubMed1985

Hospitalizations among black women using contraceptives.

We analyzed hospitalizations among 26,507 young black women who attended a large metropolitan family planning clinic between 1968 and 1976. Age-adjusted hospitalization rates were compared for women using oral contraceptives, intrauterine contraceptive devices, and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Overall, intrauterine contraceptive device and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate users were hospitalized at about the same rate, while women using oral contraceptives were hospitalized 30% less often. The oral contraceptive users were not hospitalized at a higher rate for circulatory disease. Compared to women using intrauterine contraceptive devices, users of oral contraceptives and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate were less likely to be hospitalized for benign breast disease (rate ratios = 0.5 and 0.2, respectively, with 95% confidence limits of 0.3 to 0.7 and 0.1 to 0.5) and for pelvic inflammatory disease. Women were four times as likely to be using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate when they were hospitalized with carcinoma in situ of the cervix, but depot medroxyprogesterone acetate users with at least 3 years of use were less likely to be hospitalized for carcinoma in situ than comparable groups of oral contraceptive and intrauterine contraceptive device users.

Adolescent↗