Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R A Crittenden

Publications and source records attributed to R A Crittenden.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

The effects of payback and loan repayment programs on medical student career plans.

Many states have considered implementing payback programs on state-subsidized medical education to increase the rate of graduates returning to those states to practice. An alternative is for states to offer and expand loan repayment programs to entice medical school graduates from rural states to return to their home states. The goal of this study is to determine and contrast the impact these two types of programs might have on medical school choice and students' intentions to return to their home states. Two hundred twenty-nine medical students were surveyed (response rate 80 percent). The questionnaire collected background information on the students and addressed the possible impact of payback and loan repayment policy proposals on student plans. Forty-seven percent of students reported that they would attend a different medical school if a required payback program were in place. Students who were more competitive at the time of admission to medical school were significantly more likely to say they would attend another medical school than were less competitive students. In contrast, 48 percent of students reported that they would be more likely to return to their home states if expanded loan repayment programs were available for service in areas of need. The findings suggest that payback programs may dissuade more competitive students from entering medical schools with such requirements, compromising the pool of students most likely to return to rural areas. Conversely, medical students appear willing to consider loan repayment programs upon completion of their training.

Adult↗

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 and rural training supported by Medicare graduate medical education funds.

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 promised a number of changes in medical education to benefit rural communities. The changes suggested that physician training would be more available in rural communities, programs training physicians for work in rural communities would be better supported, and residency programs would be allowed to be separate from hospitals. The regulations developed by the Health Care Financing Administration to implement the act are reviewed in the context of these expectations. Limitations in the regulations indicate that rural communities will see little benefit from this legislation. This article is a commentary on the expectations and reality of the effects of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 on rural training supported by Medicare.

Budgets↗

An expert panel approach to assessing the rural implications of health care reform: the case of the Health Security Act.

The policy arena is hungry for objective information regarding the potential effects of comprehensive national and state health care reform. Such information reduces the dependence of policy-makers on information generated solely by advocacy groups and serves as a checkpoint for such information. Unfortunately, the academic community is often unable to mobilize its resources quickly enough to help meet this information need. This article describes one model for overcoming this difficulty. When the time frame is especially short, academic expertise can be brought together in the form of an expert panel. However, for such an approach to be effective, it must be carefully configured and orchestrated. Critical ingredients include much preparatory groundwork, a well-defined framework and methodology for conducting the policy analysis, and a professional facilitator. The Rural Policy Research Institute used such an approach to analyze President Clinton's Health Security Act shortly after the initial blueprint was released (but before the legislative language was released). The consensus of the expert panel was that the Health Security Act would, on balance, represent an improvement over today's rural reality. However, a number of troubling aspects were noted. First, the Act's emphasis on primary care and nonphysician providers is a double-edged sword. While these are precisely the types of providers needed in rural areas, the short-run effect may be to create increased competition for such providers from urban areas.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comprehensive Health Care↗

The assumptions are changing.

The gavel was pounding, there was a cacophony of sound throughout the room, the union representatives were standing and asking to be recognized by the chair. The administrator of the state agency that purchases health care for employees of the state had just announced a proposed benefits cut for all employees and teachers. Unfortunately, the State of Washington is not alone in running into a financial wall. For the first time in our history, rising health care costs are significantly affecting the state's ability to educate our children, preserve our environment and pay our employees. From a base of $640 million, the projections of what the state's health benefits costs would be were for a $293 million increase, to $932 million over the next two years. That's a 46 percent increase. Something had to give, and health benefits was that "something."

Health Benefit Plans, Employee↗