Biomedical subjects

R A Boakes

Publications and source records attributed to R A Boakes.

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1976

Successive discrimination training with equated reinforcement frequencies: failure to obtain behavioral contrast.

In two experiments, pigeons were trained on two-component multiple schedules in which responding in one component (S(1)) was always maintained by a variable-interval schedule. In Experiment I, low response rates were reinforced in the second (S(2)) component for six master subjects. This schedule was adjusted to equate reinforcement frequencies in the two components. These subjects were compared to yoked partners, for which reinforcement in the S(2) component was made available on a variable-interval schedule whose value was determined by the master subjects. A similar procedure was used in Experiment II, where the S(2) schedule for master subjects made reinforcers contingent on the absence of responding. No evidence was found in either experiment for a behavioral contrast effect in the S(1) component attributable to response reduction in the S(2) component. A reliable contrast effect was obtained from a group of pigeons given extinction conditions in the S(2) component, which was compared to a group maintained throughout on a multiple variable-interval schedule. The results suggest that previous indications of behavioral contrast in similar situations were probably caused by uneven reinforcement distributions or reflect uncontrolled fluctuations in response rates.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1975

Disinhibition and spontaneous recovery of response decrements produced by free reinforcement in rats.

Spontaneous recovery and disinhibition were studied in 3 experiments in which, after rats had been trained to bar press on a variable interval schedule of reinforcement, response rates were reduced by the introduction either of extinction or of a response-independent (free) reinforcement schedule. Spontaneous recovery was consistently obtained in extinction, especially when session durations were long. Under free reinforcement conditions there was little sign of spontaneous recovery, even when with high reinforcement rates response reduction was almost as rapid as in extinction. In disinhibition tests the introduction of noise produced increased responding under free reinforcement conditions, but not in extinction. The results are interpreted as demonstrating a dissociation between spontaneous recovery and disinhibition.

Animals↗

PubMed1975

Response additivity: effects of superimposed free reinforcement on a variable-interval baseline.

Three experiments examined the effects of superimposing free reinforcement (Free VI 30-sec) on behavior maintained by a response dependent mult VI 2-min VI 2-min schedule of reinforcement. Experiment I used pigeons as subjects, key pecking as the response, and colors of response key as the stimuli associated with the multiple-schedule components. When free reinforcement was added during only one component (Differential condition) a large and highly significant increase in response rate developed in this component. Adding free reinforcement during both components (Nondifferential condition) produced smaller and far less-consistent effects. An entirely different pattern of results was obtained in two subsequent experiments, where similar procedures and reinforcement conditions were used with rats as subjects and bar pressing as the response. In both Experiments II and III, response rates decreased to the stimulus associated with added free reinforcement in the Differential condition. These findings are interpreted as the result of interactions between behavior maintained by response-reinforcer contingencies and behavior maintained by stimulus-reinforcer contingencies. As such, they support the main assumption of an autoshaping theory of behavioral contrast, that additivity of responding generated by the two kinds of contingency can occur only in situations favorable to autoshaping.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1974

Behavioral contrast without response-rate reduction.

Behavioral contrast was obtained in two experiments, which both employed a standard free-operant successive discrimination (a multiple variable-interval extinction schedule), without the occurrence of reductions of response rate in the extinction component. In Experiment I, one group of four pigeons was trained on a multiple schedule in which one stimulus was associated with a variable-interval schedule and the second stimulus with response-independent reinforcement on a free variable-interval schedule. Though by the end of this training three pigeons were responding very little to the second stimulus, when this stimulus was associated with extinction all subjects showed a contrast effect. In Experiment II, eight pigeons were trained extensively to respond to a single stimulus on a variable-interval schedule, before a second stimulus associated with extinction was introduced. This second stimulus was dissimilar to the initial stimulus and five pigeons never responded in its presence. Nevertheless, all pigeons showed a contrast effect and there was no evidence that the effect was smaller in errorless subjects or smaller than in a subsequent discrimination where all subjects made many errors. Both experiments indicated that response reduction in one component of a multiple schedule is not a necessary condition for the occurrence of contrast.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1973

Response decrements produced by extinction and by response-independent reinforcement.

The effects of extinction and of response-independent (free) reinforcement in decreasing rates of key pecking by pigeons were compared in single schedule (Phase 1) and multiple (Phase 2) conditions. In both phases, response rates decreased more rapidly with extinction than with free reinforcement conditions. Behavioral contrast was obtained from subjects trained in a multiple schedule involving extinction in Phase 2, whereas subjects trained in a multiple schedule involving free reinforcement showed a slight negative induction effect. Whether subjects experienced extinction or free reinforcement under single stimulus conditions did not affect subsequent performance in the discrimination situation of the second phase. Disinhibition testing was carried out at the end of both phases, but there was no evidence for disinhibitory effects under any condition.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1973

Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food.

Pigeons were given a choice between observing a stimulus source that was uncorrelated with food or one that was informative. The informative source was either positive, in which a stimulus change signalled food, or negative, in which change signalled no food. If observing is supported by the reduction of uncertainty, the negative as well as the positive source should be preferred to the uncorrelated source. On the other hand, if observing requires support by conditioned reinforcement, the negative source should not be preferred to the uncorrelated source. Two keys served as stimulus sources in a discrete trial procedure. The keys were lighted together, remained on for a variable length of time, and went off together. A key could change color 1 sec before going off. In the uncorrelated source, the change occurred equally often on trials ending with or without food. In the positive information source, the change occurred only on food trials, whereas in the negative information source, it occurred only on no-food trials. All stimulus changes and food delivery were response independent. As measured by orientation and autoshaped pecking, the positive information source was preferred to the uncorrelated source. However, the uncorrelated source was preferred to the negative information source. The latter result does not support the view that observing behavior is reinforced by the reduction of uncertainty. The positive and negative information sources reduced uncertainty equally but only the positive source provided a signal that could act as a conditioned reinforcer by virtue of its relation to food.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1971

Behavioral contrast and response independent reinforcement.

Four pigeons received pre-training that included presentation of the reinforcer independently of behavior and then baseline training on a variable-interval schedule of reinforcement. With the introduction of a multiple schedule, in which the first stimulus was associated with a response contingent and a second stimulus with a response independent, 1-min variable-interval schedule, a reduction in response rate was obtained in the second component, which was not accompanied by a behavioral contrast effect in the first component. A further three pigeons were given the same pre-training and baseline training before the introduction of an otherwise identical multiple schedule, in which no reinforcement occured in the second component. Behavioral contrast was obtained from all three subjects. The results indicated that under conditions of constant reinforcement density a reduction in responding is not a sufficient condition for the occurrence of behavioral contrast.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1969

The bisection of a brightness interval by pigeons.

Pigeons were trained on a discrete trials, successive discrimination procedure, in which the stimuli were two luminance values on the center key. Behavior was maintained by 25% reinforcement of correct responses on two side-keys. During occasional test trials the luminance of the center key was maintained at one of a number of values, intermediate to those of the two training stimuli, and a function relating the relative frequency of responses on the two side keys to stimulus intensity was obtained. The intersection of this function with the 50% line provided an estimate of the bisection point. Since no bisection point occurred below the geometric mean of the interval, the results were not consistent with a logarithmic scale of brightness but fitted the general mean theorem with an exponent of 0.24. With continued testing, the performance of individual subjects oscillated in an irregular manner about the mean bisection point. The relative stability of the test behavior and the absence of context effects indicated that the method was suitable as a general procedure for measuring stimulus distances.

Journal Article↗