Integrative multi-omics analysis proposes a metabolic classification of gliomas: distinct metabolic states, immune infiltration, and prognosis.
BACKGROUND: The tumor microenvironment (TME) of glioma harbors diverse cell types; however, cell metabolic heterogeneity remains to be explored. This study aims to characterize the metabolic features of different cell types in the TME by integrating multiple datasets, including genomics, bulk and single-cell transcriptomics, and metabolomics. METHODS: Unsupervised machine learning was used to construct an energy metabolic classifier based on the metabolic pathways identified from bulk RNA-seq of gliomas in the TCGA dataset. The classifier was externally validated using multiple datasets, including genomics, bulk RNA-seq, snRNA-seq, and the metabolomics data. Furthermore, metabolic heterogeneity associated with the classifier was further characterized at single-cell resolution. RESULTS: The energy metabolism-based classifier stratified patients into two prognostic clusters: patients in cluster 1 were characterized by high pathway activity of glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and fatty acid oxidation (FAO), whereas patients in cluster 2 exhibited higher activity in glutaminolysis. This metabolic classifier revealed both intratumoral and intertumoral metabolic heterogeneity, and the complexity was further validated by the metabolomics profiling and snRNA-seq data from the CPTAC dataset. Notably, OSMR, highly expressed in cluster 1, showed significant co-expression with key glycolytic enzyme genes. The OSM/OSMR/JAK1/STAT3 axis potently drives malignant progression of glioma cells, specially enhancing their invasive and migratory capabilities. Single-cell resolution analyses demonstrated that tumor metabolic heterogeneity is primarily driven by malignant cells rather than non-malignant components, while tumor microenvironment (TME) factors were also found to modulate malignant cell metabolism. Significantly, glycolytic activity in glioma cells increased during the phenotypic transition from PN (proneural) to MES (mesenchymal), with cluster 1 metabolic phenotypes predominating in the tumor core. Compared to cluster 2, cluster 1 patients exhibited higher mRNA expression of immunosuppressive checkpoint genes, which correlated with pronounced immunosuppression in the TME. Furthermore, various immune cells demonstrated distinct metabolic preferences at single-cell resolution. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed an energy metabolic-based classifier for gliomas with prognostic and therapeutic potential. Metabolic reprogramming was linked with the PN-to-MES transition of glioma cells and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. Multi-omics data, especially snRNA-seq, offered insights into metabolism heterogeneity at single-cell resolution, enabling personalized treatment strategies.