Biomedical subjects

Philipos C Loizou

Publications and source records attributed to Philipos C Loizou.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Speech processing in vocoder-centric cochlear implants.

The principles of the most recent cochlear implant processors are similar to that of the channel vocoder, originally used for transmitting speech over telephone lines with much less bandwidth than that required for transmitting the unprocessed speech signal. An overview of the various vocoder-centric processing strategies proposed for cochlear implants since the late 1990s is provided including the strategies used in different commercially available implant processors. Special emphasis is placed on reviewing the strategies designed to enhance pitch information for potentially better music perception. The various noise suppression strategies proposed over the years based on multi-microphone and single-microphone inputs are also described.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions.

A potential shortcoming of existing multichannel cochlear implants is electrical-field summation during simultaneous electrode stimulation. Electrical-field interactions can disrupt the stimulus waveform prior to neural activation. To test whether speech intelligibility can be degraded by electrical-field interaction, speech recognition performance and interaction were examined for three Clarion electrode arrays: the pre-curved, enhanced bipolar electrode array, the enhanced bipolar electrode with an electrode positioner, and the Hi-Focus electrode with a positioner. Channel interaction was measured by comparing stimulus detection thresholds for a probe signal in the presence of a sub-threshold perturbation signal as a function of the separation between the two simultaneously stimulated electrodes. Correct identification of vowels, consonants, and words in sentences was measured with two speech strategies: one which used simultaneous stimulation and another which used sequential stimulation. Speech recognition scores were correlated with measured electrical-field interaction for the strategy which used simultaneous stimulation but not the strategy which used sequential stimulation. Higher speech recognition scores with the simultaneous strategy were generally associated with lower levels of electrical-field interaction. Electrical-field interaction accounted for as much as 70% of the variance in speech recognition scores, suggesting that electrical-field interaction is a significant contributor to the variability found across patients who use simultaneous strategies.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Acoustic simulations of combined electric and acoustic hearing (EAS).

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to explore the consequences for speech understanding of leaving a gap in frequency between a region of acoustic hearing and a region stimulated electrically. Our studies were conducted with normal-hearing listeners, using an acoustic simulation of combined electric and acoustic (EAS) stimulation. DESIGN: Simulations of EAS were created by low-pass filtering speech at 0.5 kHz (90 dB octave roll-off) and adding amplitude-modulated sine waves at higher frequencies. The gap in frequency between acoustic and simulated electric hearing was varied over the range 0.5 kHz to 3.2 kHz. Stimuli included sentences in quiet, sentences in noise, and consonants and vowels. Three experiments were conducted with sample sizes of 12 listeners. RESULTS: Scores were highest in conditions that minimized the frequency gap between acoustic and electric stimulation. In quiet, vowels and consonant place of articulation showed the most sensitivity to the frequency gap. In noise, scores in the simulated EAS condition were higher than the sum of the scores from the acoustic-only and simulated electric-only conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that both deep and shallow insertions of electrodes could improve the speech understanding abilities of patients with residual hearing to 500 Hz. However, performance levels will be maximized if the gap between acoustic and electric stimulation is minimized.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Subspace algorithms for noise reduction in cochlear implants.

A single-channel algorithm is proposed for noise reduction in cochlear implants. The proposed algorithm is based on subspace principles and projects the noisy speech vector onto "signal" and "noise" subspaces. An estimate of the clean signal is made by retaining only the components in the signal subspace. The performance of the subspace reduction algorithm is evaluated using 14 subjects wearing the Clarion device. Results indicated that the subspace algorithm produced significant improvements in sentence recognition scores compared to the subjects' daily strategy, at least in stationary noise. Further work is needed to extend the subspace algorithm to nonstationary noise environments.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

The influence of noise on vowel and consonant cues.

This study assessed the acoustic and perceptual effect of noise on vowel and stop-consonant spectra. Multi-talker babble and speech-shaped noise were added to vowel and stop stimuli at -5 to +10 dB S/N, and the effect of noise was quantified in terms of (a) spectral envelope differences between the noisy and clean spectra in three frequency bands, (b) presence of reliable F1 and F2 information in noise, and (c) changes in burst frequency and slope. Acoustic analysis indicated that F1 was detected more reliably than F2 and the largest spectral envelope differences between the noisy and clean vowel spectra occurred in the mid-frequency band. This finding suggests that in extremely noisy conditions listeners must be relying on relatively accurate F1 frequency information along with partial F2 information to identify vowels. Stop consonant recognition remained high even at -5 dB despite the disruption of burst cues due to additive noise, suggesting that listeners must be relying on other cues, perhaps formant transitions, to identify stops.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the various speech processing strategies supported by the Clarion S-Series implant processor. DESIGN: Five different speech-processing strategies [the Continuous Interleaved Sampler (CIS), the Simultaneous Analog Stimulation (SAS), the Paired Pulsatile Sampler (PPS), the Quadruple Pulsatile Sampler (QPS) and the hybrid (HYB) strategies] were implemented on the Clarion Research Interface platform. These speech-processing strategies varied in the degree of electrode simultaneity, with the SAS strategy being fully simultaneous (all electrodes are stimulated at the same time), the PPS and QPS strategies being partially simultaneous and the CIS strategy being completely sequential. In the hybrid strategy, some electrodes were stimulated using SAS, and some were stimulated using CIS. Nine Clarion CIS users were fitted with the above speech processing strategies and tested on vowel, consonant and word recognition in quiet. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the mean group performance between the CIS and SAS strategies on vowel and sentence recognition. A statistically significant difference was found only on consonant recognition. Individual results, however, indicated that most subjects performed worse with the SAS strategy compared with the CIS strategy on all tests. About 33% of the cochlear implant users benefited from the PPS and QPS strategies on consonant and word recognition. CONCLUSIONS: If temporal information were the primary factor in speech recognition with cochlear implants then SAS should consistently produce higher speech recognition scores than CIS. That was not the case, however, because most CIS users performed significantly worse with the SAS strategy on all speech tests. Hence, there seems to be a trade-off between improving the temporal resolution with an increasing number of simultaneous channels and introducing distortions from electrical-field interactions. Performance for some CI users improved when the number of simultaneous channels increased to two (PPS strategy) and four (QPS strategy). The improvement with the PPS and QPS strategies must be due to the higher rates of stimulation. The above results suggest that CIS users are less likely to benefit with the SAS strategy, and they are more likely to benefit from the PPS and QPS strategies, which provide higher rates of stimulation with small probability of channel interaction.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2003

A phone-assistive device based on Bluetooth technology for cochlear implant users.

Hearing-impaired people, and particularly hearing-aid and cochlear-implant users, often have difficulty communicating over the telephone. The intelligibility of telephone speech is considerably lower than the intelligibility of face-to-face speech. This is partly because of lack of visual cues, limited telephone bandwidth, and background noise. In addition, cellphones may cause interference with the hearing aid or cochlear implant. To address these problems that hearing-impaired people experience with telephones, this paper proposes a wireless phone adapter that can be used to route the audio signal directly to the hearing aid or cochlear implant processor. This adapter is based on Bluetooth technology. The favorable features of this new wireless technology make the adapter superior to traditional assistive listening devices. A hardware prototype was built and software programs were written to implement the headset profile in the Bluetooth specification. Three cochlear implant users were tested with the proposed phone-adapter and reported good speech quality.

Cochlear Implants↗

PubMed2003

Dichotic speech recognition in noise using reduced spectral cues.

It is generally accepted that the fusion of two speech signals presented dichotically is affected by the relative onset time. This study investigated the hypothesis that spectral resolution might be an additional factor influencing spectral fusion when the spectral information is split and presented dichotically to the two ears. To produce speech with varying degrees of spectral resolution, speech materials embedded in +5 dB S/N speech-shaped noise were processed through 6-12 channels and synthesized as a sum of sine waves. Two different methods of splitting the spectral information were investigated. In the first method, the odd-index channels were presented to one ear and the even-index channels to the other ear. In the second method the lower frequency channels were presented to one ear and the high-frequency channels to the other ear. Results indicated that spectral resolution did affect spectral fusion, and the effect differed across speech materials, with the sentences being affected the most. Sentences, processed through six or eight channels and presented dichotically in the low-high frequency condition were not fused as accurately as when presented monaurally. Sentences presented dichotically in the odd-even frequency condition were identified more accurately than when presented in the low-high condition.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Factors that allow a high level of speech understanding by patients fit with cochlear implants.

Three factors account for the high level of speech understanding in quiet enjoyed by many patients fit with cochlear implants. First, some information about speech exists in the time/amplitude envelope of speech. This information is sufficient to narrow the number of word candidates for a given signal. Second, if information from the envelope of speech is available to listeners, then only minimal information from the frequency domain is necessary for high levels of speech recognition in quiet. Third, perceiving strategies for speech are inherently flexible in terms of the mapping between signal frequencies (i.e., the locations of the formants) and phonetic identity.

Cochlear Implantation↗

PubMed2002

A comparison of the speech understanding provided by acoustic models of fixed-channel and channel-picking signal processors for cochlear implants.

Vowels, consonants, and sentences were processed by two cochlear-implant signal-processing strategies-a fixed-channel strategy and a channel-picking strategy-and the resulting signals were presented to listeners with normal hearing for identification. At issue was the number of channels of stimulation needed in each strategy to achieve an equivalent level of speech recognition in quiet and in noise. In quiet, 8 fixed channels allowed a performance maximum for the most difficult stimulus material. A similar level of performance was reached with a 6-of-20 channel-picking strategy. In noise, 10 fixed channels allowed a performance maximum for the most difficult stimulus material. A similar level of performance was reached with a 9-of-20 strategy. Both strategies are capable of providing a very high level of speech recognition. Choosing between the two strategies may, ultimately, depend on issues that are independent of speech recognition-such as ease of device programming.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

The intelligibility of speech with "holes" in the spectrum.

The intelligibility of speech having either a single "hole" in various bands or having two "holes" in disjoint or adjacent bands in the spectrum was assessed with normal-hearing listeners. In experiment 1, the effect of spectral "holes" on vowel and consonant recognition was evaluated using speech processed through six frequency bands, and synthesized as a sum of sine waves. Results showed a modest decrease in vowel and consonant recognition performance when a single hole was introduced in the low- and high-frequency regions of the spectrum, respectively. When two spectral holes were introduced, vowel recognition was sensitive to the location of the holes, while consonant recognition remained constant around 70% correct, even when the middle- and high-frequency speech information was missing. The data from experiment 1 were used in experiment 2 to derive frequency-importance functions based on a least-squares approach. The shapes of the frequency-importance functions were found to be different for consonants and vowels in agreement with the notion that different cues are used by listeners to identify consonants and vowels. For vowels, there was unequal weighting across the various channels, while for consonants the frequency-importance function was relatively flat, suggesting that all bands contributed equally to consonant identification.

Humans↗