Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Philip J Rosenfeld

Publications and source records attributed to Philip J Rosenfeld.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Systemic bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: twenty-four-week results of an uncontrolled open-label clinical study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and durability of bevacizumab for the treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Open-label, single-center, uncontrolled clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: Age-related macular degeneration patients with subfoveal CNV (n = 18) and best-corrected visual acuity (VA) letter scores of 70 to 20 (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/40-20/400). METHODS: Patients were treated at baseline with an intravenous infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) followed by 1 or 2 additional doses given at 2-week intervals. Safety assessments were performed at all visits. Ophthalmologic evaluations included protocol VA measurements, ocular examinations, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging at each visit. Retreatment with bevacizumab was performed if there was evidence of recurrent CNV. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments of safety and changes from baseline in VA scores and OCT measurements were performed through 24 weeks. RESULTS: No serious ocular or systemic adverse events were identified through 24 weeks. The only adverse event identified was a mild elevation of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements (+11 mmHg, P = 0.004; +8 mmHg, P<0.001) evident by 3 weeks and easily controlled with antihypertensive medications. By 24 weeks, the systolic and diastolic mean blood pressures were at or below baseline measurements. Visual acuity in the study eyes improved within the first 2 weeks, and by 24 weeks, the mean VA letter score increased by 14 letters in the study eyes (P<0.001), and the mean OCT central retinal thickness measurement decreased by 112 microm (P<0.001). By 24 weeks, retreatment was needed for only 6 of the 18 study eyes, and after retreatment, the recurrent leakage was eliminated, with restoration of any lost VA. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic bevacizumab therapy for neovascular AMD was well tolerated and effective for all 18 patients through 24 weeks. By 6 months, most patients did not require any additional treatment beyond the initial 2 or 3 infusions. Despite these impressive results, it is unlikely that systemic bevacizumab will be studied in a large clinical trial because of the potential risks associated with systemic anti-VEGF therapy and the perception that intravitreal therapy is safer.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND: Ranibizumab--a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody Fab that neutralizes all active forms of vascular endothelial growth factor A--has been evaluated for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: In this multicenter, 2-year, double-blind, sham-controlled study, we randomly assigned patients with age-related macular degeneration with either minimally classic or occult (with no classic lesions) choroidal neovascularization to receive 24 monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (either 0.3 mg or 0.5 mg) or sham injections. The primary end point was the proportion of patients losing fewer than 15 letters from baseline visual acuity at 12 months. RESULTS: We enrolled 716 patients in the study. At 12 months, 94.5% of the group given 0.3 mg of ranibizumab and 94.6% of those given 0.5 mg lost fewer than 15 letters, as compared with 62.2% of patients receiving sham injections (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Visual acuity improved by 15 or more letters in 24.8% of the 0.3-mg group and 33.8% of the 0.5-mg group, as compared with 5.0% of the sham-injection group (P<0.001 for both doses). Mean increases in visual acuity were 6.5 letters in the 0.3-mg group and 7.2 letters in the 0.5-mg group, as compared with a decrease of 10.4 letters in the sham-injection group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The benefit in visual acuity was maintained at 24 months. During 24 months, presumed endophthalmitis was identified in five patients (1.0%) and serious uveitis in six patients (1.3%) given ranibizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal administration of ranibizumab for 2 years prevented vision loss and improved mean visual acuity, with low rates of serious adverse events, in patients with minimally classic or occult (with no classic lesions) choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00056836 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Ranibizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a phase I/II multicenter, controlled, multidose study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety of repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and to assess changes in visual acuity (VA) and AMD lesion characteristics. DESIGN: Multicenter, controlled, open-label, clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four patients with subfoveal predominantly or minimally classic AMD-related choroidal neovascularization. METHODS: In part 1, subjects were randomized to monthly intravitreal ranibizumab for 3 months (4 injections of 0.3 mg or 1 injection of 0.3 mg followed by 3 injections of 0.5 mg; n = 53) or usual care (UC; n = 11). In part 2, subjects could continue their regimen for 3 additional months or cross over to the alternative treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse events (AEs), intraocular pressure (IOP), VA, and lesion characteristics assessed by fluorescein angiography and fundus photography. RESULTS: Of the 64 randomized subjects, 62 completed the 6-month study. Twenty of 25 subjects (80%) randomized to 0.3 mg, and 22 of 28 subjects (79%) randomized to 0.5-mg ranibizumab in part 1 continued on that treatment in part 2; 9 of 11 (82%) subjects randomized to UC in part 1 crossed over to ranibizumab treatment in part 2. The most common AEs with ranibizumab were reversible inflammation and minor injection-site hemorrhages. Serious AEs were iridocyclitis, endophthalmitis, and central retinal vein occlusion (1 subject each). Postinjection, IOP increased transiently in 22.6% of ranibizumab-treated eyes in parts 1 and 2. After 4 ranibizumab injections (day 98), mean (+/- standard deviation) VA had increased 9.4+/-13.3 and 9.1+/-17.2 letters in the 0.3- and 0.5-mg groups, respectively, but had decreased 5.1+/-9.6 letters with UC. In part 2 (day 210), VA increased from baseline 12.8+/-14.7 and 15.0+/-14.2 letters in subjects continuing on 0.3 and 0.5 mg, respectively. Visual acuity improved from baseline > or =15 letters in 26% (day 98) and 45% (day 210) of subjects initially randomized to and continuing on ranibizumab, respectively, and areas of leakage and subretinal fluid decreased. No UC subject had a > or =15-letter improvement at day 98. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab had a good safety profile and were associated with improved VA and decreased leakage from choroidal neovascularization in subjects with neovascular AMD.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Ranibizumab: Phase III clinical trial results.

Ranibizumab therapy is the first treatment for neovascular AMD to improve vision for most patients. The benefits apply to all angiographic subtypes of neovascular AMD and across all lesion sizes. Although the pivotal phase III trials (MARINA and ANCHOR) used monthly injections of ranibizumab for 2 years, the ongoing PIER, PrONTO, and SAILOR trials are investigating less frequent dosing regimens, and preliminary results from the PrONTO study suggest that fewer injections will most likely result in visual acuity improvements similar to the results from the phase III trials. When comparing the ANCHOR results with the FOCUS results, it also becomes apparent that the combination of ranibizumab with PDT does not necessarily result in better visual acuity outcomes, and the use of PDT may even reduce the visual acuity benefits achieved with ranibizumab alone (see Figs. 1-3). It seems unlikely that combination therapy provides any significant advantage over ranibizumab alone unless the combination of PDT and ranibizumab can decrease the need for frequent retreatment. The results from the PrONTO Study already suggest that less frequent treatment with ranibizumab is possible by using a variable dosing regimen with OCT. Ranibizumab also seems to be safe, with the 2-year MARINA data showing no increase in the incidence of systemic adverse events that could be associated with anti-VEGF therapy, such as myocardial infarction and stroke. There was a hint of a safety concern, however, in the pooled 1-year safety results from the MARINA and ANCHOR trials. Although the combined rate of myocardial infarction and stroke during the first year of the ANCHOR and MARINA trials was similar in the control and the 0.3-mg ranibizumab arms (1.3% and 1.6% respectively), these adverse events were slightly higher in the 0.5-mg ranibizumab arm (2.9%). These differences are not statistically significant, however, and probably do not represent a dose-dependent increase in risk because the 2-year results from the MARINA trial with the same monthly injection regimen showed no increased risk of thromboembolic events. In December 2005, Genentech submitted a Biologics License Application to the FDA for the use of ranibizumab in the treatment of neovascular wet AMD based on 1-year clinical efficacy and safety data from the two pivotal phase III trials, ANCHOR and MARINA, and the phase I-II FOCUS trial. Genentech has been granted a 6-month Priority Review from the FDA with a decision anticipated 6 months from the December submission date or by the end of June 2006 [29]. By the summer of 2006, this revolutionary therapy should be available for the treatment of neovascular AMD. At that time, the major dilemma facing most retina specialists will be whether to use intravitreal ranibizumab or intravitreal bevacizumab, the low cost alternative, for the treatment of neovascular AMD.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2006

Tolerability and efficacy of multiple escalating doses of ranibizumab (Lucentis) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether multiple intravitreal doses of up to 2 mg of an antigen-binding fragment known as ranibizumab, derived from a humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, can be tolerated and are biologically active when injected using a dose-escalating strategy in eyes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Open-label, 2-center, uncontrolled, randomized clinical study of 3 different dose-escalating regimens of ranibizumab. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two patients with primary or recurrent subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD were enrolled. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (VA) in the study eye was from 20/40 to 20/640 (Snellen equivalent). METHODS: Treatment regimens consisted of 5, 7, or 9 intravitreal injections of ranibizumab at 2- or 4-week intervals for 16 weeks, with escalating doses ranging from 0.3 to 2.0 mg. Patients were evaluated through day 140, 4 weeks after their last injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety was assessed based on ocular and nonocular adverse events, changes in VA, changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), slit-lamp ocular examination, changes in lesion characteristics based on fluorescein angiography and color fundus photography, and the presence of anti-ranibizumab antibodies. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients received an injection at baseline, and 27 patients completed the study through day 140. Results were similar across the 3 treatment groups. All patients experienced ocular adverse events, most of which were mild. The most common ocular adverse events were iridocyclitis (83%) and injection-site reactions (72%). Inflammation did not increase with repeated injections, despite the increasing ranibizumab doses. Transient mild IOP elevations were common after ranibizumab injection. No serum anti-ranibizumab antibodies were detected. Overall, median and mean VAs in the study eyes improved by day 140 in all 3 groups. Only 3 of the 27 patients lost significant vision. There was no significant lesion growth, and a decrease in area of leakage from choroidal neovascularization was detected through day 140. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple intravitreal injections of ranibizumab at escalating doses ranging from 0.3 to 2.0 mg were well tolerated and biologically active in eyes with neovascular AMD through 20 weeks. Mild transient ocular inflammation was the most common postinjection adverse event.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

One-year safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the management of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) as treatment for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of data for 40 consecutive patients (40 eyes) with CRVO and macular edema treated with IVTA at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (Miami, FL). RESULTS: Median duration of symptoms before the first injection was 3 months (range, 1 day to 8 years). Median Snellen visual acuity was 20/400 at baseline (range, 20/60 to light perception; n = 40), 20/300 at 1 month (P = 0.010; n = 37), 20/300 at 3 months (P = 0.007; n = 33), 20/400 at 6 months (P = 0.726; n = 28), and 8/200 at 1 year (P = 0.569; n = 17). Vision improved by > or =3 lines in 21% of eyes at 1 month, 27% at 3 months, 14% at 6 months, and 12% at 1 year. Visual acuity was unchanged from baseline in 71% of eyes at 6 months and 1 year. By 1 year, 50% of eyes received more than one injection (mean = 1.6 injections; range 1-4 injections). Overall, intraocular pressure increased by > or =10 mmHg in 24% of eyes at 1 year. Trabeculectomy was performed on 2 of 12 eyes with preexisting open-angle glaucoma. CONCLUSION: IVTA can substantially improve vision in some patients, but most patients have stable visual acuity compared with baseline at 1 year despite repeated injections.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Promising new treatments for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Angiogenesis, the growth of new blood vessels from existing blood vessels, is responsible for vision loss in a variety of ophthalmic diseases. In neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause for legal blindness in many industrialised countries, abnormal blood vessels grow in the macula and cause blindness. There are a number of factors important in the angiogenic cascade but VEGF-A has been implicated in recent years as the major factor responsible for neovascular and exudative diseases of the eye. Numerous antiangiogenic drugs are in development but anti-VEGF drugs have shown great promise in treating neovascular AMD and other ocular diseases, and many of these drugs have been adopted from oncology where antiangiogenic therapy is gaining wide acceptance. For the first time in neovascular AMD, anti-VEGF drugs have brought the hope of vision improvement to a significant proportion of patients. This review provides an overview on angiogenic mechanisms, potential antiangiogenic treatment strategies and different antiangiogenic drugs with special focus on neovascular AMD.

Aging↗
PubMed2005

Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal minimally classic choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: 2-year results of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment effect and safety of photodynamic therapy with verteporfin using a standard (SF) or reduced (RF) light fluence rate with that of placebo therapy in patients with subfoveal minimally classic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) with age-related macular degeneration. DESIGN: Phase 2, multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Nineteen ophthalmology practices in North America and Europe. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with initial best-corrected visual acuity of at least 20/250 and a lesion size of no greater than 6 Macular Photocoagulation Study (MPS) disc areas. METHODS: We randomly assigned 117 patients (1:1:1) to verteporfin infusion (6 mg/m(2)) and light application with an RF rate (300 mW/cm(2)) for 83 seconds (light dose of 25 J/cm(2)) or an SF rate (600 mW/cm(2)) for 83 seconds (light dose of 50 J/cm(2)) or to placebo infusion with RF or SF. Treatment was repeated every 3 months if the treating physician noted fluorescein leakage from CNV on angiography. Patients in whom a predominantly classic lesion developed could receive open-label standard verteporfin treatment. Best-corrected visual acuity was measured every 3 months, and angiographic changes were assessed by the Photograph Reading Center through the 3-month examination unless an ocular adverse event or conversion to a predominantly classic lesion was identified by an investigator. Safety was assessed throughout the study. All outcomes were on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: One hundred three (88%) of 117 patients completed the 24-month examination. Twelve (30%) of 40 patients assigned to placebo received open-label standard verteporfin treatment after confirmation of presence of predominantly classic CNV. At month 12, a loss of at least 3 lines of visual acuity occurred in 5 (14%) of 36 eyes assigned to RF and 10 (28%) of 36 eyes assigned to SF, compared with 18 (47%) of 38 eyes assigned to placebo (RF, P = .002; SF, P = .08; RF + SF, P = .004). At month 24, this loss occurred in 9 (26%) of 34 eyes assigned to RF and 17 (53%) of 32 assigned to SF, compared with 23 (62%) of 37 eyes assigned to placebo (RF, P = .003; SF, P = .45; RF + SF, P = .03). Progression to predominantly classic CNV by 24 months was more common in the placebo group (11 [28%] of 39 patients compared with 2 [5%] of 38 in the RF group [P = .007] and 1 [3%] of 37 in the SF group [P = .002]). No unexpected ocular or systemic adverse events were identified. Treatment-related, usually transient visual disturbances were 13% with SF, 10% with placebo, and 5% with RF. CONCLUSIONS: Verteporfin therapy safely reduced the risks of losing at least 15 letters (> or =3 lines) of visual acuity and progression to predominantly classic CNV for at least 2 years in individuals with subfoveal minimally classic lesions due to age-related macular degeneration measuring 6 MPS disc areas or less. Based on the overall evidence available on verteporfin therapy for these lesions, the VIM Study Group would consider recommending verteporfin therapy for relatively small minimally classic lesions similar to those enrolled in the VIM Trial.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Maximum tolerated dose of a humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody fragment for treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To investigate the maximum tolerated dose of ranibizumab administered as a single intravitreal injection. DESIGN: Open-label, 5-center, uncontrolled, prospective, dose-ranging, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with best-corrected Snellen equivalent visual acuity (VA) of 20/100 or worse and considered ineligible for laser photocoagulation or photodynamic therapy. METHODS: A single intravitreal injection of ranibizumab was to be administered at 1 of 6 escalating doses (50, 150, 300, 500, 1000, and 2000 microg), with escalation to the next dose level occurring only after the safety and tolerability of the lower dose level was established through postinjection day 14. Follow-up examinations were performed on postinjection days 1, 3, 7, 14, 42, and 90. Enrollment was stopped if > or =2 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary safety measures were changes from baseline in VA, intraocular pressure (IOP), intraocular inflammation, and production of antiranibizumab antibody. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined by intraocular inflammation, elevated IOP, reduced VA, or hemorrhage within 90 days after injection. RESULTS: All patients completed this single intravitreal injection study, and 500 microg of ranibizumab was the maximum tolerated dose. At the higher dose of 1000 microg, significant intraocular inflammation was noted. All adverse events were self-limited, and no infectious endophthalmitis occurred. Aqueous or vitreous ocular inflammation occurred in 12 subjects, with complete resolution within 42 days. In 9 of the subjects, the inflammation was graded as trace to 1+ and required no treatment; in 3 of the subjects, the inflammation was graded as 2+ or 3+, and 2 of the 3 were treated with topical 1% prednisolone acetate. No serum antiranibizumab antibodies were detected. All patients had VA similar or improved compared with baseline values. CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated single dose of ranibizumab in neovascular AMD patients was 500 microg. Single intravitreal injections of ranibizumab up to a dose of 500 microg were safe and well tolerated in this small group of patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Systemic bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration twelve-week results of an uncontrolled open-label clinical study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term safety of systemic bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) and its effects on visual acuity (VA) and subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Open-label, single-center, uncontrolled clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: Age-related macular degeneration patients with subfoveal CNV (N = 9) and best-corrected VA letter scores of 70 to 20 (approximate Snellen equivalent, 20/40-20/400). METHODS: Patients were treated at baseline with an infusion of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg), followed by 1 or 2 additional doses given at 2-week intervals. Safety assessments were performed at all visits. Ophthalmologic evaluations included protocol VA measurements and ocular examinations, along with optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Safety assessments were performed, along with assessments of changes from baseline in VA scores, OCT measurements, and angiographic lesion characteristics. RESULTS: There were no serious ocular or systemic adverse events identified. By 6 weeks, the only adverse event identified was a mild elevation of systolic blood pressure (BP) (+12 mmHg; P = 0.035), and this elevation was controlled by either changing or initiating antihypertensive medication. By 12 weeks, the elevation of systolic BP was no longer significant (P = 0.51). In the study eyes, significant increases in VA were evident within 1 week of treatment, and by 12 weeks, the median and mean VA letter scores increased by 8 letters (P = 0.011) and 12 letters (P = 0.008), respectively. The median and mean central retinal thickness measurements decreased by 157 microm (P = 0.008) and 177 microm (P = 0.001), respectively. In the fellow eyes at 12 weeks, the median and mean VA letter scores increased by 27 letters (P = 0.018) and 16 letters (P = 0.012), and the median and mean central retinal thickness measurements decreased by 59 mum (P = 0.028) and 92 microm (P = 0.06). In all study eyes, angiography revealed a marked reduction or an absence of leakage from CNV. CONCLUSION: Overall, bevacizumab therapy was well tolerated, with an improvement in VA, OCT, and angiographic outcomes. Although these preliminary results are promising, a randomized controlled clinical trial is necessary before concluding that systemic bevacizumab therapy is safe and effective for patients with neovascular AMD.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Age-related maculopathy: a genomewide scan with continued evidence of susceptibility loci within the 1q31, 10q26, and 17q25 regions.

Age-related maculopathy (ARM), or age-related macular degeneration, is one of the most common causes of visual impairment in the elderly population of developed nations. In a combined analysis of two previous genomewide scans that included 391 families, containing up to 452 affected sib pairs, we found linkage evidence in four regions: 1q31, 9p13, 10q26, and 17q25. We now have added a third set of families and have performed an integrated analysis incorporating 530 families and up to 736 affected sib pairs. Under three diagnostic models, we have conducted linkage analyses using parametric (heterogeneity LOD [HLOD] scores under an autosomal dominant model) and nonparametric (Sall statistic) methods. There is ongoing evidence of susceptibility loci within the 1q31, 10q26, and 17q25 regions. If we treat the third set of families as a replication set, then two regions (10q26 and 17q25) are replicated, with LOD scores >1.0. If we pool all our data together, then four regions (1q31, 2q14.3, 10q26, and 17q25) show HLOD or Sall scores > or =2.0. Within the 1q31 region, we observed an HLOD of 2.72 (genomewide P=.061) under our least stringent diagnostic model, whereas the 17q25 region contained a maximal HLOD of 3.53 (genomewide P=.007) under our intermediate diagnostic model. We have evaluated our results with respect to the findings from several new independent genomewide linkage studies and also have completed ordered subset analyses (OSAs) with apolipoprotein E alleles, smoking history, and age at onset as stratifying covariates. The OSAs generate the interesting hypothesis that the effect of smoking on the risk of ARM is accentuated by a gene in the 10q26 region--a region implicated by four other studies.

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1↗
PubMed2004

Acute severe visual acuity decrease after photodynamic therapy with verteporfin: case reports from randomized clinical trials-TAP and VIP report no. 3.

PURPOSE: To describe in detail occurrences of acute severe visual acuity decrease after photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin in the Treatment of Age-related macular degeneration with Photodynamic therapy (TAP) Investigation and the Verteporfin In Photodynamic therapy (VIP) Trial. DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: Retrospective review of all cases that developed acute severe visual acuity decrease after treatment. RESULTS: Of 15 acute severe visual acuity decrease events originally identified in 14 eyes of 14 patients, one event in one patient was judged unlikely to have been an acute severe visual acuity decrease event on retrospective review of these events in preparation of this report. Eleven events occurred after the first treatment. At follow-up, 10 improved by at least 1 line in visual acuity from the level noted at the time of the event. Of the nine patients returning for the month 24 examination, visual acuity decreased at least 3 lines from baseline in six, including at least 6 lines in four, and remained within 1 line in three. Associated abnormal morphology included three with a serous macular detachment and abnormal choroidal hypofluorescence, four with macular hemorrhage, three with a greenish subfoveal hemorrhage, and four with no abnormality. Events appeared to be more likely when patients had a visual acuity of 20/50 or better. CONCLUSIONS: Acute severe visual acuity decrease after PDT with verteporfin was an uncommon event; the risk did not outweigh the benefits of therapy previously reported. When considering verteporfin therapy, patients should be warned of the possibility of this serious adverse event.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in ocular histoplasmosis: uncontrolled, open-label 2-year study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, effect on visual function, and fluorescein angiographic appearance of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) through 2 years after photodynamic therapy with verteporfin (Visudyne; Novartis AG, Basel, Switzerland) in patients with ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (OHS). DESIGN: Open-label, 3-center, uncontrolled clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: Ocular histoplasmosis syndrome patients with subfoveal CNV (N = 26) with a greatest linear dimension no larger than 5400 microm with classic or occult CNV extending under the geometric center of the fovea, and best-corrected visual acuity letter score of approximately 20/40 to 20/200. METHODS: The methods were similar to those described in the 1-year results with follow-up examinations every 3 months continuing through the second year. During the second year, additional therapy was recommended if fluorescein angiography showed leakage at a scheduled visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Visual function measurements included the changes from baseline in visual acuity and contrast sensitivity scores. Lesion size and leakage from classic and occult CNV were assessed at month 12 and month 24. Safety assessments also were made. RESULTS: A 24-month examination was completed in 22 of the 26 enrolled participants (85%). At the 24-month examination, median improvement from baseline in visual acuity of the 22 patients evaluated was 6 letters; median contrast sensitivity improved by 3.5 letters. At the 24-month examination, 10 patients (45%) gained 7 or more letters of visual acuity from baseline, whereas 4 patients (18%) lost 8 or more letters, including 2 patients (9%) who lost at least 15 letters. There was absence of fluorescein angiographic leakage from classic CNV in 17 of the 20 evaluable lesions (85%), and leakage from occult CNV was absent in all eyes. No serious ocular adverse events were reported, and no serious systemic event was considered to be associated with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Median visual acuity improved and fluorescein angiographic leakage decreased after verteporfin therapy in this small, uncontrolled clinical study of patients with subfoveal CNV resulting from OHS. Verteporfin therapy seemed to be relatively safe in these patients. The selected cases feature fluorescein angiographic examples of CNV that are important in determining when to apply verteporfin therapy.

Adult↗