Ramifications of personality disorder in clinical practice.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Peter Tyrer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Dual diagnosis of personality disorder and severe mental illness is an important clinical association that has been under-researched with regard to clinical management. AIMS: To compare the outcomes of different treatment models. METHOD: The outcome of patients with this combined diagnosis was compared in a systematic review of three randomised controlled trials in which different forms of community outreach treatment or intensive case management were compared with standard care. RESULTS: The results from the three studies showed that the outcome of comorbid diagnoses was worse than that of single diagnoses. Although assertive approaches reduced in-patient care, they sometimes did so at the expense of increasing social dysfunction and behavioural disturbance. CONCLUSIONS: For those with comorbid severe mental illness and personality disorder, the policy of assertive outreach and care in community settings may be inappropriate for both public and patients unless modified to take account of the special needs of this group.
BACKGROUND: The Global Assessment of Function (GAF) scale is widely used in adult psychiatric practice and research but it has not often been used in learning disability, which is inherently more complex. AIMS: To evaluate the reliability of GAF in the assessment of learning disability. METHOD: GAF reliability was tested by simultaneous multiple rating of unselected case vignettes (n=19-25) from health professionals of different disciplines, under controlled conditions. Analysis of reliability was made with the intraclass correlation coefficient (R(1)) with separate assessments to determine rater bias and individual performance of raters. RESULTS: The results of three data-sets showed generally poor overall levels of agreement, with R(1) levels of 0.35 and 0.28 and somewhat better levels for current GAF scores (R(1)=0.49). However, a subset of raters was identified that achieved much higher levels (R(1)=0.54 to 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: The GAF, in its current format, is not reliable enough to be used in the routine assessment of learning disability. A subgroup of raters, however, have ratings that are, by current biostatistical criteria, sufficiently reliable.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Since de-institutionalisation, much has been written about the risk posed to the community by those with severe mental illness. However, violent victimisation of people with mental illnesses has received little attention. AIMS: To establish the 1-year prevalence of violent victimisation in community-dwelling patients with psychosis and to identify the socio-demographic and clinical correlates of violent victimisation. METHOD: A total of 691 subjects with established psychotic disorders were interviewed. The past-year prevalence of violent victimisation was estimated and compared with general population figures. Those who reported being violently victimised were compared with those who did not on a range of social and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Sixteen per cent of patients reported being violently victimised. Victims of violence were significantly more likely to report severe psychopathological symptoms, homelessness, substance misuse and previous violent behaviour and were more likely to have a comorbid personality disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Those with psychosis are at considerable risk of violent victimisation in the community. Victimisation experience should be recorded in the standard psychiatric interview.
BACKGROUND: It is unclear why intensive case management (ICM) failed to reduce hospitalisation in the UK700 trial. AIMS: To investigate outcome generation in the UK700 trial. METHOD: A qualitative investigation was undertaken in one UK700 centre. RESULTS: Both intensive and standard case management practised individual casework, employed assertive outreach with comparable frequency, and performed similarly in the out-patient management of emergencies and in-patient discharge. However, ICM was advantaged in managing some non-compliance and undertaking casework that prevented psychiatric emergencies. Absence of team-based management and bureaucratised access to social care limited the impact of these differences on outcomes and the effective practice of assertive outreach, although this was relevant to only a sub-population of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of ICM was undermined by organisational factors. Sensitive anticipatory casework, which prevents psychiatric emergencies, may make ICM more effective than an exclusive focus on assertive outreach. Our findings demonstrate the value of qualitative research in evaluating complex interventions.
Although there are many methodological uncertainties in the treatment of personality disorders, which make it difficult to be confident about efficacy, there is growing evidence that at least in some personality disorders, drug treatment may be of value. Borderline personality disorder is a condition in which treatment evidence is the most promising, but it is also one of the most difficult disorders to disentangle the mental state from personality components. In summary, there is reasonable evidence that antidepressants, particularly serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, have beneficial effects independent of their antidepressive ones and albeit, less favourable, evidence that antipsychotic drugs and mood stabilisers may also be of value. None of this evidence is yet sufficient to point to any specific drug treatment indications.
Although there has been great diagnostic activity within the conditions formally included under the general rubric of neurosis in the last 20 years, there is little evidence that the many new diagnoses (i.e., generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and dysthymic disorder) have helped clinicians and improved the health of those diagnosed. This is largely because of the extensive comorbidity between these disorders negates much of their attempted separation and it is argued that the core of neurosis is a mixed anxiety-depressive disorder, or cothymia, combined with significant personality disorder of any type. The specific association of the anxious-fearful personality cluster (cluster C) and neurosis, called the general neurotic syndrome, is also relevant but appears to have lesser significance as the personality elements are not stable. Data are presented that justify these conclusions from a long-term follow-up study of anxiety and depressive disorders.
An important distinguishing feature of one group of personality disorders is the wish of the sufferer to seek treatment. For another group this wish is rarely entertained. Although there is some variation between different types of personality disorder the wish to change is not confined to any one diagnostic category. A useful subclassification of personality disorders is therefore into Type R (treatment rejecting) and Type S (treatment seeking) personality disorders, and these are defined operationally. The classification of 68 personality disordered patients on the caseload of an assertive community team using a simple scale showed a 3 to 1 ratio between Type R and Type S personality disorders with Cluster C personality disorders being significantly more likely to be Type S, and paranoid and schizoid (Cluster A) personality disorders significantly more likely to be Type R than others. It is suggested that this typology is useful for those contemplating treatment with those who have personality disorders.
In 1998, we in England were shocked by the apparently motiveless murders of a mother and two of her children when they were traveling home from school in a rural area. Subsequently a patient with personality disorder, being monitored by the forensic psychiatric services, was convicted of their murders. The government was determined to prevent this type of offense from recurring and in 1999 introduced a new concept, dangerous and severe personality disorder (DSPD). This subsequently became a treatment and assessment program for individuals who satisfy three requirements: (1) have a severe disorder of personality, (2) present a significant risk of causing serious physical or psychological harm from which the victim would find it difficult or impossible to recover, and (3) the risk of offending should be functionally linked to the personality disorder. The implications of this program are discussed with regard to international systems of classification and service provision. We also attempt to place DSPD in the wider context of psychiatric participation in the management of personality disordered offenders.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study has evaluated an in vitro model of the follicle-associated epithelia that overlie Peyer's patches of the small intestine. The model shares many phenotypic characteristics of M cells in vivo. Co-cultures of the human adenocarcinoma cell line Caco-2 and freshly isolated Peyer's patch cells were established. Fluorescence microscopy and quantitative image analysis were used to validate the model against known markers of M-cell phenotype. Apical expression of alkaline phosphatase was down-regulated in co-cultures and villin was re-distributed from the apical membrane to the cytoplasm. alpha5beta1 integrin was found on the apical surfaces of the monolayers and B and T lymphocytes integrated into the monolayers. Particle transport was temperature-dependent in co-cultures, indicating that a transcytotic route was responsible. This model provides opportunities to study factors that influence M-cell development, assess putative Peyer's patch targeting in oral vaccine technologies, and study intestinal uptake in vitro.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. DATA SOURCES: Published and grey literature. STUDY SELECTION: Systematic search for worldwide reports written in English between January 1966 and October 2000. DATA EXTRACTION: Qualitative review of papers describing the effects of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. RESULTS: Of 42 papers identified, 31 (74%) were case studies. Papers often described changes to services that were attributed to involving patients, including attempts to make services more accessible and producing information leaflets for patients. Changes in the attitudes of organisations to involving patients and positive responses from patients who took part in initiatives were also reported. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supports the notion that involving patients has contributed to changes in the provision of services across a range of different settings. An evidence base for the effects on use of services, quality of care, satisfaction, or health of patients does not exist.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Personality disorders are generally thought not to change by much over time. We assessed the personality status of 202 patients who had a defined diagnostic and statistical manual (DSM)-III neurotic disorder, dysthymia, panic disorder, or generalised anxiety. All patients had had drug and psychological treatment in a randomised controlled trial. 12 years after entry to the study, we reassessed the personality status of 178 (88%) of these patients using the same test (personality assessment schedule). The personality traits of patients in the cluster B flamboyant group (antisocial, histrionic) became significantly less pronounced over 12 years, but those in the cluster A odd, eccentric group (schizoid, schizotypal, paranoid), and the cluster C anxious, fearful group (obsessional, avoidant) became more pronounced. The measure of agreement between baseline and 12-year personality clusters was poor or slight (kappa=0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.23). Our results suggest that the assumption that personality characteristics do not change with time is incorrect.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a treatment, nidotherapy, or nest therapy, so named because it aims to alter the sufferer's personal environment rather than symptoms or behaviour, in the management of personality disorders. METHOD: Case studies, in which analysis of the environmental circumstances associated with the problems of personality disorder is followed by planned adjustment to that environment so that it makes a more appropriate fit for the personality. RESULT: Sustained improvement was found in two individuals with personality disorder after nidotherapy. Those with persistent and predictable personality attributes are easier in principle to treat than those with episodic or variable problems. CONCLUSION: Nidotherapy deserves further consideration in the management of personality disorders.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.