Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Peter Santago

Publications and source records attributed to Peter Santago.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Automatic colon segmentation with dual scan CT colonography.

We present a fully automated three-dimensional (3-D) segmentation algorithm to extract the colon lumen surface in CT colonography. Focusing on significant-size polyp detection, we target at an efficient algorithm that maximizes overall colon coverage, minimizes the extracolonic components, maintains local shape accuracy, and achieves high segmentation speed. Two-dimensional (2-D) image processing techniques are employed first, resulting in automatic seed placement and better colon coverage. This is followed by near-air threshold 3-D region-growing using an improved marching-cubes algorithm, which provides fast and accurate surface generation. The algorithm constructs a well-organized vertex-triangle structure that uniquely employs a hash table method, yielding an order of magnitude speed improvement. We segment two scans, prone and supine, independently and with the goal of improved colon coverage. Both segmentations would be available for subsequent polyp detection systems. Segmenting and analyzing both scans improves surface coverage by at least 6% over supine or prone alone. According to subjective evaluation, the average coverage is about 87.5% of the entire colon. Employing near-air threshold and elongation criteria, only 6% of the data sets include extracolonic components (EC) in the segmentation. The observed surface shape accuracy of the segmentation is adequate for significant-size (6 mm) polyp detection, which is also verified by the results of the prototype detection algorithm. The segmentation takes less than 5 minutes on an AMD 1-GHz single-processor PC, which includes reading the volume data and writing the surface results. The surface-based segmentation algorithm is practical for subsequent polyp detection algorithms in that it produces high coverage, has a low EC rate, maintains local shape accuracy, and has a computational efficiency that makes real-time polyp detection possible. A fully automatic or computer-aided polyp detection system using this technique is likely to benefit future colon cancer early screening.

Algorithms↗

Genetic algorithms and self-organizing maps: a powerful combination for modeling complex QSAR and QSPR problems.

Modeling non-linear descriptor-target activity/property relationships with many dependent descriptors has been a long-standing challenge in the design of biologically active molecules. In an effort to address this problem, we couple the supervised self-organizing map with the genetic algorithm. Although self-organizing maps are non-linear and topology-preserving techniques that hold great potential for modeling and decoding relationships, the large number of descriptors in typical quantitative structure-activity relationship or quantitative structure-property relationship analysis may lead to spurious correlation(s) and/or difficulty in the interpretation of resulting models. To reduce the number of descriptors to a manageable size, we chose the genetic algorithm for descriptor selection because of its flexibility and efficiency in solving complex problems. Feasibility studies were conducted using six different datasets, of moderate-to-large size and moderate-to-great diversity; each with a different biological endpoint. Since favorable training set statistics do not necessarily indicate a highly predictive model, the quality of all models was confirmed by withholding a portion of each dataset for external validation. We also address the variability introduced onto modeling through dataset partitioning and through the stochastic nature of the combined genetic algorithm supervised self-organizing map method using the z-score and other tests. Experiments show that the combined method provides comparable accuracy to the supervised self-organizing map alone, but using significantly fewer descriptors in the models generated. We observed consistently better results than partial least squares models. We conclude that the combination of genetic algorithms with the supervised self-organizing map shows great potential as a quantitative structure-activity/property relationship modeling tool.

Algorithms↗

Supervised self-organizing maps in drug discovery. 1. Robust behavior with overdetermined data sets.

The utility of the supervised Kohonen self-organizing map was assessed and compared to several statistical methods used in QSAR analysis. The self-organizing map (SOM) describes a family of nonlinear, topology preserving mapping methods with attributes of both vector quantization and clustering that provides visualization options unavailable with other nonlinear methods. In contrast to most chemometric methods, the supervised SOM (sSOM) is shown to be relatively insensitive to noise and feature redundancy. Additionally, sSOMs can make use of descriptors having only nominal linear correlation with the target property. Results herein are contrasted to partial least squares, stepwise multiple linear regression, the genetic functional algorithm, and genetic partial least squares, collectively referred to throughout as the "standard methods". The k-nearest neighbor (kNN) classification method was also performed to provide a direct comparison with a different classification method. The widely studied dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibition data set of Hansch and Silipo is used to evaluate the ability of sSOMs to classify unknowns as a function of increasing class resolution. The contribution of the sSOM neighborhood kernel to its predictive ability is assessed in two experiments: (1) training with the k-means clustering limit, where the neighborhood radius is zero throughout the training regimen, and (2) training the sSOM until the neighborhood radius is reduced to zero. Results demonstrate that sSOMs provide more accurate predictions than standard linear QSAR methods.

Algorithms↗