Biomedical subjects
Peter Gaede
Publications and source records attributed to Peter Gaede.
Monitoring kidney function in type 2 diabetic patients with incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess agreement between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the decline in GFR estimated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study Group equation or the Cockcroft-Gault formula and measured by the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We followed a cohort of 156 microalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients for 8 years with four measurements of GFR and another cohort of 227 type 2 diabetic patients with overt diabetic nephropathy for 6.5 (range 3-17) years with seven (3-22) measurements of GFR. RESULTS: For patients with microalbuminuria, mean +/- SD baseline GFR was 117 +/- 24 measured, 92 +/- 20 estimated (MDRD equation), or 103 +/- 24 ml x min(-1) per 1.73 m2 estimated (Cockcroft-Gault formula) (both P < 0.001); 95% limits of agreement were -66.1 to 20.3 (MDRD equation) and -58.7 to 30.7 (Cockcroft-Gault formula). The rate of decline in GFR was 4.1 +/- 4.2 measured, 2.9 +/- 2.8 estimated (MDRD equation), or 3.4 +/- 3.2 ml x min(-1) per 1.73 m2 estimated (Cockcroft-Gault formula) (both P < 0.001). For patients with overt nephropathy, baseline GFR was 84 +/- 30 measured, 73 +/- 24 estimated (MDRD equation), or 81 +/- 28 ml x min(-1) per 1.73 m2 estimated (Cockcroft-Gault formula) (both P < 0.001) with 95% limits of agreement -47 to 25 (MDRD equation) and -39 to 33 (Cockcroft-Gault formula). The rate of decline in GFR was 5.2 +/- 4.1 measured, 4.2 +/- 3.8 estimated (MDRD equation), and 4.6 +/- 4.1 ml x min(-1) per 1.73 m2 estimated (Cockcroft-Gault formula) (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Particularly in microalbuminuric (hyperfiltering) patients, GFR is significantly underestimated with wide limits of agreement by the MDRD equation as well as by the Cockcroft-Gault formula. The rate of decline in GFR is also significantly underestimated with both equations. This makes GFR estimations based upon these equations unacceptable for monitoring kidney function in type 2 diabetic patients with incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy.
Remission to normoalbuminuria during multifactorial treatment preserves kidney function in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria.
BACKGROUND: Intervention studies in microalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients have demonstrated that it is possible to avoid progression to overt diabetic nephropathy and even to achieve regression to normoalbuminuria. However, the long-term impact of stabilization/regression in albuminuria on decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has not been established. METHODS: 151 patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria at baseline in whom GFR was measured at least three times during 7.8 years of follow-up were divided into three groups according to the level of albuminuria during follow-up. Overt nephropathy was diagnosed as a urinary albumin excretion rate (AER) >300 mg/24 h and remission to normoalbuminuria was defined as an AER <30 mg/24 h at the last examination. RESULTS: During follow-up, 46 patients achieved remission to normoalbuminuria, 58 remained microalbuminuric and 47 patients progressed to overt nephropathy. The mean (+/- SE) yearly decline in GFR was lowest (2.3+/-0.4 ml/min/year) in patients who obtained remission, in comparison with patients remaining microalbuminuric, in whom the decline was 3.7+/-0.4 ml/min/year, and patients progressing to overt nephropathy, who had a decline in GFR of 5.4+/-0.5 ml/min/year (ANOVA, P<0.001). Start of antihypertensive treatment during follow-up was strongly associated with remission to normoalbuminuria [odds ratio: 2.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-4.93] whereas a decrease in HbA(1c) by 1% increased the probability for remission (odds ratio: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.11-1.97). CONCLUSIONS: Remission to normoalbuminuria was associated with a decreased GFR decline during 7.8 years of follow-up in type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. Antihypertensive therapy and improved glycaemic control were independent predictors for remission.
Target intervention against multiple-risk markers to reduce cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.
The risk of cardiovascular disease is markedly increased in patients with type 2 diabetes with a prevalence twice as high compared to the background population. With the recognition of multiple concomitant risk factors for both microvascular as well as cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetic patients, treatment strategies have changed during recent years. This review focuses on the many recent drug trials that have set the course for an effective multifactorial treatment of the disease. Thus, the Steno-2 Study has shown that an intensified multifactorial intervention targeting several risk factors for cardiovascular disease is capable of reducing the risk for a combined endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, coronary interventions, revascularisation to legs, and amputations by 50%.
Intensive integrated therapy of type 2 diabetes: implications for long-term prognosis.
The macro- and microvascular burden of type 2 diabetes is well established. A number of recent single risk factor intervention trials targeting hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, hypertension, procoagulation, microalbumuria, and existing cardiovascular disorders have, however, shown major beneficial effects on long-term outcome. The results from these studies are anticipated to change the future management of type 2 diabetes, and most of the updated national guidelines for the treatment of type 2 diabetes recommend a multipronged approach driven by ambitious treatment targets. The outcome of this intensive integrated therapy has, however, only been investigated in a few studies of patients with type 2 diabetes. One of these trials, the Steno-2 Study, showed that intensive intervention for an average of 7.8 years cuts cardiovascular events as well as nephropathy, retinopathy, and autonomic neuropathy by about half when compared with a conventional multifactorial treatment. The challenge for now is to ensure that the trial experiences are widely adopted in daily clinical practice.
Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular morbidity is a major burden in patients with type 2 diabetes. In the Steno-2 Study, we compared the effect of a targeted, intensified, multifactorial intervention with that of conventional treatment on modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. METHODS: The primary end point of this open, parallel trial was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, revascularization, and amputation. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to receive conventional treatment in accordance with national guidelines and 80 to receive intensive treatment, with a stepwise implementation of behavior modification and pharmacologic therapy that targeted hyperglycemia, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and microalbuminuria, along with secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease with aspirin. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 55.1 years, and the mean follow-up was 7.8 years. The decline in glycosylated hemoglobin values, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels measured after an overnight fast, and urinary albumin excretion rate were all significantly greater in the intensive-therapy group than in the conventional-therapy group. Patients receiving intensive therapy also had a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.73), nephropathy (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.87), retinopathy (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.86), and autonomic neuropathy (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: A target-driven, long-term, intensified intervention aimed at multiple risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria reduces the risk of cardiovascular and microvascular events by about 50 percent.
Intensified multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular outcome in type 2 diabetes: the Steno-2 study.
We recently published the results of the Steno-2 study, which evaluated the benefits of intensified integrated behavior modification and targeted polypharmacy. The results provide abundant evidence that an ambitious treatment strategy is superior to a conventional one. The study involved 160 high-risk type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria-a strong risk factor of both macrovascular and microvascular complications-aged 55.1 years, who were randomly assigned to a conventional or an intensive, multifactorial intervention for a period of 7.8 years. In the intensive group, a stepwise treatment plan was adopted involving both continuous lifestyle education and motivation and an ambitious goal-oriented pharmacological treatment of known modifiable risk factors. The conventional group was treated in accordance with national guidelines for type 2 diabetes with less stringent goals. The specific significant group differences in the degree of change in key clinical and biochemical variables at the end of the study were (in the intensive group): lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures, hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), fasting serum total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, fasting serum triglycerides, and 24-hour urine albumin excretion, as well as increased carbohydrate and decreased fat intake as percentage of total energy. There was no difference in weight gain between groups during follow-up and no other major side effects were reported. The primary end point was a macrovascular outcome: a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, nonfatal stroke, amputation for ischemia, or vascular surgery for peripheral arterial atherosclerosis. The differences between groups in surrogate end points translated into the following significant group differences in final clinical end points: 44% of patients in the conventional group had a cardiovascular event compared with 24% in the intensive group, ie, a relative risk reduction of about 50%. Also, the relative risk of nephropathy, retinopathy, and autonomic neuropathy (secondary end points) was diminished by about 60% in the intensively treated group. In conclusion, an intensified and goal-oriented multipronged approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes reduces cardiovascular events, as well as nephropathy, retinopathy, and autonomic neuropathy, by about half. The challenge is to ensure that this experience is widely adopted in daily practice.
Impact of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid on kidney function in type 2 diabetic patients with elevated urinary albumin excretion rate.
BACKGROUND: Low-dose treatment with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is widely recommended to type 2 diabetic patients as primary prevention against cardiovascular disease. High-dose treatment with cyclooxygenase inhibitors reduces urinary albumin excretion rate (AER) in type 1 diabetic patients with micro- or macroalbuminuria. Whether a similar effect on AER exists during low-dose ASA treatment, which may confound the diagnosis and monitoring of micro- and macroalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients, remains to be elucidated. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, 31 type 2 diabetic patients with elevated levels of AER (>30 mg/24 h) were, in random order, given ASA (150 mg/day) for 4 weeks followed by placebo for 4 weeks with a 2 week washout period or vice versa. At the end of each treatment period AER, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), blood pressure (BP), transcapillary escape rate (TER(alb)) of albumin and haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) were measured. RESULTS: The following variables remained unchanged (mean (95% CI) unless otherwise noted) (ASA vs placebo, paired Student's t-test): AER (201 (119-341) vs 205 (124-340) mg/24 h (geometric mean, 95% CI); P=0.78), GFR (103 (94-111) vs 102 (93-110) ml/min; P=0.58), systolic BP (151 (146-158) vs 152 (146-158) mmHg; P=0.68), diastolic BP (87 (83-91) vs 87 (82-91) mmHg; P=0.88), TER(alb) (6.3 (5.7-6.9) vs 5.9 (5.1-6.7); P=0.45) and HbA(1c) (8.6 (8.1-9.0) vs 8.5 (8.1-9.0) %; P=0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose treatment with 150 mg ASA daily does not have any impact on AER or GFR in type 2 diabetic patients with micro- or macroalbuminuria. Consequently, the widely recommended prescription of low-dose ASA as a primary and secondary prevention strategy against cardiovascular disease in these patients does not confound the diagnosis or monitoring of micro- or macroalbuminuria.