Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Pertti Suominen

Publications and source records attributed to Pertti Suominen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Optimally fitted tracheal tubes decrease the probability of postextubation adverse events in children undergoing general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The air leak test is recommended for assessing the appropriate size of an uncuffed tracheal tube (TT) in children. Our objectives were to determine whether there is a certain threshold air leak value beyond which a higher risk for adverse events after removal of TT can be predicted and to define other risk factors related to extubation. METHODS: We enrolled 234 cases ranging from newborn to 9 years of age requiring tracheal intubation for elective or emergency surgery. General anesthesia was induced by a mask or intravenously. The TT size was calculated using the formula: [age (years)/4] + 4.5. After the induction of anesthesia, the patient's trachea was intubated and the correct position was confirmed. The attending anesthetist assessed the leak pressure. Incidences of adverse events (prolonged or barking cough, obstructed or prolonged inspiration or expiration, subcostal and sternal retractions, arterial desaturation, or laryngospasm) were recorded after removal of TT. RESULTS: Ten patients were excluded from the study. A total of 218 children underwent 224 operations under general anesthesia. Children who had an absent air leak at 25 cmH(2)O pressure had 2.8 times more adverse events during emergence from anesthesia than those with an audible air leak. Adverse events after the removal of TT were 3.7 times more likely to occur in children whose anesthesia was provided by a less experienced anesthesia trainee. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events after removal of TT were more likely to occur in children with an absent air leak at 25 cmH(2)O pressure and in children whose anesthesia was provided by a less experienced anesthetist.

Air Pressure↗

The cardiac analgesic assessment scale (CAAS): a pain assessment tool for intubated and ventilated children after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the Cardiac Analgesic Assessment Scale (CAAS) as a postoperative pain instrument for children after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Two prospective studies included 69 children (aged 0-16 years) admitted to the intensive care following cardiac surgery with a sternotomy incision. Four concurrent observers performed paired observations with the CAAS or a visual analogue scale (VAS) for 32 patients. After a stimulus to the patient, two nursing observers independently scored the patient with the CAAS, and another two independent nursing observers simultaneously scored the patient using a VAS. In the second part of this study the CAAS was evaluated with respect to its ability to detect changes in pain status and responses to analgesia over time in 37 patients. RESULTS: Interrater reliability, represented by Lin's concordance correlation coefficient proved to be almost perfect for the CAAS score 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95, 0.99). About 91% of patients received the same total CAAS score from the two raters. The dichotomized CAAS scores of the two nurses indicated that in 97% of cases the nurses agreed upon whether there was an indication for treatment of pain. The CAAS was shown to significantly reflect changes in pain status over time. The average Spearman's rank correlation between VAS and CAAS was low (0.27), indicating that CAAS did not correlate well with VAS. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that postoperative pain in sedated and intubated children after cardiac surgery can be assessed reliably using a formal pain tool.

Adolescent↗