[Agger doesn't see the progress].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
History, 20th Century↗
Biomedical subjects
Per Vestergaard
Publications and source records attributed to Per Vestergaard.
Pain thresholds during and after treatment of severe depression with electroconvulsive therapy.
Pain and depression are often associated suggesting that both conditions share a common neurobiological mechanism, which modulate emotional function and processing of noxious information. Pain thresholds are hypothesized to be altered in depressed patients and normalized with the amelioration of depression. The purpose of this study was therefore to determine pain thresholds in patients during and after treatment with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) of severe depression and in healthy controls. Seventeen depressed patients (Hamilton depression score > 18) and an age and gender matched control group of same size participated in the study. Pain detection and tolerance thresholds to pressure and pain tolerance thresholds to the Cold Pressor Test by exposure to ice-water was measured twice in depressed patients during and after ECT and twice in controls with a similar time interval. While ECT significantly improved Hamilton depression score (from mean 23.9 (SD:5) to mean 12.5 (SD:5.7)) there was no significant change in pain thresholds during and after ECT in the patient group. However, depressed patients had significantly lower pain tolerance in the Cold Pressor Test on both examinations and on pressure pain tolerance on the second examination day than their corresponding control subjects. The differential effect of ECT on depression score and pain processing indicate that mood and noxious processing are not medicated directly by the same systems but that a complex relationship between pain and depression exists.
Adolescent↗
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as add-on antidepressant treatment. The applicability of the method in a clinical setting.
Recent research indicates that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the frontal cortex has an antidepressant effect. The aim of the present pilot study was to assess the antidepressant effect, side-effects and the applicability in daily clinical practice of left prefrontal high-frequency rTMS. Fifteen inpatients with major depression (ICD-10 and DSM-IV) were randomized to receive 15 days of real left prefrontal high-frequency rTMS (20 trains of 10 s, 60-s interval, 10 Hz, 90% of motor threshold) or sham rTMS as add on to conventional antidepressant treatment. Depressive symptoms and side-effects were evaluated blindly during the treatment period. Five out of eight patients receiving real rTMS suffered from local discomfort during treatment. Three of them dropped out and the project was closed for that reason. Real rTMS did not add efficacy to standard antidepressant medication. This pilot study did not confirm the antidepressant effect of left frontal high-frequency rTMS. Unwanted effects led to considerable patient drop-out and premature termination of the study. The result suggests that alternative treatment delivery technology should be considered.
Adult↗
Guidelines for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder: are there discrepancies between European and North American recommendations?
Practice policies and guidelines for the long-term management of bipolar patients have appeared in many parts of Europe and North America. Although recommendations in most areas do concur remarkable differences are apparent both regarding diagnostic practice and pharmacological management. Differences among recommendations point towards professional and cultural differences between Europe and North America but also towards areas with unresolved research questions and lack of scientific evidence.
Bipolar Disorder↗
[A union basis of values stigmatize the mentally ill--there is a need for ethical analysis].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
[Preventive drug therapy of depressions].
At least 5-10 per cent of the Danish population will during their lifetime experience more than one episode of major depression but only a minority of this group will receive the necessary and sufficient prophylactic treatment against their illness. Randomised controlled studies have shown that the majority of commonly used antidepressant drugs, new as well as old ones, possess prophylactic efficacy. Thus, treatment efficacy is not a major problem but the treatment efficiency in everyday clinical practice is unsatisfactory. This is partly due to a lack of relevant treatment facilities for psychiatric patients, partly to a lack of knowledge among patients and their relatives but also among doctors of the indications for prophylactic treatment against recurrent depression and the technical issues involved. A short practical guideline for prophylactic treatment against recurrent depression will appear from the article.
Antidepressive Agents↗
[Psychopharmacological treatment of bipolar disease].
This paper gives an update on the psychopharmacological treatment of bipolar disorder. The antimanic efficacy of lithium is well documented. The same applies to valproate, which is also efficacious in mixed mania. Conventional antipsychotics act fast in mania and do not require blood tests, but they have considerable neurological side effects. The newer antipsychotics, olanzapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone, have also been shown to have antimanic efficacy. Clozapine is extremely effective, also when other treatment fails. For the treatment of bipolar depression, lithium, lamotrigine, and antidepressants all seem to work, but antidepressants may sometimes precipitate mania or worsen the course of illness. For prophylaxis, lithium is still to be considered the first drug of choice. However, for several reasons, for instance treatment failure or side effects, long-term treatment with antiepileptics may often be necessary. Among the antiepileptics, carbamazepine, valproate, and lamotrigine are the best studied.
Anticonvulsants↗