Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Paul Emery

Publications and source records attributed to Paul Emery.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Value of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a diagnostic and assessment tool in early rheumatoid arthritis.

New research has revealed common pathophysiologic and cellular mechanisms behind the development of osteoporosis and joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Because osteoporosis is a direct consequence of the inflammatory disease process, bone mass measurements in principle could be an outcome marker of inflammation, of damage, and of response to therapeutic intervention. Several devices have been developed for quantitative bone mass assessment including dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which is considered the reference standard. This article based on current data and understanding discusses the use of DXA as a diagnostic and assessment tool especially in early RA.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2005

How should we manage early rheumatoid arthritis? From imaging to intervention.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic systemic and progressive inflammatory disorder of the synovium characterised by destruction of bone and cartilage. It is associated with significant morbidity and economic costs. Recent advances have shown that early diagnosis and timely, intensive therapy of rheumatoid arthritis can modify disease outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Current investigations into the role of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis suggest these modalities will provide information to assist in the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, identify poor prognostic factors, and aid in the monitoring of response to therapy. New developments in pharmacologic therapy, particularly the development of biologic agents, allow better disease control than was previously achievable, and the early application of these drugs in combination with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs seems to produce the best outcomes. SUMMARY: The application of novel imaging techniques will aid the target application of biologic therapy within the window of opportunity and aid in the monitoring of response to therapy. This is likely to significantly decrease the rate of structural damage and offers hope of a future when the normal outcome for rheumatoid arthritis will be remission.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Introduction.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2005

Adalimumab therapy: clinical findings and implications for integration into clinical guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis.

Adalimumab (Humira) is the first fully human monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibody available. Similar to the other TNF-alpha blockers, adalimumab has been shown to effectively reduce the symptoms and signs of rheumatoid arthritis and prevent the progression of erosive joint changes seen on radiological examination, which would lead to disabling joint damage. Clinical guidelines recommend the use of TNF blockers, specifically etanercept and infliximab (the only two available when the guidelines were issued) as treatment options for adults with rheumatoid arthritis who continue to have clinically active disease that has not responded adequately to two conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The clinical results available using adalimumab, and summarized in this review, reveal a clinical profile similar to etanercept and infliximab, achieving similarly high response rates, suppression of joint damage, and improvements in quality of life and disability, together with a good safety profile. Being a fully human monoclonal antibody, adalimumab may induce less antigenicity than these other agents, which might also be advantageous in maintaining the level of effectiveness. However, direct comparisons in controlled, long-term trials are needed to draw conclusions about which agent to try first in the sequence of DMARDs considered for patients.

Adalimumab↗
PubMed2005

Physical function and health related quality of life: analysis of 2-year data from randomized, controlled studies of leflunomide, sulfasalazine, or methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether improvements in physical function and health related quality of life (HRQOL) are sustained over 2 years of blinded treatment with leflunomide (LEF), methotrexate (MTX), or sulfasalazine (SSZ) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Three phase III randomized, controlled trials compared LEF, MTX, and SSZ in patients with active RA. Improvements in physical function were assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ); monthly MHAQ and mean HAQ scores were used to calculate American College of Rheumatology responses; HAQ-DI was assessed at baseline and 6-month intervals. In US301, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form questionnaire (SF-36) assessed treatment-associated changes in HRQOL at baseline and 6-month intervals. RESULTS: Mean and median improvements in HAQ-DI after 12 and 24 months of active treatment in all phase III protocols significantly exceeded -0.22 or a minimum clinically important difference (MCID). These improvements closely reflected positive changes in SF-36 that met or exceeded MCID in all domains with LEF and MTX treatment. Problem Elicitation Technique Top 5 scores reflected improvements in performance of physical activities most important to patients. CONCLUSION: Improvements in physical function were sustained over 24 months of successful treatment with LEF, MTX, and SSZ, and reflected improvements in mental as well as physical domains of HRQOL.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Use of combination of leflunomide with biological agents in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

An Expert Panel Meeting was held in May 2004 to assess experience with combination therapy with leflunomide and biological agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to identify both optimal use of such combinations and precautions for use. Eleven published prospective or retrospective studies were reviewed, principally evaluating combination of leflunomide with infliximab, as well as patient registry data. Available data suggest that combination therapies are more efficacious than monotherapies, reflecting the complementarity of mechanisms of action. Information on side effects remains contradictory, and tolerability of these combinations may vary between different patient groups. In some studies, tolerability is equivalent to that seen with monotherapy; in others a high rate of adverse events has led to frequent treatment discontinuation. Dermatological reactions may be a specific side effect of these combination therapies. Combination therapy is considered justified for treatment of patients diagnosed early who are at risk for rapid progression and for patients who fail to respond to monotherapy. The majority of participants favored adding biological agents to a previously established leflunomide monotherapy rather than starting both treatments simultaneously. On the other hand, combination therapy should be considered with caution in patients with a history of treatment failure, with hepatic comorbidity, or with other autoimmune disease, and in immunocompromised patients. When considering initiation of combination therapy, it is important to provide full information to the patient on the potential benefits and risks of such treatment and to integrate patients as far as possible into the decision-making process.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2005

Minimal disease activity for rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary definition.

Agreement on response criteria in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has allowed better standardization and interpretation of clinical trial reports. With recent advances in therapy, the proportion of patients achieving a satisfactory state of minimal disease activity (MDA) is becoming a more important measure with which to compare different treatment strategies. The threshold for MDA is between high disease activity and remission and, by definition, anyone in remission will also be in MDA. True remission is still rare in RA; in addition, the American College of Rheumatology definition is difficult to apply in the context of trials. Participants at OMERACT 6 in 2002 agreed on a conceptual definition of minimal disease activity (MDA): "that state of disease activity deemed a useful target of treatment by both the patient and the physician, given current treatment possibilities and limitations." To prepare for a preliminary operational definition of MDA for use in clinical trials, we asked rheumatologists to assess 60 patient profiles describing real RA patients seen in routine clinical practice. Based on their responses, several candidate definitions for MDA were designed and discussed at the OMERACT 7 in 2004. Feedback from participants and additional on-site analyses in a cross-sectional database allowed the formulation of 2 preliminary, equivalent definitions of MDA: one based on the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) index, and one based on meeting cutpoints in 5 out the 7 WHO/ILAR core set measures. Researchers applying these definitions first need to choose whether to use the DAS28 or the core set definition, because although each selects a similar proportion in a population, these are not always the same patients. In both MDA definitions, an initial decision node places all patients in MDA who have a tender joint count of 0 and a swollen joint count of 0, and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) no greater than 10 mm. If this condition is not met: * The DAS28 definition places patients in MDA when DAS28 < or = 2.85; * The core set definition places patients in MDA when they meet 5 of 7 criteria: (1) Pain (0-10) < or = 2; (2) Swollen joint count (0-28) < or = 1; (3) Tender joint count (0-28) < or = 1; (4) Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ, 0-3) < or = 0.5; (5) Physician global assessment of disease activity (0-10) < or = 1.5; (6) Patient global assessment of disease activity (0-10) < or = 2; (7) ESR < or = 20. This set of 2 definitions gained approval of 73% of the attendees. These (and other) definitions will now be subject to further validation in other databases.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2005

The evidence for magnetic resonance imaging as an outcome measure in proof-of-concept rheumatoid arthritis studies.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has now been used extensively in cross-sectional and observational studies as well as in controlled clinical trials to assess disease activity and joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MRI measurements or scores for erosions, bone edema, and synovitis have been developed and validated by several groups. The OMERACT criteria require that outcome measures demonstrate adequate validity, discriminative power, and feasibility if they are to be useful in clinical trials. Specific performance targets for these criteria depend on the scientific, regulatory, logistical, and financial context of the study in question. We review the extent to which MRI assessments of joint erosion, bone edema, and synovitis fulfil these criteria, particularly as they relate to proof-of-concept RA clinical trials.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2004

Practice, training, and assessment among experts performing musculoskeletal ultrasonography: toward the development of an international consensus of educational standards for ultrasonography for rheumatologists.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the training and practice of specialist practitioners in musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MUS) with the aim of developing an expert-derived consensus of educational standards for rheumatologists performing MUS. METHODS: A panel of worldwide experts in MUS was identified by literature review, consultation with members of training committees, and peer recommendation. Using a postal questionnaire, information was obtained about personal experience, current practice, training regimen, and participation in competency assessment. RESULTS: International experts in MUS were identified (57 in total: 37 radiologists, 20 rheumatologists). Response rate was 70%. Radiologists had been performing MUS for longer than rheumatologists. Both rheumatologists and radiologists conducted the same number of MUS sessions per week, although radiologists examined more patients. More radiologists performed MUS for muscle and ligament injury, nerve lesions, soft tissue masses, and of the groin (P <0.01). The number of training hours was similar. Approaches to training varied, although attending a training course and scanning with an expert was more common among rheumatologists (P <0.001). More than two-thirds of the group had not undergone any form of competency assessment. CONCLUSION: This study highlights differences in training and practice between individual expert ultrasonographers and between specialty backgrounds. In particular, there appears to be no formal training regimen and competency assessment is uncommon. The establishment of a core set of internationally applicable educational standards for MUS training for rheumatologists is required.

Internationality↗
PubMed2004

Interleukin-7 deficiency in rheumatoid arthritis: consequences for therapy-induced lymphopenia.

We previously demonstrated prolonged, profound CD4+ T-lymphopenia in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients following lymphocyte-depleting therapy. Poor reconstitution could result either from reduced de novo T-cell production through the thymus or from poor peripheral expansion of residual T-cells. Interleukin-7 (IL-7) is known to stimulate the thymus to produce new T-cells and to allow circulating mature T-cells to expand, thereby playing a critical role in T-cell homeostasis. In the present study we demonstrated reduced levels of circulating IL-7 in a cross-section of RA patients. IL-7 production by bone marrow stromal cell cultures was also compromised in RA. To investigate whether such an IL-7 deficiency could account for the prolonged lymphopenia observed in RA following therapeutic lymphodepletion, we compared RA patients and patients with solid cancers treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous progenitor cell rescue. Chemotherapy rendered all patients similarly lymphopenic, but this was sustained in RA patients at 12 months, as compared with the reconstitution that occurred in cancer patients by 3-4 months. Both cohorts produced naive T-cells containing T-cell receptor excision circles. The main distinguishing feature between the groups was a failure to expand peripheral T-cells in RA, particularly memory cells during the first 3 months after treatment. Most importantly, there was no increase in serum IL-7 levels in RA, as compared with a fourfold rise in non-RA control individuals at the time of lymphopenia. Our data therefore suggest that RA patients are relatively IL-7 deficient and that this deficiency is likely to be an important contributing factor to poor early T-cell reconstitution in RA following therapeutic lymphodepletion. Furthermore, in RA patients with stable, well controlled disease, IL-7 levels were positively correlated with the T-cell receptor excision circle content of CD4+ T-cells, demonstrating a direct effect of IL-7 on thymic activity in this cohort.

Alemtuzumab↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy of B-cell-targeted therapy with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: An open-label study indicated that selective depletion of B cells with the use of rituximab led to sustained clinical improvements for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To confirm these observations, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. METHODS: We randomly assigned 161 patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate to receive one of four treatments: oral methotrexate (> or =10 mg per week) (control); rituximab (1000 mg on days 1 and 15); rituximab plus cyclophosphamide (750 mg on days 3 and 17); or rituximab plus methotrexate. Responses defined according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) were assessed at week 24 (primary analyses) and week 48 (exploratory analyses). RESULTS: At week 24, the proportion of patients with 50 percent improvement in disease symptoms according to the ACR criteria, the primary end point, was significantly greater with the rituximab-methotrexate combination (43 percent, P=0.005) and the rituximab-cyclophosphamide combination (41 percent, P=0.005) than with methotrexate alone (13 percent). In all groups treated with rituximab, a significantly higher proportion of patients had a 20 percent improvement in disease symptoms according to the ACR criteria (65 to 76 percent vs. 38 percent, P< or =0.025) or had EULAR responses (83 to 85 percent vs. 50 percent, P< or =0.004). All ACR responses were maintained at week 48 in the rituximab-methotrexate group. The majority of adverse events occurred with the first rituximab infusion: at 24 weeks, serious infections occurred in one patient (2.5 percent) in the control group and in four patients (3.3 percent) in the rituximab groups. Peripheral-blood immunoglobulin concentrations remained within normal ranges. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment, a single course of two infusions of rituximab, alone or in combination with either cyclophosphamide or continued methotrexate, provided significant improvement in disease symptoms at both weeks 24 and 48.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2004

Lack of response to anakinra in rheumatoid arthritis following failure of tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha)- blocking therapy, there is heterogeneity of response. This raises the possibility that in certain circumstances, cytokines such as interleukin-1 (IL-1) may dominate the drive toward joint inflammation. This study was undertaken to investigate whether blocking the action of IL-1 with an IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) is efficacious in patients with disease that did not respond to TNF alpha blockade. METHODS: We identified 26 RA patients whose disease had failed to respond to TNF alpha-blocking therapy, defined as failure to achieve or sustain a 20% improvement in disease activity according to the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20 response). These patients were then treated with anakinra (100 mg/day subcutaneously) for 12 weeks, and their levels of response were assessed. RESULTS: After 3 months of anakinra therapy, only 2 of 26 patients (8%) achieved an ACR20 response; none achieved an ACR50 or ACR70 response. A rise in the mean C-reactive protein level and an increase in the mean swollen joint count were noted during the study period. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that patients with disease that fails to respond to TNF alpha blockade also do not respond to IL-1Ra. These data do not provide evidence of a dominant role for IL-1 in patients who do not respond to TNF alpha blockade, but they do not exclude a role for other proinflammatory mediators.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Enumeration and phenotypic characterization of synovial fluid multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells in inflammatory and degenerative arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate synovial fluid (SF) for the presence of mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs), to compare SF MPCs with bone marrow (BM) MPCs, and to enumerate these cells in both inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: SF from 100 patients with arthritis (53 rheumatoid arthritis [RA], 20 OA, and 27 other arthropathies) was evaluated. To establish multipotentiality, polyclonal and single cell-derived cultures of SF fibroblasts were examined by standard and quantitative differentiation assays. Their phenotype before and after expansion was determined by multiparameter flow cytometry. A colony-forming unit-fibroblast assay was used for SF MPC enumeration. RESULTS: Regardless of the nature of the arthritis, both polyclonal and single cell-derived cultures of SF fibroblasts possessed trilineage mesenchymal differentiation potentials. The number of MPCs in a milliliter of SF was higher in OA (median 37) than in RA (median 2) (P < 0.00001). No significant differences in MPC numbers were found between early and established RA (median 3 and 2 cells/ml, respectively). Culture-expanded SF and BM MPCs had the same phenotype (negative for CD45 and positive for D7-FIB, CD13, CD105, CD55, and CD10). Rare, uncultured SF fibroblasts were CD45(low) and expressed low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor, similar to in vivo BM MPCs. CONCLUSION: Our findings prove the presence of rare tripotential MPCs, at the single-cell level, in the SF of patients with arthritis. SF MPCs are clonogenic and multipotential fibroblasts that, despite the pathologic environment within a diseased joint, have a phenotype similar to that of uncultured BM MPCs. The higher prevalence of MPCs in OA SF suggests their likely origin from disrupted joint structures. These findings could determine the role of MPCs in the pathogenesis of inflammatory arthritis, together with their role in attempted joint regeneration in degenerative arthritis, which has yet to be established.

Arthritis↗
PubMed2004

Regional variation and differential response to therapy for knee synovitis adjacent to the cartilage-pannus junction and suprapatellar pouch in inflammatory arthritis: implications for pathogenesis and treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to investigate the importance of knee joint synovitis at the cartilage-pannus junction (CPJ) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as compared with synovitis at a distant site in the suprapatellar pouch (SPP) and as compared with CPJ synovitis in the spondylarthropathies (SpA), and to assess the relative response of knee joint synovitis to therapy at the CPJ and SPP sites. METHODS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DEMRI) of actively involved knee joints in 24 patients (13 with RA and 11 with SpA) was undertaken. The area of synovitis was calculated at the CPJ and SPP regions of interest in patients with RA and in patients with SpA. Differences in CPJ and SPP synovitis were determined using calculated DEMRI parameters which included the initial rate of contrast enhancement (IRE) and the maximal enhancement (ME). Changes in the synovial area at the CPJ and SPP were also measured in 10 patients with early RA, following treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (either methotrexate or leflunomide). RESULTS: In patients with RA or SpA, the area of synovitis was significantly larger immediately adjacent to the CPJ compared with a distant site at the SPP (in RA, mean synovitis area 162 mm2 at the CPJ versus 114 mm2 at the SPP [P = 0.010]; in SpA, mean synovitis area 214 mm2 at the CPJ versus 143 mm2 at the SPP [P = 0.002]), but the differences in the areas of synovitis at these sites were not significant between the RA and SpA patients. The IRE and ME values were also higher at the CPJ compared with the SPP, both in the RA patients (IRE P = 0.054, ME P = 0.018) and in the SpA patients (IRE P = 0.002, ME P = 0.001). A larger reduction in the area of synovitis was seen at the SPP compared with the CPJ following DMARD therapy in the RA patients (mean reduction 35% at the SPP [P = 0.023] and 12% at the CPJ [P not significant]). CONCLUSION: The non-disease-specific variations in synovitis and the differential responses to therapy in RA patients have implications for improving our understanding of CPJ synovitis. The results suggest that the pathophysiologic events at the CPJ reflect common anatomic, immune system, or biomechanical factors that play a role in modulating the severity of arthritis, and these events are not specific to RA since the same process was observed in other arthritides.

Aged↗