Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Paul Dassow

Publications and source records attributed to Paul Dassow.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Vasectomy: an update.

Vasectomy remains an important option for contraception. Research findings have clarified many questions regarding patient selection, optimal technique, postsurgical follow-up, and risk of long-term complications. Men who receive vasectomies tend to be non-Hispanic whites, well educated, married or cohabitating, relatively affluent, and have private health insurance. The strongest predictor for wanting a vasectomy reversal is age younger than 30 years at the time of the procedure. Evidence supports the use of the no-scalpel technique to access the vasa, because it is associated with the fewest complications. The technique with the lowest failure rate is cauterization of the vasa with or without fascial interposition. The ligation techniques should be used cautiously, if at all, and only in combination with fascial interposition or cautery. A single postvasectomy semen sample at 12 weeks that shows rare, nonmotile sperm or azoospermia is acceptable to confirm sterility. No data show that vasectomy increases the risk of prostate or testicular cancer.

Attitude to Health↗

Setting educational priorities for women's preventive health: measuring beliefs about screening across disease states.

OBJECTIVE: To measure women's beliefs about disease screening in a consistent manner across disease states to identify priority areas for educational and motivational interventions. METHODS: A cross-sectional, mailed survey of female patients, age > or =52, was conducted through a primary care practice-based research network. The Risk Behavior Diagnosis Scale, a validated 12-item instrument, was used to measure beliefs about disease severity, disease susceptibility, ability to obtain screening (self-efficacy), and response efficacy. These beliefs were measured for colon cancer, breast cancer, and osteoporosis. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight surveys were returned from 425 women invited to participate (RR 30%). Significant differences in beliefs were noted across disease states for disease severity (F = 21.67, p < 0.001), disease susceptibility (F = 14.68, p < 0.001), self-efficacy (F = 42.85, p < 0.001), and response efficacy (F = 55.49, p < 0.001). Analysis by logistic regression indicated four beliefs to be associated with adherence to screening recommendations: colon cancer severity, colon cancer susceptibility, breast cancer screening self-efficacy, and osteoporosis screening self-efficacy (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Women hold varied beliefs about disease screening that are specific for different disease states. For the three diseases studied, priority areas for educational and motivational interventions should include beliefs about colon cancer severity, colon cancer susceptibility, breast cancer screening self-efficacy, and osteoporosis screening self-efficacy.

Aged↗