Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Warde

Publications and source records attributed to P Warde.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

New approaches in the use of radiation therapy in the treatment of infiltrative transitional-cell cancer of the bladder.

Organ preservation using primary radical radiation therapy (RT) is a viable treatment option for many patients with invasive bladder cancer, and there is no evidence that survival is compromised by this approach. However, the survival and local control rates in patients with bladder cancer currently treated with radical RT are not optimal. Combined modality therapy, altered radiation-fractionation approaches, and exciting new approaches such as the application of gene therapy and the use of hypoxic cell sensitisers, among others, may well improve the results of treatment in the future. Ongoing clinical research, including prospective randomised trials, will be required to evaluate these new approaches to therapy.

Carcinoma, Transitional Cell↗

Improvement in total positioning error for lateral prostatic fields using a soft immobilization device.

PURPOSE: To prospectively measure the total positioning error present in lateral pelvic fields of patients undergoing prostatic irradiation, and to evaluate the effect of a rigid table insert and soft immobilization on the magnitude of the measured error. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one consecutive patients receiving radical prostatic irradiation with a four field technique underwent a total of 234 lateral portal films during the first, third, fifth and seventh week of treatment. The position of the isocentre was compared to the isocentre on the corresponding simulator films and the magnitude and direction of deviations recorded. The patients were divided in to three cohorts of 15 patients, 15 patients and 31 patients. The first cohort was treated on a standard treatment couch, the second cohort treated with the table top stiffened using a 1 cm polycarbonate insert, and the third cohort treated with a soft immobilization device supporting the lower legs, and the polycarbonate insert. RESULTS: There was no difference in the mean deviation of the vector of the isocentre displacement in the y and z directions identified at any of the four times when measurements were taken during therapy between the cohorts treated with or without the polycarbonate insert, but without immobilization. The overall mean deviation for these first two cohorts of patients was 3.9 mm. The positioning of patients treated with immobilization was compared to those treated without, and the immobilized patients had a significantly improved overall mean deviation of 2.6 mm (P = 0.002). This was a result of improvement in both the random and systematic components of the total error. In addition, the proportion of errors greater than 5 mm was reduced from 17% of set-ups to 8% of set-ups. The time during the course of treatment when the measurement was taken had no effect on positioning error for any of the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Stiffening the treatment couch with a 1 cm thick polycarbonate insert had no effect on reducing total positioning error, but immobilization with an inexpensive and non-customized foam rubber leg support reduced total positioning error in a statistically significant way.

Humans↗

Interobserver variation in prostate cancer Gleason scoring: are there implications for the design of clinical trials and treatment strategies?

A series of prostate cancer histological slides from 71 patients were used to measure the interobserver variation among three pathologists awarding a Gleason score. The study was prompted on account of the use of histological grade to stratify patients prior to randomization within two clinical trials currently recruiting at our centre, and a proposed study that would allocate treatment depending upon the score awarded. The pathologists were expected to award a score based upon their day to day experience, there being no consensus meeting before-hand to agree on the grey areas of the Gleason grading system. We used the kappa statistic to assess the level of agreement. This was calculated both for comparison of the raw scores awarded by the three observers, as well as the grouped scores corresponding to those groupings used for the purposes of stratification in the two trials. The extent of the interobserver variation (weighted kappa) for the raw scores (Gleason scores 2-10) was 0.16 to 0.29 and for the grouped scores (Gleason scores < or = 7 or > or = 8), kappa was 0.15 to 0.29. For the raw scores, the total agreement rate was 9.9% and the total disagreement 26.8%; for the grouped scores the total agreement rate was 43.7%. It is concluded that, despite this level of agreement there is no concern regarding stratification using the Gleason score, because of the subsequent randomization. However, using a reported Gleason score to determine treatment might be inappropriate. These data indicate the value of a central review process for pathology grading in clinical trials, especially where the treatment is directly affected by this information.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Resource implications of palliative chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To describe the costs and outcomes of palliative chemotherapy in women with recurrent and refractory ovarian cancer from the perspective of a health care provider. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of 40 consecutive women who started second- or third-line chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory ovarian cancer between 1989 and 1992. Resource utilization from the commencement of second- or third-line chemotherapy until death or last follow-up evaluation was determined from a detailed chart review. All elements of care were recorded, including inpatient admissions, outpatient visits, chemotherapy drugs, nonchemotherapy drugs, radiation therapy, surgical procedures, investigations, and home care. Costs calculated using the hotel-approximation method are expressed in 1994 Canadian dollars. Actuarial estimates of cost and survival were used to account for censored observations. RESULTS: After a minimum follow-up period of 24 months, 36 of 40 women had died. The median survival duration of the group was 1.1 years from study entry and 1.7 years from first relapse. The women received a median of two regimens of chemotherapy (range, one to four) from study entry. They spent a median of 33 days as hospital inpatients (mean, 46; range, 0 to 185); 58% of these inpatient days were for symptomatic management and 32% were for chemotherapy. The mean cost per patient was $53,000 (median, $36,600; range, $4,800 to $162,900). The relationship between cost and survival duration was not linear--the cost per year was lowest for those who lived longest. Inpatient admissions, chemotherapy drugs, and outpatient visits accounted for 62%, 21%, and 8% of the total cost, respectively. The total costs attributable to chemotherapy were $24,000 (45% of total costs) and the total costs attributable to supportive care were $23,000 (43% of total costs). CONCLUSION: These data illustrate the cost of palliative management of recurrent and refractory ovarian cancer, which must be considered in the context of quality and duration of survival. They indicate the potential to improve cost efficiency by improving resource management, for example, by shifting from inpatient to outpatient chemotherapy, everything else being equal.

Adult↗

Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I testicular seminoma treated with surveillance.

PURPOSE: We sought to identify prognostic factors predictive of disease progression in patients with clinical stage I seminoma on surveillance following orchiectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1981 and December 1993, 201 patients 20 to 86 years old (median age 34) with clinical stage I seminoma were placed on surveillance following orchiectomy. The potential prognostic factors studied included age, tumor size, mitotic count, S phase fraction, ploidy, presence of small vessel invasion, syncytiotrophoblasts and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, expression of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and low molecular weight keratin on immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: With a median followup of 6.1 years (range 1.3 to 12.3) 31 patients had relapse for an actuarial 5-year relapse-free rate of 84.9%. The 5-year actuarial survival rate was 97.1% and the cause specific survival rate was 99.5%. On univariate analysis factors predictive of relapse were tumor size (5-year relapse-free rate 88 and 67% for tumors 6 cm. or less and greater than 6 cm., respectively, p = 0.004), age (5-year relapse-free rate 79 and 91% for age 34 years or younger versus older than 34 years, respectively, p = 0.009) and presence of small vessel invasion (5-year relapse-free rate 86 versus 69%, p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis age and tumor size were predictive of relapse, while small vessel invasion approached statistical significance. The risk of relapse in 57 patients with none of the 3 adverse prognostic factors (age greater than 34 years, tumor 6 cm. or smaller and no small vessel invasion) was 6%. CONCLUSIONS: We identified age, size of the primary tumor and small vessel invasion as important prognostic factors for relapse in patients with stage I seminoma treated with surveillance. Further followup and assessment of biological factors are needed to optimize selection of patients at a high risk for relapse who should receive immediate postoperative therapy.

Actuarial Analysis↗

The role of palliative thoracic radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in both males and females. Despite this high incidence and mortality, comparatively little research has addressed the palliative treatment of thoracic symptoms. Until recently, information regarding the indications and effectiveness of radiation in this setting was obtained from retrospective reviews of single institutional experiences. More recently, three major randomized trials from the UK Medical Research Council (1991, 1992, 1994) have addressed the use of external beam radiation in randomized comparisons of different dose and fractionation strategies for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and symptoms due to intra-thoracic tumor. These studies show that shorter fractionation schemes provide equivalent palliation and essentially equivalent survival in the patient groups studied. Moreover, they provide estimates of the probability of successful palliation of common symptoms, and estimates of the toxicity of each regimen. A panel of oncologists with expertise in radiation oncology, medical oncology and epidemiology discussed the above trial results and a literature review. The panel concluded that radiation was indicated in the palliation of hemoptysis, chest pain, dysphagia, and dyspnea, and that the results of the MRC studies provided reasonable estimations of the efficacy and toxicity of radiation in this setting. These studies show that symptoms are more often than not improved with palliative radiotherapy (symptom improvement rates ranged from about 50 to 85%) and that palliation lasted for a substantial portion of the patients' remaining survival. The panel could not reach uniform consensus on the appropriate fractionation for radiation given with palliative intent. The panel agreed that favourable patients with stage IIIB NSCLC should be offered combined modality therapy with the intent of prolonging survival, and that patient preferences regarding the risks and benefits of this therapy should be considered. Further study was recommended, namely, a randomized trial evaluating five fractions of radiation vs a single fraction, using patient-based evaluation of palliation. The panel also recommended phase II development of a combined chemotherapy and low-dose radiation protocol appropriate for future study.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗

Measuring the cost of palliative radiotherapy.

Economic evaluations can be useful in decision making regarding allocation of scarce health care resources such as radiation therapy. However, assessment of treatment efficacy must be performed in addition to economic evaluations if proper resource allocation decisions are to be made. Economic evaluations cannot and should not relapse properly conducted clinical trials-particularly in the area of palliative care.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Multidisciplinary management controversies in laryngeal cancer.

While the primary goal of laryngeal cancer management is to save life, the preservation of structure and function also holds a very prominent position in the decision making for this disease. Although the therapeutic options to achieve these goals exist for most patients presenting with laryngeal carcinoma, they are not applied to a significant number of patients. In this paper we will summarise some of the disagreements which exist about optimal management and demonstrate that the opinions of experts trained to treat this disease have been shaped by non-evidence based approaches. In large part the specialty of practice and the geographic location of specialists have the greatest influence on the type of treatment recommended to an individual patient with a given stage of disease; medical knowledge, or more correctly the lack of it when comparing treatment options, seems to have a lesser influence on the decision process. We will consider the principal opportunities available to attempt to resolve controversies in laryngeal cancer. The discussion will include attention to randomised clinical trials, patient preferences, economic issues, and techniques to avoid the problems of selection bias when comparing outcomes for different treatments.

Carcinoma↗

Outcome following radiotherapy in verrucous carcinoma of the larynx.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of patients with verrucous carcinoma of the larynx treated at the Princess Margaret Hospital with respect to control rates with radiotherapy, the salvage of local failure, the risk of regional lymph node metastasis following radiation therapy, and the risk of anaplastic transformation following radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-eight patients underwent primary treatment for verrucous carcinoma of the larynx in the period between January 1961 and December 1990. This represented 1.1% of cases of laryngeal cancer seen in this time period. Forty-three received radiotherapy and 5 had surgery as the primary treatment. Several radiation dose-fractionation schedules were used, the most frequent being 50 Gy in 20 fractions in 4 weeks (31 cases), while eight patients were treated with 55 Gy over 5 weeks. RESULTS: The 5-year rate of local control was 59% for the 43 patients treated with radiotherapy. Surgical salvage was universally successful in all cases where it was attempted. The five cases treated with surgery alone did not experience relapse. Only one patient died of verrucous carcinoma. He had been medically unfit for surgical intervention at the time of initial treatment and at the time of relapse. He underwent a truncated course of radiotherapy (24 Gy in 3 fractions over three weeks in 1975). There was no evidence of increased neck relapse compared to other forms of laryngeal carcinoma following radiation treatment. No evidence to support anaplastic transformation of tumors treated with radiotherapy was evident in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Local control using radiation treatment is less successful than with ordinary invasive and in situ squamous carcinomas of the larynx. Nevertheless, the treatment is effective and provides an appropriate option for laryngeal conservation, especially in advanced lesions where total laryngectomy may be the only treatment alternative. Surgical salvage of radiation failures contributes to very high rates of cure for verrucous carcinoma of the larynx. Anaplastic transformation of cases treated with radiotherapy was not observed in any case in this series.

Adult↗

Radiation treatment of cervical lymph node metastases from an unknown primary: an analysis of outcome by treatment volume and other prognostic factors.

One hundred and forty-four patients with diagnosis of carcinoma involving cervical lymph nodes from an unknown primary site were seen at the Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto between 1970 and 1986. This paper addresses the outcome of two treatment approaches using radiation treatment as potentially curative therapy. The treatment approaches compared in a retrospective analysis are radiation to the involved node regions alone (85 cases), and radiation to both the nodes and to potential primary sites in the head and neck (59 cases). The overall 5-year survival rate of the entire group of 144 cases was 41%. There was a trend to increased survival in favour of the group receiving radiation to the nodes and potential primary sites (p = 0.07), however, when differences in extent of nodal involvement were considered and adjusted for using the Cox Proportional Hazard Model, no difference in survival, or cause-specific survival was found between the two treatment groups (p = 0.18 and 0.22, respectively). A total of seven head and neck primary cancers were subsequently discovered, six in the group receiving radiation only to the nodes and one in the group receiving radiation to the nodes and primary sites. The results of this retrospective analysis need to be interpreted with caution but suggest that, for some patients with this diagnosis, radiation to the involved node region alone is adequate. A discussion of the literature is presented with attention to the effect of extent of treatment on outcome.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

Stage I testicular seminoma: results of adjuvant irradiation and surveillance.

PURPOSE: To assess the results of treatment and patterns of relapse in a contemporary group of patients with stage I testicular seminoma managed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and surveillance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1981 and December 1991, 364 patients with stage I seminoma were treated at Princess Margaret Hospital. Of these, 194 were treated with adjuvant RT (92% received a dose of 25 Gy in 20 fractions for 4 weeks) and 172 were managed by surveillance. Two patients were included in this series twice--both had postorchiectomy RT for stage I disease, developed a contralateral seminoma, and were placed on surveillance and analyzed for outcome of both primary tumors. The median follow-up period for patients treated with adjuvant RT was 8.1 years (range, 0.2 to 12), and for patients managed by surveillance, it was 4.2 years (range, 0.6 to 10.1). RESULTS: The overall 5-year actuarial survival rate for all patients was 97%, and the cause-specific survival rate was 99.7%. Only one patient died of seminoma. Of 194 patients treated with RT, 11 have relapsed, with a 5-year relapse-free rate of 94.5%. Prognostic factors for relapse included histology, tunica invasion, spermatic cord involvement, and epididymal involvement. Twenty-seven patients developed disease progression on surveillance, which resulted in a 5-year progression-free rate of 81.9%. The only factor identified to predict progression on surveillance was age at diagnosis: patients aged < or = 34 years had a 26% risk of progression at 5 years, in contrast to a 10% risk of progression in those greater than 34 years of age. CONCLUSION: The outcome of patients with stage I testicular seminoma is excellent, with only one of 364 patients (0.27%) dying of disease. In our experience, both a policy of adjuvant RT and of surveillance resulted in a high probability of cure. Our surveillance experience showed that four of five patients with stage I seminoma are cured with orchiectomy alone. The benefit of adjuvant RT was reflected in a decreased relapse rate. We have identified a number of prognostic factors for relapse in patients managed with both approaches, but further study of prognostic factors is required, particularly to identify patients at high risk of disease progression on surveillance.

Actuarial Analysis↗

The influence of transurethral resection of prostate on prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated by radical radiotherapy.

Results of 999 patients with carcinoma of the prostate treated with radical radiotherapy were evaluated to assess the impact of pre-treatment transurethral resection of the prostate. (TURP). A total of 427 patients had a needle biopsy and 541 patients had a TURP. In 31 patients the diagnostic procedure could not be ascertained. In patients with stage T1/T2 disease (411) no adverse effect on prognosis was observed following TURP compared with needle biopsy. In patients with stage T3/T4 disease (534) a significantly higher distant relapse rate and cause-specific mortality were observed after TURP but overall survival was similar after TURP and needle biopsy. A significant correlation was observed between the probability of TURP and poorly differentiated cancers. Multivariate analysis which evaluated the influence of age, T stage, histologic differentiation and TURP did not demonstrate diagnostic TURP to be a significant independent prognostic variate for patients with prostate cancer managed by radical radiotherapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

[Small cell lung carcinoma: role of thoracic irradiation and its timing in relation to chemotherapy].

Combined modality therapy is of great importance in the management of small cell lung cancer. Randomized studies of the design chemotherapy with or without thoracic irradiation are required to demonstrate the impact of radiotherapy on rates of survival, local control and adverse effects. The method of meta-analysis allows one to analyse in a single study a set of different clinical trials of the same design. The first purpose of this paper is to briefly present the method, and the results of a meta-analysis on the role of thoracic irradiation combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of this disease. Thoracic irradiation added to chemotherapy results in a major decrease in local relapse (from 65% to 40% at 2 years), a modest increase in overall survival (from 16 to 22% at 2 years), and a small increase in lethal toxicity (from 1 to 2%). The second purpose is to discuss timing of thoracic irradiation with respect to the administration of chemotherapy using the results of a recently published trial. This Canadian study is based on the hypothesis that chemo resistant cells may develop as a result of spontaneous mutations during therapy. Limited disease patients all received the same chemotherapy (alternating 3-week cycles of CAV [cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine] over EP [etoposide, cisplatinum] for a total of six cycles), after having been randomized to receive thoracic irradiation given either early (at 3 weeks following the beginning of treatment) or late (at 15 weeks). Of the 308 patients for analysis 155 were randomized to the "early radiotherapy" arm, and 157 to the "late radiotherapy". Prognostic factors were equally distributed between the two arms. The radiotherapy regiment consisted of a dose of 40 Gy in 15 fractions to a target volume including the primary tumor and mediastinum, and prophylactic brain irradiation (25 Gy in ten fractions in 2 weeks) to patients without progression of disease. The overall survival rate was better in the "early radiotherapy" arm, with a median survival of 21 months and on overall survival rate of 20% at 5 years, compared to a median of 16 months and a 5 years survival of 11% in the "late radiotherapy" arm. The survival curves are significantly different by the log rank (P = 0.008) and Wilcoxon (P = 0.005) tests, in favour of "early radiotherapy". After allowing for prognostic factors (sex, ECOG performance status) by the Cox model, the "early" arm retains a statistically significant advantage (P = 0.006).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Carcinoma of the prostate: results of radical radiotherapy (1970-1985).

PURPOSE: To determine the outcome and prognostic factors in patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate treated with external beam radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of 999 patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated radically with megavoltage irradiation at the Princess Margaret Hospital between 1970 and 1985. Prognostic factors were analyzed using recursive partitioning method. RESULTS: Overall survival at 5 and 10 years were 69.8% and 40.1% for the whole group. The cause-specific survival rates were 78.9% and 53.5%, respectively. The cause-specific survival rates were significantly different at 10 years by T stage, T1 being 79.0%, T2 66.0%, T3 55% and T4 22%. The overall clinical local control rates was 77% in the first 5 years following treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in the local control rates of T1 and T2 stage disease at 5 years, the combined rate being 88%. Significant differences were observed between other stages, being 76% for T3 and 55% for T4. At 10 years the control rate for T1 tumours was maintained for T1 stage disease (92%) but was significantly reduced for other stages, T2 75%, T3 67% and for T4 37%. In the whole group 33.5% of patients had distant metastases in the first 5 years. The distant relapse rates at 10 years were significantly different by T stage, being 20% for T1, 33% for T2, 55% for T3 and 87% for T4. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only T stage and histological grade were independent prognostic covariates for cause-specific survival. Age was the only other independent variate in terms of overall survival. The late radiation related morbidity was 2.3% overall; 1.3% affecting rectum and recto-sigmoid and 1.0% arising in the bladder. CONCLUSION: In terms of survival the results of radiotherapy of intracapsular disease were excellent, but they were less satisfactory in patients with direct extracapsular extension. The assessment of local control was difficult and may have reflected more the lack of local disease progression rather than true local tumor control. The treatment was well tolerated and there were few serious late complications.

Adenocarcinoma↗

The results of primary radiation therapy in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

PURPOSE: The outcome of radical external beam radiation therapy for 26 consecutive patients with invasive carcinoma of the penis treated between 1970 and 1985 was assessed to test the efficacy, and side effects of such treatment. METHODS AND MATERIAL: A retrospective review of 26 patients with invasive carcinoma of the penis and 11 patients with carcinoma in-situ of the penis, treated at the Princess Margaret Hospital between 1970 and 1985, was performed. Radiation treatment was delivered using 60Co or 100-250 kv equipment to a dose ranging from 25 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks to 60 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The most often used XRT prescription was 50 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. RESULTS: The 5-year overall actuarial survival for patients with invasive cancers was 62% (+/- 10) and the cause-specific survival was 69% (+/- 9). The control of the primary lesion was 61.5%. Of five patients who progressed after initial radiotherapy, one patient was salvaged by penectomy. Of 11 patients who recurred after initial complete response, three did so in the penis alone and all were successfully salvaged by penectomy. Late complications were recorded in seven patients, two of whom underwent penectomy as a result. All patients with carcinoma in-situ achieved a complete response and, with follow-up ranging from 1 to 14 years, none recurred. CONCLUSION: We conclude that radiation therapy with surgery reserved for the management of local recurrence is an effective first line treatment for patients with carcinoma of the penis.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Carcinoma of the prostate: case report.

The authors report a case of carcinoma of the prostate with an unusual presentation. The patient, an 80-year-old man, had swelling of the right buttock and right side of the lower abdomen, diffuse bony pain and increasing weakness of both lower limbs. He responded well to therapy. Aggressive management of previously untreated carcinoma is warranted even in elderly patients with metastatic disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Is steroid receptor data useful in patients with metastatic breast cancer?

Optimal therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer is unknown. For those with rapidly progressive disease or liver metastases, combination chemotherapy is believed to be the treatment of choice. However, most patients do not fall into that category. For them, two treatment approaches can be considered: (1) ignore estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) data and treat all patients with hormonal therapy or (2) use ER/PR data and treat patients with ER-/PR- tumors with combination chemotherapy and treat all other patients with hormonal therapy. This report presents a decision analysis for assessing the usefulness of ER/PR data in this situation. The probabilities of response to hormonal therapy were obtained from literature reviews. Patients' utilities or preferences for the various outcomes were estimated by using physicians as patient surrogates. The baseline analysis favored ignoring ER/PR data and treating all patients with hormonal therapy. Extensive sensitivity analyses showed that the decision was most affected by patients' utilities for the various outcomes. The conclusion is that patients' utilities are most important in deciding the usefulness of ER/PR data in metastatic breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Does thoracic irradiation improve survival and local control in limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung? A meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Our main purpose was to determine whether the addition of thoracic radiation therapy to systemic chemotherapy improves 2-year survival, improves local (intrathoracic) tumor control, and affects treatment-related mortality in patients with limited-stage small-cell carcinoma of the lung. DESIGN: Eleven randomized trials addressing this issue were identified using a computerized literature search (Medline and Cancerline) and by polling senior investigators in the field. A meta-analysis was then performed and the results of the trials were analyzed in two ways, the odds ratio (OR) (Peto) method and the risk difference method (Dersimonian and Laird). RESULTS: The overall OR for benefit of thoracic radiation on 2-year survival (ie, the odds of surviving 2 years among patients allocated to radiation compared with the odds of surviving 2 years among patients allocated to control) is 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30 to 1.76; chi 2 = 12.76; P less than .001). The risk difference method showed that radiation therapy improved 2-year survival by 5.4% (95% CI, 1.1% to 9.7%). Local control results were available for only nine studies, the OR for treatment benefit is 3.02 (95% CI, 2.80 to 3.24; chi 2 = 101.48; P less than .0001), and intrathoracic tumor control was improved by 25.3% (95% CI, 16.5% to 34.1%). The OR for excess treatment-related deaths in the thoracic radiation-treated patients was 2.54 (95% CI, 1.90 to 3.18; chi 2 = 8.24; P less than .01). The risk difference for treatment-related deaths was 1.2% (95% CI, -0.6% to 3.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows a small but significant improvement in survival and a major improvement in tumor control in the thorax in patients receiving thoracic radiation therapy. However, this is achieved at the cost of a small increase in treatment-related mortality.

Carcinoma, Small Cell↗