Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P W Shaughnessy

Publications and source records attributed to P W Shaughnessy.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Patient-level cost of home health care under capitated and fee-for-service payment.

This article examines costs for a national sample of 1,260 Medicare patients receiving home health care from 38 home health agencies. It uses data from a study that compares home health care provided to Medicare beneficiaries in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and the traditional fee-for-service (FFS) system. The major findings indicate significantly lower costs, based on fewer home health visits, for HMO patients compared to FFS patients, even after adjustment for case mix and other factors. However, FFS patients also attain better outcomes, suggesting that HMOs may provide too few visits to home health patients. At the same time, the number of visits to FFS patients may be greater than is necessary to achieve the better FFS outcomes.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Case mix of home health patients under capitated and fee-for-service payment.

OBJECTIVE: We compare case mix of Medicare home health patients under HMO and FFS payment. STUDY DESIGN: A pseudo-experimental design was employed to study case mix using three types of Medicare-certified home health agencies (HHAs): HMO-owned agencies, pure FFS agencies that admit few Medicare HMO patients (less than 5 percent of admissions are Medicare HMO patients), and mixed (or contractual) agencies that admit at least 15 Medicare FFS patients and 15 Medicare HMO patients per month. SAMPLES OF PROVIDERS AND PATIENTS: Random samples of Medicare-aged patients (> or = 65 years) were selected at admission between June 1989 and November 1991 from the 38 study HHAs. Sample sizes by agency type were: 308 patients from 9 HMO-owned agencies; 529 patients from 15 pure FFS agencies; and 381 HMO patients and 414 FFS patients from 14 contractual agencies. DATA: Primary longitudinal data were prospectively collected at admission for all patients on health status indicators, demographics, admission source, and home environment. MEASURES: The most important case-mix measures were functional and physiologic indicators of health status, including (instrumental) activities of daily living ([I]ADLs). Selected indicators of demographic variables, prior location, living situation, characteristics of informal caregivers, mental/behavioral factors, and resource needs were also used. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: (a) The case mix of Medicare FFS patients compared with Medicare HMO patients was more intense in terms of impairments in ADLs, IADLs, and various physiologic conditions. Pressure ulcers as well as neurological and orthopedic impairments requiring rehabilitation care were also more prevalent among FFS patients. (b) Relative to HMO patients admitted to contractual agencies, HMO patients admitted to HMO-owned agencies were moderately more dependent in ADLs and IADLs. However, only 62 percent of HMO patients admitted to HMO-owned agencies, in contrast to 77 percent of HMO patients admitted to contractual agencies, had been hospitalized during the 30 days prior to home health admission. (c) In all, the case mix of patients receiving care from HMO-owned agencies is more heterogeneous than the case mix of HMO patients receiving care from contractual agencies. CONCLUSIONS: The case-mix (and selected utilization) findings indicate that HMOs use home health care differently than does the FFS sector. The greater diversity of case mix for HMO-owned agencies and the narrower or less diverse case mix that characterizes HMO patients receiving home care on a contractual basis point to the likelihood of cost differences among the two types of HMO patients and FFS patients, and raise the question of possible outcome differences.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1990

The increased needs of patients in nursing homes and patients receiving home health care.

To evaluate the effects of Medicare's prospective payment system and Medicaid's preadmission regulations on long-term care, we constructed clinical profiles in 1982 and 1986 of about 500 randomly selected patients from each of three types of facilities: nursing homes with relatively high proportions of Medicare patients (high-Medicare nursing homes; n = 23), traditional nursing homes (n = 19), and home health agencies (n = 18). Data were obtained directly from the care givers on the medical problems, problems requiring skilled nursing, and functional problems of these representative patients from 12 states. For Medicare patients in high-Medicare nursing homes, the prevalence of medical problems and problems requiring skilled nursing increased substantially, whereas the prevalence of functional problems remained relatively unchanged. For example, from 1982 to 1986 there was a marked increase in the frequency of tube feedings (21 to 29 percent), oxygen use (6 to 14 percent), urinary tract infection (7 to 13 percent), and diastolic hypertension (1 to 10 percent), but not difficulty in eating (48 to 51 percent) or speaking (28 to 29 percent). In contrast, in traditional nursing homes there was an increase in the prevalence of functional disability, but virtually no change in that of problems requiring medical and skilled nursing care. In home health care the functional care needs of Medicare patients increased significantly, and there was a slight increase in the prevalence of problems requiring medical and skilled nursing care. We conclude that from 1982 to 1986 the needs of patients in long-term care increased substantially. This trend appears to result from Medicare's prospective payment system, which encourages earlier hospital discharge to long-term care settings, and from Medicaid's policy of de-institutionalization. Meeting this greater need for care will be costly. We require a better system of reimbursing for long-term care and ensuring its quality.

Deinstitutionalization↗
PubMed1990

Quality of long-term care in nursing homes and swing-bed hospitals.

By 1989, more than 1,100 hospitals in rural communities throughout the United States were using hospital beds as swing beds to provide both long-term and acute care. In this study, the quality of long-term care in swing-bed hospitals was compared with the quality of nursing home care, using patient outcomes along with both process and structural measures of quality. Several methodological and conceptual points on measuring and analyzing the quality of long-term care are discussed in this article. Data were analyzed on approximately 2,000 patients in four different primary data samples, three of which were longitudinal involving multiple follow-up points. An analysis of changes in patient status over time, hospitalization rates, rates of discharge to independent living, services provided, and certain structural indicators showed that (1) relative to nursing home care, swing-bed care is more effective in enhancing functional outcomes and discharge to independent living and in reducing hospitalization for long-term care patients, and (2) nursing home care appears more desirable than swing-bed care for long-stay, chronic care patients with no rehabilitation potential. Swing-bed hospitals have gravitated largely to admitting postacute long-term care patients. They do not typically compete directly with community nursing homes for chronic care patients. The greater effectiveness of swing-bed care for patients with near-acute long-term care needs suggests that this approach should be considered in urban communities and that we should scrutinize our current tendency to place in traditional nursing homes many patients who have at least some rehabilitation potential.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1990

Assessing and assuring the quality of home health care: a conceptual framework.

Increased use of home care services, and the provision of more sophisticated care to acutely ill patients, have prompted concern about quality assurance in home settings. A conceptual framework is proposed to assess home health-care quality based on two premises: outcome, process, and structural measures, first, are required to evaluate quality accurately; classification of patients into quality indicator groups (QUIGs), second, permits specification and use of more practical and valid quality measures. The framework may prove useful because measures are related directly to patient conditions, services rendered, and treatment objectives. Further reliability and validity testing of the QUIGs and a system of operational quality measures are currently underway.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1989

Swing-bed hospital cost and reimbursement.

Small rural hospitals can provide long-term care in acute care beds as part of the National Swing-Bed Program enacted in 1980. Medicare reimbursement for swing-bed care is based on the incremental cost concept. This article estimates the incremental cost to hospitals of swing-bed care and assesses the adequacy of swing-bed reimbursement in light of those estimates. Other swing-bed reimbursement policy issues are discussed, including payment for ancillary services, potential bundling of routine and ancillary reimbursement, and the possible incorporation of case mix into swing-bed payment determination.

Ancillary Services, Hospital↗
PubMed1986

Medicaid and non-Medicaid case mix differences in Colorado nursing homes.

Profiles of case mix and related variables were compared for 1,064 Medicaid and 459 non-Medicaid residents of 65 freestanding nursing homes in Colorado in 1980. The results point to substantial case-mix differences, with Medicaid residents typically characterized by fewer and less intense long-term care problems as well as greater independence in functioning (ADLs). Policy impacts of these findings in Colorado have included a legislatively mandated home and community-based care program as well as a more stringent preadmission certification program for Medicaid clients. The method of comparing Medicaid and non-Medicaid case mix in nursing homes appears to have policy relevance for other states as well. Research implications in the areas of measuring severity of long-term care problems and measuring residents' functional abilities apart from services received are also suggested.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1986

Hospital swing-bed care in the United States.

As a result of federal legislation implemented in 1982, hospital beds that are used to provide both long-term care and acute care are now proliferating rapidly throughout the country. Termed swing beds, such beds are currently restricted to rural areas. However, due largely to the impacts of Medicare DRG reimbursement, pressure is mounting to expand the swing-bed approach to urban settings. Swing beds appear to fill a significant gap between the relatively intense medical needs of post-acute care patients (now discharged earlier) and the capacity of our current nursing home delivery system to meet such needs. The evolution of swing beds is marked by an unusual blend of experimentation, scientific investigation, and public policy response to community and personal health care needs. This article summarizes that evolution, highlighting research findings and key policy developments. It concludes with the current status of the national swing-bed program and issues pertinent to future directions.

Bed Conversion↗
PubMed1985

The use of swing beds in rural hospitals.

The national program under which rural hospitals are currently providing swing-bed care is the result of a HCFA-sponsored demonstration and evaluation program involving more than 100 rural hospitals in four states. We summarize herein the larger of two evaluation studies of the program. The experimental hospitals averaged approximately two fully occupied swing beds, experienced a 5% increase in total occupancy owing to swing-bed care, and may have reduced acute care length of stay slightly. A strong negative correlation between acute care occupancy and use of swing beds was observed, but no evidence was found to support the hypothesis that swing-bed care decreases nursing home occupancy in rural communities.

Bed Conversion↗
PubMed1985

Nursing home case-mix differences between Medicare and non-Medicare and between hospital-based and freestanding patients.

Case-mix differences between Medicare and non-Medicare nursing home patients and between hospital-based and freestanding nursing home patients were assessed for a sample of 756 patients from 26 nursing homes in six states in 1983. Significant differences were found between Medicare and non-Medicare patients and between hospital-based and freestanding nursing home patients. Thus, two attributes, the percentage of Medicare patient days and whether a nursing home is hospital-based or freestanding, probably should be taken into consideration as facility-level case-mix indicators in determining Medicare reimbursement until a more refined approach to case-mix reimbursement can be developed. Hospital-based/freestanding case-mix differences also suggest that Medicaid reimbursement should recognize potential differences in cost structure between these two types of facilities.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1985

Estimating patient-level nursing home costs.

This article presents a methodology developed to estimate patient-level nursing home costs. Such estimates are difficult to obtain because most cost data for nursing homes are available from Medicare or Medicaid cost reports, which provide only average values per patient-day across all patients (or all of a particular payer's patients). The methodology presented in this article yields "resource consumption" (RC) measures of the variable cost of nursing staff care incurred in treating individual nursing home patients. Results from the application of the methodology are presented, using data collected in 1980 on a sample of 961 nursing home patients in 74 Colorado nursing homes. This type of approach could be used to link nursing home payments to the care needs of individual patients, thus improving the overall equity of the payment system and possibly reducing the access barriers facing especially Medicaid patients with high-cost care needs.

Colorado↗
PubMed1985

Cost-effectiveness implications based on a comparison of nursing home and home health case mix.

Case-mix differences between 653 home health care patients and 650 nursing home patients, and between 455 Medicare home health patients and 447 Medicare nursing home patients were assessed using random samples selected from 20 home health agencies and 46 nursing homes in 12 states in 1982 and 1983. Home health patients were younger, had shorter lengths of stay, and were less functionally disabled than nursing home patients. Traditional long-term care problems requiring personal care were more common among nursing home patients, whereas problems requiring skilled nursing services were more prevalent among home health patients. Considering Medicare patients only, nursing home patients were much more likely to be dependent in activities of daily living (ADLs) than home health patients. Medicare nursing home and home health patients were relatively similar in terms of long-term care problems, and differences in medical problems were less pronounced than between all nursing home and all home health patients. From the standpoint of cost-effectiveness, it would appear that home health care might provide a substitute for acute care hospital use at the end of a hospital stay, and appears to be a more viable option in the care of patients who are not severely disabled and do not have profound functional problems. The Medicare skilled nursing facility, however, is likely to continue to have a crucial role in posthospital care as the treatment modality of choice for individuals who require both highly skilled care and functional assistance.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1982

Methodological issues in per capita measurement in health care.

General agreement exists on the utility of and need for more widespread applications of health system performance indicators measured on a per capita basis. This article contains a discussion of certain methodological issues in per capita measurement and provides recommendations to facilitate applications and future advances. The two basic approaches to per capita measurement are summarized and the need for methodological research is emphasized. Illustrative per capita measures that would be of assistance in applied settings are presented in the context of a tabular display of health and demographic data for a hypothetical state.

Catchment Area, Health↗