Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Szilagyi

Publications and source records attributed to P Szilagyi.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Interventions aimed at improving immunization rates.

BACKGROUND: Immunization rates for children and adults are rising, but coverage levels have not reached national goals. As a result of low immunization rates, vaccine-preventable diseases still occur. In an era of increasing complexity of immunization schedules, rising expectations about the performance of primary care, and large demands on primary care physicians, it is important to understand and promote interventions that work in primary care settings to increase immunization coverage. A common theme across immunization programs in all nations involves the challenge of determining the denominator of eligible recipients (e.g., all children who should receive the measles vaccine), and identifying the best strategy to ensure high vaccination rates. Strategies have focused on patient-oriented interventions (e.g., patient reminders), provider interventions, and system interventions. One intervention strategy involves patient reminder/recall systems. OBJECTIVES: Assess the effectiveness of patient reminder/recall systems in improving immunization rates, and compare the effects of various types of reminders in different settings or patient populations. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic search was performed using MEDLINE (1966-1998) and 4 other bibliographic databases: EMBASE, PsychINFO, Sociological Abstracts, and CAB Abstracts. Authors also performed a search of EPOC in April 2001 to update the review. Two authors reviewed the lists of titles and abstracts, and used the inclusion criteria to mark potentially relevant articles for full review. The reference lists of all relevant articles and reviews were back searched for additional studies. Publications of abstracts, proceedings from scientific meetings, and files of study collaborators were also searched for references. SELECTION CRITERIA STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trials (RCT), controlled before and after studies (CBA), and interrupted time series (ITS) studies written in English. TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS: Health care personnel who deliver immunizations and children (birth to 18 years) or adults (18 years and up) who receive immunizations in any setting. Types of interventions: Any intervention that falls within the Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group (EPOC) scope and that includes patient reminder and/or recall in at least one arm of the study. Types of outcome measures: Immunization rates, or the proportion of the target population up-to-date on recommended immunizations. Outcomes were acceptable for either individual vaccinations (e.g., influenza vaccination) or standard combinations of recommended vaccinations (e.g., all recommended vaccinations by a specific date or age). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS DATA COLLECTION: Each study was read independently by two reviewers. Disagreements between reviewers were resolved by a formal reconciliation process to achieve consensus. ANALYSIS: Results are presented for individual studies as relative rates for randomized controlled trials, and as absolute changes in percentage points for controlled before and after studies. Pooled results were presented using the random effects model. MAIN RESULTS: Patient reminder/recall systems were effective in improving immunization rates in 33 of 41 included studies, irrespective of baseline immunization rates, patient ages, type of setting, or type of vaccination. Increases in immunization rates due to reminders were in the range of 5 to 20 percentage points. Reminders were effective for childhood vaccinations (OR=2.02, 95% CI =1.49,2.72), childhood influenza vaccinations (OR=4.19, 95% CI =2.07,8.49), adult pneumococcus or tetanus (OR=5.14, 95%CI = 1.21, 21.8), and adult influenza vaccinations (OR=2.29, 95%CI = 1.69, 3.10). While reminders were most effective in academic settings (OR = 3.33, 95% CI = 1.98, 5.58), they were also highly effective in private practice settings (OR=1.79, 95% CI = 1.45, 2.22) and public health clinics (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.42, 3.07). All types of reminders were effective (postcards, letters, telephone or autodialer calls), with telephone being the most effective but most costly. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Patient reminder/recall systems in primary care settings are effective in improving immunization rates.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Immunization performance measurement in a changing immunization environment.

OBJECTIVE: The measurement of performance in the delivery of recommended vaccinations for children is used frequently as a marker for quality of care and as an outcome for studies of interventions to improve immunization coverage levels. The critical element of immunization performance measurement is the determination of immunization status. This methodologic review 1) discusses immunization status as a measure of quality of primary care for children, 2) describes immunization status measures used in immunization intervention studies, and 3) examines selected technical issues of immunization status measurement. METHODS AND TOPICS: 1) Description of the characteristics of immunization status measurements obtained by a systematic review of studies published between 1980 and 1997 on interventions to raise immunization coverage, and 2) illustration of technical considerations for immunization status measurement using one local database and one national database of immunization histories. Technical issues for immunization status measurement include 1) the need to use documented immunization histories rather than parental recall to determine immunization status, 2) the need to link records across providers to obtain complete records, 3) the sensitivity of immunization status to missing immunization data, and 4) the potential of measures incorporating combinations of immunizations to underestimate the degree of vaccination in a population. CONCLUSIONS: Immunization performance measurement has many characteristics of a robust quality of care measure, including high acceptance by primary care providers of routine vaccination, association of immunization status with the conduct of other clinical preventive services, agreed-on technical and programmatic standards of care, and legislative requirements for medical record documentation. However, it is not without challenges. Careful attention to technical issues has potential to improve immunization delivery health services research.

Child↗
PubMed1996

Primary care involvement among hospitalized children.

OBJECTIVE: To examine relations between characteristics of a child's usual source of primary care and involvement of that source before and during hospitalization. DESIGN: Medical record review of pediatric hospitalizations. SETTING: All hospitals in Boston, Mass; New Haven, Conn; and Rochester, NY admitting children during the calendar years 1988 through 1990. PATIENTS: The study included 1875 randomly selected pediatric hospitalizations for five diagnostic groups (i.e., asthma and other lower respiratory tract disease, abdominal pain [including appendicitis], meningitis [bacterial and viral], toxic ingestions, and head injury). Hospital records selected were limited to children aged between 1 month and 12 years and residing in the three study communities. OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether the primary care source examined the child before admission to the hospital, referred the child to the emergency department, or served as the in-hospital attending physician. RESULTS: Of the medical charts reviewed, 85.7% identified primary care sources. Children in Rochester had higher rates of medical visits before admission (P < .04), referrals (P < .001), and in-hospital care provided by the primary care physician (P < .001, chi 2) than children in Boston and New Haven. Patterns of primary care involvement also varied by source of care within cities, after controlling for income and severity of illness. Compared with children from Rochester community-based private practices, children in Boston receiving care from health centers, hospitals, or community-based private practices generally had 25% to 50% lower likelihood of positive findings on all primary care involvement measures. Children in New Haven receiving care from community-based private or hospital-based practices also had lower rates, but involvement rates were not higher when they received care from health centers. Other children in Rochester and children receiving care from health maintenance organizations in all cities demonstrated almost no significant differences compared with data from Rochester community practices. CONCLUSION: The source of primary care is associated with patterns of prehospital and hospital care among hospitalized children, although specific associations vary by city.

Child↗
PubMed1996

Does quality of care affect rates of hospitalization for childhood asthma?

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization rates for childhood asthma are three times as high in Boston, Massachusetts, as in Rochester, New York; New Haven, Connecticut, rates are intermediate. We undertook this study to determine how care for children admitted for asthma varies across these communities. METHODS: We performed a community-wide retrospective chart review. We reviewed a random sample of all asthma hospitalizations, from 1988 to 1990, of children 2 to 12 years old living in these communities (n = 614). Abstracted data included demographics, illness severity, and treatment before admission. RESULTS: Compared with Rochester children, Boston children were less likely to have received maintenance preventive therapy (inhaled corticosteroids or cromolyn [odds ratio (OR), 0.4 (0.2, 0.9)]), acute "rescue" therapy (oral corticosteroids [OR, 0.2 (0.1, 0.4)]), or inhaled beta-agonist therapy [OR, 0.5 (0.3, 1.0)]. A larger proportion of admitted asthmatic patients in Boston (34%) were in the least severely ill group-oxygen saturation 95% or above-compared with patients in Rochester (20%). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of ambulatory care, including choice of preventive therapies and thresholds for admission, likely plays a key role in determining community hospitalization rates for chronic conditions such as childhood asthma.

Acute Disease↗