Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Smits

Publications and source records attributed to P Smits.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Presynaptic inhibition of norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerve endings by endogenous adenosine.

ATP is coreleased with norepinephrine from sympathetic nerve endings and subsequently broken down to adenosine. In animal preparations, adenosine can inhibit norepinephrine release by stimulation of presynaptic receptors. We tested this feedback mechanism in humans by using a specific nucleoside transport inhibitor (draflazine) as a pharmacological tool to allow accumulation of endogenous adenosine in the synaptic cleft. In a dose-finding study on draflazine infusions into the brachial artery (n=10), we identified an optimal dose of 250 ng/min per deciliter of forearm tissue that induced considerable local nucleoside transport inhibition (approximately 40%) without systemic effects. In the main study, we investigated the effects of this draflazine dose on sympathetic-mediated norepinephrine spillover during lower body negative pressure (-25 mm Hg) by the use of the [3H]norepinephrine isotope dilution technique (n=25). Lower body negative pressure induced a significant increase in total body norepinephrine spillover, forearm norepinephrine appearance rate, forearm vascular resistance, and heart rate. During draflazine infusion into the brachial artery, the responses to lower body negative pressure were preserved for all parameters, with the exception of the median increase in forearm norepinephrine appearance rate, which was reduced from 54% to 2% (P <.05). We conclude that accumulation of endogenous adenosine in the synaptic cleft during sympathetic stimulation can inhibit norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerve endings.

Adenosine↗

Activation of the sodium-potassium pump contributes to insulin-induced vasodilation in humans.

Systemic hyperinsulinemia induces vasodilation in human skeletal muscle. This vasodilation contributes to insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and has been found to be reduced in various insulin-resistant states. The mechanism of the effect of insulin on vascular tone is not completely understood. We hypothesized that activation of the sodium-potassium pump (Na+, K(+)-ATPase) located in endothelial or smooth muscle cells would be involved in the insulin-mediated vasodilation. Therefore, in 24 healthy, nonsmoking, nonobese, normotensive volunteers, we infused ouabain, a specific inhibitor of Na+, K(+)-ATPase, into the brachial artery before and during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. As expected, insulin (systemic concentrations, approximately 700 [low] and 1400 [high] pmol.L-1) induced vasodilation in the control arm (forearm blood flow [FBF, plethysmography] from 1.6 +/- 0.2 to 2.1 +/- 0.4 mL.dL-1.min-1 [low insulin] and from 1.6 +/- 0.2 to 2.1 +/- 0.2 [high insulin], P < .05 for both), but the increase in FBF was abolished in the ouabain-infused forearm (from 1.3 +/- 0.1 to 1.4 +/- 0.2 mL.dL-1.min-1 [low] and from 1.3 +/- 0.1 to 1.3 +/- 0.1 [high], P = NS). Ouabain-induced increases in forearm potassium release were partly reversed by insulin. To investigate whether the mechanism of action could be at the endothelial level, we infused NG-monomethyl-I-arginine (L-NMMA), an inhibitor of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mg.dL-1.min-1) intra-arterially in 12 subjects and induced a clear dose-dependent decrease of FBF from 1.7 +/- 0.2 to 1.2 +/- 0.1 mL.dL-1.min-1 (P < .01). In contrast, after ouabain (and continued insulin) infusion, L-NMMA had no effect on FBF (from 1.6 +/- 0.4 to 1.5 +/- 0.3 mL.dL-1.min-1, n = 6, P = .66). These results demonstrate that insulin induces vasodilation by stimulation of Na+, K(+)-ATPase. This activation of Na+, K(+)-ATPase could occur at the level of the endothelium rather than that of vascular smooth muscle and contributes to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator response to insulin.

Adolescent↗

Effects of insulin on vascular tone and sympathetic nervous system in NIDDM.

Chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system may be a pathogenetic mechanism by which hyperinsulinemia induces cardiovascular damage in insulin-resistant NIDDM patients. The influence of physiological hyperinsulinemia (approximately 700 pmol/l) on basal and stimulated sympathetic outflow was studied in 12 lean normotensive subjects with well-controlled NIDDM without complications and in 13 matched control subjects. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured with forearm plethysmography; sympathetic nervous system activity was assessed by the [3H]norepinephrine (NE) tracer method. NIDDM patients were insulin resistant (glucose infusion rates 31.8 +/- 3.8 vs. 48.7 +/- 2.0 mumol.kg-1.min-1 in control subjects, P < 0.01). After a mixed meal, NIDDM patients showed a hyperinsulinemic response (2-h insulin levels: NIDDM patients 324 +/- 34 pmol/l, control subjects 165 +/- 19 pmol/l, P < 0.001). Insulin infusion induced a vasodilator response (not significantly different between the groups). Arterial plasma NE levels and total-body NE spillover increased significantly (total spillover in NIDDM patients from 0.77 +/- 0.09 to 1.18 +/- 0.16 nmol.m-2.min-1, in control subjects from 0.98 +/- 0.14 to 1.23 +/- 0.18 nmol.m-2.min-1, P < 0.01 for all, not different between groups). Total-body NE clearance did not change. Sympathetic stimulation (lower-body negative pressure [LBNP] 15 mmHg) induced forearm vasoconstriction and increased arterial and venous plasma NE and total NE spillover. Responses of FBF and NE kinetics to LBNP were not significantly different between groups and were not altered by hyperinsulinemia. Although these nonobese subjects with uncomplicated NIDDM showed postprandial hyperinsulinemia and resistance to the effect of insulin on glucose metabolism, this group was not resistant to the vasodilator and sympathetic stimulant effects of insulin. Responses to sympathetic stimuli (LBNP) were normal and unaffected by physiological hyperinsulinemia. Therefore, because of daily life hyperinsulinemia, chronic sympathetic stimulation could be operative in these patients and may explain the increased incidence of hypertension and/or cardiovascular complications.

Adult↗

Endothelial release of nitric oxide contributes to the vasodilator effect of adenosine in humans.

BACKGROUND: The endogenous nucleoside adenosine plays an important role in the regulation of vascular tone, especially during ischemia. Experimental data derived from animal models suggest that nitric oxide (NO) contributes to the vasodilator effect of adenosine. The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine whether the endothelial release of NO contributes to adenosine-induced vasodilation in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: Venous occlusion plethysmography was used to assess the forearm blood flow (FBF) responses to graded intra-arterial infusions of adenosine (1.5 to 500 micrograms/min). Dose-response curves were constructed before and during intra-arterial infusion of the NO synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) (2 mg/min, n = 6) or vehicle (n = 6). Before infusion of L-NMMA, adenosine caused a dose-dependent increase in FBF from 2.3 to 15.9 mL.min-1.dL-1. During concurrent infusion of L-NMMA, adenosine increased FBF from 1.7 to 10.0 mL.min-1.dL-1, and this change from baseline was significantly reduced compared with that before L-NMMA (P < .05). L-NMMA also attenuated the FBF response to adenosine when the basal constrictor effect of L-NMMA was prevented by coinfusion of the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (n = 6, P < .01). In contrast, L-NMMA did not affect the FBF response to intra-arterial infusion of the endothelium-independent vasodilator verapamil (from 2.0 to 13.9 mL.min-1.dL-1 before L-NMMA and from 1.3 to 13.6 mL.min-1.dL-1 during L-NMMA; n = 6, P = NS). The second objective of this study was to determine whether the adenosine-induced release of NO is mediated by activation of endothelial potassium channels, putatively coupled to adenosine receptors. Thus, the FBF response to adenosine was measured before and during infusion of the ATP-dependent potassium channel blocker tolbutamide (1 mg/min, n = 6), or the potassium channel blocker quinidine (0.5 mg/min, n = 6). The adenosine-mediated increments in FBF were not attenuated by either potassium channel blocker. CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine-induced vasodilation in humans is mediated, at least in part, by endothelial release of NO. The transducing mechanism of this phenomenon is not known, but it does not appear to involve the activation of either ATP-dependent or quinidine-sensitive potassium channels.

Adenosine↗

High-grade nucleoside transport inhibition stimulates ventilation in humans.

In 6 healthy male volunteers a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, crossover trial was done to assess the effect of 1, 2, 4, and 6 mg of draflazine, a specific nucleoside transport inhibitor, on ventilation. Draflazine increased thoracic excursions dose-dependently by maximally (median with 95% confidence interval) 114.0% (38.3-184.8%) without affecting breathing rate. Ex vivo adenosine transport was inhibited by 0% (0-1%) after placebo, and 70% (59-74%), 81% (76-85%), 90% (86-93%), and 93% (90-96%) after the 4 increasing draflazine dosages, respectively (P < .05 for each draflazine dosage versus placebo). These results indicate that endogenously released adenosine may play a role in the regulation of ventilation.

Adenosine↗

Cardiovascular effects of sulphonylurea derivatives. Implications for the treatment of NIDDM?

Sulphonylurea derivatives are widely used in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The mechanism of action of the insulino-tropic effect of these agents is based on the closure of adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP)-sensitive potassium channels (KATP-channels) in the beta cells of the pancreas. In the last decade, these KATP-channels have been demonstrated in myocardial cells as well as in vascular smooth muscle cells. During myocardial ischaemia, the KATP-channels are thought to open by a fall in the cytosolic ATP concentration. The increase in the extracellular adenosine concentration, and the release of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF) during ischaemia may further contribute to the opening of cardiovascular KATP-channels. Independently from the mechanism of opening, sulphonylurea derivatives have been reported to block the opening of cardiovascular KATP-channels. Related to the role of KATP-channel-opening in the (patho)physiology of ischaemia, the use of sulphonylurea derivatives significantly modifies the outcome of experimental myocardial infarction. Sulphonylurea derivatives impair the recovery of the contractile function and increase the ultimate infarct size in animal models. In contrast, sulphonylurea derivatives have a beneficial effect on the incidence of ventricular fibrillation as occurs after ischaemic incidents of the myocardium. Based on these experimental observations, human studies are indicated to investigate whether the use of these drugs modifies the clinical outcome of cardiovascular events in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.

Animals↗

A comparison of 5 days of dirithromycin and 7 days of clarithromycin in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

The safety and efficacy of dirithromycin and clarithromycin were compared in a single-blind, multicentre study of patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Patients received either dirithromycin, 500 mg once daily for 5 days, or clarithromycin, 250 mg twice daily for 7 days. A total of 212 patients entered the study, of whom 191 qualified for efficacy analysis. Favourable post-therapy clinical and bacteriological response rates for qualified patients (95 dirithromycin and 96 clarithromycin) were similar: 89.5% and 68.8% for dirithromycin vs 94.8% and 71.9% for clarithromycin. At late post-therapy evaluation, favourable clinical and bacteriological response rates were achieved in 98.8% and 96.2% of dirithromycin patients and 95.3% and 93.3% of clarithromycin patients, respectively. These differences were neither statistically nor clinically significantly different. Both drugs had similar efficacy against Haemophilus influenzae and both were well tolerated. Dirithromycin, administered as a single daily dose for just 5 days resulted in complete compliance in all but four patients. In clarithromycin-treated patients, requiring a 7-day course of twice-daily treatment, compliance was less satisfactory, with 12 patients failing to comply, though the between-group difference was not statistically significant. It can be concluded that 5 days of dirithromycin, 500 mg once daily is as safe and effective as 7 days of clarithromycin, 250 mg, twice daily in the treatment of AECB.

Acute Disease↗

Effect of long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on endothelial function in patients with the insulin-resistance syndrome.

Cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipemia are associated with an impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, these risk factors are frequently clustered. We investigated whether long-term treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor perindopril can improve endothelium-dependent vasodilation in this particular group of patients. We selected 10 patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension (age 59.4 +/- 3.2 years, body mass-index 29.7 +/- 1.5 kg.m-2, blood pressure 169 +/- 6/92 +/- 1 mm Hg, total cholesterol 6.6 +/- 0.3 mM). Using venous occlusion plethysmography, we recorded the increases in forearm blood flow (FBF) in response to three vasodilator stimuli: (a) 5 min of forearm ischemia, (b) infusion of the endothelium-dependent vasodilator methacholine (Mch) into the brachial artery (0.03, 0.3, and 1.0 micrograms/min/100 ml), and (c) intraarterial infusion of the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (SNP 0.06, 0.2, 0.6 microgram/min/100 ml). This procedure was repeated after 6 months of treatment with perindopril 4-8 mg/day. Forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was calculated by the quotient of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the FBF. Perindopril reduced blood pressure (BP) by 19/10 mm Hg (p < 0.05) and increased baseline FVR, but improved neither the maximal percentage decrease in vascular resistance induced by Mch (from -80 +/- 2 to -82 +/- 2%) nor that induced by SNP (from -73 +/- 3 to -72 +/- 3%). Perindopril decreased the FVR reached after the ischemic stimulus from 6.5 +/- 1.2 to 4.8 +/- 0.6 U (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

Neurohumoral antecedents of vasodepressor reactions.

Vasodepressor (vasovagal) syncope, the most common cause of acute loss of consciousness, can occur in otherwise vigorously healthy people during exposure to stimuli decreasing cardiac filling. Antecedent physiological or neuroendocrine conditions for this dramatic syndrome are poorly understood. This study compared neurocirculatory responses to non-hypotensive lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in subjects who subsequently developed vasodepressor reactions during hypotensive LBNP with responses in subjects who did not. In 26 healthy subjects, LBNP at -15 and -40 mmHg was applied to inhibit cardiopulmonary and arterial baroreceptors. All the subjects tolerated 30 min of LBNP at -15 mmHg, but during subsequent LBNP at -40 mmHg 11 subjects had vasodepressor reactions, with sudden hypotension, nausea, and dizziness. In these subjects, arterial plasma adrenaline responses to LBNP both at -15 and at -40 mmHg exceeded those in subjects who did not experience these reactions. In 16 of the 26 subjects, forearm noradrenaline spillover was measured; in the eight subjects with a vasodepressor reaction, mean forearm noradrenaline spillover failed to increase during LBNP at -15 mmHg (delta = -0.06 +/- (SEM) 0.04 pmol min-1 100mL-1), whereas in the eight subjects without a vasodepressor reaction, mean forearm noradrenaline spillover increased significantly (delta = 0.31 +/- 0.13 pmol min-1 100mL-1). Plasma levels of beta-endorphin during LBNP at -15 mmHg increased in some subjects who subsequently had a vasodepressor reaction during LBNP at -40mmHg. The findings suggest that a neuroendocrine pattern including adrenomedullary stimulation, skeletal sympathoinhibition, and release of endogenous opioids can precede vasodepressor syncope.

Hemodynamics↗

Hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of various grades of selective adenosine transport inhibition in humans. Implications for its future role in cardioprotection.

In 12 healthy male volunteers (27-53 yr), a placebo-controlled randomized double blind cross-over trial was performed to study the effect of the intravenous injection of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 mg draflazine (a selective nucleoside transport inhibitor) on hemodynamic and neurohumoral parameters and ex vivo nucleoside transport inhibition. We hypothesized that an intravenous draflazine dosage without effect on hemodynamic and neurohumoral parameters would still be able to augment the forearm vasodilator response to intraarterially infused adenosine. Heart rate (electrocardiography), systolic blood pressure (Dinamap 1846 SX; Critikon, Portanje Electronica BV, Utrecht, The Netherlands) plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine increased dose-dependently and could almost totally be abolished by caffeine pretreatment indicating the involvement of adenosine receptors. Draflazine did not affect forearm blood flow (venous occlusion plethysmography). Intravenous injection of 0.5 mg draflazine did not affect any of the measured hemodynamic parameters but still induced a significant ex vivo nucleoside-transport inhibition of 31.5 +/- 4.1% (P < 0.05 vs placebo). In a subgroup of 10 subjects the brachial artery was cannulated to infuse adenosine (0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, and 50 micrograms/100 ml forearm per min) before and after intravenous injection of 0.5 mg draflazine. Forearm blood flow amounted 1.9 +/- 0.3 ml/100 ml forearm per min for placebo and 1.8 +/- 0.2, 2.0 +/- 0.3, 3.8 +/- 0.9, 6.3 +/- 1.2, 11.3 +/- 2.2, and 19.3 +/- 3.9 ml/100 ml forearm per min for the six incremental adenosine dosages, respectively. After the intravenous draflazine infusion, these values were 1.6 +/- 0.2 ml/100 ml forearm per min for placebo and 2.1 +/- 0.3, 3.3 +/- 0.6, 5.8 +/- 1.1, 6.9 +/- 1.4, 14.4 +/- 2.9, and 23.5 +/- 4.0 ml/100 ml forearm per min, respectively (Friedman ANOVA: P < 0.05 before vs after draflazine infusion). In conclusion, a 30-50% inhibition of adenosine transport significantly augments the forearm vasodilator response to adenosine without significant systemic effects. These results suggest that draflazine is a feasible tool to potentiate adenosine-mediated cardioprotection in man.

Adenosine↗

Clinical pharmacokinetics and efficacy of renin inhibitors.

The successful introduction of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension or heart failure has increased interest in the (patho)physiological role of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). ACE is not only involved in the formation of angiotensin II from angiotensin I, but also inactivates vasoactive substances such as bradykinin and substance P. Accumulation of these substances during treatment with ACE inhibitors may contribute to both their therapeutic action and certain adverse effects associated with their use, such as cough and angioneurotic oedema. Renin inhibitors offer an alternative approach to inhibit the RAS. The major advantage of these, still experimental, drugs is their high specificity for the RAS since angiotensinogen is the only known substrate of renin. The currently available renin inhibitors are pseudopeptides that are rapidly taken up by the liver and excreted in the bile. Consequently, these drugs are subjected to a considerable first pass effect which limits their oral bioavailability. Additionally, plasma elimination half-life times are short and the duration of action is limited. Despite these shortcomings, single oral or intravenous administration results in a 80 to 90% inhibition of plasma renin activity and a slight reduction in blood pressure in patients with hypertension. The extent of blood pressure reduction is dependent on the patient's salt balance. After 1 week of oral treatment with the renin inhibitor remikiren, the antihypertensive effect was reduced in salt-repleted hypertensive patients. Subsequent intravenous administration of the drug did not further affect blood pressure, indicating that it was not the first pass effect that was limiting the efficacy of remikiren.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗

Acute effects of flosequinan (BTS 49465) in untreated moderate to severe hypertension.

Flosequinan (BTS 49465, 7-fluoro-1-methyl-3-methyl-sulphinyl-4-quinolone), a recently direct-acting vasodilator that should cause relatively less reflex tachycardia, was given in a single oral dose of 200 mg to 10 untreated patients with moderate to severe hypertension. Flosequinan caused a fall in blood pressure (BP) from 181/116 +/- 7/4 to 161/102 +/- 5/4 mm Hg (P < 0.05). The proportional decrease of mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 14.6% (P < 0.01). Together with the decrease of BP an increase of heart rate from 79 +/- 5 to 96 +/- 5 beats/min occurred (31 +/- 4%, P < 0.01). Forearm blood flow increased insignificantly (NS) from 3.7 +/- 0.6 to 5.5 +/- 1.5 ml/100 ml/min together with a small decrease in forearm vascular resistance from 47 +/- 7 to 39 +/- 7 arbitrary units (NS). Forearm venous distensibility remained stable around 0.03% mm Hg (NS). Neurohormonal parameters showed the consequences of systemic vasodilation: noradrenaline rose from 1.25 +/- 0.10 to 2.88 +/- 0.34 nmol/l (P < 0.01), adrenaline from 0.16 +/- 0.03 to 0.35 +/- 0.10 nmol/l (NS), plasma renin activity from 2.33 +/- 0.46 to 3.27 +/- 0.73 ng/ml/h (P < 0.05) and aldosterone from 14.31 +/- 2.47 to 26.3 +/- 8.02 ng/ml (P < 0.05). The serum concentrations of flosequinan and its major metabolite were within the therapeutic limits. Nine patients experienced minor side-effects such as headache, nausea and palpitations. We conclude that flosequinan has hypotensive efficacy with signs of systemic counter-regulatory mechanisms but without a clear forearm vasodilation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗

Effects of arginine vasopressin and 1-desamino-8-D arginine vasopressin on forearm vasculature of healthy subjects and patients with a V2 receptor defect.

OBJECTIVES: To assess which vasopressin receptor subtype mediates the vasodilation occurring in response to arginine vasopressin and 1-desamino-8-D (DD)-arginine vasopressin and whether nitric oxide is involved in these effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Vasoactive effects of arginine vasopressin and DD-arginine vasopressin on forearm vasculature were studied in healthy subjects and in patients with congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus with a vasopressin type 2 (V2) receptor gene defect. Venous occlusion plethysmography was used to assess the forearm blood flow responses to the infusion of arginine vasopressin and its analogue into the brachial artery, in the presence and the absence of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NG-monomethyl-arginine (L-NMMA). RESULTS: In healthy subjects (n =10), DD-arginine vasopressin (0.1, 1 and 10 or 5, 10 and 20 ng/min per dl) induced a dose-related increase in forearm blood flow, but did not affect forearm blood flow in the patients with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (n = 3). In two healthy subjects, seven increasing doses of arginine vasopressin (0.25-12 ng/min per dl) induced an initial decrease in forearm blood flow and then a gradual increase. In one of the patients, the same arginine vasopressin doses produced a persistent decrease in forearm blood flow. In the healthy subjects, infusion of L-NMMA reduced forearm blood flow significantly (n = 10). Subsequent administration of DD-arginine vasopressin during L-NMMA infusion produced a slight reduction in the forearm blood flow increase compared with DD-arginine vasopressin alone, but this was significant only for the absolute forearm blood flow increase induced by 10 ng/min per dl in all subjects. Infusion of arginine vasopressin in the presence of L-NMMA did not increase forearm blood flow significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In human forearm vasculature, extrarenal V2 receptors mediate the vasodilation induced by DD-arginine vasopressin or high doses of arginine vasopressin, whereas these receptors are not necessary for arginine vasopressin-induced vasoconstriction. The DD-arginine vasopressin-induced vasodilation seems to be mediated predominantly by a mechanism other than endothelial nitric oxide release, whereas arginine vasopressin-induced vasodilation seems to involve nitric oxide release only.

Adult↗

Hydrochlorothiazide exerts no direct vasoactivity in the human forearm.

BACKGROUND: Recently, hydrochlorothiazide has been shown to relax vascular smooth muscle in vitro in clinically relevant concentrations by the opening of calcium-activated potassium channels, leading to hyperpolarization and consequent closing of voltage-operated calcium channels. Long-term administration of hydrochlorothiazide reduces peripheral vascular resistance in vivo in man. These results indicate that hydrochlorothiazide has hemodynamic activity, and we therefore examined the direct vascular action of this drug in vivo. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forearm vasodilator responses to the infusion of a placebo and five increasing doses of hydrochlorothiazide into the brachial artery were recorded by venous occlusion strain-gauge plethysmography (perfused forearm technique) in eight normotensive male volunteers. Venous samples were taken from an ipsilateral antecubital vein at the end of each infusion period to measure the hydrochlorothiazide concentration. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Plasma concentrations of hydrochlorothiazide averaged 3.5 +/- 0.3 mu g/ml at the highest infusion rate. This concentration leads to a 60 +/- 10% relaxation in vitro and is more than 10 times the therapeutic plasma concentration. Despite these supratherapeutic levels, we were unable to demonstrate a change in forearm blood flow and vascular resistance. Also, no significant changes were observed in blood pressure and heart rate. CONCLUSION: In contrast to in vitro results, hydrochlorothiazide does not exert any direct vasoactivity in the forearm vascular bed of healthy normotensive male volunteers at (supra)therapeutic plasma concentrations.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

[A single blood pressure reading during check-up for hypertension leads to a change in management more often than multiple readings].

OBJECTIVE: To define the number of blood pressure readings necessary during a patient's visit to serve as a correct reference for patient management. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic in the Netherlands. METHOD: In a period of 30 months blood pressure was measured in 250-300 patients with hypertension during 1008 patients' visits. All readings were done by the same physician in the same room with the same system, after the patients had been submitted to at least 10 minutes of supine rest. Three readings were taken simultaneously with a mercury sphygmomanometer and (via a Y-connector) with a semiautomatic oscillometric method. RESULTS: Blood pressure readings of 932 visits were available for further analysis. Both methods gave similar results for the mean of each reading and for the combination of 2 or 3 readings. Based on the first diastolic reading alone instead of the mean of 3 readings, 25% of the patients would have been subjected to different patient management. On the basis of the first two readings II% would have been treated differently. CONCLUSION: No definite recommendation can be made for the ideal number of blood pressure readings per visit, but with only 1 or 2 readings, 11-25% of the subjects would have been submitted to different management.

Blood Pressure Determination↗

No specific effect of fluoxetine treatment on fasting glucose, insulin, lipid levels, and blood pressure in healthy men with abdominal obesity.

In this paper we investigated the effect of fluoxetine (60 mg/d) on serum lipids, glucose and insulin concentrations and blood pressure by means of a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial. Thirty-eight overweight (BMI: 26-30 kg/m2), nondiabetic, nonhypertensive men with an abdominal fat distribution (waist/hip ratio: > 0.97) received dietary advice and placebo or fluoxetine for 12 weeks. The changes in serum parameters and blood pressure in the fluoxetine treated group were not different from the placebo treated group, despite a significantly larger weight loss in the fluoxetine group. In both groups serum total-cholesterol concentrations, serum LDL-cholesterol concentrations and the HDL/LDL ratio were significantly improved after treatment. Reductions in fasting glucose concentration and systolic blood pressure were only significant in the placebo group. A reduction of serum triglycerides and an increase of HDL-cholesterol were found in the fluoxetine treated group. In the total study population the changes in serum lipids seemed to be more strongly related to the change in total body fat or subcutaneous abdominal fat (assessed by MRI) compared to the change in visceral fat. The improvement of most of the serum lipids was related to the change in total body fat independent of the mechanism for attaining this fat loss. Our results indicate that fluoxetine treatment has no specific effect beyond that expected for weight loss on serum lipid, glucose and insulin concentrations, and blood pressure in overweight men.

Abdominal Fat↗

Atrial natriuretic factor potentiates the human forearm vasoconstrictor response to sympathetic stimulation.

1. Atrial natriuretic factor has been suggested to affect human sympathetic nervous system activity. The interaction between atrial natriuretic factor and the sympathetic nervous system has not been fully elucidated yet, but may occur at different sites. We studied this modulator effect at the level of the forearm vascular bed: the forearm vasoconstrictor response was examined after alpha-adrenergic sympathetic stimulation in healthy subjects during the locoregional administration of atrial natriuretic factor, sodium nitroprusside and placebo. As a sympathetic stimulation test, the technique of the lower body negative pressure (-20 mmHg) was used. 2. Lower body negative pressure increased the forearm vascular resistance by +37 +/- 8% during concomitant intra-arterial infusion of placebo (n = 10). During a predilator state achieved by infusion of atrial natriuretic factor (10 ng min-1 100 ml-1 forearm volume) into the brachial artery, lower body negative pressure subsequently induced a forearm vasoconstrictor response of +153 +/- 22% (P < 0.05 versus placebo), whereas this was +64 +/- 14% when predilatation was achieved by infusion of an equipotent vasodilator dose of sodium nitroprusside (P > 0.1 versus placebo; P < 0.05 versus atrial natriuretic factor). The potentiation of the forearm vasoconstrictor response to lower body negative pressure by atrial natriuretic factor only occurred in the experimental and not in the contralateral arm. According to calculations on simultaneously sampled arterial and venous plasma catecholamine concentrations, the augmented forearm vasoconstrictor response seemed not to be caused by an increased release of noradrenaline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗