Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Servos

Publications and source records attributed to P Servos.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis.

This study examined the contribution of binocular vision to the control of human prehension. Subjects reached out and grasped oblong blocks under conditions of either monocular or binocular vision. Kinematic analyses revealed that prehensile movements made under monocular viewing differed substantially from those performed under binocular conditions. In particular, grasping movements made under monocular viewing conditions showed longer movement times, lower peak velocities, proportionately longer deceleration phases, and smaller grip apertures than movements made under binocular viewing. In short, subjects appeared to be underestimating the distance of objects (and as a consequence, their size) under monocular viewing. It is argued that the differences in performance between the two viewing conditions were largely a reflection of differences in estimates of the target's size and distance obtained prior to movement onset. This study provides the first clear kinematic evidence that binocular vision (stereopsis and possibly vergence) makes a significant contribution to the accurate programming of prehensile movements in humans.

Adult↗

A clear left hemisphere advantage for visuo-spatially based verbal categorization.

For a range of tachistoscopically presented stimuli that varied from modified complex Shepard and Metzler figures to simple lines, subjects had to judge whether or not the top or bottom of the stimuli contained the target feature. A marked and consistent right visual field (left hemisphere) advantage was observed for all such tasks. In addition, a task that required subjects to judge whether a solid black rectangle was in front of or behind a white rectangle also yielded a clear left hemisphere advantage. The results are explained in terms of a left hemisphere specialization for spatially based verbal categorizations in general support of Kosslyn's (Psychol. Rev. 94, 148-175, 1984) model.

Adult↗

Marked sex differences on a fine motor skill task disappear when finger size is used as covariate.

Purdue Pegboard performance of 16 male and 25 female right-handed college students were compared, and results were replicated with 25 male and 28 female subjects. In agreement with the literature, women performed significantly better than men. When measures of index finger and thumb thickness were used as covariate, all significant sex differences in performance disappeared. Negative correlations between performance and finger size were observed in both sexes. Sex differences in fine manual dexterity tasks may therefore be confounded by sex differences in finger size.

Female↗

Performance of subgroups of left-handers and right-handers.

Fifty-three left-handers with consistent left-hand preferences (CLH), 65 left-handers with inconsistent hand preferences (ILH), and 57 right-handers (RH) were given unimanual and bimanual performance tests involving skill, speed, and strength as well as tests of articulatory speed and verbal fluency. Contrary to claims in the current literature (Ponton, 1987), CLHs and ILHs do not differ in quality and speed of performance, but, in some tests, they do show asymmetries in opposite directions. Thus, when left-handers are treated as a combined group, the faulty impression of a lack of between-hand asymmetries arises. The results suggest that a distinction between CLHs and ILHs yields subgroups with reliably different and distinctive performance patterns which are not trivially attributable to differences in strength of lateralization. CLHs behave much like mirror image RHs, whereas ILHs show a dissociation between strength, fine manual skill, attentional asymmetries.

Adult↗