Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Sandercock

Publications and source records attributed to P Sandercock.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

How do scores on the EuroQol relate to scores on the SF-36 after stroke?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The EuroQol and Medical Outcome Survey 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) questionnaires have both been validated for the assessment of health-related quality of life after stroke. However, the relationship between these instruments has not been studied after stroke. We therefore sought to compare the responses of a group of stroke patients to both instruments. METHODS: A total of 2253 patients with stroke entered by United Kingdom hospitals in the International Stroke Trial were randomized to follow-up with either the EuroQol or SF-36 instruments. We randomly selected one third of patients who had responded to the EuroQol for follow-up, again using the SF-36, and two thirds of patients who had responded to the SF-36 for follow-up, again using the EuroQol. We assessed the patients' mean score for each domain of the SF-36 categorized by their response to the corresponding EuroQol domain and the correlation between the domains of the 2 instruments. RESULTS: The domains for both instruments, which assessed physical functioning, social functioning, bodily pain, and overall health-related quality of life, correlated closely. The mental health domain of the SF-36 correlated only poorly with the psychological functioning domain of the EuroQol. CONCLUSIONS: Both the EuroQol and SF-36 measure broadly similar domains of health. The weak relationship between the assessments of mental health may reflect a difference in content or more fundamental problems with the validity or reliability of the items in one of the instruments with respect to this domain. This study has provided the first empirical qualitative evidence by which the data on the SF-36 after stroke may be interpreted.

Health Surveys↗

What questions can large, simple trials answer?

Large, simple trials can provide reliable evidence on the balance of risk and benefit of widely practicable treatments that have moderate effects on major clinical outcomes. Treatments for stroke will potentially be used extensively world-wide. Each year about 8,000,000 people have an acute stroke, with about 5,000,000 being ischaemic. Of these, perhaps 1,000,000 receive medical attention within the first few hours of stroke onset. If reliable decisions about the treatment of such large numbers of patients are to be made, we need to be certain about the effects of treatment on death from any cause (and on other important outcomes) and in many different types of patient. Generally, such reliable evidence on whether to treat and on whom to treat, will only come from large, randomised trials recruiting many thousands of patients. Such trials are only feasible and affordable if they are simple.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗

Qualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The reliability of the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke is not known. We therefore aimed to assess and compare the test-retest reliability of both instruments in a group of stroke patients. METHODS: A total of 2253 patients with stroke entered by United Kingdom hospitals in the International Stroke Trial were randomized to follow up with either the EuroQol or the SF-36 instruments. For both instruments, we randomly selected one third of respondents and asked them to complete another, identical questionnaire. We assessed test-retest reliability using agreement statistics: unweighted kappa statistics for the categorical domains of the EuroQol and intraclass correlation coefficients for the EuroQol visual analog scale, utility scores, and SF-36. RESULTS: For the five categorical domains of the EuroQol, reproducibility was generally good (kappa ranged from 0.63 to 0.80). The reproducibility of the domains of the SF-36 was qualitatively similar for all the domains except mental health (intraclass correlation coefficient=.28). However, the 95% confidence intervals for the difference in scores between test and retest were substantial. For both instruments, reproducibility was better when the patient completed the questionnaires than when a proxy did. CONCLUSIONS: Both the EuroQol and SF-36 have acceptable and qualitatively similar test-retest reliability. Therefore, either instrument might function effectively as a discriminatory measure for assessing health-related quality-of-life outcomes in groups of patients after stroke. However, our data do not support the use of either instrument for serial assessments in individual patients unless very large differences over time are expected.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Epileptic seizures after a first stroke: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the immediate and long term risk of epileptic seizures after a first ever stroke. DESIGN: Cohort study following up stroke survivors for 2 to 6.5 years; comparison with age specific incidence rates of epileptic seizures in the general population. SETTING: Community based stroke register. SUBJECTS: 675 patients with a first stroke, followed up for a minimum of 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of single and recurrent seizures. RESULTS: 52 patients had one or more post stroke seizures; in 25 the seizures were recurrent. The 5 year actuarial risk of a post stroke seizure in survivors (excluding 19 patients with a history of epilepsy and 3 patients in whom the seizure occurred shortly before death from another cause) was 11.5% (95% confidence interval 4.8% to 18.2%). The relative risk of seizures, in comparison with the general population, was estimated at 35.2 in the first year after stroke and 19.0 in year 2. The risk of seizures was increased in survivors of subarachnoid and intracerebral haemorrhage (hazard ratio for intracranial haemorrhage v cerebral infarction 10.2 (3.7 to 27.9)). The risk of seizures after ischaemic stroke was substantial only in patients presenting with severe strokes due to total anterior circulation infarction. Only 9 of 295 patients (3%) independent one month after stroke suffered a seizure between 1 month and 5 years (actuarial risk 4.2% (0.1% to 8.3%)). CONCLUSION: Stroke patients have about an 11.5% risk of single or recurrent seizures in the first 5 years after a stroke. Patients with more severe strokes or haemorrhagic strokes are at higher risk.

Adolescent↗

Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The EuroQol measures aspects of quality of life that are highly relevant to stroke patients. It is short and simple and many stroke patients can complete the form without help. However, its validity has not been adequately assessed after stroke. We therefore assessed its concurrent and discriminant validity in a group of prospectively studied stroke survivors. METHODS: We assessed the validity of the EuroQol in a series of 152 patients with stroke who were all visited by a study nurse. The nurse gave the patients the EuroQol, the Frenchay Activities Index, a visual analogue pain scale, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in the form of questionnaires to be self-completed where possible. The nurse interviewed the patient directly to assess disability using the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Disability scale and Barthel Index. RESULTS: The nurse assessed 152 patients; of these 92 were able to complete the EuroQol without help, the remaining 60 could only be assessed by interview. The EuroQol had reasonable concurrent validity; median scores on the relevant standard instruments varied significantly (and in the appropriate direction) for groups defined by their response to the relevant EuroQol domain. The EuroQol had reasonable discriminant validity since the responses enabled separation between patients with differing stroke syndromes and stroke severities. Accuracy for predicting outcome after stroke was good for both self-completed and interview-completed questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The EuroQol appears to have acceptable concurrent and discriminant validity for the measurement of health-related quality of life after stroke. It may be administered by either a questionnaire for self-completion in patients with mild to moderate stroke or by interview in patients with significant motor deficits.

Aged↗

Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate, and unbiased?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is often difficult to determine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of stroke patients because physical and cognitive problems limit their ability to complete complex questionnaires. A proxy, such as a family member or caregiver, may be able to give an estimate of the patients' health status. We therefore examined the agreement between the HRQoL as assessed by a series of patients and that assessed by their proxies. METHODS: We studied the validity of the EuroQol in a series of 152 patients from our prospective registry of patients with first (or recurrent) stroke. We asked patients to ensure that a friend or relative (a proxy) who knew them well was available at the time of the interview. We asked each proxy to complete a EuroQol questionnaire independently on behalf of the patient. RESULTS: Proxies completed forms for 130 patients (86%). Agreement between responses from the patients and those from their proxies was better for patients who were able to self-complete the EuroQol than for patients who required the EuroQol to be administered by interview. For both groups, agreement was best for the self-care domain and worst for the domain that assessed psychological outcome. For the more severely affected patients, agreement was only fair for the pain and social functioning domains and no better than chance alone for the psychological functioning domain (kappa = 0.05, 95% confidence interval, 0 to 0.43). Patients tended to rate their own health status as better than their proxies did (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate agreement between responses from patients and those from their proxies for the more directly observable domains of the EuroQol. Proxy agreement was less good for the more subjective domains. In health surveys, allowing responses by a proxy increases response rate. However, the disadvantages inherent in the use of proxy responses must be considered carefully. In general, some domains of HRQoL information obtained from a proxy may be sufficiently valid and unbiased to be useable in most types of trials and surveys.

Caregivers↗

Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin in acute ischaemic stroke.

Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, started within 48 hr of an acute ischaemic stroke, is safe and effective, avoiding about 10 deaths and early recurrent strokes per 1,000 patients treated. The reduction in early recurrent ischaemic stroke is not offset by any significant increase in intracranial haemorrhage. Immediate antiplatelet therapy in acute ischaemic stroke also seems to be associated with better long-term functional outcome, reducing the proportion of patients dead or dependent 6 months after the stroke. Aspirin is the only antiplatelet agent which has been evaluated adequately in acute ischaemic stroke. In this setting a dose is required which is large enough to achieve rapid inhibition of thromboxane biosynthesis and around 160-300 mg is required. If the patient can swallow safely, aspirin can be administered by mouth, if not, then per rectum as a suppository.

Aspirin↗

The Cochrane Collaboration Stroke Review Group. Meeting the need for systematic reviews in stroke care.

BACKGROUND: There is a pressing need to identify which interventions are definitely effective in the prevention of stroke and in the treatment and rehabilitation of stroke patients, which interventions are definitely ineffective, and which interventions require further research. This information is most reliably obtained from reviewing all the available evidence from randomized controlled trials in a systematic way. SUMMARY OF COMMENT: There have been many (at least 8000) randomized controlled trials relevant to stroke. It would be difficult for any one individual to keep track of all these trials, and therefore most clinicians, therapists, and researchers are dependent, to some degree, on reviews of this literature. However, most current reviews are unsystematic and tend to be either incomplete or biased, so that their recommendations can be seriously flawed. Until now there has been no attempt to systematically identify all randomized controlled trials relevant to stroke (including subarachnoid hemorrhage), to review the data they contain, and to keep these reviews up-to-date in the light of new evidence. The Stroke Review Group has now been established within the Cochrane Collaboration to try to perform these tasks. There are presently 40 collaborators from 13 countries working on approximately 25 reviews. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying and reviewing all randomized controlled trials relevant to stroke should bring important benefits to patients and all those involved in purchasing or providing care for patients with stroke. The Cochrane Collaboration Stroke Review Group has started this process and would welcome help from anyone interested in collaborating in this enormous task.

Bias↗