Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Rougier

Publications and source records attributed to P Rougier.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

[How mirror feedback improves undisturbed upright stance control].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in normal and healthy adults, the postural effects induced by a protocol of body sway mirror feedback. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two experimental conditions, one consisting in staring eyes open (EO) and one consisting in mirror feedback (MFB), are randomly proposed. Displacements of the centre of pressure (CP), issued from a force platform, are advantageously decomposed along medio-lateral ML and antero-posterior AP directions into two elementary components: the horizontal motions of the centre of gravity (CG(h)) and the difference CP-CG(v). The former is recognised as the main controlled variable in upright stance whilst several clues can be assessed by the latter: the overall muscular activity, the ankle stiffness and the horizontal accelerations communicated to the CG. Elementary motions CG(h) and CP-CG(v) are then processed in the frequential domain and characterized through RMS and MPF parameters. RESULTS: For CP-CG(v) motions the MFB protocol induces larger MPF along the AP direction and thus an increased ankle stiffness. In addition, the RMS are slightly decreased, indicating that less motor units are called into play. On the other hand, no real effect is observed in the ML direction. A general trend is that the CG(h) amplitudes are diminished by the MFB protocol, especially in the ML direction where a statistical effect is noticed. CONCLUSION: The specificity of the effects induced by the MFB technique makes it an appropriate tool for re-establishing, especially on the AP direction, the balance functions, in particular those involving exaggerated CP-CG(v) motions.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer (current expert opinion derived from the Third International Conference: Perspectives in Colorectal Cancer, Dublin, 2001).

This article summarises the progress that has been made in the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer over the last decade. In view of the consequent improvements in recurrence rates and in overall survival, the development of effective adjuvant treatments for colorectal cancer is considered as one of the most important to be made in clinical oncology over the last decade. Treatment recommendations based on evidence-based data and on expert opinions are summarised in this manuscript. However, a consensus cannot be reached on all aspects of treatment because of data that is currently emerging that will influence clinical practice and because of the many ongoing clinical trials. Those involved in the treatment of colorectal cancer should therefore be encouraged to continue to provide optimal patient care and to participate in well designed clinical trials in order to increase the evidence upon which they can base their clinical judgements and in order to make further progress.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Clinical determinants of survival in patients with 5-fluorouracil-based treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a multivariate analysis of 3825 patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are usually offered systemic chemotherapy as palliative treatment. A multivariate analysis was performed in order to identify predictors and their constellation that allow a valid prediction of the outcome in patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 3825 patients treated with 5-FU within 19 prospective randomised and three phase II trials were separated into learning (n = 2549) and validation (n = 1276) samples. Data were analysed by tree analysis using the recursive partition and amalgamation method (RECPAM). A predictor could only enter the RECPAM analysis if the number of patients with missing values was < 33.3% within a node, and the minimal node size was set to 50 patients. Twenty-three potential predictors were grouped into subsets of laboratory variables (11 parameters), tumour-related variables (seven parameters) and clinical variables (five parameters). In the first step, tree analysis was performed separately for each predictor subset. The selected prognostic parameters of the resulting partial models (the 'winners') were entered into the general model. The classification rule from the data of the learning set was applied to the independent validation set. RESULTS: Winners of the subgroup analysis for laboratory variables were: platelets > or = 400 x 10(9)/l, alkaline phosphatase > or = 300 U/l, white blood cell (WBC) count > or = 10 x 10(9)/l and haemoglobin < 11 x 10(9)/l, and all predicted a worse outcome. Negative predictors within the subgroup of tumour parameters were: number of tumour sites more than one or more than two, presence of liver metastases or peritoneal carcinomatosis, which predicted a worse outcome. Furthermore, presence of lung metastases, a primary rectal cancer and presence of lymph node metastases all predicted a better outcome in the multivariate setting. Among the clinical parameters only performance status of ECOG 0 or 1 predicted better outcome. In the final regression tree, three risk groups could be identified: low risk group (n = 1111) with a median survival of 15 months for patients with ECOG 0/1 and only one tumour site; intermediate risk group (n = 904) with a median survival of 10.7 months for patients with ECOG 0/1 and more than one tumour site and alkaline phosphatase < 300 U/l or patients with ECOG > 1, WBC count < 10 x 10(9)/l and only one tumour site; high risk group (n = 534) with a median survival of 6.1 months for patients with ECOG 0/1 and more than one tumour site and alkaline phosphatase of > or = 300 U/l or patients with ECOG > 1 and more than one tumour site or WBC count > 10 x 10(9)/l. The median survival times for the good, intermediate and high risk groups in the validation sample were 14.7, 10.5 and 6.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients can be divided into at least three risk groups depending on the four baseline clinical parameters: performance status, WBC count, alkaline phosphatase and number of metastatic sites. Any molecular or biological marker should be validated against these clinical parameters and decisions for more or less intensive treatments may be studied separately in these three risk groups. Also, clinical trials should be stratified according to the three risk groups.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗
PubMed2002

First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety profile of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterized population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in two phase II studies. In these trials, capecitabine achieved significantly superior response rates, equivalent time to disease progression and equivalent survival compared with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 1207) were randomized to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily, on days 1-14 every 21 days) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-FU/leucovorin (Mayo Clinic regimen). RESULTS: Capecitabine demonstrated a safety profile superior to that of 5-FU/leucovorin, with a significantly lower incidence of diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea, alopecia and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia leading to significantly fewer neutropenic fever/sepsis cases and fewer hospitalizations. All patients in the capecitabine group received a starting dose of 1250 mg/m2 twice daily and the majority (66%) did not require dose modification for adverse events. In the 5-FU/leucovorin group, 58% of patients did not require dose reduction for toxicities. The capecitabine dose-modification scheme reduced the recurrence of key toxicities without compromising efficacy. In both treatment arms, patients with moderate renal impairment at baseline (estimated creatinine clearance 30-50 ml/min) experienced a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities. This increase was more pronounced with 5-FU/leucovorin. CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine is at least as effective, better tolerated and more convenient than i.v. 5-FU/leucovorin as treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Analysis of data from two large phase III trials demonstrates that efficacy is not compromised in patients requiring a dose reduction for adverse events. The phase III data and an additional pharmacokinetic study support a lower starting dose in patients with moderate renal impairment at baseline (calculated creatinine clearance 30-50 ml/min) and a contra-indication in patients with severely impaired creatinine clearance at baseline (<30 ml/min). For patients with normal or mildly impaired renal function at baseline, the standard starting dose is well tolerated. The incidence and severity of adverse events in patients with moderate renal impairment at baseline who were treated with 5-FU/leucovorin was more pronounced, indicating that capecitabine provides a better-tolerated alternative.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

A randomised trial comparing 5-FU with 5-FU plus cisplatin in advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is moderately efficient as a treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but patient survival and quality of life has improved with this modality in some trials. In a previous phase II trial, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin (FUP) yielded a 26.5% response rate and a 29% survival rate at 1 year. The present study aimed to compare FUP with 5-FU alone, which was the control arm in former Mayo Clinic trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated cytologically or histologically proven metastatic or locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were deemed measurable or evaluable. Chemotherapy regimens consisted of a control FU arm (5-FU 500 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days) and the investigational FUP arm (continuous 5-FU 1000 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 or day 2). In both arms, chemotherapy was repeated at day 29. RESULTS: Two-hundred and seven patients from 18 centres were randomised: 103 in the FU arm and 104 in FUP arm. Treatment arms were balanced with respect to performance status grade 0-1 (83% versus 86%, respectively) and the presence of metastases (92% versus 89%, respectively). The median number of cycles administered was two in both arms (range 0-14). Five patients did not receive any chemotherapy and 45 received only one cycle. Toxicity (WHO grade 3-4) was lower with FU than with FUP (20% versus 48%, P <0.001), as was neutropenia (6% versus 23%), vomiting (4% versus 17%) and toxicity-related deaths (one versus four early in the trial). The response rate was low in both arms, but superior in the FUP arm: 12% versus 0% (intention-to-treat analysis, P <0.01). The survival rates at 6 months were 28% and 38% for the FU and FUP arms, respectively, and 1-year survival rates were 9% and 17% (log-rank test, P = 0.10). One-year progression-free survival was 0% with FU versus 10% with FUP (log-rank test, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In advanced pancreatic carcinomas with a poor prognosis, FUP was superior to FU in terms of response and progression-free survival, but not in terms of overall survival. The low response rate is partly related to the number of patients who received only one cycle of chemotherapy. A more effective, better tolerated version of this FUP combination is needed.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Optimization of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin combination chemotherapy with a new schedule of leucovorin, 5-FU and cisplatin (LV5FU2-P regimen) in patients with biliary tract carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Unresectable biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) is associated with a very poor prognosis. To improve efficacy and tolerance of the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin combination in BTC, we designed a new therapeutic schedule, the LV5FU2-P regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with advanced or metastatic BTC were prospectively enrolled in the study. The treatment (LV5FU2-P regimen) consisted of a biweekly administration of a 2-h infusion of leucovorin 200 mg/m(2), a 400 mg/m(2) bolus of 5-FU followed by a 22-h continuous infusion of 600 mg/m(2) 5-FU on two consecutive days and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 2. Clinical symptoms, performance and weight changes were monitored. RESULTS: Objective responses were observed in 10 patients (34%) (95% confidence interval 23% to 45%) including one complete response and nine partial responses (stabilization 38%, progression 28%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.5 and 9.5 months, respectively. Weight gain was observed in 45% of patients and performance status improved in 60%. One patient had a grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 toxicity occurred in 41% of patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This study, one of the largest phase II trials performed for this disease, shows that the LV5FU2-P regimen is an active and well-tolerated chemotherapy for advanced and metastatic BTC.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Antitumour activity of three second-line treatment combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after optimal 5-FU regimen failure: a randomised, multicentre phase II study.

BACKGROUND: We have investigated the efficacy, safety and quality of life profiles of three therapeutic combinations [irinotecan + leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin + LV/5-FU and irinotecan +oxaliplatin] in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of a 5-FU-based regimen, or whose disease had progressed within 6 months of the end of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients were randomised to receive either: (i) irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by an LV 200 mg/m(2) infusion, before a 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by a 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) infusion (LV5FU2 regimen), on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; (ii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by the LV5FU2 regimen on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; or (iii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 200 mg/m(2), both on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat ORRs were 11.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-26.7), 21.2% (95% CI 9.0-38.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 5.1-31.9), respectively, in the three arms. Tumour growth control was >or=60% for all three combinations and overall survivals were 12.2 months (95% CI 9.2-16.0), 11.5 months (95% CI 9.0-14.1) and 11.0 months (95% CI 8.1-12.2), respectively. All patients were evaluable for safety. Main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (33 to 39% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, second-line treatment with irinotecan/LV5FU2, oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 or irinotecan/oxaliplatin, provides good tumour growth control and survival coupled with an acceptable safety profile.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of orally administered capecitabine (Xeloda; Roche Laboratories, Inc, Nutley, NJ), a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate designed to mimic continuous fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion but with preferential activation at the tumor site, with that of intravenous (IV) 5-FU plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively randomized 602 patients to treatment with capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) administered twice daily days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks, or to the 4-weekly Mayo Clinic regimen (5-FU/LV) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: The primary objective, to demonstrate at least equivalent response rates in the two treatment groups, was met. The overall response rate was 18.9% for capecitabine and 15.0% for 5-FU/LV. In the capecitabine and 5-FU/LV groups, respectively, median time to disease progression was 5.2 and 4.7 months (log-rank P =.65); median time to treatment failure was 4.2 and 4.0 months (log-rank P =.89); and median overall survival was 13.2 and 12.1 months (log-rank P =.33). The toxicity profiles of both treatments were typical of fluoropyrimidines. However, capecitabine led to significantly lower incidences (P <.00001) of stomatitis and alopecia, but a higher incidence of cutaneous hand-foot syndrome (P <.00001). Capecitabine also resulted in lower incidences (P <.00001) of grade 3/4 stomatitis and neutropenia, leading to a lower incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenic fever and sepsis. Only grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (P <.00001) and uncomplicated grade 3/4 hyperbilirubinemia (P <.0001) were reported more frequently with capecitabine. CONCLUSION: Oral capecitabine achieved an at least equivalent efficacy compared with IV 5-FU/LV. Capecitabine demonstrated clinically meaningful safety advantages and the convenience of an oral agent.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

No evidence of somatic FGFR3 mutation in various types of carcinoma.

Germline specific point mutations in the gene encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) are associated with autosomal dominant human skeletal dysplasia and craniosynostosis syndromes. Mutations identical to the germinal activating mutations found in severe skeletal dysplasias have been identified in certain types of cancer: at low frequency in multiple myeloma and cervix carcinoma and at high frequency in bladder carcinoma. We analysed, by SSCP and sequencing, the prevalence of FGFR3 mutations in 116 primary tumours of various types (upper aerodigestive tract, oesophagus, stomach, lung and skin). The regions analysed encompassed all FGFR3 point mutations previously described in severe skeletal dysplasia and cancers. No mutations were detected in the tumour types examined, suggesting that FGFR3 mutations are restricted to a few tumour types, the evidence to date suggesting that they are very specific to bladder carcinomas.

Bone Diseases, Developmental↗
PubMed2001

Curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colorectal cancer by complete resection and intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is fatal, despite standard systemic chemotherapy. A new approach that combines maximal surgery with maximal regional chemotherapy has potential to cure selected patients who have colorectal PC. The authors have reported the oncologic results of this combined treatment. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective study of 64 patients who had PC arising from colorectal adenocarcinomas, 19 (29.6%) of whom also had other metastases. These patients were treated by complete resection of all detectable tumors and by a 5-day course of early intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) with mitomycin C, then by 5-fluorouracil (n = 37), or by intraoperative intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH) with mitomycin C, alone or combined with cisplatin (n = 27), in 2 separate trials. In the trial of IPCH, aimed at selecting the most reliable procedure in terms of spatial diffusion and thermal homogeneity, the 27 patients were treated with 7 different procedures. The extent of PC was assessed precisely by using a peritoneal index. The median follow-up period for the entire patient population was 51.7 months. RESULTS: The postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 9.3% and 54.6%, respectively. Most severe complications occurred in patients who required extensive cytoreductive surgery. Global and disease-free survival rates were respectively 60.1% and 54.7% at 2 years and were 27.4% and 18.4% at 5 years. Results were significantly better (P = 0.04) when patients were metastasis-free (apart from PC) and when the peritoneal index was lower than 16 (P = 0.005). IPCH seemed to be more effective than EPIC for treatment of PC. CONCLUSION: This treatment plan, which combined maximal surgery with maximal regional chemotherapy, cured approximately 25% of patients. This strategy was mainly applicable to patients with limited intraperitoneal cancer volume and no extraperitoneal involvement. IPCH proved to be more effective than EPIC but more difficult to use correctly. Future results should improve through routine use of the optimal hyperthermia procedure, with improvements in the composition of instillate, better patient selection, and the reduction in the rate of complications that occurs with physician experience.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Backward and forward leaning postures modelled by an fBm framework.

Body leaning effects on postural control have been assessed by recording the centre of pressure (CP) displacements in healthy subjects under three experimental conditions (REF, BWD and FWD corresponding to upright, backward leaning and forward leaning of the body, respectively). The CP displacements were used to compute the motions of the vertical projections of the centre of gravity (CG(v)) and those of the difference CP-CG(v). A frequential analysis shows that the main effect takes place on CP-CG(v) motions, suggesting increased muscular activity in these leaning postures. In addition, changes also occur on CG(v) motions, especially in the antero-posterior (AP) direction. Modelling these motions as fractional Brownian motion (fBm) indicates that leaning the body induces, in the AP direction, a shift in the time interval Deltat at which the corrective process takes over the initial one operating in open-loop. In FWD and BWD conditions, the Deltat is diminished whilst the mean distance covered at this Deltat is increased for both CG(v) and CP-CG(v) motions. Moreover, more determinism in the overall upright stance control is observed in the corrective (closed-loop) process involving CG(v) motions. These facts emphasize the inability for the CP displacements to express properly the overall body sway in upright stance control.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[A forward leaning posture affects more the amplitudes of the centre of pressure displacements than those of the centre of gravity].

OBJECTIVE: An ordinary and practical method to assess the postural control mechanisms is to measure, through a force platform, the point of application of the resultant reaction forces. The recorded signal, the centre of pressure CP, is used to compute the motions of the vertical projection of the centre of gravity (CG(v)) and those of the difference CP-CG(v). The former is considered in this postural task as the controlled variable whereas the latter is thought to express the ankle resultant stiffness. Interestingly, the CG(v) motions can be extracted from the CP trajectory through a simple mathematical model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The relationship between CP and the elementary motions CP-CG(v) and CG(v) has been tested in the present study by comparing the postural effects induced by a leaning forward position to a normal one consisting to stand still. RESULTS: A large increase is noticed for the amplitudes of the CP-CG(v) motions for both medio-lateral ML and antero-posterior AP directions. On the other hand, a similar effect appears for the CG(v) motions but only on the ML direction. Nevertheless, the frequency analysis indicates that the constancy of the CG(v) motions on the AP direction is accompanied by a change in the frequency distribution, as assessed by the MPF parameters. DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION: These features highlight the necessity, to interpret rigorously the postural performance, to take into account in separate ways each of the elementary CP-CG(v) and CG(v) motions which, combined, constitute the CP displacements.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Antitumour activity of somatostatin analogues in progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.

A few studies have suggested an antitumour activity of somatostatin analogues in neuroendocrine tumours (NET). The aim of this study was to evaluate the antitumour efficacy of somatostatin analogues in patients with documented progressive tumours. 35 consecutive patients with documented tumour progression were treated with somatostatin analogues. Patients were classified into two groups. In Group 1, tumours were progressing rapidly (an increase of 50% or more in the lesion surface area in 3 months) and in Group 2, tumours were progressing more slowly (an increase of less than 50% in the lesion surface area in 3 months but greater than 25% in 6 months). Treatment consisted of subcutaneous (s.c.) octreotide, 100 microg thrice daily for 17 patients, intramuscular lanreotide, 30 mg/every 14 days for 11 patients and for 7 patients both somatostatin analogues were used successively during the follow-up. Primary tumour sites were the small intestine (n=12), pancreas (n=13), lungs (n=5), and other sites (n=5). 18 patients had the carcinoid syndrome with flushing and/or diarrhoea. The median duration of treatment was 7 months. Treatment was discontinued in 3 patients due to side-effects. One patient (3%) achieved a partial response and the disease was stabilised in 20 patients (57%) for a median duration of 11 months (6-48 months). Stabilisation of patients in Group 1 was significantly less frequent at 6 months than that of patients in Group 2 (4/12 and 13/17 respectively, P<0.02). Somatostatin analogue treatment resulted in one partial response (3%) and 20 cases of stabilisation (57%) in 35 patients with progressive NET. A slow tumour growth rate before treatment is predictive of a good response to somatostatin analogues which could be considered an option for first-line treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The treatment of undifferentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

The aggressiveness of poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors is similar to small-cell lung cancer within a median survival of 6 months without treatment. Most patients have metastatic disease and poor condition at the time of diagnosis, and cannot be approached surgically with curative intent. Moertel et al. [Treatment of neuroendocrine carcinomas with combined etoposide and cisplatin, Cancer 1991;68:227--232] reported an objective response rate of 67% with a chemotherapy regimen combining etoposide plus cisplatin, with a median survival of 19 months and a median time to progression of 11 months. Since this publication, this regimen has been considered as the reference treatment for poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. A French retrospective study has recently confirmed the high chemosensitivity of those tumors. However, the prognosis remains poor with a 2-year survival lower than 20% and other therapeutic approaches should be developed.

Adult↗