Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P R Saxena

Publications and source records attributed to P R Saxena.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Experimental migraine models and their relevance in migraine therapy.

Although the understanding of migraine pathophysiology is incomplete, it is now well accepted that this neurovascular syndrome is mainly due to a cranial vasodilation with activation of the trigeminal system. Several experimental migraine models, based on vascular and neuronal involvement, have been developed. Obviously, the migraine models do not entail all facets of this clinically heterogeneous disorder, but their contribution at several levels (molecular, in vitro, in vivo) has been crucial in the development of novel antimigraine drugs and in the understanding of migraine pathophysiology. One important vascular in vivo model, based on an assumption that migraine headache involves cranial vasodilation, determines porcine arteriovenous anastomotic blood flow. Other models utilize electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion/nerve to study neurogenic dural inflammation, while the superior sagittal sinus stimulation model takes into account the transmission of trigeminal nociceptive input in the brainstem. More recently, the introduction of integrated models, namely electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion or systemic administration of capsaicin, allows studying the activation of the trigeminal system and its effect on the cranial vasculature. Studies using in vitro models have contributed enormously during the preclinical stage to characterizing the receptors in cranial blood vessels and to studying the effects of several putative antimigraine agents. The aforementioned migraine models have advantages as well as some limitations. The present review is devoted to discussing various migraine models and their relevance to antimigraine therapy.

Analgesics↗

Intravital microscopy on a closed cranial window in mice: a model to study trigeminovascular mechanisms involved in migraine.

The purpose of the study was to develop a mouse model to study trigeminovascular mechanisms using intravital microscopy on a closed cranial window. In addition, we studied exogenous and endogenous calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-mediated vasodilation in dural arteries. Arteries in C57BL/6Jico mice were constricted with endothelin-1, which reduced the baseline diameter by 65-75%. Subsequently, vasodilation was induced by alpha-CGRP, capsaicin or transcranial electrical stimulation of perivascular trigeminal nerves in the absence or presence of different concentrations of BIBN4096BS or sumatriptan. Both alpha-CGRP and capsaicin induced vasodilation in preconstricted arteries. Transcranial electrical stimulation also induced current-dependent relaxation of dural arteries with 100 microA producing maximal dilation in the control group. BIBN4096BS blocked the responses evoked by alpha-CGRP and capsaicin, as well as electrical stimulation, whereas sumatriptan attenuated only vasodilation induced by electrical stimulation. This model is likely to prove useful in dissecting elements of the trigeminovascular system and for exploring pathophysiological aspects of migraine, especially in future studies using transgenic mice with mutations relevant to those observed in patients with migraine.

Animals↗

Lack of effect of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist, GR79236, on capsaicin-induced CGRP release in anaesthetized pigs.

Migraine is a common neurological disorder that is associated with an increase in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) levels. CGRP, a potent vasodilator released from the activated trigeminal sensory nerves, dilates intracranial blood vessels and transmits vascular nociception. Hence, inhibition of trigeminal CGRP release may prevent neurotransmission and, thereby, ameliorate migraine headache. Therefore, the present study in anaesthetized pigs investigates the effects of a selective adenosine A(1) receptor agonist, GR79236 (3, 10 and 30 microg/kg, i.v.) on capsaicin-induced carotid haemodynamic changes and on plasma CGRP release. Intracarotid (i.c.) infusion of capsaicin (10 microg/kg/min, i.c.) increased the total carotid blood flow and conductance as well as carotid pulsations, but decreased the difference between arterial and jugular venous oxygen saturations. These responses to capsaicin were dose-dependently attenuated by GR79236. However, the increases in the plasma CGRP concentrations by capsaicin remained essentially unmodified after GR79236 treatment. The above results suggest that GR79236 may have an antimigraine potential due to its postjunctional effects (carotid vasoconstriction) rather than to prejunctional inhibition of trigeminal CGRP release.

Adenosine↗

Assessment of anti-migraine potential of a novel alpha-adrenoceptor agonist S19014: effects on porcine carotid and regional haemodynamics and human coronary artery.

Taking into account the drawbacks associated with the use of triptans, attempts are being made to explore other avenues for the treatment of migraine. Recently, it has been shown that both alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptors mediate the constriction of porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses, which has effectively served as an experimental model predictive of anti-migraine activity. The present study investigated the effects of a novel alpha-adrenoceptor agonist S19014 (spiro[(1,3-diazacyclopent-1-ene)-5 : 2'-(4',5'-dimethylindane)] fumarate) on carotid and systemic haemodynamics in anaesthetized pigs, and on human isolated coronary arteries. Increasing doses of S19014 (1-30 micro g/kg, i.v.) produced a dose-dependent initial short-lasting vasopressor response and a decrease of total carotid blood flow and conductance. The carotid blood flow and conductance changes were exclusively due to constriction of carotid arteriovenous anastomoses (capillary blood flow increased) and were accompanied by an increase in arterio-jugular venous oxygen saturation difference. Whereas prazosin (100 micro g/kg, i.v.) was ineffective, rauwolscine (300 micro g/kg, i.v.) attenuated the responses to S19014. The compound did not much affect the distribution of cardiac output to peripheral organs when compared with the vehicle group. Furthermore, S19014 only slightly contracted the human isolated coronary artery and its contractions, contrary to those of sumatriptan, were not increased in blood vessels pre-contracted with U46619. These results suggest that (i) the systemic and carotid vascular effects of S19014 are mainly mediated by alpha2-adrenoceptors, and (ii) S19014 could be effective in the treatment of migraine with an improved cardiovascular tolerance.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

Effects of sumatriptan on capsaicin-induced carotid haemodynamic changes and CGRP release in anaesthetized pigs.

It is suggested that during a migraine attack capsaicin-sensitive trigeminal sensory nerves release calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP), resulting in cranial vasodilatation and central nociception. Hence, inhibition of trigeminal CGRP release may prevent the above vasodilatation and, accordingly, abort migraine headache. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of sumatriptan (100 and 300 microg/kg, i.v.) on capsaicin-induced carotid haemodynamic changes and on CGRP release. Intracarotid (i.c.) infusions of capsaicin (10 microg/kg/min, i.c.) increased total carotid, arteriovenous anastomotic and capillary conductances as well as carotid pulsations, but decreased the difference between arterial and jugular venous oxygen saturations. Except for some attenuation of arteriovenous anastomotic changes, the capsaicin-induced responses were not affected by sumatriptan. Moreover, i.c. infusions of capsaicin (0.3, 1, 3 and 10 microg/kg/min, i.c.) dose-dependently increased the jugular venous plasma concentrations of CGRP, which also remained unaffected by sumatriptan. The above results support the contention that the therapeutic action of sumatriptan is mainly due to cranial vasoconstriction rather than trigeminal (CGRP release) inhibition.

Animals↗

Possible role of alpha-adrenoceptor subtypes in acute migraine therapy.

Even though the underlying mechanisms for the pathophysiology of migraine attacks are not completely understood, little doubt exists that the headache phase is explained by dilatation of cranial, extracerebral blood vessels. In this context, experimental models predictive for anti-migraine activity have shown that both triptans and ergot alkaloids, which abort migraine headache, produce vasoconstriction within the carotid circulation of different species. In contrast to the well-established role of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) 5-HT1B receptors in the common carotid vascular bed, the role of alpha-adrenoceptors and their subtypes has been examined only relatively recently. Using experimental animal models and alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists (phenylephrine and BHT933, respectively) and antagonists (prazosin and rauwolscine, respectively), it was shown that activation of either receptor produces a cranioselective vasoconstriction. Subsequently, investigations employing relatively selective antagonists at alpha1- (alpha1A, alpha1B, alpha1D) and alpha2- (alpha2A, alpha2B, alpha2C) adrenoceptor subtypes revealed that specific receptors mediate the carotid haemodynamic responses in these animals. From these observations, together with the potential limited role of alpha1B- and alpha2C-adrenoceptors in the regulation of systemic haemodynamic responses, it is suggested that selective agonists at these receptors may provide a promising novel avenue for the development of acute anti-migraine drugs.

Adrenergic Agonists↗

Characterization of sumatriptan-induced contractions in human isolated blood vessels using selective 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptor antagonists and in situ hybridization.

The 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist sumatriptan is effective in aborting acute attacks of migraine and is known to cause constriction of cranial arteries as well as some peripheral blood vessels. The present study set out to investigate whether 5-HT(1B) and/or 5-HT(1D) receptors mediate contractions of the human isolated middle meningeal and temporal arteries (models for anti-migraine efficacy) and coronary artery and saphenous vein (models for side-effect potential). Concentration-response curves were made with sumatriptan (1 nm-100 microm) in blood vessels in the absence or presence of selective antagonists at 5-HT(1B) (SB224289) and 5-HT(1D) (BRL15572) receptors. SB224289 antagonized sumatriptan-induced contractions in all blood vessels, although the antagonism profile was different amongst these blood vessels. In the temporal artery, SB224289 abolished contraction to sumatriptan, whereas in the middle meningeal artery and saphenous vein sumatriptan-induced contractions were blocked in an insurmountable fashion. Moreover, SB224289 acted as a weak surmountable antagonist in the coronary artery (pK(B): 6.4 +/- 0.2). In contrast, BRL15572 had little or no effect on sumatriptan-induced contractions in the four blood vessels investigated. In situ hybridization revealed the expression of 5-HT(1B) receptor mRNA in the smooth muscle as well as endothelial cells of the blood vessels, whereas the mRNA for the 5-HT(1D) receptor was only very weakly expressed. These results show that the 5-HT(1B) receptor is primarily involved in sumatriptan-induced contractions of human cranial as well as peripheral blood vessels.

Adult↗

Effects of donitriptan on carotid haemodynamics and cardiac output distribution in anaesthetized pigs.

We investigated the effects of donitriptan, which possesses a uniquely high affinity and efficacy at 5-HT1B/1D receptors, on carotid and systemic haemodynamics in anaes thetized pigs. Donitriptan (0.16-100 microg kg(-1), i.v.) dose-dependently decreased total carotid blood flow and vascular conductance (maximum response: -25 +/- 3%). This effect was entirely due to a selective reduction in the cephalic arteriovenous anastomotic fraction (maximum response: - 63 +/- 3%; ED50%: 92 +/- 31 nmol/kg); the nutrient vascular conductance increased. Donitriptan did not decrease vascular conductances in or blood flow to a number of organs, including the heart and kidneys; in fact, vascular conductances in the skin, brain and skeletal muscles increased. Cardiac output was slightly decreased by donitriptan, but this effect was confined to peripheral arteriovenous anastomoses. The haemodynamic effects of donitriptan were substantially reduced by the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR127935. These results show that donitriptan selectively constricts arteriovenous anastomoses via 5-HT1B receptor activation. The drug should be able to abort migraine headaches and it is unlikely to compromize blood flow to vital organs.

Animals↗

An introduction to migraine: from ancient treatment to functional pharmacology and antimigraine therapy.

Migraine treatment has evolved from the realms of the supernatural into the scientific arena, but it seems still controversial whether migraine is primarily a vascular or a neurological dysfunction. Irrespective of this controversy, the levels of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT), a vasoconstrictor and a central neurotransmitter, seem to decrease during migraine (with associated carotid vasodilatation) whereas an i.v. infusion of 5-HT can abort migraine. In fact, 5-HT as well as ergotamine, dihydroergotamine and other antimigraine agents invariably produce vasoconstriction in the external carotid circulation. The last decade has witnessed the advent of sumatriptan and second generation triptans (e.g. zolmitriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan), which belong to a new class of drugs, now known as 5-HT1B/1D/1F receptor agonists. Compared to sumatriptan, the second-generation triptans have a higher oral bioavailability and longer plasma half-life. In line with the vascular and neurogenic theories of migraine, all triptans produce selective carotid vasoconstriction (via 5-HT1B receptors) and presynaptic inhibition of the trigeminovascular inflammatory responses implicated in migraine (via 5-HT1D/5-ht1F receptors). Moreover, selective agonists at 5-HT1D (PNU-142633) and 5-ht1F (LY344864) receptors inhibit the trigeminovascular system without producing vasoconstriction. Nevertheless, PNU-142633 proved to be ineffective in the acute treatment of migraine, whilst LY344864 did show some efficacy when used in doses which interact with 5-HT1B receptors. Finally, although the triptans are effective antimigraine agents producing selective cranial vasoconstriction, efforts are being made to develop other effective antimigraine alternatives acting via the direct blockade of vasodilator mechanisms (e.g. antagonists at CGRP receptors, antagonists at 5-HT7 receptors, inhibitors of nitric oxide biosynthesis, etc). These alternatives will hopefully lead to fewer side-effects.

Animals↗

Prostanoids, but not nitric oxide, counterregulate angiotensin II mediated vasoconstriction in vivo.

To evaluate the modulating effects of nitric oxide and prostanoids during angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction, male Wistar rats (n=25) were infused with increasing doses of angiotensin II following pretreatment with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin, the nitric oxide-synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) plus sodium nitroprusside to restore mean arterial blood pressure, or saline. Hemodynamics were studied with the radioactive microsphere method. Indomethacin did not alter systemic or regional hemodynamics. L-NAME+sodium nitroprusside reduced cardiac output, as well as systemic and renal vascular conductance. Angiotensin II increased mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate, and decreased systemic vascular conductance as well as vascular conductance in gastrointestinal tract, kidney, skeletal muscle, skin, mesentery+pancreas, spleen and adrenal. Indomethacin enhanced the angiotensin II-mediated effects in all vascular beds, whereas L-NAME+sodium nitroprusside enhanced its effect in mesentery+pancreas only. In conclusion, vasodilator prostanoids, but not nitric oxide, counterregulate angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction in vivo.

Adrenal Glands↗

Vascular and renal effects of vasopressin and its antagonists in conscious rats with chronic myocardial infarction; evidence for receptor shift.

Acute myocardial infarction evokes activation of, among others, the arginine-vasopressin system, resulting in vasoconstriction and fluid retention. In the present study, the vasoconstrictor and antidiuretic effects of vasopressin were examined in vivo in conscious rats with chronic myocardial infarction, in the absence or presence of the V(1a) receptor antagonist SR-49059 or the V(2) receptor antagonist OPC-31260. In sham rats, vasopressin dose-dependently increased mean arterial pressure (maximum response: 45+/-3 mm Hg), which was significantly suppressed in infarcted rats (maximum response: 32+/-3 mm Hg). SR-49059, but not OPC-31260, caused a significant rightward shift of the dose pressure response curve in sham rats, indicating V(1a) receptor mediation. This rightward shift by SR-49059 was significantly more in infarcted rats. The suppressed response to the agonist and enhanced sensitivity to the antagonist suggest a reduction of V(1a) receptor number in infarcted rats. In both sham and infarcted rats, the urine production after OPC-31260 (337+/-14 and 329+/-30 microl/min, respectively) was about twice of that in vehicle-treated rats (188+/-25 and 155+/-24 microl/min, respectively). However, the response in infarcted rats reached its peak quicker and lasted for a shorter period, resulting in a 40% lower area under the curve. Although only measurable during V(2) receptor blockade, the reduction of urine production by vasopressin was significantly more in infarcted compared to sham rats. The enhanced renal response to the agonist and reduced response to the antagonist suggest an increase in V(2) receptor number in infarcted rats. In conclusion, in chronically infarcted rats, vasopressin causes vasoconstriction and fluid retention through the V(1a) and V(2) receptors, respectively. Altered responses after infarction indicate a shift from V(1a) to V(2) receptors.

Animals↗

Pharmacological identification of the major subtypes of adrenoceptors involved in the canine external carotid vasoconstrictor effects of adrenaline and noradrenaline.

This study investigated the potential effects of adrenaline and noradrenaline on the external carotid blood flow of vagosympathectomised dogs and the receptor mechanisms involved. One minute (1 min) intracarotid infusions of adrenaline and noradrenaline produced dose-dependent decreases in external carotid blood flow without changes in blood pressure or heart rate. These responses, which remained unaffected after saline, were: (i) mimicked by the adrenoceptor agonists, phenylephrine (alpha1) and BHT933 (6-Ethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-4H-oxazolo [4,5-d] azepin-2-amine dihydrochloride; alpha2); (ii) abolished after phentolamine (2000 microg/kg) unmasking a vasodilator component (subsequently blocked by propranolol; 1000 microg/kg); and (iii) partly blocked by rauwolscine (30 and 100 microg/kg), and subsequently abolished by prazosin (100 microg/kg). Accordingly, rauwolscine (100 and 300 microg/kg) markedly blocked the responses to BHT933 without affecting those to phenylephrine; likewise, prazosin (100 microg/kg) markedly blocked the responses to phenylephrine without affecting those to BHT933. These results show that both alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptors mediate vasoconstriction within the canine external carotid circulation. Moreover, after blockade of alpha1/alpha2-adrenoceptors, both adrenaline and noradrenaline exhibit a beta-adrenoceptor-mediated vasodilator component.

Adrenergic Agonists↗

A61603-induced vasoconstriction in porcine carotid vasculature: involvement of a non-adrenergic mechanism.

It has recently been shown that the pharmacological profile of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors mediating constriction of porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses resembles that of alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor subtypes. In an attempt to verify the involvement of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors, we used the potent alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor agonist N-[5-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2yl)-2-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-naphthalen-1-yl]methane sulphonamide (A61603) and found that intracarotid (i.c.) administration of A61603 (0.3-10 microg kg(-1)) dose-dependently decreased porcine carotid blood flow and vascular conductance. This decrease was exclusively due to a constriction of carotid arteriovenous anastomoses; the capillary blood flow and conductance remained unchanged. Surprisingly, the responses to A61603 were little modified by prior i.v. treatment with 5-methylurapidil (1000 microg kg(-1)), prazosin (100 microg kg(-1)) or a combination of prazosin and rauwolscine (100 and 300 microg kg(-1), respectively). The 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist N-[4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl) phenyl]-2'-methyl-4'(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)[1,1,-biphenyl]-4-carboxamide hydrochloride monohydrate (GR127935; 500 microg kg(-1)) and ketanserin (500 microg kg(-1)) also failed to modify carotid vascular responses to A61603, but, interestingly, methiothepin (3000 microg kg(-1)) proved to be an effective antagonist. Taken together, the present results show that A61603 is a relatively poor agonist at the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor in anaesthetised pigs and that the carotid vasoconstriction produced by A61603 is mediated by a novel non-adrenergic mechanism.

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Agonists↗

Unravelling the pharmacological profile of the canine external carotid vasodilator '5-HT1-like' receptors: coexistence of sympatho-inhibitory 5-HT1B and postjunctional 5-HT7 receptors.

It has been suggested that the external carotid vasodilatation produced by serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) in anaesthetised dogs with intact vagosympathetic trunks is mediated by sympatho-inhibitory '5-HT1D' receptors and musculotropic '5-HT1-like' receptors. The present study has re-analysed this suggestion with regard to the classification schemes recently proposed by the NC-IUPHAR subcommittee on 5-HT receptors. In pentobarbital-anaesthetised dogs with intact vagosympathetic trunks, 1-min intracarotid (i.c.) infusions of 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT; 0.01-0.3 microg/min), 5-HT (0.3-30 microg/ min), 5-methoxytryptamine (5-MeO-T; 1-100 microg/min) or sumatriptan (1-100 microg/min) dose-dependently increased the external carotid blood flow without affecting blood pressure or heart rate. The selective 5-HT1D receptor agonist, PNU-142633 (1-1000 microg/min), was essentially inactive. After mesulergine (300 microg/kg, i.v.), an antagonist at cardiovascular 5-HT7 receptors, the above responses to 5-HT, 5-CT and 5-MeO-T were blocked, whilst those to sumatriptan remained unaffected. In contrast, after the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist, GR127935 (10 microg/kg, i.v.), the responses to 5-HT, 5-CT and 5-MeO-T were not affected, but those to sumatriptan were abolished. Furthermore, after the selective 5-HT1B receptor antagonist, SB224289 (300 microg/kg, i.v.), the responses to 5-HT, 5-CT and 5-MeO-T were significantly enhanced, whereas those to sumatriptan were abolished. Interestingly, the responses to all these agonists remained unmodified after the selective 5-HT1D receptor antagonist, BRL15572 (300 microg/kg, i.v.). The above results suggest that the '5-HT1-like' receptors, which mediate canine external carotid vasodilatation, display the pharmacological profile of sympatho-inhibitory 5-HT1B receptors and musculotropic 5-HT7 receptors, and confirm the existence of vasoconstrictor 5-HT1B receptors.

5-Methoxytryptamine↗

Pharmacological profile of the mechanisms involved in the external carotid vascular effects of the antimigraine agent isometheptene in anaesthetised dogs.

The present study set out to investigate the external carotid vascular effects of isometheptene in vagosympathectomised dogs, anaesthetised with pentobarbital. One-minute intracarotid (intra-arterial; i.a.) infusions of isometheptene (10, 30, 100 and 300 microg/min) produced dose-dependent decreases in external carotid blood flow, without affecting blood pressure or heart rate. The vasoconstrictor responses to 100 microg/min and 300 microg/min of isometheptene were clearly attenuated in animals pretreated with reserpine (5,000 microg/kg). Moreover, after prazosin (an alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist; 100 microg/kg), the responses to isometheptene remained unaltered in untreated as well as reserpine-pretreated dogs. In contrast, the responses to isometheptene were attenuated by rauwolscine (an alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist; 300 microg/kg) in untreated animals, and were practically abolished in reserpine-pretreated dogs. Further investigation into the specific alpha2-adrenoceptor subtypes, using selective antagonists, showed that BRL44408 (alpha2A) and MK912 (alpha2C) markedly attenuated this response, while imiloxan (alpha2B) was ineffective. The involvement of 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors seems highly unlikely since antagonists at 5-HT1B (SB224289) and 5-HT1D (BRL15572) receptors (both at 300 microg/kg) were ineffective. On this basis, it is concluded that isometheptene-induced canine external carotid vasoconstriction is mediated by both indirect (a tyramine-like action) and direct (acting at receptors) mechanisms, which mainly involve alphaA- and alpha2C-adrenoceptors, while the involvement of alpha1-adrenoceptors seems rather limited.

Anesthesia↗

The GR127935-sensitive 5-HT(1) receptors mediating canine internal carotid vasoconstriction: resemblance to the 5-HT(1B), but not to the 5-HT(1D) or 5-ht(1F), receptor subtype.

This study has further investigated the pharmacological profile of the GR127935-sensitive 5-HT(1) receptors mediating vasoconstriction in the internal carotid bed of anaesthetized vagosympathectomized dogs. One-minute intracarotid infusions of the agonists 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; 0.1 - 10 microg min(-1); endogenous ligand) and sumatriptan (0.3 - 10 microg min(-1); 5-HT(1B/1D)), but not PNU-142633 (1 - 1000 microg min(-1); 5-HT(1D)) or LY344864 (1 - 1000 microg min(-1); 5-ht(1F)), produced dose-dependent decreases in internal carotid blood flow without changing blood pressure or heart rate. The responses to 5-HT were apparently resistant to blockade by i.v. administration of the antagonists SB224289 (300 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(1B)), BRL15572 (300 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(1D)) or ritanserin (100 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(2)). In contrast, the responses to sumatriptan were antagonized by SB224289, but not by BRL15572. In the animals receiving SB224289, but not those receiving BRL15572, the subsequent administration of ritanserin abolished the 5-HT-induced vasoconstriction and unmasked a vasodilator component. Similarly, in ritanserin-treated animals, the subsequent administration of SB224289, but not BRL15572, completely blocked the 5-HT-induced vasoconstriction, revealing vasodilatation. In animals receiving initially BRL15572, the subsequent administration of SB224289 did not affect (except at 10 microg min(-1)) the vasoconstrictor responses to 5-HT. Notably, in animals pretreated with 1000 microg kg(-1) of mesulergine, a 5-HT(2/7) receptor antagonist, 5-HT produced a dose-dependent vasoconstriction, which was practically abolished by SB224289. After BRL15572, no further blockade was produced and the subsequent administration of ritanserin was similarly inactive. These results suggest that the GR127935-sensitive 5-HT(1) receptors mediating canine internal carotid vasoconstriction resemble the 5-HT(1B) but not the 5-HT(1D) or 5-ht(1F), receptor subtype.

Animals↗

Evidence for 5-HT(1B/1D) and 5-HT(2A) receptors mediating constriction of the canine internal carotid circulation.

The present study has investigated the preliminary pharmacological profile of the receptors mediating vasoconstriction to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the internal carotid bed of vagosympathectomised dogs. One minute intracarotid infusions of the agonists 5-HT (0.1 - 10 microg min(-1)), sumatriptan (0.3 - 10 microg min(-1); 5-HT(1B/1D)), 5-methoxytryptamine (1 - 100 microg min(-1); 5-HT(1), 5-HT(2), 5-HT(4), 5-ht(6) and 5-HT(7)) or DOI (0.31 - 10 microg min(-1); 5-HT(2)), but not 5-carboxamidotryptamine (0.01 - 0.3 microg min(-1); 5-HT(1), 5-ht(5A) and 5-HT(7)), 1-(m-chlorophenyl)-biguanide (mCPBG; 1 - 1000 microg min(-1); 5-HT(3)) or cisapride (1 - 1000 microg min(-1); 5-HT(4)), resulted in dose-dependent decreases in internal carotid blood flow, without changing blood pressure or heart rate. The vasoconstrictor responses to 5-HT, which remained unaffected after saline, were resistant to blockade by i.v. administration of the antagonists ritanserin (100 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(2A/2B/2C)) in combination with tropisetron (3000 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(3/4)) or the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin (5000 microg kg(-1)), but were abolished by the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist, GR127935 (30 microg kg(-1)). Interestingly, after administration of GR127935, the subsequent administration of ritanserin unmasked a dose-dependent vasodilator component. GR127935 or saline did not practically modify the vasoconstrictor effects of 5-MeO-T. In animals receiving GR127935, the subsequent administration of ritanserin abolished the vasoconstrictor responses to 5-MeO-T unmasking a dose-dependent vasodilator component. The vasoconstriction induced by sumatriptan was antagonized by GR127935, but not by ritanserin. Furthermore, ritanserin (100 microg kg(-1)) or ketanserin (100 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(2A)), but not GR127935, abolished DOI-induced vasoconstrictor responses. The above results suggest that 5-HT-induced internal carotid vasoconstriction is predominantly mediated by 5-HT(1B/1D) and 5-HT(2A) receptors.

Animals↗

The role of several alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenoceptor subtypes mediating vasoconstriction in the canine external carotid circulation.

1. It has recently been shown that both alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors mediate vasoconstriction in the canine external carotid circulation. The present study set out to identify the specific subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B) and alpha(1D) as well as alpha(2A), alpha(2B) and alpha(2C)) mediating the above response. 2. Consecutive 1 min intracarotid infusions of phenylephrine (alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist) and BHT933 (alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist) produced dose-dependent decreases in external carotid blood flow, without affecting mean arterial blood pressure or heart rate. 3. The responses to phenylephrine were selectively antagonized by the antagonists, 5-methylurapidil (alpha(1A)) or BMY7378 (alpha(1D)), but not by L-765,314 (alpha(1B)), BRL44408 (alpha(2A)), imiloxan (alpha(2B)) or MK912 (alpha(2C)). In contrast, only BRL44408 or MK912 affected the responses to BHT933. 4. The above results support our contention that mainly the alpha(1A), alpha(1D), alpha(2A) and alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor subtypes mediate vasoconstriction in the canine external carotid circulation.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗