Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P R Cunningham

Publications and source records attributed to P R Cunningham.

71 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1976

Improving evaluation of amalgam restorations.

A predictive model of overall quality of performance is presented which might assist both dental students and dental faculty by increasing the reliability of clinical and laboratory evaluations. Training effectiveness can be improved by identification of those restorative skills which contribute most to the quality rating of restoration.

Dental Amalgam↗
PubMed1976

Skills analysis of a class I amalgam restoration in a mandibular right first molar.

1. Students changed their body position 32% more often than instructors during amalgam condensation. 2. Experienced instructors used 38% fewer strokes than students to condense the amalgam. 3. On the average, instructors used 65% less time per condensation stroke than students. This was not due to ability to move the instrument more quickly, since both students and instructors had similar minimum stroke times, but rather to the fact that instructors performed slowly less often. 4. The upstroke during condensation required nearly the same time for both students and instructors (an eight percent difference). It was the downstroke that was greatly different (a 96% difference). 5. Instructors repeated condensation strokes 22% more often than students, working more systematically with less "jumping around" in the cavity. 6. The total number of carving strokes was not related to experience. 7. Students repeated carving strokes more often than instructors. 8. Students and instructors tended to use the same length of strokes in carving. 9. There was a noticeable difference between instructors and students in the method used to grasp the instruments.

Dental Amalgam↗
PubMed1975

Objective evaluation of quality in cavity preparations.

Significant improvements in reliability of criteria measures were obtained by using a newly developed instrument to evaluate objectively the quality of cavity preparations in comparison to subjective ratings by the instructors of the quality of cavity preparations.

Dental Cavity Preparation↗
PubMed1975

A second generation training simulator for acquisition of psychomotor skills in cavity preparation.

Thirty freshmen dental students, without prior dental technique laboratory experience, were divided randomly into two groups of 15 subjects. One group (control) was trained in the traditional way while the other group used a newly developed dental training simulator. The results for Class I cavity preparations in the mandibular right first molar indicate that a two-thirds reduction in training time occurred for the group trained by the simulator as compared to the control group. The mean training times were 57 minutes for the control group and 21 minutes for the experimental group. No statistically significant differences in quality were noted.

Adult↗