Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

P Plassmann

Publications and source records attributed to P Plassmann.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

MAVIS: a non-invasive instrument to measure area and volume of wounds. Measurement of Area and Volume Instrument System.

Accurate measurement of the physical size of wounds is vital for assessment of the progress of healing. An instrument has been developed to measure area and volume of skin wounds, ulcers, and pressure sores. MAVIS--Measurement of Area and Volume Instrument System-is based on the principle of colour coded structured light. A set of parallel stripes of alternating colours is projected onto the wound area at an angle of approximately 45 degrees and is recorded by a CCD camera. From the known position of the focal points of projector and camera, and from the observed intersection points of the stripes of light with the wound surface, a computer calculates a three-dimensional map of the observed wound. The volume of the wound is defined as the volume of the region sandwiched between the observed surface and the original healthy skin surface which is simulated by cubic spline interpolation. This paper compares the performance of the instrument with three traditional wound measurement techniques using results obtained from a clinical trial involving 50 patients. Traditional area measurement techniques such as transparency tracings produce results with standard deviations between 4% (large wounds) and up to 20% (small wounds) of the measured mean value. MAVIS measurements reduce these standard deviations by 3-5%. Measuring the wound volume by alginate casts produces errors in volume figures between 5% and 40%. Standard deviations of MAVIS results are 5% smaller on average. The results demonstrate that MAVIS yields more reproducible results with a minimum of inter-observer error. The instrument does not make contact with the wound, provided visual records and measurements are made in less then 5 min. It is not suitable for undermined, very deep or very large wounds.

Humans

Measuring wounds.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anthropometry

Methods of measuring wound size: a comparative study.

The lack of an accepted method of accurate and objective measurement of wound dimensions is a major obstacle to the assessment of effective wound management regimes. This study compares three different wound volume measurement techniques (filling the lesion with saline, molding of a dental impression material and a computer vision method based on image processing and the Structured Light technique) in terms of accuracy, precision and practicability in a clinical environment. Three groups of hospital staff, doctors, nurses and technicians, repeatedly measured a set of 6 different models of wounds. Measuring wound volume by filling it with saline produces results with standard deviations between 9 percent and 18 percent of the actual volume. Dental impression material performs better, between 5 percent and 16 percent, but is difficult to apply and time consuming to use. Apart from the advantage of providing instant optical records of wounds, the image processing method produces more reliable volume measurements with a standard deviation of between 3 percent and 15 percent. The results demonstrate that the computer based method yields the most reproducible results with a minimum of inter-observer error but the method is not applicable for undermined, very deep and very large wounds.

Anthropometry