Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P P Meier

Publications and source records attributed to P P Meier.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Breastfeeding in the special care nursery. Prematures and infants with medical problems.

In summary, clinical interventions that are focused on increasing the rates with which mothers initiate and sustain lactation for infants with medical problems must reflect the scientific evidence for this vulnerable population. These interventions should include counseling to ensure that mothers may make an informed decision about providing milk; nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic strategies to maximize maternal milk volume; and basing protocols for at-breast feeding on studies conducted with breastfeeding for premature and other at-risk infants, rather than on ideology or research conducted with term, healthy infants.

Bottle Feeding↗
PubMed2000

Nipple shields for preterm infants: effect on milk transfer and duration of breastfeeding.

This study reports breastfeeding outcomes for 34 preterm infants whose mothers used ultrathin silicone nipple shields to increase milk transfer. Mean milk transfer was compared for 2 consecutive breastfeedings without and with the nipple shield. Total duration of breastfeeding was calculated for a maximum of 365 days. Mean milk transfer was significantly greater for feedings with the nipple shield (18.4 ml vs. 3.9 ml), with all 34 infants consuming more milk with the nipple shield in place. Mean duration of nipple shield use was 32.5 days, and mean duration of breastfeeding was 169.4 days; no association between these variables was noted. The nipple shield was used for 24.3% of the total breastfeeding experience, with no significant association between the percentage of time the shield was used and total duration of breastfeeding. These findings are the first to indicate that nipple shield use increases milk intake without decreasing total duration of breastfeeding for preterm infants.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Estimating milk intake of hospitalized preterm infants who breastfeed.

This study describes the accuracy of clinical indices to estimate the milk intake of breastfed preterm infants. Twenty-nine mother-infant pairs were studied for a total of 39 breastfeeding sessions. Two NICU nurses (RN1 and RN2) and one certified lactation educator (CLE) collected data, each blind to the others' measures. RN1 and RN2 performed test-weights using the Smart Model 20 electronic scale. The CLE observed the breastfeeding and estimated milk intake, using clinical indices of milk transfer. Clinical indices did not provide an accurate estimate of milk intake (r = .48). The mean absolute difference between the test-weights and clinical estimates was 5.79 ml, with a maximal difference of 20 ml. These differences were random in that clinical indices did not consistently over- or underestimate milk intake. None of 17 clinical indices of milk intake significantly lowered the magnitude of error in the clinical estimate. These data suggest that clinical indices cannot serve as a replacement for test-weighing of preterm infants when an accurate estimate of milk intake is necessary.

Body Weight↗
PubMed1996

State of the science. Breastfeeding for mothers and low birth weight infants.

There is support in the research literature for encouraging mothers of preterm and LBW to breastfeed their infants, although the numerous barriers to their successful breastfeeding have been well documented. The emerging work addressing short- and long-term health benefits for preterm infants provide's scientific rationale for allocation of resources, that is, equipment and personnel, to assist these mothers in attaining their breastfeeding goals. The literature also has linked selected, individualized interventions to breastfeeding outcomes for this population. Examples of this linkage include milk expression recommendations for maximizing milk yield, techniques for in-hospital breastfeeding, and models for providing breastfeeding services in the NICU. Clinical priorities should focus on strategies for implementing the available research into practice and for using the research to establish standards of care for mothers who breastfeed preterm and LBW infants. Research priorities should focus on practice models for providing breastfeeding services that demonstrate improved breastfeeding outcomes and cost effectiveness for this vulnerable population.

Breast Feeding↗
PubMed1995

Reliability of in-bed weighing procedures for critically ill infants.

The purpose of this study was to describe the intra- and interexaminer reliability of weight measurements obtained from critically ill infants on an in-bed electronic scale. Weight measurements were obtained using the in-bed scale (Smart Model 35, Olympic Medical, Seattle, Washington) for 32 infants; 16 were in an incubator, and 16 were under a radiant warmer. Two nurses each obtained two weight measurements for each infant for three consecutive days, for a total of 96 data collection sessions. The nurses were blinded to their own and to the other nurse's weight measurements. The average mean absolute difference for individual nurses' weight measurements (interexaminer reliability) was 12.58 gm for weights obtained in the incubator and 19.19 gm for weights obtained under the radiant warmer. The average mean absolute difference for pairs of nurses' weight measurements (interexaminer reliability) was 14.29 gm for weights obtained in the incubator and 24.42 gm for weights obtained under the radiant warmer. The average mean absolute differences for weights obtained in the two bed types differed significantly for both intra- (Z = -2.46, p = .0141) and interexaminer (Z = -3.11, p = .0019) reliability. The number of pieces of equipment that had to be held during the weight measurement was weakly correlated with both the intra- (rs = .1878, p = .0091) and interexaminer (rs = .1600, p = .0266) mean absolute differences. These findings suggest that weight measurements of critically ill infants obtained using the Smart Model 35 in-bed electronic scale are sufficiently reliable for calculation of medication, parenteral fluid, blood replacement, and nutritional requirements.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anthropometry↗
PubMed1994

Transition of the preterm infant to an open crib: process of the project group.

This manuscript outlines the process used by members of the AWHONN project group in conceptualizing and implementing the research utilization project Transition of the Preterm Infant to an Open Crib. The group, which was composed of clinical experts and researchers, met on three occasions at AWHONN headquarters. The outcome of this process was a research-based protocol that was tested at nine clinical sites in the United States or Canada. The process and discussions of the project group, which are detailed here might serve as a format for subsequent research utilization endeavors.

Beds↗
PubMed1994

A new scale for in-home test-weighing for mothers of preterm and high risk infants.

The purposes of this research were to describe the accuracy of test-weighing with the BabyWeigh, a new infant scale suitable for use in the home, and to determine whether mothers and investigators could estimate intake accurately during breastfeeding sessions, using clinical cues that are recommended for this purpose. Within five days of projected NICU discharge, 30 preterm and/or high risk infants and their mothers were studied during a single breastfeeding session. A member of the research team performed test-weights with the Smart Model 20 infant scale, and mothers performed test-weights with the BabyWeigh scale. The mothers and investigators each estimated volume of intake for the breastfeeding session using clinical cues. Mothers and investigators were blind to each others' test-weights and clinical estimates. Results revealed that the BabyWeigh scale provided an accurate estimate of intake during breastfeeding across a large range of infant weights and intake volumes. In contrast, investigator and maternal estimates of intake were not sufficiently accurate.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The accuracy of test weighing for preterm infants.

A series of recent studies has suggested that preterm infants are capable of breast feeding at weights less than 1,500 g. However, estimating intake during breast feeding for these small infants is important for safe clinical practice and valid research. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of test weighing as an estimate of intake for preterm infants using two types of scales: a mechanical scale (Toledo) commonly used in many special care nurseries, and a new electronic scale (SMART; Olympic Medical). Fifty clinically stable preterm infants, weighing between 1,088 and 2,440 g (mean = 1,599 g), who were clothed identically for all weights and feedings, were studied. Two experienced neonatal nurses (RN-1 and RN-2) collected the data. Before feeding, each infant was weighed once on each scale by each nurse; the order of nurse and scale was assigned randomly. Then, RN-1 administered a prescribed volume of feeding. After feeding, RN-2 weighed each infant twice on each scale; the order of scale was assigned randomly. RN-1 was blind to postfeed weights, and RN-2 was blind to actual volume of intake. Results indicated that differences between the actual and estimated volumes of intake were smaller for the electronic than for the mechanical scale on all measures. These findings suggest that test weighing with an electronic scale provides an accurate estimate of intake for preterm infants, and support the use of this instrument in clinical practice and research.

Body Weight↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Breastfeeding success with preterm quadruplets.

Although the incidence of triplet and quadruplet birth has increased in the United States, few research-based guidelines are available for assisting mothers of these multiple births with breastfeeding. The purpose of this case study is to report a successful breastfeeding experience of a mother with preterm quadruplets. The quadruplets were born by cesarean delivery at 34 weeks' gestation and weighed from 1,820 g to 2,240 g. In-hospital breastfeeding experiences were managed by the authors, according to research-based guidelines for breastfeeding preterm neonates and infants. During the first month after discharge of the four newborns, the mother breastfed 12-34 times daily. Mean daily weight gains for the quadruplets during this time varied from 30 g to 54 g, indicative of adequate maternal milk supply. Nurses in maternity and neonatal specialties can apply the findings from this study to similar cases of mothers who want to breastfeed multiple neonates or infants.

Aftercare↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Breastfeeding support services in the neonatal intensive-care unit.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a model for providing breastfeeding support in the neonatal intensive-care unit (NICU). DESIGN: Naturalistic, participant observation. SETTING: Suburban Level III NICU. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-two mother-infant pairs over 1 year. Infants were hospitalized in the NICU, and mothers had initiated lactation efforts. INTERVENTIONS: Investigators provided breastfeeding interventions for the mother-infant pairs, based on identified problems, the research literature, or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of mothers who were breastfeeding at the time of discharge from the NICU. RESULT: Interventions were classified into five categories: expression and collection of mothers' milk, gavage feeding of expressed mothers' milk, in-hospital breastfeeding sessions, postdischarge breastfeeding management, and additional consultation. CONCLUSIONS: This model was effective in preventing breastfeeding failure for this population. The model can provide the basis for NICU breastfeeding standards of care, protocols, and chart records, or for reimbursement purposes. The model also provides a framework for studying a specific category or breastfeeding intervention.

Aftercare↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Mothers' performing creamatocrit measures in the NICU: accuracy, reactions, and cost.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mothers of infants in the neonatal intensive-care unit could be taught to perform creamatocrits (CRCTs) accurately on own mothers' milk (OMM). These mothers' reactions to performing CRCTs also were measured. SAMPLE: Twenty-six mothers and four advanced-practice nurses (RNs) participated in this study. DESIGN: For Phase One of this blinded trial, mothers were taught to perform the CRCT by one of the two instructional RNs. For Phase Two, mothers and one of the two validation RNs performed CRCTs simultaneously and independently on the same OMM sample, and the mother completed a Maternal Reactions questionnaire. RESULTS: Mothers' CRCT measures were highly accurate. The mean absolute difference between RNs' and mothers' CRCTs was 0.69%, with 50% and 84.6% of these differences, respectively, < or = 0.5% and < or = 1.0% CRCT. A strong linear correlation was noted between RNs' and mothers' CRCTs. Ninety-six percent of the mothers reported that the CRCT was easy to learn, they felt comfortable performing the procedure, and it made them feel more involved in infant care. A mean of 23.6 minutes was spent teaching the mother to perform CRCT, a figure that reflects the cost-effectiveness of the approach. CONCLUSION: Mothers can be taught to perform CRCTs accurately and easily on their OMM. This practice exemplifies high quality, cost-effective care that maximizes maternal involvement and satisfaction.

Breast Feeding↗