Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Nunes

Publications and source records attributed to P Nunes.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Do elderly patients deserve a kidney graft?

PURPOSE: Compare renal transplant long-term outcomes among recipients aged 60 years or older with those in younger patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 103 transplants in recipients above 60 years of age for the influence of key factors related to the graft and patient. The results were compared with 1060 transplant recipients aged 18 to 59 years. RESULTS: The mean ages were 62.93 and 40.35 years for the older and younger group. The older group showed a higher prevalence of obesity and unknown etiologies for the end-stage renal disease. Important comorbidity was significantly more frequent among recipients aged more than 60 years, mainly of a cardiovascular nature (56% vs 18.5%). Donor age (39.75 vs 31.59 years), cold ischemia time (22.43 vs 20.49 hours) and human leukocyte antigen compatibilities (2.59 vs 2.36) were significantly greater in the older subset. After a mean follow-up of 4.72 and 6.07 years for the older versus younger group, we found no differences in initial graft function, acute rejection rate, and serum creatinine/clearance. Patient and graft survivals at 1, 5, and 10 years were lower among the 60+ group. There were no differences in graft survival censored for death with a functioning graft, namely, 95.1%, 89.4%, and 81.2% for the 60+ cohort. The main cause of graft loss in the older group was death with a functioning graft. CONCLUSION: Renal transplantation should be considered for selected patients older than 60 years. Despite a shorter life expectancy, they benefit from it similar to younger recipients.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in renal transplantation.

PURPOSE: To describe our initial results using a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression protocol in renal transplants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2001 and June 2003, 56 recipients of a renal allografts were started on an immunosuppression protocol without calcineurin inhibitors, consisting of basiliximab, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. We analyzed patient and graft survival, acute rejection episodes, and renal function. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 19.6 months. Actuarial patient survival at 1 and 2 years was 98.1% and 95.3%, respectively. Actuarial graft survival at 1 and 2 years was 92.9% and 87.6%, respectively. Acute rejection occurred in 27.8% of the patients, usually Banff 1 (73.3%). There was stable renal function with mean serum creatinine of 1.3, 1.4, 1.3, and 1.3 mg/dL at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of immunosuppression free of calcineurin inhibitors is effective and safe. Further follow-up is needed to evaluate the impact on long-term results.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Pediatric renal transplantation: comparative study with renal transplantation in the adult population.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively review our experience with pediatric renal transplantation and to compare the results with the adult population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1981 and August 2003, 74 renal transplants were performed in patients < or =18 years at the time of the transplant--the pediatric group versus 1153 patients in the adult group. We analyzed various risk factors for actuarial kidney graft and patient survivals using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median ages were 13.8 +/- 3.5 and 42.6 +/- 2.4 years, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the human leukocyte antigen matching or immunosuppression. There was, however, a younger donor age and shorter ischemia time in the pediatric group. Overall, kidney transplant survival rates for patients < or =18 years at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were 94.4%, 91.3%, 70.6%, and 58.2%, respectively, with no significant difference for patients older than 18 (91.2%, 89.3%, 78.8%, 60.5%, P = .4325). There was a significantly decreased graft survival in the adult group at 10 years when the donor age was over 60 years and when the ischemia time was > or =20 hours. The incidence of delayed graft function and the creatinine levels of functioning grafts did not differ between the two groups. During the follow-up, acute rejections were more frequent in the younger group. Patient survival in the pediatric group at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years was 98.6%, 98.8%, 98.6%, and 90.3%, respectively, significantly lower in the adult group (95.3%, 94.0%, 87.9%, 76.8%, P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation may be successfully performed in the pediatric patients with end-stage renal disease. Overall graft survival at 10 years did not differ significantly between the two groups. There is a higher incidence of acute rejections but longer patient survival in the pediatric population.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cadaveric donor factor variations during a 12-year period: influence on kidney transplant outcomes.

UNLABELLED: Our purpose was to evaluate changes in cadaveric donor factors between 1993 and 2004 and their impact on the short- and long-term outcomes of renal transplants in a single center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cadaveric renal transplants performed in our unit between 1993 and 2004 were divided in two groups of identical length: A (n = 455; 1993-1998) and B (n = 465; 1999-2004). Major differences related to donor, graft, and recipient factors were analyzed between groups and correlated with main outcome parameters. Recipient age, gender, weight, etiology of end-stage renal disease, average length of dialysis, and cold ischemia were not different in the two periods. RESULTS: Grafts harvested in our hospital were more frequent in group A (92.3 vs 78.2%; P < .005). Traumatic causes of death were more frequent before 1999: 90.9 vs 70.9% (P < .001). Mean donor age was higher after 1999: 31.37 vs 35.94 years (P < .005). Female donors were more frequent in the second period: 20.5 vs 26.6% (P < .05). Mean donor weight was also higher: 52.36 vs 67.86 kg (P < .05). All of these differences were unfavourable characteristics regarding graft outcomes. Delayed graft function (A = 13%, B = 24.2%), acute rejection episodes (A = 41.2%, B = 28%), and chronic allograft dysfunction (A = 23.5%, B = 14.4%) were also significantly different between the two cohorts (P < .005). Graft function (serum creatinine at 1 and 2 years), patient and graft survivals, causes of graft loss, and of patient death were similar across time. CONCLUSION: The unfavorable tendency in the quality of cadaveric donors during the last 12 years had no negative impact on graft function and patient outcome.

Adult↗