Biomedical subjects

P McLardy-Smith

Publications and source records attributed to P McLardy-Smith.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement.

The Oxford hip score (OHS) is a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome which is often used after total hip replacement, and the EuroQol 5D (EQ5D) is a patient-based generic questionnaire for health assessment. In an analysis of the outcome at one year of 609 revision hip replacements (RHRs), we compared the OHS and EQ5D scores, postoperative patient satisfaction and change in pain. About 25% of the operations were repeat RHRs. At one year, 57% of patients were very pleased with their operation. The correlation between preoperative and postoperative scores and change scores for the OHS and EQ5D was high. For both instruments the effect sizes were large, but the greater effect size of the OHS suggests that it is particularly sensitive to improvements after RHR. The effect scores of the OHS declined with the number of previous RHRs, while those for the EQ5D seemed less sensitive. Our results confirm the value of the OHS in assessing outcome after RHR.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

PubMed1999

Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Total joint replacement has been one of the most remarkable successes of modern medical technology. Once John Charnley had solved the problems of implant design, choice of materials, implant fixation, and infection (initial rates of infection were approximately 10%), the way was clear for the widespread use of this valuable treatment, which is highly effective at removing pain and restoring function. Unfortunately, infection still remains an important, though less common, problem. It is associated with serious morbidity (pain, loss of function, wound breakdown, wound discharge, implant failure) and sometimes mortality. It may be impossible to eradicate or suppress infection in the long term without removal of the prosthesis, and most clinicians would consider it unwise to re-implant a new prosthesis in the presence of infection. Hence, patients with infected prosthetic joints generally require multiple additional operations and prolonged periods of antibiotic therapy. Even radical attempts at cure may fail (in 10% to 15% of cases in most series), requiring further cycles of treatment with progressively deteriorating function. Thus, the treatment of prosthetic joint infection is arduous for the patient and the health care team, with no guarantee of success.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1998

Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group.

A prospective study was performed to establish criteria for the microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection at elective revision arthroplasty. Patients were treated in a multidisciplinary unit dedicated to the management and study of musculoskeletal infection. Standard multiple samples of periprosthetic tissue were obtained at surgery, Gram stained, and cultured by direct and enrichment methods. With reference to histology as the criterion standard, sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated by using different cutoffs for the diagnosis of infection. We performed revisions on 334 patients over a 17-month period, of whom 297 were evaluable. The remaining 37 were excluded because histology results were unavailable or could not be interpreted due to underlying inflammatory joint disease. There were 41 infections, with only 65% of all samples sent from infected patients being culture positive, suggesting low numbers of bacteria in the samples taken. The isolation of an indistinguishable microorganism from three or more independent specimens was highly predictive of infection (sensitivity, 65%; specificity, 99.6%; LR, 168.6), while Gram staining was less useful (sensitivity, 12%; specificity, 98%; LR, 10). A simple mathematical model was developed to predict the performance of the diagnostic test. We recommend that five or six specimens be sent, that the cutoff for a definite diagnosis of infection be three or more operative specimens that yield an indistinguishable organism, and that because of its low level of sensitivity, Gram staining should be abandoned as a diagnostic tool at elective revision arthroplasty.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

PubMed1996

Ultrasonically driven tools.

Ultrasonically driven tools have been employed extensively in revision hip surgery during the last 2 years at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre. In combination with hand revision instruments, the removal of cement, in particular the removal of the distal cement plug, has been made safer. One significant complication that has occurred with this device is reported and advice on its prevention offered.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Revision of cemented fixation and cement-bone interface strength.

Interfacial shear strength between poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement and cancellous bone was measured in bone samples from human proximal femora. Samples were prepared with fresh cement-bone, fresh cement inside a mantle of existing cement and with fresh cement-revised bone surfaces. Push-out tests to measure shear strength caused failure only at bone-cement interfaces; revised bone interfaces were 30 per cent weaker (P < 0.02) than primary interfaces. The clinical relevance is that revision of cemented joint arthroplasties may necessitate removal of components with sound cement-bone fixation. The practice of removing all traces of PMMA cement may not yield the optimal fixation; adhesion of fresh cement to freshly prepared surfaces of the existing cement might also be considered where circumstances are favourable.

Bone Cements↗

PubMed1988

The frozen hip.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

PubMed1986

Ischaemic contracture of the intrinsic muscles of the hands. A hazard of physical restraint.

A case is described of bilateral ischaemic contracture of the intrinsic muscles of the hands, presenting in a mentally-disturbed patient one year after a reported period of immobilisation in a physical restraint device. Involvement of the deep thenar muscles and the interossei on the radial side of the hand can be explained by consideration of the anatomy of the deep palmar arch. Division of the tendons of the contracted interosseous muscles proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints and release of the left first web improved hand function. Those who supervise the use of physical restraint devices should be aware of the risk of intrinsic muscle ischaemia and of the need for prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Adult↗