Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P McAteer

Publications and source records attributed to P McAteer.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Physiological advantages of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthesia. A randomised clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: to examine the effects of type of anaesthesia on cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). DESIGN: prospective randomised study. METHODS: thirty-four CEA procedures under local anaesthesia (LA) are compared to 33 procedures under general anaesthesia (GA). Mean middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAV(mean)) was monitored using Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) assessed by continuous intra-arterial blood pressure transducer. RESULTS: pre-op MCAV(mean) and MAP were similar in both groups. Pre-clamp MCAV(mean) was similar in both groups and did not differ from pre-op values. With carotid clamping the MCAV(mean) significantly dropped in both groups. The post-clamp MCAV(mean) was significantly less in the GA group (p < 0.05), and the percentage reduction in MCAV(mean) significantly more for GA procedures (p < 0.05). Pre-clamp MAP was significantly elevated in LA procedures and significantly lowered in GA procedures. Pre-clamp MAP was significant less for GA procedures (p < 0.001). Post clamp MAP did not differ from pre-clamp levels in either group. There was no correlation between MCAV(mean) and MAP. Complication rate, combined death/stroke rates were similar in each group. CONCLUSION: LA CEA is associated with better preservation of the ipsilateral cerebral circulation and increased tolerance of the effects of carotid clamping. Changes in MCAV(mean) cannot be explained by variations in blood pressure between the two techniques.

Aged↗

Nitrous oxide.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗

Patient and hospital benefits of local anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: this study reviews and compares carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed under local anaesthesia (LA) with CEA performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in a single institution. METHODS: data were collected prospectively from 240 CEA procedures. 140 GA CEA procedures are compared to 100 LA CEA procedures in terms of outcome, operative techniques, complications, and length of stay. RESULTS: the groups were similar for age, gender distribution and preoperative risk factors. There were more asymptomatic patients in the LA group. There were no significant differences in death, stroke or death/stroke rate between the two techniques. LA CEA was associated with lower shunt rate (LA 13%, GA 50%, p < 0.001), lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension (LA 8%, GA 40%, p < 0.001), decreased hospital stay (median (IQ); LA 2 (1-2), GA 3 (1-4), and a cost saving of pound235 per CEA procedure. CONCLUSIONS: carotid endarterectomy can be performed safely under local anaesthesia with the advantage that LA CEA enables the surgeon to monitor and selectively shunt patients more accurately. In addition LA CEA is associated with a shorter hospital stay and important cost savings.

Adult↗