[Hypertyrosinemia, Reye's syndrome, thymic dysplasia and adrenal atrophy].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to P Mattioli.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The results of the evaluation of use of low-cost video conferencing systems (VCSs) in telemedicine is presented. Applications sharing, a new feature of these systems, recently has allowed high-quality computer-supported collaborative work (CSCW). The video conferencing (VCing) equipment used was Intel ProShare 200 v2.0a. It is representative of other low-cost VCSs. The areas of application are epidemiology and telemedicine (orthopaedics and radiology). Potential end users filled out 58 evaluation questionnaires concerning user profiles, contents and benefits of the sessions, organizational aspects, user friendliness, user acceptance, cost effectiveness, technical and multipoint related aspects. Although the end users had a lot of computer experience, their knowledge in VCSs was rather limited. The users assessed the system capable of being integrated into routine work, despite a high organizational impact. The VCS is user friendly, application sharing being used in almost every session. Audio quality was not always sufficient. The remote video was sufficient, as was the quality of medical images such as CT, MRI or X-ray. The user acceptance of the system was high. Multipoint sessions require a structured protocol to be effective. Some technical problems with MCUs (Multipoint Control Units) occurred. The use of low-cost standard VCSs in telemedicine is advisable and is a good substitute for real meetings.
Until hospitals convert to 'filmless' radiology departments, computerized display and archival of x-ray images will necessitate devices to transform conventional X-ray films into digital images. Current methods for digitizing x-ray films include laser based and Charged Couple Device (CCD) based scanners. There is now much interest in the use of CCD devices for demanding applications, with the lower cost of ownership contributing towards the diffusion of CCD scanners. We report a study comparing the performance of three CCD based systems (an x-ray film digitizer, and two low cost flatbed scanners), looking at characteristic curve, useful optical range with respect the noise, repeatability, Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), and geometric distortion. In addition, we evaluated the potential and limitations of these devices in the clinical assessment of x-ray films. The most important weakness of CCD devices derived from the stability and the noise of CCD detectors, mostly affecting the useful optical range in the darker regions of x-ray films. Spatial resolution and geometric distortion were confirmed be the real points of strength of CCD technology. Therefore, the most appropriate system for each user depends on what type of clinical decision will be made following inspection of the digitised images.