Biomedical subjects

P M Smeele

Publications and source records attributed to P M Smeele.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Laterality in visual speech perception.

The lateralization of visual speech perception was examined in 3 experiments. Participants were presented with a realistic computer-animated face articulating 1 of 4 consonant-vowel syllables without sound. The face appeared at 1 of 5 locations in the visual field. The participants' task was to identify each test syllable. To prevent eye movement during the presentation of the face, participants had to carry out a fixation task simultaneously with the speechreading task. In one study, an eccentricity effect was found along with a small but significant difference in favor of the right visual field (left hemisphere). The same results were found with the face articulating nonlinguistic mouth movements (e.g., kiss). These results suggest that the left-hemisphere advantage is based on the processing of dynamic visual information rather than on the extraction of linguistic significance from facial movements.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Perception of asynchronous and conflicting visual and auditory speech.

Previous research has shown that perceivers naturally integrate auditory and visual information in face-to-face speech perception. Two experiments were carried out to study whether integration would be disrupted by differences in the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), the temporal arrival of the two sources of information. Synthetic visible and natural and synthetic auditory syllables off/ba/, /va/, [symbol: see text]a/, and /da/ were used in an expanded factorial design to present all possible combinations of the auditory and visual syllables, as well as the unimodal syllables. The fuzzy logical model of perception (FLMP), which accurately describes integration, was used to measure the degree to which integration of audible and visible speech occurred. These findings provide information about the temporal window of integration and its apparent dependence on the range of speech events in the test.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Cross-linguistic comparisons in the integration of visual and auditory speech.

We examined how speakers of different languages perceive speech in face-to-face communication. These speakers identified synthetic unimodal and bimodal speech syllables made from synthetic auditory and visual five-step /ba/-/da/ continua. In the first experiment, Dutch speakers identified the test syllables as either /ba/ or /da/. To explore the robustness of the results, Dutch and English speakers were given a completely open-ended response task. Tasks in previous studies had always specified a set of alternatives. Similar results were found in the two-alternative and open-ended task. Identification of the speech segments was influenced by both the auditory and the visual sources of information. The results falsified an auditory dominance model (ADM) which assumes that the contribution of visible speech is dependent on poor-quality audible speech. The results also falsified an additive model of perception (AMP) in which the auditory and visual sources are linearly combined. The fuzzy logical model of perception (FLMP) provided a good description of performance, supporting the claim that multiple sources of continuous information are evaluated and integrated in speech perception. These results replicate previous results found with English, Spanish, and Japanese speakers. Although there were significant performance differences, the model analyses indicated no differences in the nature of information processing across language groups. The performance differences across languages were caused by information differences due to different phonologies in Dutch and English. These results suggest that the underlying mechanisms for speech perception are similar across languages.

Adult↗