Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Lechat

Publications and source records attributed to P Lechat.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Heart rate and cardiac rhythm relationships with bisoprolol benefit in chronic heart failure in CIBIS II Trial.

BACKGROUND: beta-Blockade-induced benefit in heart failure (HF) could be related to baseline heart rate and treatment-induced heart rate reduction, but no such relationships have been demonstrated. METHODS AND RESULTS: In CIBIS II, we studied the relationships between baseline heart rate (BHR), heart rate changes at 2 months (HRC), nature of cardiac rhythm (sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation), and outcomes (mortality and hospitalization for HF). Multivariate analysis of CIBIS II showed that in addition to beta-blocker treatment, BHR and HRC were both significantly related to survival and hospitalization for worsening HF, the lowest BHR and the greatest HRC being associated with best survival and reduction of hospital admissions. No interaction between the 3 variables was observed, meaning that on one hand, HRC-related improvement in survival was similar at all levels of BHR, and on the other hand, bisoprolol-induced benefit over placebo for survival was observed to a similar extent at any level of both BHR and HRC. Bisoprolol reduced mortality in patients with sinus rhythm (relative risk 0.58, P:<0.001) but not in patients with atrial fibrillation (relative risk 1.16, P:=NS). A similar result was observed for cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for HF worsening. CONCLUSIONS: BHR and HRC are significantly related to prognosis in heart failure. beta-Blockade with bisoprolol further improves survival at any level of BHR and HRC and to a similar extent. The benefit of bisoprolol is questionable, however, in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of single nasal (5 mg and 10 mg) and oral (50 mg) doses of ephedrine in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cardiovascular, subjective effects and potential of abuse liability of single dose (-) ephedrine (E) administered orally (50 mg) or intranasally (10 mg and 5 mg). METHODS: Sixteen healthy Caucasian men with no history of drug/alcohol/nicotine abuse or dependence received intranasal single doses of E 5 mg, 10 mg and oral doses of 50 mg and placebo in a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. Dependent measures included assessment of subjective feelings by Addiction Research Centre Inventory (ARCI). Profile of Mood States (POMS). visual analogue scales (VAS); "drug liking", "any drug effect", subjective quality of sleep and blood pressure and heart rate. Plasma E concentrations were also determined. RESULTS: (-) E increased supine systolic, diastolic blood pressure (P < 0.01). Changes in supine systolic blood pressure (areas under the 8 h of the experimental sessions) were -59 +/- 47 mmHgh with placebo, -59 +/- 57 mmHg-h with E5 mg by the nasal route, -18 +/- 48 mmHg x h with E 10 mg by the nasal route and 13 +/- 58 mmHgh with E 50 mg by the oral route (P<0.001). (-) E-induced orthostatic hypotension (P < 0.01) (maximal systolic blood pressure drop: E 50 mg 14 +/- 10 mmHg, P < 0.03; E 10 mg 11 +/- 6 mmHg, P = 0.08 compared with placebo) and resulted in decreased tiredness (placebo -2 +/- 39 mm x h, E 5 mg -17 +/- 39 mm x h, E 10 mg -30 +/- 42 mm x h, E 50 mg -24 +/- 35 mm x h; P < 0.03). E did not modify ARCI subscales--in particular the "amphetamine" subscale--but showed a tendency for drug liking (P= 0.09). On the "any drug effect" questionnaire, subjects could identify drug effect (P=0.007). Maximal plasma E concentration (Cmax) and areas under the curves for up to 8 h were proportional to the doses. Elimination half-life was approximately 6 h. A clockwise hysteresis was observed for systolic blood pressure in all but one subject with E 50 mg by the oral route. CONCLUSION: E even at low doses and by the nasal route can decrease tiredness in healthy persons; this is accompanied by a substantial increase in blood pressure and orthostatic hypotension exposing individuals in case of intensive physical exercise to cardiovascular risks. No clear evidence of abuse liability in healthy drug naive subjects was observed.

Administration, Intranasal↗
PubMed2001

Results from post-hoc analyses of the CIBIS II trial: effect of bisoprolol in high-risk patient groups with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of the beta-blocker bisoprolol on mortality and rate of hospitalisation as well as its safety in patients with chronic heart failure has been proven. However, its efficacy in patients in whom beta-blockers have traditionally been contraindicated or caution has been advised has not been clearly determined. Therefore, analyses in high-risk subgroups of patients taking part in CIBIS II have been performed to investigate the effect of bisoprolol in elderly patients, in patients with type 2 diabetes, with renal failure, NYHA functional class IV or concomitantly treated with digitalis, aldosterone antagonists or amiodarone. METHODS: High-risk subgroups of patients with chronic heart failure taking part in the CIBIS II study were retrospectively analysed with respect to mortality, hospitalisation, combined endpoint of cardiovascular mortality or hospitalisation for cardiovascular reasons and treatment withdrawal as well as cause of death and hospitalisation. Analysis is based on intention-to-treat. RESULTS: It was demonstrated that in spite of the expected increase in the overall risk of death and hospitalisation, patients who are diabetic, have renal impairment, NYHA class IV symptoms, are elderly, are taking either digitalis, amiodarone or aldosterone antagonists as co-medication benefit equally from beta-blockade with bisoprolol as patients without these complications or drugs. Benefit was shown for the primary endpoint all cause mortality, as well as for the secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the hitherto prevailing doctrine of not using beta-blockers in high risk patient groups with chronic heart failure, retrospective analyses of the CIBIS II study justify the use of this drug class in patients regardless of age, NYHA functional class, the presence of diabetes, renal impairment or concomitant treatment with digitalis, amiodarone or aldosterone antagonists.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

Beta-blocker treatment in heart failure.

Heart failure treatment has markedly changed during the last few decades, with demonstration of benefit of afterload reduction by vasodilator therapy and introduction of the concept of the deleterious consequences of the neuro-hormonal compensatory stimulation. Blockade of beta-adrenergic receptors, initially contra-indicated in heart failure, provide a marked reduction of mortality and morbidity in combination with diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, as demonstrated in many clinical trials. We performed a review of all clinical trials that compare beta-blockers vs. placebo in chronic heart failure. Beta-blockers with different pharmacological profiles have been tested, mainly metoprolol, bisoprolol, bucindolol and carvedilol. With progressive dose increment, tolerance of such treatment was generally good, left ventricular function improved, hospitalisations for heart failure were less frequent and mortality was reduced. The meta-analysis of the 16 randomised trials, with at least one death in each treatment group, provides a 24% relative risk reduction for such hospitalisations (95% CI=19%-29%) and 22% reduction for mortality (95% CI=16%-28%). Heterogeneity of beta-blocker effect for mortality was found and related to the non-significant benefit obtained in the BEST trial with bucindolol. When such a trial is excluded, the effect model analysis shows that relative risk reduction (beta-blocker induced benefit) is constant whatever the severity of the disease. The mechanism of beta-blocker induced benefit remains unclear, but is at least partly related to left ventricular function improvement and prevention of severe ventricular arrhythmias. In conclusion, beta-blocker treatment has become an established therapy for heart failure, in combination with diuretics and ACE inhibitors. Complementary informations will be needed to clarify the mechanism of benefit and to define the best therapeutic strategy according to the individual characteristics of patients with heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

Anticoagulant (fluindione)-aspirin combination in patients with high-risk atrial fibrillation. A randomized trial (Fluindione, Fibrillation Auriculaire, Aspirin et Contraste Spontané; FFAACS).

BACKGROUND: A combination of low-dose aspirin with anticoagulants may provide better protection against thromboembolic events compared to anticoagulants alone in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the preventive efficacy against nonfatal thromboembolic events and vascular deaths of the combination of the oral anticoagulant fluindione and aspirin (100 mg) in patients with high-risk atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial was conducted at 49 investigating centers in France. Atrial fibrillation patients with a previous thromboembolic event or older than 65 years and with either a history of hypertension, a recent episode of heart failure or decreased left ventricular function were included in the study. Patients were treated with fluindione plus placebo (i.e. anticoagulant alone) or fluindione plus aspirin (i.e. combination therapy), with an international normalized ratio target of between 2 and 2.6. The combined primary endpoint was stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), myocardial infarction, systemic arterial emboli or vascular death. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of hemorrhagic complications. RESULTS: The 157 participants (average age 74 years; 52% women; 42% with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) were followed for an average of 0.84 years. Three nonfatal thromboembolic events were observed (1 in the anticoagulation group, 2 in the combination group) and 6 patients died (3 in the anticoagulation group, 3 in the combination group), none of them from a thromboembolic complication. However, 3 deaths were secondary to severe hemorrhagic complications (1 in the anticoagulation group, 2 in the combination group). Nonfatal hemorrhagic complications occurred more often in the combination group (n = 10, 13.1%) compared to the anticoagulation group (n = 1, 1.2%) (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The combination of aspirin with anticoagulant is associated with increased bleeding in elderly atrial fibrillation patients. The effect on thromboembolism and the overall balance of benefit to risk could not be accurately assessed in this study due to the limited number of ischemic events.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

[Does statin therapy reduce the risk of stroke? A meta-analysis].

Large scale clinical trials have clearly demonstrated that the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) reduce cardiovascular mortality by about 30%. The specific benefit on stroke prevention remains however to be determined. We reviewed all controlled clinical trials comparing statins versus placebo in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. We identified 13 studies including 4S, CARE, WOSCOPS and LIPID. More than 32000 patients were randomized. The meta-analysis was performed using relative risk as treatment effect parameter. Statin treatment induced a significant relative risk reduction (RRR) of 24% (95% CI [12%-34%]) for stroke (2.1% vs 2.8%). RRR achieved 25% (95% CI [17%-32%]) for cardiovascular mortality and 34% (95% CI [30%-38%]) for myocardial infarction, without heterogeneity between trials. Stroke was reduced by 25% in secondary prevention, and by 15% in primary prevention, without significant heterogeneity between them. RRR of stroke was similar with pravastatin (RRR=0.79, p=0.0038) and with simvastatin (RRR=0.71, p=0.049). The effect model analysis (relationship between annual incidence of events in treated group versus placebo group in each trial) showed that RRR was constant whatever the baseline risk. These results are in favor of a preventive efficacy of statin treatment against stroke in middle aged patients with coronary heart disease. Complementary information will be needed to clarify the mechanism of this beneficial effect and to demonstrate statin efficacy in a population with a higher risk of stroke such as the elderly.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2000

Prognostic value of neurohormonal activation and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with chronic heart failure.

We compared the value of plasma neurohormones and cardiopulmonary exercise testing for predicting long-term prognosis in patients with moderate congestive heart failure (CHF). We studied 264 consecutive patients with CHF due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), norepinephrine, and endothelin-1 were measured at rest in all patients, who also underwent a symptom-limited maximal exercise with oxygen consumption (VO(2)) determination. After a median follow-up of 789 days, 52 deaths and 31 heart transplantations occurred, of which 4 were urgent. In an univariate analysis, New York Heart Association functional class, systolic blood pressure at rest, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, peak VO(2), percent of predicted peak VO(2), plasma ANP, plasma norepinephrine, and plasma endothelin-1 were associated with survival without urgent heart transplantation. In a multivariate stepwise regression analysis, only plasma ANP (p = 0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.007), and plasma norepinephrine (p = 0.035), but neither peak VO(2) nor percentage of predicted peak VO(2), were independent predictors of death or urgent heart transplantation. Determination of plasma ANP and norepinephrine provides additional independent information for long-term prognostic determination compared with exercise testing alone. Measurement of plasma neurohormones should therefore be considered routinely as a complementary or alternative tool for identifying high-risk patients with moderate CHF.

Atrial Natriuretic Factor↗
PubMed2000

Plasma adrenomedullin, a new independent predictor of prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Adrenomedullin, a potent endogenous vasodilating and natriuretic peptide, may play an important role in the pathophysiology of chronic heart failure. Plasma levels of immunoreactive adrenomedullin were examined for prediction of prognosis in chronic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Plasma levels of immunoreactive-ADM (ir-ADM) were measured by radioimmunoassay in 117 chronic heart failure patients with idiopathic or ischaemic cardiomyopathy (mean ejection fraction: 28 +/- 10%, in the NYHA functional class I/II/III/IV:8/73/29/7, and treated with ACE inhibitors and diuretics. Plasma levels of immunoreactive adrenomedullin were significantly increased in chronic heart failure patients by comparison to controls (618 +/- 293 pg x ml(-1) vs 480 +/- 135 pg x ml(-1), P=0.01). During the follow-up period (237 +/- 137 days) 14 cardiovascular deaths and four urgent cardiac transplantations occurred. In the univariate Cox model, immunoreactive adrenomedullin plasma levels were related to prognosis (P=0.004). A multivariate analysis including heart rate, systolic blood pressure, NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular echocardiographic end-diastolic diameter, plasma levels of immunoreactive adrenomedullin, endothelin-1, norepinephrine and atrial natriuretic peptide was performed: plasma levels of immunoreactive adrenomedullin (P=0.03), of endothelin-1 (P=0.0001), and systolic blood pressure (P=0.003) were significantly associated with outcome. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that elevated plasma levels of immunoreactive adrenomedullin are an independent predictor of prognosis in predominantly mild to moderate chronic heart failure treated by conventional therapy and provide additional prognostic information.

Adrenomedullin↗
PubMed2000

Predictors of medical events in patients enrolled in the cardiac insufficiency bisoprolol study (CIBIS): a study of the interactions between beta-blocker therapy and occurrence of critical events using analysis of competitive risks.

BACKGROUND: The risk of occurrence of medical events in a clinical trial is competitive in nature; that is, in a given patient the risk of having a critical event depends on the amount of time elapsed since random assignment and on the previous events that may have occurred in the patient. The purpose of this study was to examine the relations between baseline variables, the interactions between treatment, bisoprolol, or placebo, and the occurrence of critical events during the CIBIS trial, a mortality and morbidity trial of beta-blockade in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: A Cox model for censored data was used to analyze the relations between baseline variables, total deaths, permanent treatment withdrawals, nonlethal cardiovascular events, and their interactions with bisoprolol or placebo. We examined the influence of treatment on the occurrence of deaths, permanent treatment withdrawals, and nonlethal cardiovascular events by using the technique of event history analysis, which takes into account competitive risks between events. Compared with placebo, bisoprolol reduced mortality rates in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction < or =20% (relative risk [RR] 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27 to 0.88; P =.02). In patients whose baseline heart rate was in the upper tertile of distribution, permanent treatment withdrawals were less frequent in patients randomly assigned to bisoprolol than in patients randomly assigned to placebo (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.88; P =.02). Bisoprolol reduced the incidence of nonlethal cardiac events in patients in whom heart failure was present for at least 4 years (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.71; P <.01). Event history analysis revealed that among patients who died under treatment after having at least 1 nonlethal cardiovascular event, 20 patients were treated with placebo but only 7 patients were treated with bisoprolol (RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.98; P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with heart failure derive more benefit from beta-blocker therapy than others. In the CIBIS trial, they are those patients with the lower left ventricular ejection fractions and those who have nonlethal cardiovascular events but in whom beta-blocker therapy is not permanently discontinued.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2000

Effects of prolonged propranolol treatment on left ventricular remodeling and oxidative stress after myocardial infarction in rats.

Mechanisms determining the benefit of beta blockade in patients with heart failure remain incompletely understood but are assumed consequent to prevention of deleterious effects of catecholamines. Recent studies have demonstrated that oxidative stress in congestive heart failure may be related to increased catecholamine levels. The aim of this study was to examine effects of long-term treatment with propranolol on progression of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, remodeling and oxidative stress on an experimental model of chronic heart failure. Six weeks after myocardial infarction by coronary ligation, Wistar rats were randomized to two groups: 10 weeks of therapy with propranolol (50 mg/kg/day in drinking water) and no treatment (infarcted controls). A third group was sham-operated rats without treatment. Animals were anesthetized for hemodynamic measurements, and hearts were then removed for histologic analysis, papillary muscle contractility study, and oxidative stress measurements using thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) determination. Control infarcted rats demonstrated significant alterations of hemodynamic parameters and remodeling with increase of heart weight/body weight, of right ventricular lateral wall thickness, of LV circumference, LV septal area/body weight, and LV papillary muscle weight/body weight as compared with sham. In propranolol-treated rats, hypertrophy of the LV septum, papillary muscle, and right ventricle were similar to those of the infarcted control. Myocardial oxidative stress was significantly increased in control infarcted rats compared with sham, and propranolol prevented such oxidative stress increase. Papillary muscle isometric tension parameters were not significantly different among groups. Propranolol treatment prevented isoprenaline-induced spontaneous papillary muscle activity in vitro. Oxidative stress is increased in the rat model of heart failure secondary to coronary ligation. Long-term treatment with propranolol in vivo does not modify the compensatory process of hypertrophy but completely abolishes the oxidative stress increase and reduces the increased cardiac sensitivity to catecholamine-induced arrhythmias observed in this experimental model of heart failure.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Prediction of fluindione maintenance dosage hampered by large intraindividual variability.

In a previous study, the authors proposed a method to individualize fluindione dosage regimen, based on a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model describing the evolution of the International Normalized Ratio (INR). In this method, daily maintenance dosage for a target INR depends on the product of individual Cl and C50. The present work shows the results of a follow-up study in 50 patients for whom target INR was 2.5. INR measurements and dosage regimens were recorded both during hospital stay and during the 1st month of treatment. Patients were defined as equilibrated after 1 month if the last two INRs were in the range 1.5-3.5 under a stable dosage regimen. Actual maintenance dose was compared with the dose predicted using the three first INRs measured in the hospital. Intraindividual variability of Cl*C50 between hospital stay and after 1 month was evaluated. After 1 month, only 27 patients (54%) were equilibrated. Actual maintenance dose varied from 5 to 30 mg daily. There was no bias between predicted and actual maintenance dose (1.4 mg), but a large root mean squared error (8 mg) was found. The intraindividual variability in Cl*C50 between hospital and maintenance regimen was high (93%), which may explain the dispersion in the predicted maintenance dose.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1999

Different effects of bisoprolol on heart rate in patients with ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (a 24-hour Holter substudy of the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study [CIBIS]).

The effect of beta blockade on heart rate in patients with either idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy was studied. It was found that beta blockade reduced the early morning increase in heart rate to a greater extent in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy than in those with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Clinical effects of beta-adrenergic blockade in chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: beta-Blockers have improved symptoms and reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in studies of patients with heart failure, but it is unclear which end points are most sensitive to the therapeutic effects of these drugs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We combined the results of all 18 published double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials of beta-blockers in heart failure. From this combined database of 3023 patients, we evaluated the strength of evidence supporting an effect of treatment on left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA functional class, hospitalizations for heart failure, and death. beta-Blockers exerted their most persuasive effects on ejection fraction and on the combined risk of death and hospitalization for heart failure. beta-Blockade increased the ejection fraction by 29% (P<10(-9)) and reduced the combined risk of death or hospitalization for heart failure by 37% (P<0.001). Both effects remained significant even if >90% of the trials were eliminated from the analysis or if a large number of trials with a neutral result were added to the analysis. In contrast, the effect of beta-blockade on NYHA functional class was of borderline significance (P=0.04) and disappeared with the addition or removal of only 1 moderate-size study. Although beta -blockade reduced all-cause mortality by 32% (P=0.003), this effect was only moderately robust and varied according to the type of ss-blocker tested, ie, the reduction of mortality risk was greater for nonselective beta-blockers than for beta1-selective agents (49% versus 18%, P=0.049). However, selective and nonselective beta-blockers did not differ in their effects on other measures of clinical efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate that there is persuasive evidence supporting a favorable effect of beta-blockade on ejection fraction and the combined risk of death and hospitalization for heart failure. In contrast, the effect of these drugs on other end points requires additional study.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

Beta-blocker treatment in heart failure. Role of heart rate reduction.

The potential therapeutic effect of beta-blocker treatment in chronic heart failure is still actively being investigated through large scale clinical trials. The underlying cardioprotective mechanism relies upon protection against the deleterious consequences of cardiac sympathetic stimulation. Heart rate reduction induced by beta-blocker treatment may importantly contribute to such benefit especially by improving myocardial energetic balance and by inducing a less negative force-frequency relationship. Results from clinical trials such as CIBIS suggest that prognosis in chronic heart failure may partly depend on left ventricular function improvement, but additional data are needed to more precisely define the relationships between heart rate reduction, left ventricular function improvement, and survival.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1998

Modifications of myocardial Na+,K(+)-ATPase isoforms and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in aldosterone/salt-induced hypertension in guinea pigs.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether changes in cardiac Na+,K(+)-ATPase subunits and Na+/Ca2+ exchanger expression are regulated in aldosterone-salt hypertensive guinea pigs. METHODS: Guinea pigs (GP) were unilaterally nephrectomized and randomized into three groups (aldosterone-salt; control-salt; control). After 90 days of treatment, echocardiographic M-mode assessment and right carotid arterial catheterization were performed in vivo, and plasma hormones and electrolytes were measured. mRNA and protein levels were studied by Northern and Western blot analysis. RESULTS: Aldosterone-salt treatment induced, (1) arterial hypertension (+40%) and LV hypertrophy (+60%) without altering LV-fractional shortening, (2) an increase in plasma norepinephrine levels (+262%) and suppression of renin activity. Northern blot analysis showed the presence of the mRNA encoding the three alpha isoforms and the beta 1 subunit of Na+,K(+)-ATPase in GP myocardium. In the aldosterone-salt group, levels of alpha 1 and beta 1 mRNAs were unchanged. alpha 2 mRNA was increased in both ventricles, whereas alpha 3 mRNA was increased in hypertrophied LV only. Furthermore, levels of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger mRNA were decreased in both ventricles. At protein level, the two major transcripts (alpha 1 and alpha 2) were detected but alpha 3 isoform was not. Parallel changes in protein and mRNA accumulation of alpha 1 and alpha 2 isoforms were observed in hypertrophied LV. CONCLUSION: These results show that alpha 1 and alpha 2 isoforms are expressed in GP heart and that they are independently regulated in aldosterone-salt hypertension. Like the alpha 1 isoform in renal tissue, alpha 2 isoform is the main target of aldosterone-salt. Reciprocal expression of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger and Na+,K(+)-ATPase suggests an adaptational mechanism which maintains an appropriate sodium gradient and calcium concentration in hypertensive myocardium.

Aldosterone↗
PubMed1998

Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of fluindione in patients.

OBJECTIVE: Fluindione is a vitamin K antagonist with a long half-life. This study was designed to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of multiple doses of fluindione in patients. METHODS: In a learning group of 49 patients who began fluindione treatment, blood samples were taken 12, 18, or 24 hours after one, three, and five doses. Concentration of fluindione, activity of clotting factors II, VII, IX and X, prothrombin complex activity (PCA), and international normalized ratio (INR) were measured. An indirect-response pharmacodynamic model was used for each effect. A comprehensive analysis was performed with a nonparametric population approach. The model was evaluated in 24 other patients: blood samples were taken 24 hours after two, three, four, and six doses; and PCA and INR were observed. RESULTS: Analysis of concentrations and clotting factor activities showed notably that (1) fluindione has a long half-life (median, 69 hours), and (2) concentration that inhibits the synthesis of the clotting factors by 50% varied for each factor, with a median ranging from 0.25 to 2.05 mg.L-1 for factors VII and II, respectively. The results obtained for INR and PCA were validated in the 24 subsequent patients. CONCLUSION: The population approach allowed the comparison of several pharmacodynamic submodels. This first application of the indirect-response model to multiple oral anticoagulant doses in patients confirmed that both the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of fluindione show substantial interindividual variability.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed1998

A cost-minimization of heart failure therapy with bisoprolol in the French setting: an analysis from CIBIS trial data. Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study.

Beta-blocker-induced benefit in heart failure is under intense evaluation. Several large-scale mortality trials are currently being performed, with CIBIS II evaluating bisoprolol. The economic impact of beta-blocker therapy in heart failure has not been previously determined. The present study is a cost-effectiveness evaluation of bisoprolol treatment based on CIBIS I data. It considers direct costs, that is, the bisoprolol medication cost and the cost of hospitalization related to heart failure and its complications. Hospitalization costs were calculated from the French system of classification (PMSI), which provides costs according to homogeneous groups of patients (GHM). The cost difference between bisoprolol and placebo in the entire CIBIS population and the trial duration result from an increase in cost caused by bisoprolol treatment (+ 2018 Frs/patient) and a decrease in cost related to reduced hospitalization (6349 Frs/patient). A total savings per patient of about 4330 Frs was produced by bisoprolol. Cost reduction is still more pronounced in patients not having a history of myocardial infarction. We conclude that heart failure therapy with bisoprolol lowers medical healthcare costs, mainly due to the reduced rate of hospital admissions for heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗