Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Lamesch

Publications and source records attributed to P Lamesch.

44 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

Monoethylglycinexylidide formation kinetics: a novel approach to assessment of liver function.

A novel quantitative liver function test is described which is based on monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) formation after lidocaine bolus injection. Following the administration of small single doses of lidocaine hydrochloride (1 mg/kg), monoethylglycinexylidide serum concentration-time curves were determined by a novel highly sensitive fluorescence polarisation immunoassay (FPIA) in healthy volunteers, liver donors and patients with liver cirrhosis. The FPIA allowed rapid and reliable monoethylglycinexylidide determinations in serum and urine (between-days coefficient of variation: less than 10.3%, recovery: 80-113%). Monoethylglycinexylidide concentrations measured by FPIA in 32 serum samples from patients correlated well those determined by HPLC. The monoethylglycinexylidide concentration in serum determined 15 min after a lidocaine bolus injection proved to be a highly sensitive and specific indicator of hepatic dysfunction. Average monoethylglycinexylidide concentrations in serum obtained 15 min after lidocaine injection were substantially lower in patients with liver cirrhosis than in healthy volunteers. The average monoethylglycinexylidide concentrations in serum were also substantially lower in liver donors with ballooning or fatty changes of hepatocytes than in donors without relevant alterations of liver histology. By means of monoethylglycinexylidide formation in the liver donors, primary function of the transplanted liver was correctly predicted in 32/37 cases and initial non-function in 4/6 cases.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Surgical treatment of cholangiocellular carcinoma.

Intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) is known to be associated with severe symptoms and a particularly poor prognosis. Nonsurgical methods have failed to change this situation up to now. Surgical therapy, so far, is the only chance for effective treatment, but it has had limited success. The relative infrequency of this tumor does not allow extensive statistics and limits our present knowledge. In this contribution the outcome of 50 patients who underwent liver resection or liver transplantation in our institution is reported. Their courses have been reevaluated according to pathohistologic classification and TNM tumor staging. The median survival rates were 12.8 months in the group of patients after liver resection (n = 32) and 5.0 months after liver transplantation (n = 18). Liver transplantation, however, was performed only in patients with unresectable tumors. The longest survival after transplantation was 25 months; after resection four patients survived more than 5 years. In the resection group and the transplantation group survival rates correlated with tumor size and tumor stages according to TNM, although the differences were not statistically significant. Liver resection thus has its place in resectable situations. Liver transplantation for unresectable lesions of this tumor type--always deemed critically in the past--seems not to be indicated with our present stage of knowledge, unless adjuvant protocols appear promising and are tested.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Benign liver tumors: differential diagnosis and indications for surgery.

The differential diagnosis for hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), and hepatocellular adenoma may be difficult. Reliable diagnosis is mandatory for the decision of whether to apply surgery or observation. Experience with long-term observation in nonoperated patients with hemangioma and FNH is limited. A group of 437 patients from a single institution were analyzed with regard to a diagnostic algorithm, the indications for surgery, and observation. There were 238 hemangiomas, 150 cases of FNH, 44 adenomas, and 5 mixed tumors. Of the 437 patients, 173 underwent surgery; 103 with hemangioma and 54 with FNH were observed at our own institution, whereas 117 patients underwent follow-up elsewhere or were lost. Among the operated patients with confirmed histology, a good diagnostic yield was found for a combination of ultrasonography (US), contrast (bolus)-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and labeled red blood cell (RBC) scanning: sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100%, negative predictive value (NPV) 81.8%, and accuracy 91.3%. For FNH and combination of US and CT plus cholescintigraphy showed a sensitivity 82.1%, specificity 97.1%, PPV 95.8%, NPV 84.6%, and accuracy 90.3%. Surgical mortality was 0.6%. Observation of patients with hemangioma and FNH for a median of 32 months revealed no increase in tumor size in 80% and a decrease in fewer than 7%. There was no tumor rupture and no evidence of malignant transformation. We concluded that liver hemangioma and FNH can be differentiated from adenoma with high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy by labeled RBC scanning and cholescintigraphy in combination with US and contrast-enhanced CT. In the case of symptoms or an equivocal diagnosis with respect to adenoma or hepatocellular carcinoma, surgery can be performed with very low risk. Because in asymptomatic patients with observed hemangioma or FNH no increase of tumor size can be expected for many years, the indications for surgery must be carefully evaluated.

Adenoma, Liver Cell↗