Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Kotrappa

Publications and source records attributed to P Kotrappa.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Performance of electret ionization chambers in magnetic field.

Electret ionization chambers are widely used for measuring radon and radiation. The radiation measured includes alpha, beta, and gamma radiation. These detectors do not have any electronics and as such can be introduced into magnetic field regions. It is of interest to study the effect of magnetic fields on the performance of these detectors. Relative responses are measured with and without magnetic fields present. Quantitative responses are measured as the magnetic field is varied from 8 kA/m to 716 kA/m (100 to 9,000 gauss). No significant effect is observed for measuring alpha radiation and gamma radiation. However, a significant systematic effect is observed while measuring beta radiation from a 90Sr-Y source. Depending upon the field orientation, the relative response increased from 1.0 to 2.7 (vertical position) and decreased from 1.0 to 0.60 (horizontal position). This is explained as due to the setting up of a circular motion for the electrons by the magnetic field, which may increase or decrease the path length in air depending upon the experimental configuration. It is concluded that these ionization chambers can be used for measuring alpha (and hence radon) and gamma radiation in the range of magnetic fields studied. However, caution must be exercised if measuring beta radiation.

Alpha Particles↗

Electrets to measure ion concentration in air.

Positive and negative ions are produced in air, mainly due to radon and terrestrial/cosmic radiation sources. Measuring ion concentration in air indirectly provides a measure of these sources. Electrets (electrically charged pieces of Teflon), when exposed in the environment, collect ions of opposite sign leading to a measurable decrease in charge, depending upon the exposure time and ion concentration. This work describes a method of correlating electret discharge rate to the ion concentration as measured by a calibrated ion density meter. Once calibrated, electrets can then be used to measure ion concentration of either sign. The ion concentration in ambient air was measured to be about 200 ions mL(-1), measured over several hours. Both positive and negative ion concentrations were similar. In a typical room, negative ion concentration was about 3,500 ions mL(-1), and, surprisingly, there were no positive ions at all in that room. Being an integrating passive device, the method provides the unique possibility of measuring low or high concentrations of positive or negative ions over extended periods, which is difficult to do with other ion concentration measuring instruments.

Air Pollutants, Radioactive↗

Radon monitor calibration using NIST radon emanation standards: steady flow method.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) polyethylene-encapsulated 226Ra/222Rn emanation (PERE) standards (old SRM 4968 and new SRMs 4971, 4972, and 4973) provide precise radon emanation rate, certified to a high degree of accuracy (approximately to 2%). Two new SRM 4973 standards containing totally 1036 Bq (0.028 microCi) of 226Ra, emanate 0.114 Bq (3.08 pCi) of 222Rn per min. Air passing over such sources at a flow rate of 1 l min(-1) will have a radon concentration of 114 Bq m(-3) (3.08 pCi l(-1)). This paper describes a practical calibration system and the actual calibration verification data obtained at different flow rates, for E-PERM passive radon monitors, Femto-Tech and Alpha Guard Continuous Radon Monitors. The use of such an affordable and easy to use system by the manufacturers and users of radon measurement devices will bring uniform standards with traceability to a NIST standard source and is considered an important step in standardising radon measurement methods.

Air Pollutants, Radioactive↗

Measurement of alpha particle energy using windowless electret ion chambers.

Electret ion chambers are inexpensive, lightweight, robust, commercially available, passive, charge-integrating devices for accurate measurement of different ionizing radiations. In an earlier work a chamber of dimensions larger than the range of alpha particles having aluminized Mylar windows of different thickness was used for measurement of alpha radiation. Correlation between electret mid-point voltage, alpha particle energy, and response was developed and it was shown that this chamber could be used for estimating the effective energy of an unknown alpha source. In the present study, the electret ion chamber is used in the windowless mode so that the alpha particles dissipate their entire energy inside the volume, and the alpha particle energy is determined from the first principles. This requires that alpha disintegration rate be accurately known or measured by an alternate method. The measured energies were within 1 to 4% of the true values for different sources (230Th, 237Np, 239Pu, 241Am, and 224Cm). This method finds application in quantitative determination of alpha energy absorbed in thin membrane and, hence, the absorbed dose.

Americium↗

Electret method for continuous measurement of the concentration of radon in water.

A passive system using an electret ion chamber to measure dissolved radon in a water sample has been recently described. In the current work, an electret ion chamber has been used to measure time-averaged concentration of dissolved radon in water. A steady concentration of radon in water is generated by bubbling radon gas into water in a 20-L jar and maintaining constant rates of feed and bleed of the water. To perform the measurement, the outgoing water flows into a 4-L cylindrical chamber. Air is bubbled at 1 L min-1 through a 10 cm long sintered stainless steel tube immersed in this water releasing the radon from water into the chamber volume. A 1-L electret ion chamber ("H" chamber) loaded with an electret is hung in the 4-L chamber. Radon diffuses into the "H" chamber through its tyvek (carbon-coated) covered openings. The radon concentration in air is measured from the change in electret voltage. The concentration of radon in water is then obtained from the concentration of radon in air and the air and water flow rates. For comparison, the radon concentration in water was measured using a standard liquid scintillation counting method. For the concentration range covered (4.7 to 72 Bq L-1), there was a good agreement between the two methods.

Radon↗

Field test of electret ion chambers for environmental monitoring.

A field test of electret ion chambers was performed to evaluate their performance in making environmental exposure measurements at nuclear facilities. The objectives of the study were to determine electret ion chamber variability and to perform comparisons with thermoluminescent dosimeter and high-pressure ion chamber measurements. Three electret ion chambers were placed at each of 40 monitoring locations in the vicinity of a commercial nuclear power station during four consecutive quarters. The electret ion chamber measurements were compared to thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements made by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. Two types of comparison were made with the high-pressure ion chamber. One used yearly average electret ion chamber measurement and instantaneous high-pressure ion chamber measurements at 15 of the monitoring locations. The other involved the simultaneous exposure of five electret ion chambers and the high-pressure ion chamber for 15 d at a single location. The mean ratios of electret ion chamber measurements to thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements was 1.06. The mean ratio of electret ion chamber measurements to instantaneous and simultaneous high-pressure ion chamber measurements were 1.06 and 1.07, respectively. Electret variability, defined here as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean, was determined for each set of three detectors. The average variability for the 160 sets of quarterly measurements was approximately 7%. Among the 450 individual electret measurements, there were six outliers. Based on the results of this study, electret ion chambers appear to yield accurate measurements of environmental exposure provided that measures are taken to either minimize or correct for radon interferences and care is taken to prevent spurious discharges during handling.

Environmental Monitoring↗

Electret ion chamber radon monitors measure dissolved 222Rn in water.

This paper describes a simple and relatively inexpensive method of determining the concentration of dissolved 222Rn in water. The method involves a recently developed electret-passive environmental radon monitor, which uses an electret ion chamber. The procedure consists of sealing a known volume of a carefully collected water sample with one of these monitors in an exposure container and determining the average equilibrium 222Rn gas concentration in the air phase during the exposure time period. This average concentration can then be used to calculate the 222Rn concentration in the original water sample. Identical samples were analyzed both by this new method and by a standard liquid scintillation method, and the results were compared over a wide range of 222Rn concentrations. There was good agreement except that the electret ion chamber method gave results that were consistently lower by about 15%. This bias in the results was attributed to both 222Rn losses during sample handling and possibly to some errors in the assumptions made in the theoretical model. A correction factor is recommended to bring the results of this technique into agreement with the standard method. The procedures are simple and economical and can be easily employed by many primary 222Rn-measuring laboratories currently using these monitors for measuring indoor 222Rn.

Radiation Monitoring↗

Elevation correction factors for E-PERM radon monitors.

E-PERM radon monitors are based on the principle of electret ion chambers and are usually calibrated in a standard radon chamber located at sea level. Corrections are needed if the monitors are used at elevations other than sea level. These were experimentally determined for three models of commercially available electret ion chambers (E-PERM) as functions of elevation above sea level. These corrections are minor and should be applied for obtaining more accurate results.

Calibration↗

A practical E-PERM (electret passive environmental radon monitor) system for indoor 222Rn measurement.

The technical and scientific basis for the measurement of indoor 222Rn concentration using an E-PERM (Electret passive environmental radon monitor) has been described in our earlier work. The purpose of this paper is to describe further development of a practical and convenient system that can be used routinely for indoor 222Rn measurement. The ion chamber is now made of electrically conducting plastic to minimize the response from natural gamma radiation. A spring-loaded shutter method is used to cover and uncover the electret from outside the chamber. The electret voltage reader has been modified to improve the accuracy and the ease in operation. The calibration, performance, error analysis, and lower limits of detection for these standardized versions of E-PERMs are also described.

Air Pollutants↗

An electret passive environmental 222Rn monitor based on ionization measurement.

The electret passive environmental 222Rn monitor (E-PERM) is an extension of electret dosimeters used for measurement of x and gamma radiation. An E-PERM consists of a small cup or canister, having an electret at the bottom, and a filtered inlet at the top. The 222Rn gas entering through the filter and the decay products formed inside the cup generate ions which are collected by the electret. The reduction of charge (or surface potential) on the electret is a measure of time integrated 222Rn exposure. An E-PERM of 220-mL volume with an electret of 0.23 cm thickness gave a surface potential drop of 2.5 V for 37 Bq m-3 d (1 pCi L-1 d). The electret voltage was measured with a specially built surface potential voltmeter. This sensitivity was found adequate for a 1-wk measurement of 222Rn in homes. For longer term measurements, an E-PERM of 40-mL volume and an electret of 51-micron thickness was developed which gave a surface potential drop of 2.6 V for 37 Bq m-3 y (1 pCi L-1 y). Other combinations of chamber volume and electret thicknesses gave responses between these two values. The surface potential of electrets made from Teflon FEP were shown to stay stable even under extreme conditions of relative humidity. The ion collection process in E-PERMs was also shown to be independent of humidity down to an electret surface potential of 100 V.

Environmental Monitoring↗

Radium-226 body burden in U miners by measurement of Rn in exhaled breath.

Uranium miners were made to inhale Rn-free medical O2 and exhale through a 5.2-1 A1 chamber before reporting to work. The chamber was sealed and isolated from the sampling circuit. An electrostatic plate collected the freshly formed Rn-decay products. The subsequent programmed alpha counting of the plate yielded a Rn concentration in the exhaled breath. Assuming that the exhaled breath represents a certain fraction of the Rn produced inside the body, the body burden of 226Ra was calculated. Standardisation of this procedure and the data collected on 310 miners are discussed. The procedure is simple and applicable for routine measurements. The miner needs to be in the laboratory for only 10 min. The system is also portable for field application. For routine use, the minimum detectable concentration is 3.87 Bq X m-3 which corresponds to a body burden of 0.26 kBq in a typical miner, if one assumes the Rn release fraction from the body as 84%. The system offers a more convenient and sensitive alternative to whole-body counting of workers for 226Ra.

Body Burden↗

Measurement of 220Rn in exhaled breath of Th plant workers.

The concentration of 220Rn in the exhaled breath of workers currently employed in a Th plant was measured using a double filter system. The results are expressed in terms of the equivalent activity of 224Ra freely emanating 220Rn at the mouth. Measurements performed on 176 subjects, without isolating them from day-to-day work, showed 220Rn levels having a median of 0.74 Bq, with the group consisting of sweepers and helpers showing the highest average level (1.68 Bq). Measurements performed on 15 selected workers, after isolating them from work for a minimum duration of 48 h yielded 220Rn levels which were consistently lower than those obtained in the first measurements. This is attributed to the material undergoing short term elimination from the body. It was also found from the latter measurements that the group consisting of workers engaged in radioactive work for more than 24 y has an average 220Rn level of 2.65 Bq which is significantly higher than that (1.27 Bq) found in the group that has worked for less than 12 y. A conversion factor of 0.09 deduced by earlier investigators is assumed to be valid for estimating the actual 224Ra burdens from the 220Rn data.

Body Burden↗

Passive measurement of radon and thoron using TLD or SSNTD on electrets.

An electret is an electrical analogue of a permanent magnet and it carries a permanent electric charge. Our previous work has shown that such electrets are suitable for collecting decay products of radon and thoron in passive chambers. In the present work, the decay products are directly collected on the surface of a TLD or SSNTD providing in situ registration of the radiation from the decay products of radon and thoron. A 101. chamber, the sides of which were covered with a layer of Whatman No. 1 (W-1) filter paper, showed the following responses: (i) SSNTD (CR-39) recorded 92 +/- 13 tracks per cm2 per pCi/l, hr for radon and 9 +/- 1.5 tracks per cm2 per pCi/l. hr for thoron; (ii) for similar levels TLD (CaF2(Dy)) chips recorded an equivalent of 1.35 +/- 0.16 mR for radon and 0.30 +/- jk0.09 mR for thoron. Taking advantage of the differential response of the two chambers (one covered with a layer of W-1 filter paper and the other with a 75 mm polyurethene foam), simultaneous measurement of radon and thoron could be achieved.

Radiation Monitoring↗