Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P J de Feyter

Publications and source records attributed to P J de Feyter.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Reduction in infarct size, but no functional improvement after bone marrow cell administration in a porcine model of reperfused myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Stem cell therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) has been studied in models of permanent coronary occlusion. We studied the effect of intracoronary administration of unselected bone marrow (BM) and mononuclear cells (MNC) in a porcine model of reperfused MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 34 swine, the left circumflex coronary artery was balloon-occluded for 2 h followed by reperfusion. Ten swine without MI served as controls. All swine underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1 week post-MI. The next day, 10 of the 30 surviving MI swine received BM, 10 other MI swine received MNC, and the remaining MI swine received medium intracoronary. Four weeks later, all swine underwent a follow-up MRI. One week after MI, end-diastolic volume (92+/-16 mL) and left ventricular (LV) weight (78+/-12 g) were greater, whereas ejection fraction (40+/-8%) was lower than in controls (69+/-11 mL, 62+/-13 g, and 53+/-6%). Injection of BM or MNC had no effect on the MI-induced changes in global or regional LV-function. However, there was a significant reduction in infarct size 4 weeks after MNC injection (-6+/-3%) compared with the medium (-3+/-5%). CONCLUSION: Intracoronary injection of BM or MNC in swine does not improve regional or global LV-function 4 weeks after injection. However, a reduction in infarct-size was noted after MNC injection.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

One year clinical follow up of paclitaxel eluting stents for acute myocardial infarction compared with sirolimus eluting stents.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcome of paclitaxel eluting stents (PES) versus sirolimus eluting stents (SES) for the treatment of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: The first 136 consecutive patients treated exclusively with PES in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in this single centre registry were prospectively clinically assessed at 30 days and one year. They were compared with 186 consecutive patients treated exclusively with SES in the preceding period. SETTING: Academic tertiary referral centre. RESULTS: At 30 days, the rate of all cause mortality and reinfarction was similar between groups (6.5% v 6.6% for SES and PES, respectively, p = 1.0). A significant difference in target vessel revascularisation (TVR) was seen in favour of SES (1.1% v 5.1% for PES, p = 0.04). This was driven by stent thrombosis (n = 4), especially in the bifurcation stenting (n = 2). At one year, no significant differences were seen between groups, with no late thrombosis and 1.5% in-stent restenosis (needing TVR) in PES versus no reinterventions in SES (p = 0.2). One year survival free of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was 90.2% for SES and 85% for PES (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were seen in MACE-free survival at one year between SES and PES for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with very low rates of reintervention for restenosis. Bifurcation stenting in acute myocardial infarction should, if possible, be avoided because of the increased risk of stent thrombosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Long term outcome after intracoronary beta radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the long term outcome after intracoronary beta radiation therapy (IRT). SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. METHODS: The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was retrospectively determined in 301 consecutive patients who were treated with IRT. MACE was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or any reintervention. Long term clinical outcome was obtained from an electronic database of hospital records and from questionnaires to the patients and referring physicians. Long term survival status was assessed by written inquiries to the municipal civil registries. RESULTS: The mean (SD) follow up was 3.6 (1.2) years. The cumulative incidence of MACE at six months was 19.1%, at one year 36.4%, and at four years 58.3%. The target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate at six months was 12.9%, at one year 28.3%, and at four years 50.4%. From multivariate analysis, dose < 18 Gy was the most significant predictor of TLR. At four years the cumulative incidence of death was 3.8%, of myocardial infarction 13.4%, and of coronary artery bypass surgery 11.3%. Total vessel occlusion was documented in 12.3% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the long term follow up of patients after IRT, there are increased adverse cardiac events beyond the first six months.

Beta Particles↗
PubMed2004

Routine sirolimus eluting stent implantation for unselected in-stent restenosis: insights from the rapamycin eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of routine sirolimus eluting stent (SES) implantation for unselected patients with in-stent restenosis and to provide preliminary information about the angiographic outcome for lesion subgroups and for different in-stent restenosis patterns. DESIGN: Prospective, single centre registry. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: 44 consecutive patients (53 lesions) without previous brachytherapy who were treated with SES for in-stent restenosis were evaluated. Routine angiographic follow up was obtained at six months and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was evaluated. RESULTS: At baseline, 42% of the lesions were focal, 21% diffuse, 26% proliferative, and 11% total occlusions. Small vessel size (reference diameter < or = 2.5 mm) was present in 49%, long lesions (> 20 mm) in 30%, treatment of bypass grafts in 13%, and bifurcation stenting in 18%. At follow up, post-SES restenosis was observed in 14.6%. No restenosis was observed in focal lesions. For more complex lesions, restenosis rates ranged from 20-25%. At the one year follow up, the incidence of death was 0, myocardial infarction 4.7% (n = 2), and target lesion revascularisation 16.3% (n = 7). The target lesion was revascularised because of restenosis in 11.6% (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: Routine SES implantation is highly effective for focal in-stent restenosis and appears to be a promising strategy for more complex patterns of restenosis.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Noninvasive coronary imaging using electron beam CT: surface rendering versus volume rendering.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional data for noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries are acquired from electron beam CT, multidetector CT, or MR imaging. Most commonly, surface rendering is used for three-dimensional processing, but recent advances in hardware and software technology have made it possible to use volume rendering. Our objective was to compare volume rendering with surface rendering for the visualization of the coronary artery tree. CONCLUSION: Our experience in the comparison of both techniques shows that because of intrinsic problems associated with surface rendering, volume rendering produces better image quality.

Coronary Angiography↗
PubMed2002

Bypass surgery versus stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease in patients with unstable angina compared with stable angina.

BACKGROUND: Earlier reports have shown that the outcome of balloon angioplasty or bypass surgery in unstable angina is less favorable than in stable angina. Recent improvements in percutaneous treatment (stent implantation) and bypass surgery (arterial grafts) warrant reevaluation of the relative merits of either technique in treatment of unstable angina. Methods and Results- Seven hundred fifty-five patients with stable angina were randomly assigned to coronary stenting (374) or bypass surgery (381), and 450 patients with unstable angina were randomly assigned to coronary stenting (226) or bypass surgery (224). All patients had multivessel disease considered to be equally treatable by either technique. Freedom from major adverse events, including death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events, at 1 year was not different in unstable patients (91.2% versus 88.9%) and stable patients (90.4% versus 92.6%) treated, respectively, with coronary stenting or bypass surgery. Freedom from repeat revascularization at 1 year was similar in unstable and stable angina treated with stenting (79.2% versus 78.9%) or bypass surgery (96.3% versus 96%) but was significantly higher in both unstable and stable patients treated with stenting (16.8% versus 16.9%) compared with bypass surgery (3.6% versus 3.5%). Neither the difference in costs between stented or bypassed stable or unstable angina ($2594 versus $3627) nor the cost-effectiveness was significantly different at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in rates of death, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular event at 1 year in patients with unstable angina and multivessel disease treated with either stented angioplasty or bypass surgery compared with patients with stable angina. The rate of repeat revascularization of both unstable and stable angina was significantly higher in patients with stents.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Initial observation regarding changes in vessel dimensions after balloon angioplasty and stenting followed by catheter-based beta-radiation. Is stenting necessary in the setting of catheter-based radiotherapy?

AIMS: We sought to compare the effect of intracoronary beta-radiation on the vessel dimensions in de novo lesions using three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound quantification after balloon angioplasty and stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients (44 vessels; 28 balloon angioplasty and 16 stenting) treated with catheter-based beta-radiation and 18 non-irradiated control patients (18 vessels; 10 balloon angioplasty and 8 stenting) were investigated by means of three-dimensional volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis post-procedure and at 6-8 months follow-up. Total vessel (EEM) volume enlarged after both balloon angioplasty and stenting (+37 mm(3) vs +42 mm(3), P=ns), but vessel wall volume (plaque plus media) also increased similarly (+33 mm(3) vs +49 mm(3), P=ns) in the irradiated patients. Lumen volume remained unchanged in both groups (+3 mm(3) vs -7 mm(3), P=ns). In the stent-covered segments, neointima at follow-up was significantly smaller in the irradiated group than the control group (8 mm(3) vs 27 mm(3), P=0.001, respectively), but the total amount of tissue growth was similar in both groups (33 mm(3) vs 29 mm(3), P=ns). CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary beta-radiation induces vessel enlargement after balloon angioplasty and/or stenting, accommodating tissue growth. Additional stenting may not play an important role in the prevention of constrictive remodelling in the setting of catheter-based intracoronary beta-radiotherapy.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers for failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction, alone or as adjunct to other rescue therapies; single centre retrospective analysis of 548 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction.

In order to study the safety of 'rescue' strategies in the treatment of patients with failed thrombolysis, all 548 patients admitted with evolving myocardial infarction to the Thoraxcenter, Rotterdam, from January 1997 until April 1999 were reviewed. Of these patients, 49% had received thrombolysis. Of patients treated with thrombolysis and not referred from other hospitals (n = 154) 36% received rescue therapy for failed thrombolysis. Three rescue therapies were used after failed thrombolysis: percutaneous coronary intervention (74%), retreatment with thrombolysis (39%) and platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockers (53%), often in combination. Platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers were administered in 64% of patients treated with rescue percutaneous coronary intervention. Major bleeding occurred in 14% of all thrombolysis treated patients, and in 30% of patients who received multiple rescue therapies. Bleeding was related to heparin usage and platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers, as was the insertion of catheters for percutaneous coronary intervention or intra-aortic balloon pumps. Major bleeding resulted in one death due to a ruptured ventricle, one haemorrhagic stroke, and three cases of tamponade for which surgery was needed. Four of these patients had received combination rescue therapy. Rescue therapy is a widely used strategy for failed thrombolysis, but is associated with a high bleeding rate. Alternative reperfusion strategies to avoid failed thrombolysis should be considered in high risk patients.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2002

Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography by multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PATIENTS: 78 patients who underwent both conventional and MSCT coronary angiography for suspicion of de novo coronary artery disease (n=53) or recurrent coronary artery disease after percutaneous intervention (n=25). SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. METHODS: Intravenously contrast enhanced MSCT coronary angiography was done during a single breath hold, and ECG synchronised images were reconstructed retrospectively. All coronary segments of > or = 2.0 mm without stents were evaluated by two investigators and compared with quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were classified according to the average heart rate (mean (SD)) into three equally sized groups: group 1, 55.8 (4.1) beats/min; group 2, 66.6 (2.8) beats/min; group 3, 81.7 (8.8) beats/min. RESULTS: Image quality was sufficient for analysis in 78% of the coronary segments in patients in group 1, 73% in group 2, and 54% in group 3 (p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting significant stenoses (> or = 50% lumen reduction) in these assessable segments were: 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84% to 100%) and 96% in group 1; 74% (52% to 89%) and 94% in group 2; and 67% (33% to 90%) and 94% in group 3 (p < 0.05). Accounting for all segments of > or = 2.0 mm, including lesions in non-assessable segments as false negatives, the sensitivity decreased to 82% (28/34 lesions, 95% CI 69% to 91%), 61% (14/23 lesions, 42% to 77%), and 32% (6/19 lesions, 15% to 50%), respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: MSCT allows reliable coronary angiography in patients with low heart rates.

Confidence Intervals↗