Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma imitating gelsolin amyloidosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to P J Dyck.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To study the role of mechanical, infectious, and inflammatory factors inducing neuropathic attacks in hereditary brachial plexus neuropathy (HBPN), an autosomal dominant disorder characterised by attacks of pain and weakness, atrophy, and sensory alterations of the shoulder girdle and upper limb muscles. METHODS: Four patients from separate kindreds with HBPN were evaluated. Upper extremity nerve biopsies were obtained during attacks from a person of each kindred. In situ hybridisation for common viruses in nerve tissue and genetic testing for a hereditary tendency to pressure palsies (HNPP; tomaculous neuropathy) were undertaken. Two patients treated with intravenous methyl prednisolone had serial clinical and electrophysiological examinations. One patient was followed prospectively through pregnancy and during the development of a stereotypic attack after elective caesarean delivery. RESULTS: Upper extremity nerve biopsies in two patients showed prominent perivascular inflammatory infiltrates with vessel wall disruption. Nerve in situ hybridisation for viruses was negative. There were no tomaculous nerve changes. In two patients intravenous methyl prednisolone ameliorated symptoms (largely pain), but with tapering of steroid dose, signs and symptoms worsened. Elective caesarean delivery did not prevent a typical postpartum attack. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammation, probably immune, appears pathogenic for some if not all attacks of HBPN. Immune modulation may be useful in preventing or reducing the neuropathic attacks, although controlled trials are needed to establish efficacy, as correction of the mutant gene is still not possible. The genes involved in immune regulation may be candidates for causing HBPN disorders.
BACKGROUND: Already there is evidence that simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK), or pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplantation, in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage kidney disease prevents worsening of diabetic polyneuropathy, but neuropathic improvement is delayed and incomplete. METHODS: In 85 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who underwent SPK or PAK transplantations, we performed sequential neuromuscular evaluations before, every 3 months after, and yearly after transplantation, quantitating muscle weakness separately from overall severity of polyneuropathy. RESULTS: We found that, on average, the weakness subscore of the Neuropathy Impairment Score of the lower limbs [NIS(LL)-W] was significantly worse at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (by about 5 points) than at baseline. By contrast, for these times after transplantation, a composite score of nerve conduction abnormalities, an independent measure of severity of polyneuropathy, was not significantly worse and, in fact, was significantly improved. In multivariate analysis, length of hospital stay correlated with the increased weakness. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that: (1) increased neuromuscular impairment after transplantation is mainly due to muscle weakness and not to worsening polyneuropathy; (2) in multivariate analysis, duration of hospitalization after transplantation was significantly associated with this increased weakness; (3) increased weakness is probably due to development of myopathy, which may be related to graft rejection, immunosuppression, sepsis, and intercurrent infections; (4) in future transplantation trials, weakness should be evaluated separately from neuropathic status, and the lowest efficacious dosages of immunotherapy should be used; and (5) essentially all diabetic patients reported that SPK or PAK transplantation was worthwhile because it freed them from diabetic lifestyle concerns.
Three masked neuromuscular experts analyzed the contribution of the data from sequential evaluations in predicting specific varieties of peripheral neuropathy in 72 patients. The largest improvement (16%) in diagnostic accuracy resulted from presentation of neurologic history. By contrast, diagnostic confidence increased gradually with presentation of additional medical information. Therefore, the authors conclude that for diagnostic accuracy and certainty, expert neuromuscular judgment and extensive characterizing or discriminative testing are needed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To report on an open trial of intravenous methylprednisolone (IV MP) in nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LSRPN). BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy is a subacute, unilateral or asymmetric syndrome of pain, weakness, and paresthesia of the lower extremity, which is attributed to ischemic injury from microvasculitis in lumbosacral roots, plexus, and nerves. METHODS: Eleven nondiabetic patients with worsening LSRPN were treated - ten with infusions of IV MP (1 gm/wk) for 8 to 16 weeks and one with an equivalent dosage of oral prednisone. The main endpoints evaluated were: 1) the Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS), and 2) the Neuropathy Symptoms and Change (NSC) scores. RESULTS: The median age of our patients was 67 years, range 49 to 86 years. Seven patients were women. All 11 patients reported improvement during treatment--nine reported marked improvement. The median NIS improved from 42 points (range 9 to 106 points) before treatment, to 20 points (range 5 to 57 points) (p = 0.005) after treatment. Pain was completely resolved in four patients and much improved in seven. The change subscore and the severity subscore of the NSC were statistically significantly improved after treatment. Prior to treatment, all patients had significant weakness with six confined to wheelchairs and four using mechanical devices to aid in ambulation. After treatment, the weakness was markedly improved in nine patients; only one still required a wheelchair and six walked independently (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: 1) In LSRPN, pain and neurological deficits improved (often dramatically) with IV MP treatment. 2) Although our results should be interpreted with caution since this trial is uncontrolled, IV MP may favorably affect the natural history of LSRPN. 3) The results are sufficiently promising to provide a rationale for prospective, sham controlled, double blind trials.
Diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (DLSRPN) (other names include diabetic amyotrophy) is well recognized, unlike the non-diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LSRPN), which has received less attention. Our objective was to characterize the natural history and outcome of LSRPN and to assess whether it is similar to the diabetic variety in its symptoms, course, electrophysiological features, quantitative sensory and autonomic findings, and the underlying pathophysiology. We studied 57 patients with LSRPN and 33 patients with DLSRPN. We found that the age of onset, course, kind and distribution of symptoms and impairments, laboratory findings and outcomes are essentially alike. Both disorders are a lumbosacral plexus neuropathy associated with weight loss, often beginning focally or asymmetrically in the thigh or leg but usually progressing to involve the initially unaffected segment and the contralateral side. Both have prolonged morbidity due to pain, paralysis, autonomic involvement and sensory loss. In biopsied distal LSRPN nerves, we found changes similar to those found in DLSRPN-alterations typical of ischaemic injury and of microvasculitis. The long-term outcome was determined in 42 LSRPN patients: two had become diabetic, seven had relapsed and only three had recovered completely, although all had improved. We conclude that: (i) LSRPN is a subacute, asymmetrical, painful and debilitating neuropathy of the lower limbs associated with weight loss, and we think it is under-recognized; (ii) recovery from the long-term impairments of LSRPN is usually delayed and incomplete and only a small minority of patients develop diabetes mellitus; (iii) LSRPN mirrors the diabetic variety in its clinical features, course, pathological findings (ischaemic injury from microvasculitis) and long-term outcome; and (iv) LSRPN should be set apart from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and from systemic necrotizing vasculitis. We infer an autoimmune basis for LSRPN and emphasize the need for controlled trials of immune-modulating therapy.
CONTEXT: Nerve growth factor is a neurotrophic factor that promotes the survival of small fiber sensory neurons and sympathetic neurons in the peripheral nervous system. Recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) has demonstrated efficacy as treatment for peripheral neuropathy in experimental models and phase 2 clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 12-month regimen of rhNGF in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial conducted from July 1997 through May 1999. SETTING: Eighty-four outpatient centers throughout the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 1019 men and women aged 18 to 74 years with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes and a sensory polyneuropathy attributable to diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either rhNGF, 0.1 microg/kg (n = 504), or placebo (n = 515) by subcutaneous injection 3 times per week for 48 weeks. Patients were assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was a change in neuropathy between baseline and week 48, demonstrated by the Neuropathy Impairment Score for the Lower Limbs, compared between the 2 groups. Secondary outcome measures included quantitative sensory tests using the CASE IV System, the Neuropathy Symptom and Change questionnaire, the Patient Benefit Questionnaire (PBQ), and a global symptom assessment, as well as nerve conduction studies and occurrence of new plantar foot ulcers. Patients also were evaluated for presence of adverse events. RESULTS: Among patients who received rhNGF, 418 (83%) completed the regimen compared with 461 (90%) who received placebo. Administration of rhNGF was safe, with few adverse events attributed to treatment apart from injection site pain/hyperalgesia and other pain syndromes. However, neither the primary end point (P =.25) nor most of the secondary end points demonstrated a significant benefit of rhNGF. Exceptions were the global symptom assessment (P =.03) and 2 of 32 comparisons within the PBQ, which showed a modest but significant benefit of rhNGF (P =.05 for severity of pain in the legs and P =.003 for 6-month symptoms in the feet and legs). CONCLUSION: Unlike previous phase 2 trials, this phase 3 clinical trial failed to demonstrate a significant beneficial effect of rhNGF on diabetic polyneuropathy. JAMA. 2000;284:2215-2221.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Linkage analysis studies have identified 3 genetically different varieties of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type 2 (HMSN 2, also called Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2, or CMT 2): HMSN 2A (linked to 1p35-p36), 2B (to 3q13-q22), and 2D (to 7p14). Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type 2C is characterized by diaphragmatic and vocal cord paresis; its disease locus has not been mapped. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the HMSN 2C phenotype, previously shown not to be linked to the HMSN 2A locus, is linked to the HMSN 2B or HMSN 2D loci. DESIGN: Linkage analysis. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Thirty-three subjects, including 12 affected individuals and 11 individuals at risk, in a large family with HMSN 2C. RESULTS: Evidence was found against linkage of HMSN 2C phenotype to either the HMSN 2B or the 2D loci. CONCLUSIONS: HMSN 2C is genetically distinct from HMSN 2A, 2B, and 2D. We think that at least 4 genetically distinct varieties of autosomal dominant HMSN 2 exist.
We studied 46 consecutive patients with multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMN-CB). Typically, asymmetric weakness and atrophy of the hands or arms developed insidiously, but spontaneous improvement (without treatment) or death from this disease did not occur and 94% remained employed. For 18 patients examined on multiple occasions using the weakness subscore of the neuropathy impairment score [NIS(W)] for a median time of 2.3 years, worsening of 1.3 points per year was observed; many patients, however, had received intensive immunomodulating therapy. Median worsening to our first evaluation (generally without treatment) was estimated at 4.2 points per year, perhaps suggesting that treatment had influenced course. Three criteria for conduction block (CB) were compared, but the least stringent was sensitive for the diagnosis. Conduction block accompanied by weakness and atrophy typically affected only motor fibers, especially of midforearm nerves, and these sites of dysfunction persisted for months or years. Neurological signs and electrodiagnostic features were consistent with CB, axonal degeneration, a variable degree of reinnervation, and segmental demyelination. Although this study did not focus on therapy, intravenous gammaglobulin and cyclophosphamide appeared to be associated with neurological improvement, which was seldom complete or sustained. Axonal degeneration and faulty regeneration may in part explain this muted response. Possibly, treatment must be earlier, more intense, or different.
Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy (HNPP) is typified as isolated nerve palsies caused by trivial compression or trauma. It rarely presents in two extremities and even more infrequently affects all four limbs simultaneously. We present a patient who concurrently experienced right shoulder, left hand, and bilateral foot weakness mimicking several multifocal conditions. Electromyography suggested HNPP and subsequent nerve biopsy and genetic testing were confirmatory. The case demonstrates that HNPP can present in a fulminant manner and should be included in the differential diagnosis of acute multiple mononeuropathies. The possible causes for such a rapid clinical course in our patient are discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The pathogenesis of the axonal degeneration in acquired or hereditary amyloidosis is unknown. In this immunohistochemistry study, we examined 20 sural nerve biopsies from individuals with amyloid neuropathy (14 acquired and 6 hereditary) for evidence of complement activation. Complement activation products were detected on and around amyloid deposits within peripheral nerves. We found no difference in the extent, location or pattern of complement activation products between the 2 forms of amyloidosis. The presence of early classical pathway activation markers in the absence of antibody in hereditary cases suggests an antibody-independent activation of the classical pathway through binding of C1q. The lack of Factor Bb-suggested alternative pathway activation was not significant in these cases. The detection of C5b-9 neoantigen on amyloid deposits demonstrated that the full complement cascade was activated. Complement activation on amyloid deposits and the generation of C5b-9 in vivo may contribute to bystander injury of axons in the vicinity of amyloid deposits.
Diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (DLSRPN) has been shown to be due to ischemic injury from microvasculitis. The present study tests whether ischemic injury and microvasculitis are the pathologic cause of non-diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LSRPN), and whether the pathologic alterations are different between LSRPN and DLSRPN. We studied distal cutaneous nerve biopsies of 47 patients with LSRPN and compared findings with those of 14 age-matched healthy controls and 33 DLSRPN patients. In both disease conditions, we found evidence of ischemic injury (multifocal fiber degeneration and loss, perineurial degeneration and scarring, characteristic fiber alterations, neovascularization, and injury neuroma) that we attribute to microvasculitis (mural and perivascular mononuclear inflammation of microvessels, inflammatory separation, fragmentation and destruction of mural smooth muscle, and previous microscopic bleeding [hemosiderin]). Teased nerve fibers in LSRPN showed significantly increased frequencies of axonal degeneration, segmental demyelination, and empty nerve strands. The segmental demyelination appeared to be clustered on fibers with axonal dystrophy. The nerves with abnormal frequencies of demyelination were significantly associated with nerves showing multifocal fiber loss. We reached the following conclusions: 1) LSRPN is a serious condition with much morbidity that mirrors DLSRPN. 2) Ischemic injury from microvasculitis appears to be the cause of LSRPN. 3) Axonal degeneration and segmental demyelination appear to be linked and due to ischemia. 4) The pathologic alterations in LSRPN and DLSRPN are indistinguishable, raising the question whether these 2 conditions have a common underlying mechanism, and whether diabetes mellitus contributes to the pathology or is a risk factor in DLSRPN. 5) Both LSRPN and DLSRPN are potentially treatable conditions.
OBJECTIVE: To test quantitative sensation testing (QST) patterns of hypoesthesia and hyperalgesia as indicators of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and its severity RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used Computer-Assisted Sensory Examination IV; characterized the QST results of the foot of each patient in three diabetic cohorts (approximately 1,500 patients) as hyperesthetic (< or = 2.5th percentile), low-normal (2.5th-50th percentiles), high-normal (50th-97.5th percentiles), or hypoesthetic (> or = 97.5th percentile); and tested associations with symptoms, impairments, and test abnormalities. RESULTS: Overall neuropathic impairment was most severe in the pancreas-renal transplant and nerve growth factor cohorts, but it was much less severe in the population-based Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study (RDNS) cohort. The frequency distribution of sensory abnormalities mirrored this difference. When the QST spectra of diabetic cohorts were compared with those of the control subject cohort for vibration and cooling sensations, the only abnormality observed was hypoesthesia, which was expressed as an increased number of subjects with values at or above the 97.5th percentile or by an increased percentage of cases with high-normal values. Symptoms and impairments of DPN were significantly more frequent in the subjects with values at or above the 97.5th percentile than in the subjects whose values were between the 50th and 97.5th percentiles. For heat pain (HP) sensation thresholds (intermediate pain severity [HP:5], pain threshold [HP:0.5], and pain-stimulus response slope [HP:5-0.5]), an increased frequency of both hypoalgesia and hyperalgesia was observed (especially in the RDNS cohort). Steeper pain-stimulus response slopes were significantly associated with sensory symptoms, including severity of pain. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Decreased vibratory sensation (hypoesthesia) appears to be characteristic of mild DPN, whereas panmodality hypoesthesia is characteristic of severe DPN. 2) A shift of vibratory and cold detection thresholds (and also of attributes of nerve conduction and a measure of autonomic dysfunction) from low-normal (2.5th-50th percentiles) to high-normal (50th-97.5th percentiles) appears to precede overt expression of DPN and to thereby provide evidence of subclinical abnormality 3) Heat stimulus-induced hyperesthesia (low thresholds) occurs especially in mild DPN, and, because it correlates with DPN symptoms and impairments, it must be attributed to hyperalgesia rather than to supersensitivity Therefore, hypoalgesia or hyperalgesia may be an indicator of early DPN.
Adult polyglucosan body disease is a clinicopathologic entity characterized by progressive upper and lower motor neuron dysfunction, sensory loss in the lower extremities, sphincter dysfunction, and occasionally dementia. Pathologically, numerous large polyglucosan bodies are noted in peripheral nerves, cerebral hemispheres, and the spinal cord, as well as in other systemic tissues. We present a case of probable adult polyglucosan body disease based on clinical history and examination, magnetic resonance images, and sural nerve biopsy findings.