Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P J Bingley

Publications and source records attributed to P J Bingley.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Continuing metformin when starting insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

AIMS: To test the effect of continuing metformin on weight gain and glycaemic control in patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes who need to start insulin. METHODS: Patients with Type 2 diabetes on maximum tolerated oral agents referred for insulin conversion were recruited from hospital diabetes clinics into a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. The 183 participants received metformin or placebo, titrated up to 2 g a day or maximum tolerated dose, with insulin started according to local practice. The main outcome measures were weight change over 12 months, HbA1c, insulin dose, frequency of hypoglycaemia, treatment satisfaction, and well-being. RESULTS: Over 12 months, metformin was associated with less weight gain than placebo [mean 6.1 kg vs. 7.6 kg; adjusted difference 1.5 kg (95% confidence interval 0.2-2.9); P=0.02], a greater reduction in HbA1c[1.5% vs. 1.3%; adjusted difference 0.5% (0.1-0.9); P=0.02] and a lower insulin requirement [62 units vs. 86; adjusted difference 25 units (15-34); P<0.001], but also more hypoglycaemia [relative risk of any episode 1.24 (1.02-1.1); P=0.03]. Treatment satisfaction improved more in patients on metformin than on placebo (P<0.001), as did the positive well-being score (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin decreases weight gain, lowers insulin requirement, and improves glycaemic control, and should be continued in patients with Type 2 diabetes who transfer to insulin.

Cholesterol↗

European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial (ENDIT): a randomised controlled trial of intervention before the onset of type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Results of studies in animals and human beings suggest that type 1 diabetes is preventable. Nicotinamide prevents autoimmune diabetes in animal models, possibly through inhibition of the DNA repair enzyme poly-ADP-ribose polymerase and prevention of beta-cell NAD depletion. We aimed to assess whether high dose nicotinamide prevents or delays clinical onset of diabetes in people with a first-degree family history of type 1 diabetes. METHOD: We did a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of nicotinamide in 552 relatives with confirmed islet cell antibody (ICA) levels of 20 Juvenile Diabetes Federation (JDF) units or more, and a non-diabetic oral glucose tolerance test. Participants were recruited from 18 European countries, Canada, and the USA, and were randomly allocated oral modified release nicotinamide (1.2 g/m2) or placebo for 5 years. Random allocation was done with a pseudorandom number generator and we used size balanced blocks of four and stratified by age and national group. Primary outcome was development of diabetes, as defined by WHO criteria. Analysis was done on an intention-to-treat basis. FINDINGS: There was no difference in the development of diabetes between the treatment groups. Of 159 participants who developed diabetes in the course of the trial, 82 were taking nicotinamide and 77 were on placebo. The unadjusted hazard ratio for development of diabetes was 1.07 (95% CI 0.78-1.45; p=0.69), and the hazard ratio adjusted for age-at-entry, baseline glucose tolerance, and number of islet autoantibodies detected was 1.01 (0.73-1.38; p=0.97). Of 168 (30.4%) participants who withdrew from the trial, 83 were on placebo. The number of serious adverse events did not differ between treatment groups. Nicotinamide treatment did not affect growth in children or first-phase insulin secretion. INTERPRETATION: Large-scale controlled trials of interventions designed to prevent the onset of type 1 diabetes are feasible, but nicotinamide was ineffective at the dose we used.

Autoimmune Diseases↗

Mortality of South Asian patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus in the United Kingdom: a cohort study.

AIMS: To investigate mortality in South Asian patients with insulin-treated diabetes and compare it with mortality in non South Asian patients and in the general population. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted of 828 South Asian and 27 962 non South Asian patients in the UK with insulin-treated diabetes diagnosed at ages under 50 years. The patients were followed for up to 28 years. Ethnicity was determined by analysis of names. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated, comparing mortality in the cohort with expectations from the mortality experience of the general population. RESULTS: SMRs were significantly raised in both groups of patients, particularly the South Asians, and especially in women and subjects with diabetes onset at a young age. The SMRs for South Asian patients diagnosed under age 30 years were 3.9 (95% CI 2.0-6.9) in men and 10.1 (5.6-16.6) in women, and in the corresponding non South Asians were 2.7 (2.6-2.9) and 4.0 (3.6-4.3), respectively. The SMR in women was highly significantly greater in South Asians than non South Asians. The mortality in the young-onset patients was due to several causes, while that in the patients diagnosed at ages 30-49 was largely due to cardiovascular disease, which accounted for 70% of deaths in South Asian males and 73% in females. CONCLUSIONS: South Asian patients with insulin-treated diabetes suffer an exceptionally high mortality. Clarification of the full reasons for this mortality are needed, as are measures to reduce levels of known cardiovascular disease risk factors in these patients.

Adult↗

The prevalence of insulin autoantibodies at the onset of Type 1 diabetes is higher in males than females during adolescence.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The incidence of Type 1 diabetes shows little sex bias up to age 15 years, but more males are diagnosed in early adult life. Humoral responses to the beta cell antigen insulin could help to reveal the mechanism underlying this difference. We therefore determined the influence of sex on the prevalence of insulin autoantibodies (IAA) at diagnosis. METHODS: IAA were measured by radiobinding assay in 598 patients with newly diagnosed Type 1 diabetes (aged 10.5, range 0.8-20.7 years, 333 male), and analysed according to age, sex and HLA class II genotype. RESULTS: Overall, 74% of males and 65% of females had IAA above the 97.5(th) centile of 2860 schoolchildren ( p=0.028). IAA prevalence was similar in males and females under the age of 15 (0-4 yr, 95% vs 88%; 5-9 yr, 76% vs 73%; 10-14 yr, 67% vs 58%), but male excess was seen between 15 and 21 years (66% vs. 32%, p(corr)=0.016). HLA class II genotype was available for 426 patients. IAA prevalence in DR4 homozygous patients was 87%, in DR4 heterozygous patients 72% and in DR4 negative patients 55% ( p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed independent association of IAA with age ( p<0.001), number of DR4 alleles ( p<0.001) and male sex ( p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The prevalence of IAA in patients with newly diagnosed Type 1 diabetes is higher in males than females between 15 and 21 years of age. The lower prevalence of IAA in adolescent females implies sex-specific modulation of the autoimmune process during puberty.

Adolescent↗

Three generations of autoimmune diabetes: an extended family study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: One in four children with Type 1 diabetes in a population-based family study has an affected grandparent. We set out to study the clinical and immune features of diabetes in the grandparents' generation, and to examine sharing of HLA class II susceptibility haplotypes between grandparent and grandchild. METHODS: Of 5855 grandparents in the Bart's-Oxford family study, 428 (7.3%) were known to have diabetes. Clinical data and samples were collected from 115 of 213 surviving affected grandparents and from 219 unaffected grandparents within the same families. Samples were tested for ICA and autoantibodies to GAD and IA-2, and typed for HLA-DRB1-DQA1-DQB1. Transmission of HLA class II haplotype from affected and unaffected grandparents to the diabetic proband was compared. RESULTS: Of 115 affected grandparents studied, the median age at diagnosis was 61 years and at analysis was 73 years; 70% were diet or tablet treated and 30% were on insulin. One or more islet autoantibodies were found in 26% and 66% had one or both of the high risk HLA class II susceptibility haplotypes DRB1*03-DQA1*0501-DQB1*0201 or DRB1*04-DQA1*0301-DQB1*0302. In 79 informative families the HLA class II haplotype of the affected grandparent was transmitted to the proband more frequently than expected overall (59%, p=0.02), and in the insulin-treated subgroups (65%, p=0.03). CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: A total of 7.3% of grandparents reported a clinical diagnosis of diabetes and 2.2% had features of Type 1 diabetes. Genetic susceptibility was shared between grandparents with diabetes and their affected grandchildren. Diabetes in the grandparents of children with Type 1 diabetes often has an autoimmune basis, even when it presents late in life and does not require insulin treatment.

Aged↗

Mortality from heart disease in a cohort of 23,000 patients with insulin-treated diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Although ischaemic heart disease is the predominant cause of mortality in older people with diabetes, age-specific mortality rates have not been published for patients with Type 1 diabetes. The Diabetes UK cohort, essentially one of patients with Type 1 diabetes, now has sufficient follow-up to report all heart disease, and specifically ischaemic heart disease, mortality rates by age. METHODS: A cohort of 23,751 patients with insulin-treated diabetes, diagnosed under the age of 30 years and from throughout the United Kingdom, was identified during the period 1972 to 1993 and followed for mortality until December 2000. Age- and sex-specific heart disease mortality rates and standardised mortality ratios were calculated. RESULTS: There were 1437 deaths during the follow-up, 536 from cardiovascular disease, and of those, 369 from ischaemic heart disease. At all ages the ischaemic heart disease mortality rates in the cohort were higher than in the general population. Mortality rates within the cohort were similar for men and women under the age of 40. The standardised mortality ratios were higher in women than men at all ages, and in women were 44.8 (95%CI 20.5-85.0) at ages 20-29 and 41.6 (26.7-61.9) at ages 30-39. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The risk of mortality from ischaemic heart disease is exceptionally high in young adult women with Type 1 diabetes, with rates similar to those in men with Type 1 diabetes under the age of 40. These observations emphasise the need to identify and treat coronary risk factors in these young patients.

Adolescent↗

Islet autoantibodies, nationality and gender: a multinational screening study in first-degree relatives of patients with Type I diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: First-degree relatives of patients with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus diagnosed at 20 years of age or under were screened for islet cell antibodies (ICA) in the course of recruitment to an international diabetes prevention trial. Our aim was to evaluate the influence of age, gender, proband characteristics and nationality on the prevalence of ICA and co-existence of autoantibodies to GAD, IA-2 and insulin. METHODS: A central laboratory screened samples from 10 326 non-diabetic relatives who were aged less than 40 years, from eight European countries for ICA. Antibodies to GAD and IA-2 were measured in all samples with ICA of 10 JDF units or more. RESULTS: Overall, 8.9 % of relatives had ICA of 10 JDF units or more, 3.8 % with ICA of 20 JDF units or more. Of 921 relatives with ICA of 10 JDF units or more, 29 % had co-existing antibodies to GAD or IA-2 or both. ICA of 10 JDF units or more were more prevalent in males (10.8 %) than females (7.3 %). ICA with GAD or IA-2 antibodies or both were also more common in males (3.4 %) than females (1.9 %) and in relatives under 20 years of age (3.5 % vs 1.5 %). Multiple regression analysis showed nationality to be a determinant of ICA of 10 JDF units or more but not of ICA of 20 JDF units or more or of ICA with co-existing islet antibodies, and confirmed the importance of age and gender as determinants of islet autoimmunity. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Relatives from different European countries have similar rates of islet autoimmunity despite wide variation in the background incidence of childhood diabetes, and male excess is equally evident in all populations. The male excess of ICA and islet autoimmunity over 10 years of age reflects the higher male incidence of Type I diabetes in this age group, and suggests that boys may be more likely than girls to develop islet autoimmunity during adolescence.

Adolescent↗

Diabetes in the parents of children with Type I diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Previous studies have reported an excess of Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in parents of children with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. We set out to characterise the clinical and immunogenetic features of diabetes in parents of affected children, and to test the hypothesis that there is no excess of Type II diabetes within this population. METHODS: Clinical details were collected from 3164 parents of 1641 children with Type I diabetes participating in the Bart's-Oxford study of childhood diabetes. Islet cell antibodies, antibodies to GAD and IA-2, and HLA class II genotype were determined in a subset of this group. Individuals were assigned a classification of Type I diabetes on the basis of clinical features and measurement of islet autoantibodies. RESULTS: Of 184 parents with diabetes, 138 (75 %) were on insulin. At least one islet autoantibody was detected in 90 (59 %) of 152 parents tested, and of 116 who were HLA-typed, 23 (20 %) had the highest risk genotype HLA-DRB1(*)03-DQA1*0501-DQB1(*)0201 / DRB1*04-DQA1(*)0301-DQB1*0302. Of 46 non-insulin-treated parents, 12 had islet autoantibodies. Of all parents, 141 (4.5 %) were therefore classified as having Type I diabetes, and 31 (0.98 %) as Type II diabetes; 12 could not be classified because of missing data or samples. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Autoimmune diabetes can present late and without immediate need for insulin treatment in parents of children with the disease. Previous studies have categorised this as Type II diabetes. Our study suggests that there is no excess of non-autoimmune diabetes in the families of children with Type I diabetes.

Adolescent↗

A comparison of the prevalence of islet autoantibodies in children from two countries with differing incidence of diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: To examine the prevalence of sub-: clinical islet autoimmunity in children from two countries with a twofold to threefold difference in incidence of childhood Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Sera were collected from 2,860 English and 3,053 Lithuanian non-diabetic schoolchildren according to the same protocol. Occult diabetes was excluded by blood glucose measurement. Antibodies to GAD and the protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 were measured with standardised radiobinding assays in a single laboratory. Islet cell antibodies and insulin autoantibodies were additionally measured in all samples with GAD and/or IA-2 antibody levels above the 97.5th centile of the English schoolchildren. RESULTS: Of Lithuanian schoolchildren 2.7 % had GAD antibodies above the 97.5th centile of the English schoolchildren but only 0.2 % had antibodies to IA-2 above this threshold (p < 0.001). Islet cell and/ or insulin autoantibodies above the 97.5th centile were found in 22 Lithuanian and 16 English schoolchildren and the overall prevalence of two or more antibodies on or above the 97.5th centile was similar [0.7 % (0.5-1.1) vs 0.6 % (0.4-1.0)] in the two cohorts. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: The prevalence of multiple antibody markers was similar in the cohorts from the two populations, despite the two to three-fold difference in incidence of diabetes. The unexpectedly high prevalence of subclinical islet autoimmunity suggests that the incidence of diabetes in Lithuania is likely to increase in the near future.

Adolescent↗

Update on major trials for the prevention of type 1 diabetes mellitus: the American Diabetes Prevention Trial (DPT-1) and the European Nicotinamide Diabetes Intervention Trial (ENDIT).

The general population risk of developing type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM), 1/300, is magnified 15-20 fold in first-degree relatives of affected individuals. Because a combination of immunologic, metabolic, and genetic markers can be used to predict the disease, multicenter prevention trials in the US (DPT-1) and Europe (ENDIT) were initiated in relatives. In the DPT-1 over 80,000 relatives under 45 years of age will be screened for ICA and then 'staged' to assess risk. High-risk subjects (>50% over 5 yr) are randomized either to 4 days intravenous insulin infusion annually followed by b.i.d. low doses of subcutaneous ultralente insulin, or to close observation. To date (September 2000), 331/340 (97%) high-risk subjects have been enrolled with the intention of detecting a 35% decrease in disease over 5 years (80% power). 280/490 (57%) of intermediate risk subjects (25-50% over 5 yr) have been randomized to oral insulin or placebo. A 50% treatment difference is sought. Anticipated enrolment for the high-risk arm will be completed by year 2001, and by 2003 for the oral arm. The ENDIT study will prospectively address whether nicotinamide will reduce the rate of progression to DM in relatives. 40,000 first-degree relatives (5-40 yr) have been screened with 552 subjects (ICA titers > or = 20 JDF U) randomized to nicotinamide or placebo. This study is designed with 90% power to detect a 35% reduction in disease (placebo group estimated at 40% risk over 5 years). Analysis of data is expected in 2003.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1↗

The high prevalence of autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase in first-degree relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes is not associated with islet autoimmunity.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of celiac autoimmunity in type 1 diabetic patients and the overlap between islet and celiac autoimmunity in their nondiabetic relatives. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase were determined in serum taken from 433 type 1 diabetic patients and 1,442 nondiabetic first-degree relatives. Samples with transglutaminase antibodies above the 97.5th percentile of 347 schoolchildren were also assayed for IgA anti-endomysial antibodies (EMAs). Markers of islet autoimmunity (islet cell antibodies and autoantibodies to insulin, glutamate decarboxylase. and protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2) had previously been measured in all relatives. RESULTS: In the absence of known celiac disease, the prevalence of transglutaminase antibody levels above the 97.5th percentile of the schoolchildren was 13.4% in diabetic patients and 7.0% in nondiabetic relatives. ENMAs were found in addition to transglutaminase antibodies in 2.6% of probands and in 1.9% of first-degree relatives, but none of the schoolchildren. Transglutaminase antibodies were found to persist in 10 of 30 patients and in 30 of 59 relatives with follow-up samples taken at least 2 years after the initial sample. Of 186 nondiabetic relatives with islet autoantibodies, only 10 also had transglutaminase antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high prevalence of celiac autoimmunity in patients and first-degree relatives of children with type 1 diabetes, but we found limited overlap between islet and celiac autoimmunity in nondiabetic relatives. The high prevalence of celiac autoimmunity may be explained by shared genetic susceptibility and identifies a population within which screening for the disease may be justified.

Adolescent↗

Influence of maternal age at delivery and birth order on risk of type 1 diabetes in childhood: prospective population based family study. Bart's-Oxford Family Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the influence of parental age at delivery and birth order on subsequent risk of childhood diabetes. DESIGN: Prospective population based family study. SETTING: Area formerly administered by the Oxford Regional Health Authority. PARTICIPANTS: 1375 families in which one child or more had diabetes. Of 3221 offspring, 1431 had diabetes (median age at diagnosis 10.5 years, range 0.4-28.5) and 1790 remained non-diabetic at a median age of 16. 1 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease free survival and hazard ratios for the development of type 1 diabetes in all offspring, assessed by Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Maternal age at delivery was strongly related to risk of type 1 diabetes in the offspring; risk increased by 25% (95% confidence interval 17% to 34%) for each five year band of maternal age, so that maternal age at delivery of 45 years or more was associated with a relative risk of 3.11 (2.07 to 4.66) compared with a maternal age of less than 20 years. Paternal age was also associated with a 9% (3% to 16%) increase for each five year increase in paternal age. The relative risk of diabetes, adjusted for parental age at delivery and sex of offspring, decreased with increasing birth order; the overall effect was a 15% risk reduction (10% to 21%) per child born. CONCLUSIONS: A strong association was found between increasing maternal age at delivery and risk of diabetes in the child. Risk was highest in firstborn children and decreased progressively with higher birth order. The fetal environment seems to have a strong influence on risk of type 1 diabetes in the child. The increase in maternal age at delivery in the United Kingdom over the past two decades could partly account for the increase in incidence of childhood diabetes over this period.

Adult↗

Safety of high-dose nicotinamide: a review.

Nicotinamide, the amide derivative of nicotinic acid, has over the past forty years been given at high doses for a variety of therapeutic applications. It is currently in trial as a potential means of preventing the onset of Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in high-risk, first-degree relatives. Nicotinamide is for regulatory purposes classed as a food additive rather than a drug and has not therefore required the formal safety evaluation normally expected of a new therapy. Because the safety of treatment with megadoses of vitamins cannot be assumed, a full literature review has been undertaken. The therapeutic index of nicotinamide is wide but at very high doses reversible hepatotoxicity has been reported in animals and humans. Minor abnormalities of liver enzymes can infrequently occur at the doses used for diabetes prevention. There is no evidence of teratogenicity from animal studies and nicotinamide is not in itself oncogenic; at very high doses it does however potentiate islet tumour formation in rats treated with streptozotocin or alloxan. There is no evidence of oncogenicity in man. Growth inhibition can occur in rats but growth in children is unaffected. Studies of its effects on glucose kinetics and insulin sensitivity are inconsistent but minor degrees of insulin resistance have been reported. The drug is well tolerated, especially in recent studies which have used relatively pure preparations of the vitamin. Experience to date therefore suggests that the ratio of risk to benefit of long-term nicotinamide treatment would be highly favourable, should the drug prove efficacious in diabetes prevention. High-dose nicotinamide should still, however, be considered as a drug with toxic potential at adult doses in excess of 3 gm/day and unsupervised use should be discouraged.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗