Consensus statement on the treatment of allergic rhinitis. European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to P H Howarth.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Allergic rhinitis manifests itself clinically due to the local release of mediators from activated cells within the nasal mucosa. Treatment strategies aim either to reduce the effects of these mediators on the sensory neural and vascular end organs, or to reduce the tissue accumulation of the activated cells that generate them. Corticosteroids intervene at a number of steps in the inflammatory pathway, and, by reducing the release of cytokines and chemokines, inhibit cell recruitment and activation. These effects are evident both in vivo and in vitro. While antihistamines also have some anti-inflammatory effects in vitro, these require higher concentrations than with corticosteroids and are not consistently reproduced in vivo. In addition, although antihistamines and corticosteroids might appear to have complementary mechanisms of action, clinical trials suggest that their co-administration does not confer any additional long-term benefits compared with that achieved with corticosteroids alone. Topical corticosteroids are therefore the preferred anti-inflammatory therapy for persistent allergic rhinitis.
Allergic rhinitis is an inflammatory disorder of the nasal mucosa typified by the symptoms of nasal itch, sneeze, anterior nasal secretions, and nasal blockage. These symptoms arise from the interaction between mediators and neural, vascular, and glandular structures within the nose. Nasal itch, sneezes, and rhinorrhoea are predominantly neural in origin, while nasal obstruction is predominantly vascular. Nasal biopsy studies show accumulation of eosinophils within the lamina propria and epithelium and an increase in tissue and cell surface basophils in both seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis. These cells are in an activated state. Within the epithelium, increased numbers of mast cells, T cells and Langerhans' cells, which induce T-cell activation, are found. The accumulation of these cells can be linked to chemokine and cytokine generation by the epithelial cells themselves. Thus, the tissue cell recruitment is orchestrated by activated mast cells, T cells, and epithelial cells, with the recruited tissue eosinophils also contributing to their persistence at this site through autocrine mechanisms. Mast cells generate an array of mediators including histamine, tryptase, leukotrienes, and prostaglandins. Histamine is also generated by basophils. Eosinophils and basophils contribute to the leukotriene synthesis within the tissue. Histamine nasal insufflation induces nasal itch, sneeze, and rhinorrhoea as well as nasal blockage, thereby reproducing all the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. These effects are primarily mediated by H1-receptors, and H1-receptor antagonists are a prominent treatment. Antagonism of histamine at these receptors reduces symptoms by about 40-50%, with the greatest effect on the neurally mediated responses. Thus, histamine is a major mediator of allergic rhinitis, but not the sole contributor. Nasal insufflation with leukotrienes, prostaglandins, or kinins is associated with the development of nasal blockage. These mediators act primarily on the nasal vasculature and, in this respect, leukotrienes are potent mediators. Leukotrienes also induce plasma protein exudation, which contributes to the anterior nasal secretions. Studies with combination products have suggested that modifying the effects of both leukotrienes and histamine has complementary effects in relieving nasal symptoms, indicating that both these mediators are relevant to disease expression.
BACKGROUND: Human mast cells synthesize and secrete many cytokines of relevance to the pathogenesis of allergic diseases such as asthma and rhinitis. In particular, interleukin (IL) -4 and IL-5 are likely to play key roles in the development of the inflammatory response that characterizes these diseases. Immunohistochemical studies on human nasal and bronchial mucosal biopsies suggest that IL-4 and IL-5 may be stored preformed in mast cells. OBJECTIVE: To identify whether IL-4 and IL-5 are stored within mast cell secretory granules. METHODS: We used immunogold electron microscopic analysis on bronchial mucosa and lung parenchyma from resected lung specimens, and a nasal mucosal biopsy from a patient with active allergic rhinitis. Samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde plus 0.5% glutaraldehyde and processed into Lowicryl K4M resin by the 'Progressive Lowering of Temperature' technique. Ultrathin sections were stained immunohistochemically by an indirect immunogold method. RESULTS: Immunoreactivity for IL-4, but not IL-5, was localized to the granules of mast cells in all tissue samples. IL-5 was localized to the matrix of eosinophil granules in these samples, but neither cytokine was detected in T cells. IL-4 immunoreactivity increased in the granules of mast cells 24 h after immunoglobulin (Ig) E-dependent activation (mean 17.5 +/- 1.4 gold particles per granule) compared with nonactivated mast cells (mean 6.8 +/- 0.8 gold particles per granule, P < 0.001), suggesting replenishment of stores by newly generated protein. Immunoreactive IL-5 remained undetectable in mast cells 24 h after activation, a time point at which they are known to secrete large quantities of this cytokine. CONCLUSION: Human mast cells store IL-4 within the matrix of their granules. Very few, if any, lung or nasal mast cells store IL-5. A store of preformed IL-4 within mast cell granules is likely to have an important influence during the initiation and maintenance of the allergic immunological response.
BACKGROUND: The epidermal growth factor (EGF) family of growth factors plays an important role in maintenance and repair in a variety of epithelial tissues. However, very little is known about coexpression of these factors and their receptors, the c-erbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases, in human nasal epithelium. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the expression of these molecules in cultured nasal epithelial cells and nasal mucosa from healthy individuals. METHODS: Identification of c-erbB receptors and their ligands was sought by using reverse transcription PCR, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Messenger RNA encoding the EGF receptors (EGFR) c-erbB2 and c-erbB3, but not c-erbB4, was detected in primary cultures of human nasal epithelial cells. Transcripts encoding EGF, heparin-binding EGF, transforming growth factor (TGF) alpha, and amphiregulin were also detected. Receptor and ligand expression was confirmed by using immunocytochemical staining of the cells and Western blotting of the cell lysates. Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue sections obtained from biopsy specimens of nasal mucosa revealed intense membrane staining for the EGFR within the respiratory nasal epithelium, which was predominantly localized at the level of the columnar epithelial layers. Similar staining patterns were observed for c-erbB2 and c-erbB3 in the respiratory nasal epithelium. Evidence for EGF, transforming growth factor alpha, heparin-binding EGF, amphiregulin, and betacellulin immunostaining in the nasal epithelium was also obtained; their staining patterns paralleled that of EGFR immunostaining. CONCLUSION: Colocalization of c-erbB receptors and ligands establishes a basis on which to investigate c-erbB receptor- mediated effects in human nasal epithelium.
Epithelial damage and airway remodeling are consistent features of bronchial asthma and are correlated with disease chronicity, severity, and bronchial hyperreactivity. To examine the mechanisms that control bronchial epithelial repair, we investigated expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (c-erbB1, EGFR) in asthmatic bronchial mucosa and studied repair responses in vitro. In biopsies from asthmatic subjects, areas of epithelial damage were frequently observed and exhibited strong EGFR immunostaining. EGFR expression was also high in morphologically intact asthmatic epithelium. Using image analysis, EGFR immunoreactivity (% of total epithelial area, median (range) was found to increase from 9.4 (4.1-20.4) in normal subjects (n=10) to 18.4 (9.3-28.9) in mild asthmatics (P<0.01, n=13) and 25.4 (15.4-31.8) in severe asthmatics (P<0.00, n=5). Epithelial EGFR immunoreactivity remained elevated in patients treated with corticosteroids and was positively correlated with subepithelial reticular membrane thickening. Using 16HBE 14o- bronchial epithelial cells, we found that EGF accelerated repair of scrape-wounded monolayers and that the EGFR-selective inhibitor, tyrphostin AG1478, inhibited both EGF-stimulated and basal wound closure whereas dexamethasone was without effect. Intrinsic activation of the EGFR was confirmed by analysis of tyrosine phosphorylated proteins, which revealed a rapid, damage-induced phosphorylation of the EGFR, irrespective of the presence of exogenous EGF. To assess the relationship between EGFR-mediated repair and tissue remodeling, release of the profibrogenic mediator TGF-beta2 was also measured. Scrape wounding increased release of TGF-beta2 from epithelial monolayers and EGF had no additional stimulatory effect. However, when repair was retarded with AG1478, the amount of TGF-beta2 increased significantly. These data indicate that the EGFR may play an important role in bronchial epithelial repair in asthma and that impairment of this function may augment airway remodeling.
To gain further insight into the kinetics of airway inflammatory response and explore the possibility of nitric oxide as a surrogate marker of the lower airway inflammatory response to ozone, nine subjects with mild atopic asthma were exposed to filtered air or 0.2 ppm ozone for 2 hours with intermittent exercise. Lung function was measured at baseline and immediately after exposures. Sputum induction was performed at 6 hours and at 24 hours after exposures, and exhaled nitric oxide levels were measured at baseline, immediately, 6, and 24 hours after both exposures. A significant decline in forced expiratory volume in one second and inspiratory capacity was detectable following exposure to ozone. In addition, a 2-fold increase was observed in the percentage of polymorphonuclear leukocytes 6 hours after exposure to ozone, with no changes in other biomarkers at this time point. By 24 hours after ozone exposure, the neutrophilia had subsided but there was an increase in albumin, total protein, myeloperoxidase, and eosinophil cationic protein. Exhaled nitric oxide levels, histamine, interleukin-8, and growth-related oncogene-alpha in sputum did not change significantly following ozone exposure. It was concluded that short-term ozone exposure induces an acute inflammatory response in asthmatic airways, characterized by early polymorphonuclear leukocyte influx followed by plasma extravasation and activation of eosinophils and neutrophils. Exhaled nitric oxide is not a useful marker for detecting inflammatory response to ozone in persons with mild asthma.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Fexofenadine hydrochloride (HCl) is a new H(1) antihistamine used twice daily in some countries. OBJECTIVE: A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of fexofenadine HCl (120 and 180 mg administered once daily) and cetirizine (10 mg once daily) in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: After a 3- to 5-day run-in period, patients meeting entrance criteria were randomized to receive placebo, fexofenadine HCl 120 mg once daily, fexofenadine HCl 180 mg once daily, or cetirizine 10 mg once daily (active control) for 2 weeks. Eight hundred twenty-one patients comprised the intention-to-treat population and 722 patients completed the study. Symptom assessments were conducted 12 hours after the dose for the previous 12 hours and again at 24 hours after the dose for the previous 12 hours. In addition, assessment was made immediately before dosing in the morning for the previous 30 minutes. Total symptom score was calculated as the sum of scores for the 4 individual symptoms: (1) sneezing, (2) rhinorrhea, (3) itchy nose, palate, or throat, and (4) itchy, watery, or red eyes; the nasal congestion score was also recorded. RESULTS: Both doses of fexofenadine HCl were superior to placebo in reducing the total symptom score. Efficacy was maintained for the entire dosing interval (ie, for 24 hours). There were no differences in efficacy between the 2 doses of fexofenadine HCl or between either dose of fexofenadine HCl and cetirizine. There was no major side effect, but the combined incidence of drowsiness or fatigue was greater with ce-tirizine (9%) than with placebo (4%) (P =.07) or fexofenadine (4%) (P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily fexofenadine is thus a valuable addition to the nonsedating group of H(1) receptor antagonists currently available for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Salmeterol xinafoate is an inhaled long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist recently introduced for the treatment of asthma. Both in vitro and animal studies suggest that it may have anti-inflammatory activities of benefit in this disease. To assess this directly, the effects of 6 weeks' treatment with salmeterol on indices of clinical activity, airway dysfunction and inflammation in subjects with stable atopic asthma were investigated. In a double blind study, asthmatic patients were randomized to 6 weeks' treatment with either salmeterol 50 microg twice daily (n=14) or placebo (n=12). They underwent bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and bronchial biopsy immediately before starting treatment and again after 6 weeks. Treatment with salmeterol improved clinical indices of asthma activity, but there were no changes in BAL differential cell counts or mediator levels, and no change in T-cell numbers or activation status. In the biopsy specimens there were no changes in numbers of inflammatory cells, sub-basement membrane collagen deposition or mast cell degranulation. Regular treatment with salmeterol improves clinical indices of asthma but has no effect on the underlying inflammatory process. These findings strengthen guideline recommendations that long-acting beta2-agonists should not be prescribed as sole antiasthma medication.
H1 antihistamines are widely used in the treatment of conditions such as seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis, urticaria and angioedema, as well as being an adjunct therapy for anaphylaxis. The development of new compounds within this class of pharmacological agents is based on preclinical and clinical assessments prior to registration. Preclinical assessment of novel compounds has been advanced both by the definition of the molecular structure of the H1 receptor and by high throughput screening, which allows the definition of potent and selective candidate compounds. The elimination, in subsequent evaluations, of those compounds with potential for central nervous system and cardiotoxic effects and those with inappropriate pharmacokinetics restricts the subsequent toxicological and clinical evaluation of novel H1 antihistamines. Clinical evaluation is based initially on human volunteer studies to define pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and safety parameters. Local challenge models such as in the skin or nose for oral therapy or nose and conjunctiva for topical drug development allow definition of potential dose for administration, speed of onset of activity and duration of effect, both in comparison to placebo and to reference compounds. While a range of laboratory allergen challenge models, pollen chamber challenge studies and acute 'day in the park' study designs have been used in the early clinical evaluation of H1 antihistaminic activity, ultimately it is the efficacy of novel compounds in naturally occurring disease that is of importance. The assessment of the magnitude and profile of clinical disease improvement in specific disease areas is thus the crucial evaluation. The appropriate selection and characterization of patients, the optimization of the trial design, dependent upon the nature of the disease, and the appropriate selection of endpoints for analysis are thus critical considerations, as well as evaluation of appropriate safety criteria.
BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of exercise-induced asthma is not well understood. Hypertonicity of the airway lining fluid resulting from loss of water due to hyperventilation is considered to play a role, but the precise mechanism by which hypertonicity can induce bronchoconstriction is unknown. Peptides of the endothelin (ET) family have potent smooth muscle contractile properties, and have been linked to airway narrowing in stable asthma. We postulated that ET release may contribute to the acute bronchoconstrictor response induced by a hypertonic stimulus. METHODS: Seven male asthmatic subjects underwent local endobronchial challenge with hypertonic (3.6%) saline and, as a control, isotonic (0.9%) saline aerosols in separate bronchopulmonary segments. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed at both sites during the phase of immediate bronchoconstriction. Concentrations of immunoreactive ET and of the mast cell products, histamine, tryptase and prostaglandin D2, in BAL fluid were measured. RESULTS: Concentrations of ET in BAL fluid from the hypertonic saline-challenged sites were significantly lower than those in BAL fluid from sites exposed to isotonic saline (0.19 [0.11-1.24] fmol/mL vs. 0.40 [0.20-2.36] fmol/mL, P<0.05). Concentrations of histamine, tryptase, and prostaglandin D2 did not differ significantly between the two sites. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the hypothesis that ET release within the airway lumen is involved in the bronchoconstrictor response induced by hypertonic saline.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Airway wall remodelling is an established pathological feature of asthma but its causes are not well understood. One cytokine of potential relevance is transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta 1). The immunolocalization of TGF-beta 1 and of its small binding proteoglycan decorin have been examined in the airways of normal subjects and atopic asthmatics. Bronchial biopsy specimens were obtained by fibreoptic bronchoscopy, processed into glycolmethacrylate resin, and stained immunohistochemically using specific antibodies. Immunoreactive TGF-beta 1 was principally localized extracellularly in association with subepithelial connective tissue. Some staining of bronchial epithelial cells was also evident, but otherwise there was little intracellular staining. The overall pattern of immunohistochemical staining was indistinguishable in biopsy specimens from asthmatic and control subjects. Comparison of adjacent sections demonstrated the co-localization of immunoreactivity for TGF-beta 1 and decorin in the mucosa. It is concluded that immunoreactive TGF-beta 1 in human airways is principally extracellular and that matrix-associated TGF-beta 1 is likely to be bound at least in part to decorin. This interaction may provide a reservoir of TGF-beta 1 that can be released in an active form in response to appropriate stimuli.
BACKGROUND: Although beta2-adrenoceptor agonists are widely used in the treatment of asthma, a number of studies have suggested that their long-term use may exacerbate the condition. One possible mechanism for this stems from the in vitro observation that beta2-agonists increase IgE synthesis by human blood mononuclear cells. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the effect of regular beta2-agonist therapy on IgE production in vivo in human volunteers. METHODS: Placebo or salbutamol (8 mg BD) tablets were given in a double-blind, randomized fashion to 25 volunteers allergic to grass pollen throughout a period encompassing the UK grass pollen season (April through September). Levels of serum IgE were measured monthly, and nasal IgE was measured at the height and end of the season. Efficacy was assessed through monthly recordings of symptoms of blocked nose (vascular) and other symptoms of rhinitis (nonvascular). RESULTS: For the whole group the geometric mean of serum IgE levels rose from a baseline of 58.7 IU/mL (range, 0 to 1027 IU/mL) to 140 IU/mL (range, 12 to 878 IU/mL) at the height of the pollen season (P =.0001). There was no significant difference between the magnitude of the rise in IgE between the groups with a ratio of increase for salbutamol/placebo of 1.17 (confidence interval = 0.78 to 1.75). There was no change in nasal IgE levels. Total and nonvascular symptom scores were reduced by salbutamol, reaching statistical significance at the height of the pollen season (P <.05). CONCLUSION: An oral dose of the beta2-agonist salbutamol, sufficient to maintain therapeutic levels and provide clinical benefit, does not accentuate the seasonal increase of IgE in human atopic volunteers.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.