Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P G Strange

Publications and source records attributed to P G Strange.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Assays for enhanced activity of low efficacy partial agonists at the D(2) dopamine receptor.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Low efficacy partial agonists at the D2 dopamine receptor may be useful for treating schizophrenia. In this report we describe a method for assessing the efficacy of these compounds based on stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Agonist efficacy was assessed from [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to membranes of CHO cells expressing D2 dopamine receptors in buffers with and without Na+. Effects of Na+ on receptor/G protein coupling were assessed using agonist/[3H]spiperone competition binding assays. KEY RESULTS: When [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays were performed in buffers containing Na+, some agonists (aripiprazole, AJ-76, UH-232) exhibited very low efficacy whereas other agonists exhibited measurable efficacy. When Na+ was substituted by N-methyl D-glucamine, the efficacy of all agonists increased (relative to that of dopamine) but particularly for aripiprazole, aplindore, AJ-76, (-)-3-PPP and UH-232. In ligand binding assays, substitution of Na+ by N-methyl D-glucamine increased receptor/G protein coupling for some agonists -. aplindore, dopamine and (-)-3-PPP - but for aripiprazole, AJ-76 and UH-232 there was little effect on receptor/G protein coupling. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Substitution of Na+ by NMDG increases sensitivity in [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assays so that very low efficacy agonists were detected clearly. For some agonists the effect seems to be mediated via enhanced receptor/G protein coupling whereas for others the effect is mediated at another point in the G protein activation cycle. AJ-76, aripiprazole and UH-232 seem particularly sensitive to this change in assay conditions. This work provides a new method to discover these very low efficacy agonists.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

Agonist regulation of D(2) dopamine receptor/G protein interaction. Evidence for agonist selection of G protein subtype.

The D(2) dopamine receptor has been expressed in Sf21 insect cells together with the G proteins G(o) and G(i2), using the baculovirus system. Expression levels of receptor and G protein (alpha, beta, and gamma subunits) in the two preparations were similar as shown by binding of [(3)H]spiperone and quantitative Western blot, respectively. For several agonists, binding data were fitted best by a two-binding site model in either preparation, showing interaction of expressed receptor and G protein. For some agonists, binding to the higher affinity site was of higher affinity in D(2)/G(o) than in the D(2)/G(i2) preparation. Some agonists exhibited binding data that were best fitted by a two-binding site model in D(2)/G(o) and a one-binding site model in D(2)/G(i2). Therefore, receptor/G protein interaction seemed to be stronger in the D(2)/G(o) preparation. Agonist stimulation of [(35)S]GTP gamma S (guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate) binding in the two preparations also gave evidence for higher affinity D(2)/G(o) interaction. In the D(2)/G(o) preparation, agonist stimulation of [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding occurred at higher potency for several agonists, and a higher stimulation (relative to dopamine) was achieved in D(2)/G(o) compared with D(2)/G(i2). Some agonists were able to stimulate [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding in the D(2)/G(o) preparation but not in D(2)/G(i2). The extent of D(2) receptor selectivity for G(o) over G(i2) is therefore dependent on the agonist used, and thus agonists may stabilize different conformations of the receptor with different abilities to couple to and activate G proteins.

Animals↗

Dopamine D2 receptor dimer formation: evidence from ligand binding.

We have examined the binding of two radioligands ([(3)H]spiperone and [(3)H]raclopride) to D(2) dopamine receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. In saturation binding experiments in the presence of sodium ions, both radioligands labeled a similar number of sites, whereas in the absence of sodium ions [(3)H]raclopride labeled about half the number of sites labeled by [(3)H]spiperone. In competition experiments in the absence of sodium ions, however, raclopride was able to inhibit [(3)H]spiperone binding fully. In saturation analyses with [(3)H]spiperone in the absence of sodium ions raclopride exerted noncompetitive effects, decreasing the number of sites labeled by the radioligand. These data are interpreted in terms of a model where the receptor exists as a dimer, and in the absence of sodium ions, raclopride exerts negative cooperativity across the dimer both for its own binding and the binding of spiperone. A model of the receptor has been produced that provides a good description of the experimental phenomena described here.

Animals↗

Mechanisms of inverse agonism of antipsychotic drugs at the D(2) dopamine receptor: use of a mutant D(2) dopamine receptor that adopts the activated conformation.

The antipsychotic drugs have been shown to be inverse agonists at the D(2) dopamine receptor. We have examined the mechanism of this inverse agonism by making mutations in residue T343 in the base of the sixth transmembrane spanning region of the receptor. T343R, T343S and T343K mutant D(2) dopamine receptors were made and the T343R mutant characterized in detail. The T343R mutant D(2) dopamine receptor exhibits properties of a receptor that resides more in the activated state, namely increased agonist binding affinity (independent of G-protein coupling and dependent on agonist efficacy), increased agonist potency in functional tests (adenylyl cyclase inhibition) and increased inverse agonist effects. The binding of agonists to the mutant receptor also shows sensitivity to sodium ions, unlike the native receptor, so that isomerization of the receptor to its inactive state may be driven by sodium ions. The binding of inverse agonists to the receptor is, however, unaffected by the mutation. We conclude that inverse agonism at this receptor is not achieved by the inverse agonist binding preferentially to the non-activated state of the receptor over the activated state. Rather the inverse agonist appears to bind to all forms of the receptor but then renders the receptor inactive.

1-Methyl-3-isobutylxanthine↗

Antipsychotic drugs: importance of dopamine receptors for mechanisms of therapeutic actions and side effects.

Interaction of the antipsychotic drugs with dopamine receptors of the D2, D3, or D4 subclasses is thought to be important for their mechanisms of action. Consideration of carefully defined affinities of the drugs for these three receptors suggests that occupancy of the D4 subclass is not mandatory for achieving antipsychotic effects, but actions at D2 or D3 receptors may be important. A major difference between typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs is in the production of extrapyramidal side effects by the typical drugs. Production of extrapyramidal side effects by typical drugs seems to be due to the use of the drugs at doses where striatal D2 receptor occupancy exceeds approximately 80%. Use of these drugs at doses that do not produce this level of receptor blockade enables them to be used therapeutically without producing these side effects. The antipsychotic drugs have been shown to act as inverse agonists at D2 and D3 dopamine receptors, and this property may be important for the antipsychotic effects of the drugs. It is suggested that the property of inverse agonism leads to a receptor up-regulation upon prolonged treatment, and this alters the properties of dopamine synapses. Several variants of the dopamine receptors exist with different DNA sequences and in some cases different amino acid sequences. These variants may have different properties that alter the effects of dopamine and the antipsychotic drugs. The determination of such variants in patients may help in the prediction of drug responsiveness.

Animals↗

Regulation of human D(1), d(2(long)), d(2(short)), D(3) and D(4) dopamine receptors by amiloride and amiloride analogues.

1. The modulatory effects of the allosteric effectors methylisobutylamiloride (MIA), benzamil and amiloride have been examined at human D(1), D(2), D(3) and D(4) dopamine receptors. The subtype selectivity and the mechanism of action of this allosteric regulation was examined. 2. In radioligand dissociation experiments each modulator accelerated dissociation from all four receptor subtypes indicating allosteric regulation. MIA displayed selectivity for the D(3) subtype for acceleration of radioligand dissociation. 3. In equilibrium binding (pseudo-competition) experiments the three compounds inhibited radioligand binding at the four receptor subtypes. Inhibition curves for D(1), D(2(short)), D(2(long)) and D(3) receptors were described by Hill coefficients exceeding unity and data were fitted best by a model that assumes binding of modulator to both the primary and allosteric binding sites of the receptor (the allosteric/competitive model). 4. At the D(4) subtype, Hill coefficients of unity described the binding data for amiloride and benzamil, consistent with competitive inhibition. The Hill coefficient for MIA at the D(4) subtype was less than unity and data could be fitted well by the allosteric/competitive model, but it was not possible to define unambiguously the modulatory mechanism. For this effect a better definition of the mechanism could be obtained by simultaneous analysis of data obtained in the presence of a range of concentrations of a purely competitive ligand. 5. MIA reduced the potency with which dopamine stimulated [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding at the D(2) receptor. The effects of MIA could be described by the allosteric/competitive model with effects of MIA to inhibit the binding of dopamine but not its ability to induce a response.

Allosteric Regulation↗

Mechanisms of agonism and inverse agonism at serotonin 5-HT1A receptors.

Mechanisms of agonist and inverse agonist action at the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor have been studied using the modulation of guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding in membranes of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the receptor (CHO-5-HTA1A cells). A range of agonists increased [35S]GTPgammaS binding with different potencies and to different maximal extents, whereas two compounds, methiothepin and spiperone, inhibited both agonist-stimulated and basal [5S]GTPgammaS binding, thus exhibiting inverse agonism. Potencies of agonists to stimulate [35S]GTPgammaS binding in membranes from CHO-5-HT1A cells were reduced by adding increasing concentrations of GDP to assays, whereas changes in sodium ion concentration did not affect agonist potency. The maximal effect of the agonists was increased by increasing sodium ion concentrations. The affinities of agonists in ligand binding assays were unaffected by changes in sodium ion concentration. Increasing GDP in the assays of the inverse agonists increased potency for spiperone to inhibit [35S]GTPgammaS binding and had no effect for methiothepin, in agreement with the sensitivity of these compounds to guanine nucleotides in ligand binding assays. Potencies for these inverse agonists were unaffected by changes in sodium ion concentration. These data were simulated using the extended ternary complex model. These simulations showed that the data obtained with agonists were consistent with these compounds achieving agonism by stabilising the ternary complex. For inverse agonists, the simulations showed that the mechanism for spiperone may be to stabilise forms of the receptor uncoupled from G proteins. Methiothepin, however, probably does not alter the equilibrium distribution of different receptor species; rather, this inverse agonist may stabilise an inactive form of the receptor that can still couple to G protein.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

Effect of multiple serine/alanine mutations in the transmembrane spanning region V of the D2 dopamine receptor on ligand binding.

Three conserved serine residues (Ser193, Ser194, and Ser197) in transmembrane spanning region (TM) V of the D2 dopamine receptor have been mutated to alanine, individually and in combination, to explore their role in ligand binding and G protein coupling. The multiple Ser -->Ala mutations had no effect on the binding of most antagonists tested, including [3H]spiperone, suggesting that the multiple mutations did not affect the overall conformation of the receptor protein. Double or triple mutants containing an Ala197 mutation showed a decrease in affinity for domperidone, whereas Ala193 mutants showed an increased affinity for a substituted benzamide, remoxipride. However, dopamine showed large decreases in affinity (>20-fold) for each multiple mutant receptor containing the Ser193Ala mutation, and the high-affinity (coupled) state of the receptor (in the absence of GTP) could not be detected for any of the multiple mutants. A series of monohydroxylated phenylethylamines and aminotetralins was tested for their binding to the native and multiple mutant D2 dopamine receptors. The results obtained suggest that Ser193 interacts with the hydroxyl of S-5-hydroxy-2-dipropylaminotetralin (OH-DPAT) and Ser197 with the hydroxyl of R-5-OH-DPAT. We predict that Ser193 interacts with the hydroxyl of R-7-OH-DPAT and the 3-hydroxyl (m-hydroxyl) of dopamine. Therefore, the conserved serine residues in TMV of the D2 dopamine receptor are involved in hydrogen bonding interactions with selected antagonists and most agonists tested and also enable agonists to stabilise receptor-G protein coupling.

Alanine↗

Site-directed mutations in the third intracellular loop of the serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptor alter G protein coupling from G(i) to G(s) in a ligand-dependent manner.

The effect of mutations (V344E and T343A/V344E) in the third intracellular loop of the serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptor expressed transiently in human embryonic kidney 293 cells have been examined in terms of receptor/G protein interaction and signaling. Serotonin, (R)-8-hydroxy-2-dipropylaminotetralin [(R)-8-OH-DPAT], and buspirone inhibited cyclic AMP production in cells expressing native and mutant 5-HT(1A) receptors. Serotonin, however, produced inverse bell-shaped cyclic AMP concentration-response curves at native and mutant 5-HT(1A) receptors, indicating coupling not only to G(i)/G(o), but also to G(s). (R)-8-OH-DPAT, however, induced stimulation of cyclic AMP production only after inactivation of G(i)/G(o) proteins by pertussis toxin and only at the mutant receptors. The partial agonist buspirone was unable to induce coupling to G(s) at any of the receptors, even after pertussis toxin treatment. The basal activities of native and mutant 5-HT(1A) receptors in suppressing cyclic AMP levels were not found to be significantly different. The receptor binding characteristics of the native and mutant receptors were investigated using the novel 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist [(3)H]NAD-299. For other receptors, analogous mutations have produced constitutive activation. This does not occur for the 5-HT(1A) receptor, and for this receptor the mutations seem to alter receptor/G protein coupling, allowing ligand-dependent coupling of receptor to G(s) in addition to G(i)/G(o) proteins.

8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin↗

G-protein coupled receptors: conformations and states.

Activation of G-protein coupled receptors by agonists is thought to involve the stabilisation of a ternary complex of agonist/receptor/G-protein, leading to effector activation, but this mechanism may be an oversimplification, as follows: (a) Agonist binding to the free receptor (uncoupled from G-proteins) is not a neutral event, but includes a component of the activation process and may be described in terms of the stabilisation of a partly activated form of the receptor (R*) that is able to couple to the G-protein. Stabilisation of R*, therefore, may contribute to agonist efficacy. Also, determinations of agonist affinity even in the absence of G-protein coupling do not necessarily describe the affinities of agonists for the ground state of the receptor. (b) R* is a partly activated intermediate between the ground state of the receptor (R) and the activated form coupled to G-protein (R*G). There is some indication that different agonists may stabilise different conformational states of the receptor, i.e. different R* species. (c) Agonists also stabilise the activated, coupled form of the receptor (AR*G), and for some agonists acting at a single receptor, the activated states may be similar, although there is evidence for other agonists that different activated states with different activities may be stabilised. (d) Two or more efficacy-generating steps are involved in the activation of G-protein coupled receptors by agonists: the stabilisation of R*, the stabilisation of R*G, and possibly the modulation of the activity of the activated state (AR*G). (e) The experimentally observed excess of G-proteins over receptors in membranes is inconsistent with data obtained from ligand-binding assays on these receptors. Receptors and G-proteins, therefore, may exist in some form of higher order array with cooperative interactions.

Animals↗

Comparison of the ability of dopamine receptor agonists to inhibit forskolin-stimulated adenosine 3'5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation via D2L (long isoform) and D3 receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.

The pharmacological properties of the human D2L (long isoform) and rat D3 dopamine receptors in functional assays were examined. A range of dopamine agonists were assessed for their ability to inhibit adenosine 3'5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation via the two receptors expressed stably in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Dopamine caused a significantly greater maximal inhibition (P < 0.05) of cAMP accumulation via the D2L receptor (approximately 70%) as compared to the D3 receptor (approximately 50%). The pattern of agonist effects was different at the two receptors. The absolute and relative potencies for inhibition of cAMP accumulation were different for a range of agonists acting at the two receptors. Similarly, the maximal inhibitions achieved by a range of agonists were different for the two receptors.

Animals↗

Constraints on the transport and glycosylation of recombinant IFN-gamma in Chinese hamster ovary and insect cells.

In this study we compare intracellular transport and processing of a recombinant glycoprotein in mammalian and insect cells. Detailed analysis of the N-glycosylation of recombinant human IFN-gamma by matrix-assisted laser-desorption mass spectrometry showed that the protein secreted by Chinese hamster ovary and baculovirus-infected insect Sf9 cells was associated with complex sialylated or truncated tri-mannosyl core glycans, respectively. However, the intracellular proteins were predominantly associated with high-mannose type oligosaccharides (Man-6 to Man-9) in both cases, indicating that endoplasmic reticulum to cis-Golgi transport is a predominant rate-limiting step in both expression systems. In CHO cells, although there was a minor intracellular subpopulation of sialylated IFN-gamma glycoforms identical to the secreted product (therefore associated with late-Golgi compartments or secretory vesicles), no other intermediates were evident. Therefore, anterograde transport processes in the Golgi stack do not limit secretion. In Sf9 insect cells, there was no direct evidence of post-ER glycan-processing events other than core fucosylation and de-mannosylation, both of which were glycosylation site-specific. To investigate the influence of nucleotide-sugar availability on cell-specific glycosylation, the cellular content of nucleotide-sugar substrates in both mammalian and insect cells was quantitatively determined by anion-exchange HPLC. In both host cell types, UDP-hexose and UDP-N-acetylhexosamine were in greater abundance relative to other substrates. However, unlike CHO cells, sialyltransferase activity and CMP-NeuAc substrate were not present in uninfected or baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells. Similar data were obtained for other insect cell hosts, Sf21 and Ea4. We conclude that although the limitations on intracellular transport and secretion of recombinant proteins in mammalian and insect cells are similar, N-glycan processing in Sf insect cells is limited, and that genetic modification of N-glycan processing in these insect cell lines will be constrained by substrate availability to terminal galactosylation.

Animals↗

Role of conserved serine residues in the interaction of agonists with D3 dopamine receptors.

To understand the role of conserved serine residues in the fifth transmembrane domain (Ser192, Ser193, and Ser196) of the D3 dopamine receptor, these have been mutated individually to alanine, and the ligand binding properties of the mutant receptors have been evaluated. The mutations had little or no effect on the binding of the antagonist spiperone and the agonist quinpirole, indicating that the overall conformation of the receptor was unaffected. The binding of dopamine and 7-hydroxydipropylaminotetralin, agonists containing hydroxyl groups, was, however, of lower affinity for the Ser192 mutation but unaffected by the other mutations (Ser193 and Ser196). Therefore, for the agonists tested, the hydroxyl groups interact exclusively with Ser192.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Agonism and inverse agonism at dopamine D2-like receptors.

1. The processes that follow the binding of ligands to receptors are critical for their physiological functions. In the present paper I intend to review our own work and the work of other laboratories attempting to understand these processes for the dopamine D2-like receptors (D2, D3, D4) and how they contribute to the mechanisms of drug action. It is thought that the key event in agonist action for these receptors is the stabilization, by the agonist, of the agonist-receptor-G-protein ternary complex. The majority of the work I shall describe has been performed using recombinant receptors expressed in cell lines and the mechanisms of receptor action have been probed using ligand binding (competition vs [3H]-spiperone), the stimulation of [35S]-GTP gamma S binding and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. 2. Measures of the ability of agonists to stabilize the agonist-receptor-G-protein ternary complex may be obtained in ligand-binding studies using the ratio of dissociation constants for the higher and lower affinity states (KI/KH ratio). The stimulation of [35S]-GTP gamma S binding provides a very convenient assay for agonist action and allows the determination of agonist potency and maximal response. Estimates of these quantities may also be obtained from the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. For a range of agonists at the D2 receptor, there is a tendency for high values of KI/KH to predict high maximal activity and vice versa, but there is no general correlation. This suggests that the simple scheme of agonist action depending on the stabilization of the ternary complex is an over-simplification and further efficacy determining steps need to be included. For a number of receptors, including the D2 and D3 receptors, it has now been shown that there is activity in the absence of agonist (so-called constitutive activity). This agonist-independent activity can be inhibited by compounds previously considered to be antagonists (e.g. the antipsychotic drugs). Therefore, these compounds are inverse agonists rather than antagonists. The mechanism of this inverse agonist effect is unclear and we are examining this using a variety of biochemical approaches, including the use of constitutively active mutants. 3. The mechanisms of agonism and inverse agonism may be probed using biochemical assays and these studies are of great relevance to the understanding of drug action.

Dopamine Agonists↗

Pharmacological characterisation of the D2 dopamine receptor expressed in the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

The rat D2(long) dopamine receptor has been expressed in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe at levels of about 1 pmol/mg of protein. The recombinant receptor, analysed in ligand binding experiments, exhibits properties typical of a D2 dopamine receptor and the affinities of antagonists agree with values obtained for the receptor expressed in mammalian systems although the affinities of some antagonists are lower. Substituted benzamide antagonists show lower affinities in the absence of sodium ions whereas clozapine and classical antagonists mostly show higher affinities. Agonist binding is insensitive to the effects of GTP indicating lack of a stable interaction with G-proteins.

Animals↗