Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P G Dionne

Publications and source records attributed to P G Dionne.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Rat lung reactivity to natural and man-made fibrous silicates following short-term exposure.

The inflammatory and fibrogenic potential of three naturally occurring and two man-made industrial minerals were compared. Groups of five rats each received respectively a single intratracheal instillation of saline (control), UICC chrysotile B asbestos, short chrysotile 4T30, attapulgite, xonotlite (a calcium silicate), and Fiberfrax (an aluminum silicate) at doses of 1, 5, and 10 mg. One month after the treatment, assessment of lung morphology and bronchoalveolar lavage were performed on each animal. Under these conditions, UICC chrysotile B at all doses tested (1, 5, and 10 mg) induced fibrotic lesions in bronchiolar tissues while short chrysotile 4T30 (1, 5, and 10 mg) caused focal accumulation of inflammatory cells in the alveolar structures but no apparent fibrosis. Compared to these positive reactions with different fibrogenicity, xonotlite caused minimal inflammatory reactions detectable only at high dose (10 mg) and by bronchoalveolar analysis. By contrast, the rat lung reacted more significantly to attapulgite and Fiberfrax although the tissue reaction differed considerably for these two materials. While attapulgite, at doses up to 10 mg caused minimal reactions characterized by mononuclear cell infiltration mainly in the alveolar structures, Fiberfrax at 1 mg and higher caused significant granulomatous reactions and the appearance of early fibrosis. Overall the order of lung biological reactivity observed for the various silicates was xonotlite much less than attapulgite less than short chrysotile 4T30 less than Fiberfrax less than UICC chrysotile B. These observations indicate that Fiberfrax, attapulgite, and, to a lesser extent, xonotlite are biologically active within the time span studied and potentially deleterious for lung tissue.

Animals↗

Comparison of Marlex and Gore-tex to repair abdominal wall defects in the rat.

Marlex and Gore-tex, two prosthetic materials used to close abdominal wounds, were compared with respect to strength and adhesion formation. A 2.5 X 3.5-cm full-thickness area of abdominal wall was excised in 32 CD rats. The defect was repaired using identically sized patches of Marlex or 1-mm Gore-tex, determined by alternate assignment, and sutured with continuous 4-0 Gore-tex. Adhesion formation was graded at necropsy and recorded photographically in each animal. The mean adhesion index (none = 0, maximal = 4) was 1.37 +/- 0.12 and 2.62 +/- 0.12 (mean +/- SEM) for Gore-tex and Marlex groups respectively (p less than 0.005, unpaired t-test). A template was used to fashion 2-cm coronal strips of abdominal wall for tensile-strength testing. The relative strengths were 2.67 +/- 0.14 and 3.02 +/- 0.16 kg/cm (mean +/- SEM) for the Gore-tex and Marlex groups respectively (NS). Histologically, there were more epithelioid giant cells and less collagen formation in the Gore-tex group. Abdominal wall reconstruction with Gore-tex resulted in wound strength equal to that of Marlex and fewer adhesions. Gore-tex is preferred when prosthetic material and viscera are in close proximity.

Abdominal Injuries↗

Epithelioid sarcoma.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Amputation, Surgical↗