Somatisation: a joint responsibility of doctor and patient.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Humans↗
Biomedical subjects
P F M Verhaak
Publications and source records attributed to P F M Verhaak.
Communication in general practice: differences between European countries.
BACKGROUND: Based on differences in national health care system characteristics such as the gatekeeping role of GPs (at the macrolevel) and on diverging GP and patient characteristics (at the microlevel), communication may differ between countries. Knowledge of the influence of these characteristics on doctor-patient communication will be important for setting European health care policies. OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were (i) to compare doctor-patient communication in general practice between European countries; and (ii) to investigate the influence of the gatekeeping system and GP and patient characteristics on doctor-patient communication in general practice. METHODS: Fifteen patients per GP (in total 2825 patients) of 190 GPs in six European countries were included. Participating countries were The Netherlands, Spain, the UK (gatekeeping countries), Belgium, Germany and Switzerland (non-gatekeeping countries). Data were collected by means of patient and GP questionnaires and observation of videotaped consultations, and analysed by one-way and multilevel, multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Differences in communication between countries were found in: affective and instrumental behaviour; biomedical and psychosocial talk; GPs' patient-directed gaze; and consultation length. The study showed that GPs' gatekeeping role (with registered patients) was less important for doctor-patient communication than was expected. Patient characteristics such as gender, age, having psychosocial problems, and familiarity between the doctor and the patient were the most important in explaining differences in communication. CONCLUSION: The gatekeeping role of GPs is hardly important in explaining doctor-patient communication. The relationship is more complex than expected. Patient and GP characteristics are more important. Cultural factors should be included in future studies.
Adult↗
Unexplained severe chronic pain in general practice.
The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of unexplained severe chronic pain (USCP) in general practice and to report medical as well as psychological descriptions of patients suffering from this condition.A total of 45 GPs in 35 different practices included patients throughout the year 1996. Patients were included according to the following criteria: between 18 and 75 years of age; pain which had lasted at least 6 months; pain is the most prominent aspect in the clinical presentation; pain is serious enough to justify clinical attention; pain has led to obvious discomfort and disability in daily life for at least for 1 month. Medical aspects were measured with the IASP taxonomy while psychological aspects were derived from the MPI. The overall prevalence of USCP was 7.91 per 1000 enlisted patients. Estimates ranged between 1.87 in the youngest age group and 13.50 in the 55-59 age category. The lower back and lower limbs were most frequently affected and 31% of the patients had pain in more than three major body sites. Pain was most frequently associated by the musculoskeletal system and most often (nearly) continuous. Mean severity of current pain was 3.7 on a scale from 0 (indicating no pain) to 6 (indicating a lot of pain). Mean rating of 'average pain in the last week' was 4.1. Regarding the psychosocial and behavioural aspects of pain, 27% of the patients could be described as perceiving severe pain while gaining social support for it. Fourteen per cent felt in the category 'pain combined with affective and relational distress' and 10% was classified as 'coping well with pain intensities lower than those of the other groups'. The other half of the patients were on average or not classifiable on these aspects. Unexplained severe chronic pain lasting more than 6 months had on overall prevalence of 7.91 per 1000 enlisted patients, ranging from 1.87 in the youngest to 13.50 in the oldest patients in these 35 general practices in The Netherlands. Our prevalence estimate of USCP is low compared to other studies on chronic pain. Probably for three reasons: Firstly, our study was confined to unexplained pain and not all chronic pain. Secondly, our inclusion criteria focused the attention of very severe chronic pain patients, and thirdly, we have defined 'chronic' as more than 6 months, while others have been using shorter time spans.
Adaptation, Psychological↗