Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Emery

Publications and source records attributed to P Emery.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in active rheumatoid arthritis.

Leflunomide, the newest disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inhibits de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis. In two placebo-controlled trials, leflunomide was superior to placebo and comparable to sulphasalazine and methotrexate for improving the signs and symptoms of RA, significantly improved functional ability compared with placebo, sulphasalazine and methotrexate, and was superior to methotrexate and comparable to sulphasalazine in slowing radiographically assessed disease progression. In a multinational trial vs methotrexate, leflunomide showed an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rate similar to that in placebo-controlled trials. The ACR response rate with methotrexate was significantly greater. Differences between these trials included methotrexate dosing regimens, folate usage and disease duration. Common adverse events with leflunomide included gastrointestinal symptoms, allergic reactions, alopecia and elevated liver enzyme levels. No long-term safety issues were reported with leflunomide at 2 yr. Efficacy of leflunomide was maintained at 2 yr. Leflunomide is a safe and efficacious addition to the roster of anti-rheumatic drugs.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2000

Microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin (Sandimmun Neoral) vs Sandimmun: comparative safety, tolerability and efficacy in severe active rheumatoid arthritis. On behalf of the OLR 302 Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the new oral microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin A (CyA; Sandimmun Neoral) and the original CyA formulation (Sandimmun), in patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), over a 12-month period. METHODS: In this double-blind, multicentre study, patients were randomized to treatment with Neoral or Sandimmun, starting with 2.5 mg/kg/day, with dose adjustments after 4 weeks. Primary efficacy criteria included patients' assessment of disease activity. Pharmacokinetic and safety assessments were performed at regular intervals. RESULTS: Compared with Sandimmun, Neoral showed a consistent trend towards greater clinical efficacy from week 12 onwards, including a significant difference in patients' assessment of disease activity at the study end-points. A significantly lower increase in dose from baseline was observed with Neoral at week 24. Pharmacokinetic assessments at week 24 showed increased absorption and decreased variability with Neoral. No differences in safety were found between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: These observations indicate that Neoral is as safe and at least as effective as Sandimmun and have important implications for patient management given the increasing role for CyA in the treatment of severe, active RA.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2000

How does functional disability in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affect patients and their lives? Results of 5 years of follow-up in 732 patients from the Early RA Study (ERAS)

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on function and how this affects major aspects of patients' lives. METHODS: The inception cohort of RA patients was recruited from rheumatology out-patient departments in nine National Health Service (NHS) hospital trusts in England. All consecutive patients with RA of less than 2 yr duration, prior to any second-line (disease-modifying) drug treatment were recruited and followed-up for 5 yr. Standard clinical, laboratory and radiological assessments, and all hospital-based interventions were recorded prospectively at presentation and yearly. The outcome measures were clinical remission and extra-articular features, functional ability [functional grades I-IV and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], use of aids, appliances and home adaptations, orthopaedic interventions, and loss of paid work. RESULTS: A total of 732 patients completed 5 yr of follow-up, of whom 84% received second-line drugs. Sixty-nine (9.4%) had marked functional loss at presentation, compared with normal function in 243 (33%), and by 5 yr these numbers had increased in each group, respectively, to 113 (16%) and 296 (40%). Home adaptations and/or wheelchair use by 5 yr were seen in 74 (10%). Work disability was seen in 27% of those in paid employment at onset. One hundred and seventeen (17%) patients underwent orthopaedic surgery for RA, 55 (8%) for major joint replacements. Marked functional loss at 5 yr was more likely in women [odds ratio (OR) 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-2.5], patients older than 60 yr (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.3-2.9), and with HAQ > 1.0 at presentation (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.8-7.0). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical profiles of RA patients treated with conventional drug therapy over 5 yr showed that a small proportion of patients (around 16%) do badly functionally and in terms of life events, whereas around 40% do relatively well. The details and exact figures of cumulative disability are likely to be useful to clinicians, health professionals and patients. The rate of progression and outcome in these patients can be compared against future therapies with any disease-modifying claims.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of leflunomide and methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of leflunomide and methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind trial, 999 subjects with active RA were randomized to leflunomide (n = 501; loading dose 100 mg/day for 3 days, maintenance dose 20 mg/day) or methotrexate (n = 498; 10-15 mg/week) for 52 weeks. After 1 yr the subjects could choose to stay for a second year of double-blind treatment. The primary end-points were tender and swollen joint counts and overall physician and patient assessments. Analyses were of the intent-to-treat group. RESULTS: After 1 yr, the mean changes in the leflunomide and methotrexate groups, respectively, were -8.3 and -9.7 for tender joint count; -6.8 and -9.0 for swollen joint count; -0.9 and -1.2 for physician global assessment; -0.9 and -1.2 for patient global assessment; -14.4 and -28.2 for erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Improvements seen with methotrexate were significantly greater than those with leflunomide. No further improvement occurred after the second year of treatment and the distinction between the two treatments in terms of tender joint count and patient global assessment was lost. During the first year of treatment, a small and equivalent degree of radiographically assessed disease progression was seen with both drugs. After 2 yr, disease progression was significantly less with methotrexate. The most common treatment-related adverse events in both groups were diarrhoea, nausea, alopecia, rash, headache, and elevated plasma liver enzyme levels. Over 2 yr, 21 subjects receiving methotrexate were withdrawn due to elevated plasma liver enzymes vs eight subjects taking leflunomide. Two drug-related deaths from pulmonary causes were recorded with methotrexate vs no drug-related deaths among the subjects receiving leflunomide. CONCLUSIONS: Both leflunomide and methotrexate are efficacious for prolonged treatment of RA. At the doses used, some clinical benefit of methotrexate over leflunomide was observed in the first year of treatment. This benefit must be weighed against the potential toxicity of this drug when used without folate supplementation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Racial origin and its effect on disease expression and HLA-DRB1 types in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a matched cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: There are a significant number of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of North Indian or Pakistani origin (Asian) now living in the UK. RA has been poorly studied in this racial group. The aim of this study was to compare RA in this Asian group with RA in the indigenous northern European (European) population. It was hypothesized that these two racial groups would have different disease expressions and immunogenetics that could be relevant to pathogenesis, prognosis and therapy. METHODS: One hundred and seven Asian RA patients, who fulfilled the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria, were stringently matched for age, sex and disease duration with 107 European RA patients, and were fully assessed. RESULTS: The Asian RA patients had significantly fewer bony erosions [median Larsen score 58.5 (interquartile range 45.5-77.8) vs 68 (52-93) for European patients; P: = 0.0066, Mann-Whitney U:-test] and rarely had nodules (5.7 vs 20%, P: = 0. 0019, Fisher's exact test). The two groups had the same prevalence of rheumatoid factor positivity, number of swollen joints and level of inflammation (C-reactive protein). The Asian RA patients had a reduced prevalence of the conserved third allelic hypervariable region (3AHVR) (45 vs 82%, P: < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test), particularly DRB1*0401 (4.5 vs 55%). However, the prevalence of the conserved 3AHVR was significantly increased in the Asian RA patients compared with Asian controls. By contrast, the Asian patients had more tender joints [13.5 (7-22) vs 5.5 (2-11.8); P: < 0.0001 Mann-Whitney U:-test]. The Health Assessment Questionnaire score was also significantly worse in the Asians compared with the Europeans [median 2.0 (1.13-2.63) vs 1.25 (0.5-2.13), P: = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The Asian patients had similar levels of inflammation and less damage but more pain and disability than the matched European RA patients. Of the known prognostic factors for erosions (rheumatoid factor, conserved 3AHVR, swollen joints and C-reactive protein), only the conserved 3AHVR was reduced in the Asian RA patients, and this was consistent with their less erosive disease. These data also indicate the importance of pain as well as erosive damage in determining disability in Asian patients and stress the importance of adequate pain relief, in addition to disease suppression, when treating Asian RA patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Leflunomide: a new DMARD for rheumatoid arthritis.

Early diagnosis and referral of rheumatoid arthritis may significantly improve patient outcomes. Arava (leflunomide) is the first new disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) to be introduced in the UK for over a decade. Arava has a rapid onset of action and has been shown to retard radiographic disease progression and significantly improve patients' functional ability.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed2000

Autologous blood stem cell transplantation as therapy for autoimmune diseases.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is starting to be investigated as a potential therapy for severe refractory autoimmune disease including rheumatological, neurological and haematological diagnoses. Increasing numbers of cases are now reported in the literature. Data from all transplanted patients are being collated in a centralized register by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) to enable effective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of this promising technique. Thus far, results have been encouraging; however, more treatment-related deaths were reported in multiorgan diseases such as scleroderma and less in diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, which confirms the importance of careful patient selection. Optimization of mobilization, conditioning regimen and graft manipulation is required to maximize efficacy without increasing mortality and morbidity. The use of maintenance therapy after ASCT in order to prevent relapse needs to be explored. Following individual case reports and small cohort studies, the next step is likely to involve multicentre randomized controlled trials.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed1999

Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trial. ATTRACT Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Not all patients with rheumatoid arthritis can tolerate or respond to methotrexate, a standard treatment for this disease. There is evidence that antitumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) is efficacious in relief of signs and symptoms. We therefore investigated whether infliximab, a chimeric human-mouse anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody would provide additional clinical benefit to patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis despite receiving methotrexate. METHODS: In an international double-blind placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial, 428 patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis, who had received continuous methotrexate for at least 3 months and at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks, were randomised to placebo (n=88) or one of four regimens of infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6. Additional infusions of the same dose were given every 4 or 8 weeks thereafter on a background of a stable dose of methotrexate (median 15 mg/week for > or =6 months, range 10-35 mg/wk). Patients were assessed every 4 weeks for 30 weeks. FINDINGS: At 30 weeks, the American College of Rheumatology (20) response criteria, representing a 20% improvement from baseline, were achieved in 53, 50, 58, and 52% of patients receiving 3 mg/kg every 4 or 8 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 4 or 8 weeks, respectively, compared with 20% of patients receiving placebo plus methotrexate (p<0.001 for each of the four infliximab regimens vs placebo). A 50% improvement was achieved in 29, 27, 26, and 31% of infliximab plus methotrexate in the same treatment groups, compared with 5% of patients on placebo plus methotrexate (p<0.001). Infliximab was well-tolerated; withdrawals for adverse events as well as the occurrence of serious adverse events or serious infections did not exceed those in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: During 30 weeks, treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate was more efficacious than methotrexate alone in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis not previously responding to methotrexate.

Adult↗