Acute pain management: scientific evidence revisited.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to P E Macintyre.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We conducted a retrospective audit of adult non-obstetric patients who had received a single dose of intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia. These patients were predominantly admitted to a regular postsurgical ward with strict hourly nursing observations, treatment protocols in place and supervision by an Acute Pain Service for the first 24 hours after intrathecal morphine administration. A total of 409 cases were examined for sedation score, incidence of respiratory depression and other side-effects, admission to the high dependency or intensive care unit and opioid-tolerance. Respiratory depression was defined as requiring treatment with naloxone (implying a sedation score of 3 irrespective of respiratory rate), or a sedation score of 2 with a respiratory rate less than six breaths per minute. The patients were predominantly elderly (57.2% were over the age of 70 years) and 84.8% had undergone vascular surgery. Of the total of 409 cases, only one case of respiratory depression was observed. A total of 77 patients were admitted to high dependency or intensive care unit for various reasons including management of postsurgical complications and patient co-morbidities. Our findings suggest that elderly patients who receive intrathecal morphine analgesia can be safely managed in a regular postsurgical ward.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Pharmacokinetic modelling of estimated central nervous system concentrations was used to devise the optimal mixture of morphine and alfentanil for the treatment of postoperative pain. Modelling revealed that an intravenous opioid pain protocol using an alfentanil-morphine mixture in the proportions 0.75 : 10 mg would provide a profile of analgesia of rapid onset, yet slow offset. The regimen was evaluated in 58 patients in the recovery ward who were randomly allocated to receive analgesia using pain protocols with either morphine or the mixture. Groups were well matched for age, weight and initial pain scores. The mean (SD) time to patient comfort was 27.6 (20.2) min for the mixture and 41.2 (18.6) min for morphine (p = 0.01). Multiple regression analysis revealed that that initial pain score (p = 0.009) and drug group (p = 0.02), but not age, weight or gender were independent predictors of the time to comfort. Drug group was not a significant predictor of adverse effects.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The pharmacokinetics of morphine in venous blood after a 5 mg bolus dose via an indwelling subcutaneous cannula were characterised in 22 elderly patients undergoing elective major surgery. In a subgroup of seven patients, the kinetics were also characterised after a second 5 mg dose of morphine administered 180 min after the first dose. Blood morphine concentrations following the single dose were highly variable--the coefficients of variation of Cmax, Tmax and the AUC up to 180 min (AUC180) were 54, 37 and 39%, respectively, with mean values of 86.6 ng.ml-1, 15.9 min and 3954 ng.ml-1, respectively. These mean values for the second dose were not statistically different to those of the first dose but were more variable. It was concluded that the injection of morphine via an indwelling subcutaneous cannula results in blood concentrations that are comparable to, and as variable as, those arising from intramuscular injection.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Traditionally, opioids have been administered as fixed doses at fixed dose intervals. This approach has been largely ineffective. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and upgraded traditional approaches incorporating flexibility in dose size and dose interval, and titration for an effect in individual patients with the monitoring of pain and sedation scores, can greatly improve the efficacy of opioid administration. Optimising opioid use, therefore, entails optimising the titration process. Opioids have similar pharmacodynamic properties but have widely different kinetic properties. The most important of these is the delay between the blood concentrations of an opioid and its analgesic or other effects, which probably relate to the delay required for blood and brain and spinal cord (CNS) equilibrium. The half-lives of these delays range from approximately 34 minutes for morphine to 1 minute for alfentanil. The titration is influenced by the time needed after an initial dose before it is safe to administer a second dose and the duration of the effects of a single dose, which varies widely between opioids, doses and routes of administration. To compare opioids and routes of administration, we examined the relative CNS concentration profiles of opioids - the CNS concentration expressed as a percentage of its maximum value. The relative onset was the defined as the time the relative CNS concentration first rose to 80% of maximum, while the relative duration was defined as the length of time the concentration was above 80%. For an intravenous bolus dose, the relative onset varies from approximately 1 for alfentanil to 6 minutes for morphine, while their relative durations are approximately 2 and 96 minutes, respectively. Although all of the common opioids, perhaps with the exception of alfentanil, have kinetic and dynamic properties suitable for use in PCA with intravenous bolus doses, the long relative duration of morphine makes it particularly suited to an upgraded traditional approach using staff administered intramuscular or subcutaneous doses. There is a clear kinetic preference for regimens with a rapid onset and short duration (e.g. intravenous PCA) for coping with incident pain. It is shown that, in general, titration is improved by the more frequent administration of smaller doses, but it is important to use additional doses to initially 'load' a patient. The titration of opioids should always be accompanied by the monitoring of pain and sedation scores and ventilation.
The dose of opioid prescribed for postoperative pain relief has traditionally been based on the weight of the patient. Although a reduction in dose is often suggested for elderly patients over 70 years of age, age-related alterations to dose are generally not considered for younger patients. The records of 1010 patients, under 70 years old, prescribed morphine via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after major operations were examined to see what factors might best predict the amount of morphine used in the first 24 h after surgery. Factors included were age, sex, weight, operative site, verbal numeric pain score (at rest and on movement) and a nausea/vomiting score. In a subgroup of 78 of these patients, the effects of intraoperative and recovery room doses of opioid ('clinical' loading dose) were analysed. Although the interpatient variability in PCA morphine doses was large (differences of up to 10-fold in each age group), the best predictor of PCA morphine requirement in the first 24 h after surgery (the amount required in the 24 h after the initial loading dose) was the age of the patient. An estimate of these requirements for patients over the age of 20 years can be obtained from the formula: average first 24 h morphine requirement (mg) = 100 - age. PCA allows patients the flexibility to titrate their own opioid dose; if conventional analgesic regimens are to become more effective, they too need to allow for the wide interpatient variation in dose requirements. Although previous studies have noted a correlation between patient age and the amount of opioid needed, this study quantifies this correlation and provides guidelines for opioid dosing. Prescriptions for conventional analgesic regimens should include a dose range centred on values obtained from the above formula to allow for the large interpatient variation in each age group. While initial morphine dose should be guided by patient age and not weight, subsequent doses must still be titrated according to effect.
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with i.v. opioids is prescribed increasingly. We report three cases of norpethidine toxicity in patients receiving pethidine by PCA.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Acute Pain Service began at the Royal Adelaide Hospital in April 1989. Funding, education programmes, policies, procedures, protocols, techniques (particularly patient-controlled analgesia, epidural opioid analgesia and subcutaneous morphine therapy) and daily organisation of the service are described in this article, and the experience with the 1053 patients referred to the Service during the first year of operation is reported. The occurrence of major complications was small. Mild-to-moderate respiratory depression occurred in four (0.5%) of the 747 patients who received patient-controlled analgesia and in none of the 177 who received epidural opioids. Five patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia had persistent nausea/vomiting; 320 (35%) of all patients receiving patient-controlled analgesia or epidural opioids suffered nausea/vomiting that required no treatment or was alleviated by treatment with an antiemetic. Around 13% of patients reported mild-to-moderate itching. In our experience, the combination of appropriately trained nursing and medical staff, standardised orders and procedures, and proper supervision can lead to safe, more effective management of acute pain.
Meperidine has been used to suppress postanesthesia shivering. However, its efficacy to date has only been assessed by observation of visible shivering. We measured the effect of meperidine on oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2) and pulmonary gas exchange in 14 otherwise healthy patients shivering after general anesthesia. Meperidine successfully suppressed visible shivering in all patients and was associated with significant decreases in VO2, and VCO2 and minute ventilation (VE) but not with return to basal levels. Arterial PCO2 levels remained unchanged at normal, whereas significant improvements occurred in pH and bicarbonate levels. Meperidine is an effective method of reducing the elevated metabolic demand of shivering.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical relevance of routine microbiological culture of epidural catheter tips after use in acute pain management, and to identify patterns of culture result with respect to both indications for, and duration of, epidural catheterization. METHODS: The Acute Pain Service (APS) reviews all patients under its care at least daily and keeps detailed records on each. Over a 4-year period, when APS protocol required epidural catheter tips to be sent for microbiological culture on removal, the APS saw 1,810 patients who had received epidural analgesia. The records of these patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Culture results were available for 1,443 (79.7%) patients: 1,027 catheter tips (71.2%) were sterile, while 416 (28.8%) were positive for at least 1 type of microorganism. Clinically, no epidural space infections were identified. The highest positive culture rates were found from epidural catheters used in the treatment of pain from fractured ribs or fractured pelves, while the lowest incidences occurred in elective orthopedic and thoracic surgery. The proportion of epidural catheters with positive culture results steadily increased with the duration of catheterization, but there were no clinically significant differences for catheters left in situ for either 3 or 4 days. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that a significant proportion of epidural catheter tips may be "culture positive" after removal. It is suggested that this probably represents colonization of the skin at the catheter insertion site and subsequent contamination of the catheter tip on removal of the catheter. The large number of "culture positive" tips in the absence of clinically identifiable epidural space infection suggests that routine culture of epidural catheter tips is clinically irrelevant in the vast majority of cases, and that it is not a good predictor of the presence of an epidural space infection.