Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P E Gosden

Publications and source records attributed to P E Gosden.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Pharmacokinetics of once-a-day netilmicin (4.5 mg/kg) in neonates.

The pharmacokinetics of once-a-day netilmicin (4.5 mg/kg) was studied in 16 neonates, divided for analysis into three groups according to gestational age: group 1 >36 weeks (n=7); group II between 34-36 weeks (n=4); and group III <34 weeks (n=5). The serum netilmicin (mean +/- SD) 4h and 24h after the first dose were 4.7 +/- 0.8 and 0.8 +/- 0.5 mg/L; 4.9 +/- 0.8 and 1.9 +/-0.2 mg/L; 4.9 +/- 0.5 and 1.7 +/- 0.5 mg/L in groups I, II and III respectively. After the second dose, concentrations at 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 h were 7.2 +/- 1.0, 5.0 +/- 0.8, 3.0 +/- 0.6, 1.7 +/- 0.4 and 0.9 +/- 0.2 mg/L (group I); 8.6 +/- 0.2, 6.1 +/- 0.5, 4.2 +/- 0.7, 2.6 +/- 0.1 and 1.4 +/- 0.4 mg (group II); 9.0 +/- 1.2, 6.3 +/- 0.9, 4.1 +/- 0.7, 2.6 +/- 0.5 and 1.7 +/- 0.3 mg/L (group III). There was a large degree of inter-patient variability in serum concentrations and serum half-life (t1/2), volume of distribution (VD), area-under-the-curve (AUC), relative serum clearance (Clp) such that these parameters could not be correlated to age or weight. Absolute serum clearance (L/h) was correlated with gestational age (r = 0.672, P <0.01). There was no statistically significant evidence of accumulation between the first and second doses for any patient group. One baby from each group II and group III had concentration >2 mg/L 24h after the first dose and one baby from group III had concentration >2 mg/L 24h after the second dose. There are no established correlations between serum netilmicin concentrations and efficacy or toxicity in neonates and keeping 24 h trough concentration below 2 mg/L with a once-a-day dose of 4.5 mg/L would have to be validated in terms of its clinical efficacy and potential toxicity in a neonatal population.

Drug Administration Schedule↗

Importance of air quality and related factors in the prevention of infection in orthopaedic implant surgery.

Small numbers of organisms can cause orthopaedic implant infections, which give rise to a considerable degree of morbidity and also mortality. The periprosthetic infection rates have been shown to correlate with the number of airborne bacteria within 30 cm of the wound. This is influenced by factors such as the number of operating theatre personnel, their clothing and the type of ventilation system used. Guidance on routine bacteriological monitoring of ultraclean air theatres, based on the Department of Health document Health Technical Memorandum 2025, is discussed. Factors important in minimizing the number of postoperative implant infections such as the use of ultraclean air, ultraviolet radiation, different types of surgical clothing, prophylactic antibiotics and host-related factors are also discussed. The importance of proper scientific investigation into the effectiveness of practical preventative measures in the operating room is emphasized.

Air Microbiology↗

Comparison of the modified Stokes' method of susceptibility testing with results obtained using MIC methods and British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy breakpoints.

The majority of clinical microbiology laboratories in the UK use comparative disc diffusion methods based on the Stokes' method to determine antibiotic susceptibility. The technical validity of the results obtained from the modified Stokes' method of disc testing and how they relate to MIC data are not known. We studied susceptibility testing using a modified Stokes' disc diffusion method for a wide range of clinical isolates against which MICs had been determined by collaborators not involved with the disc testing evaluation. Results indicated that for 1301 organism-antibiotic combinations the number of major errors (where resistant strains were reported as sensitive) was 21/468 (4.4%) and the number of minor errors (where sensitive strains were reported as resistant) was 14/713 (1.9%) using ciprofloxacin breakpoints of 0.5 and 2 mg/L. There was good correlation between the disc susceptibility test and the MIC for 119 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae tested with the exception of Serratia spp. Excluding Serratia spp. the number of major errors for Enterobacteriaceae was 1/200 (0.5%). Data revealed 2/25 (8%) major errors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 1/45 (2.2%) for Acinetobacter spp. Haemophilus influenzae showed a number of unexpected categorization errors. The modified Stokes' method performed accurately for Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci when tested for susceptibility to gentamicin, erythromycin, teicoplanin and vancomycin. No major errors were reported for Streptococcus pneumoniae and beta-haemolytic streptococci. Problems occurred with the detection of antibiotic resistance in Enterococcus spp. Major errors were seen for ampicillin (2/12 strains), teicoplanin (5/6 strains) and vancomycin (5/13 strains) using a 30 microg disc but only 1/13 strains using a 5 microg disc. Overall, from our data, the modified Stokes' disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility test showed an unacceptable number of major errors but an acceptable number of minor errors.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗