HIV results in the frame. HIV an illusion.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to P Duesberg.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The oncogene hypothesis postulates that mutated cellular genes, termed proto-onc genes, function as cancer genes because they are related to retroviral onc genes. However, in contrast to retroviral onc genes, mutated proto-onc genes from cancers are not sufficient for carcinogenesis. Therefore, it has been proposed that mutated proto-onc genes depend on other proto-onc genes for carcinogenesis. Since the oncogene of the avian leukemia virus E26 includes coding regions derived from two cellular proto-onc genes, proto-myb and proto-ets, this hybrid gene has been proposed to be a model for two-gene-carcinogenesis. Here we set out to test this proposal. For this purpose myb and ets deletion mutants of cloned E26 provirus were prepared, and the corresponding viruses, produced by transfected primary chicken embryo cells, were tested for leukemogenicity in newborn chickens. It was found that an ets deletion mutant was just as leukemogenic as the wild-type virus and that a myb deletion mutant lacked leukemogenicity completely. To eliminate the possibility that our E26 myb deletion mutant failed to be leukemogenic because it failed to replicate, the virus was titered by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. By this method, E26 from the plasma of infected chickens was first allowed to reverse-transcribe viral RNA to cDNA in vitro, and then the cDNA concentration was determined from the lowest dilution that gave a positive signal after amplification of E26 cDNA by the PCR method. Virus titers of about 10(5) per ml were found for wild type and for myb and ets deletion mutants of E26. It is concluded that the ets region is not essential for carcinogenesis, and E26 derives transforming function from overexpression of its proto-myb coding region via the retroviral promoter. Thus, E26 is a single-hit carcinogen and, like all other oncogenic retroviruses, is not a model for two-gene-carcinogenesis. Viral ets probably reflects a genetic accident that transduced sequences of proto-ets together with proto-myb in generating E26.
The hypothesis that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) causes AIDS was advanced in 1984, based only on circumstantial evidence. To this date, the primary evidence are correlations between the presence of antibody against HIV and AIDS. But these correlations are biased by proponents of the HIV hypothesis in favour of HIV. They ignore HIV-free AIDS and they base correlations on selected studies because there are no national HIV-AIDS statistics. The HIV-AIDS hypothesis has made the following predictions: (1) AIDS would 'explode' from the original risk groups into the general population via sexual transmission of HIV. (2) Health care workers would contract AIDS from their patients, scientists from propagating HIV, and prostitutes from their clients. (3) The 150 chimpanzees that have been experimentally inoculated with HIV, and the 15,000 American hemophiliacs who have been iatrogenically inoculated before 1984, would develop AIDS. (4) Antiviral immunity and vaccines would protect against AIDS. (5) HIV would cause AIDS by killing T-cells. (6) AIDS would occur only in people infected by HIV. But none of these predictions proved to be correct. Recent studies show that HIV is a passenger virus instead of the cause of AIDS: (1) AIDS occurs at unpredictable intervals after infection; (2) HIV may be active, passive, or totally absent from otherwise identical AIDS cases. Indeed, AIDS does not meet one of the classical criteria of infectious disease: (1) Equal distribution between the sexes; (2) disease following infection within days or weeks, the time microbes take to become either immunogenic or pathogenic or both; (3) the presence of a common active microbe. Therefore it is proposed that American and European AIDS is caused by the long-term consumption of recreational drugs and the anti-HIV drug AZT. This hypothesis is testable and provides a rational basis for AIDS control.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The transforming (onc) genes of oncogenic retroviruses share most or all of their coding sequences with normal cellular genes termed proto-onc genes. The viral genes differ from proto-onc genes in virus-specific promoters and in various point mutations and substitutions of cell-derived coding regions. In view of the structural similarities between viral oncogenes and cellular proto-onc genes, the hypothesis has been advanced that proto-onc genes become cellular cancer genes if they have suffered mutations. Indeed, point mutations and substitutions have been observed in the proto-onc genes of some cancers. However, the hypothesis has been difficult to prove because mutated proto-onc genes from tumors do not transform diploid cells. Moreover, owing to the popularity of this hypothesis, even viral oncogenes are thought to derive transforming function from mutations of this cell-derived coding region. A competing hypothesis proposes that enhanced expression from retroviral promoters is necessary and sufficient for oncogenic function of proto-onc genes. To distinguish between these hypotheses we have tested tumorigenicity of RpSV, a synthetic retrovirus with the normal proto-src coding region in a vector derived from Rous sarcoma virus (RSV). In addition, we have tested the role of RSV-specific src point mutations on the tumorigenicity of RpSV. It was found that RpSV with an unmutated proto-src coding region is tumorigenic in chickens and that tumorigenicity is enhanced by RSV-specific src point mutations. It is concluded that retroviral promoters are essential for the transforming function of viral oncogenes and that certain point mutations merely supplement their transforming function. Thus retroviral onc genes are not models for the hypothesis that mutated, but transcriptionally normal, proto-onc genes of certain tumors are cancer genes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The mammalian protooncogene homologue of the avian v-ets sequence from the E26 retrovirus consists of two sequentially distinct domains located on different chromosomes. Using somatic cell hybrid panels, we have mapped the mammalian homologue of the 5' v-ets-domain to chromosome 11 (ETS1) in man, to chromosome 9 (Ets-1) in mouse, and to chromosome D1 (ETS1) in the domestic cat. The mammalian homologue of the 3' v-ets domain was similarly mapped to human chromosome 21 (ETS2), to mouse chromosome 16 (Ets-2), and to feline chromosome C2 (ETS2). Both protooncogenes fell in syntenic groups of homologous linked loci that were conserved among the three species. The occurrence of two distinct functional protooncogenes and their conservation of linkage positions in the three mammalian orders indicate that these two genes have been separate since before the evolutionary divergence of mammals.
Avian carcinoma virus MH2 contains two potential transforming genes, delta gag-mht and delta gag-myc. Thus, MH2 may be a model for two-gene carcinogenesis in which transformation depends on two synergistic genes. Most other directly oncogenic viruses contain single, autonomous transforming (onc) genes and are models for single-gene carcinogenesis. To determine which role each potential onc gene of MH2 plays in oncogenesis, we have prepared deletion and frameshift mutants of each of the two MH2 genes by in vitro mutagenesis of cloned proviral DNA and have tested transforming function and virus production in cultured primary quail cells. We have found that mht deletion mutants and wild-type virus transform primary cells and that myc deletion and frameshift mutants do not. The morphologies of cells transformed by the mht deletion mutants and by wild-type MH2 are similar yet vary considerably. Nevertheless, typical mutant transformed cells can often be distinguished from cells transformed by wild-type MH2. We conclude that the delta gag-myc gene transforms primary cells by itself, without the second potential onc gene. This myc-related gene is the smallest that has direct transforming function. delta gag-mht is without detectable transforming function but may affect transformation by delta gag-myc. Thus, MH2 behaves like a virus with a single onc gene, although it expresses two potential onc genes, and it appears not to be a model for two-gene carcinogenesis. Further work is necessary to determine whether the delta gag-mht gene possibly enhances oncogenic function of delta gag-myc or has independent oncogenic function in animals.
An intact 5.7-kb provirus of the avian erythroblastosis virus E26 has been molecularly cloned for comparisons with avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) and other avian tumor viruses. E26 and AMV transform hemopoietic cells exclusively. Both cause myeloblastosis, but E26 also causes erythroblastosis. Sequence analysis of the proviral DNA showed that: The tripartite transforming gene of E26 forms a contiguous reading frame of 1046 codons, including 272 gag, 283 mybE, and 491 ets codons. No subgenomic ets-specific mRNA was detected in E26-infected cells. By contrast, the onc gene of AMV consists almost entirely of a mybA sequence expressed via subgenomic mRNA that extends over the 5' and 3' ends of mybE. mybE is only slightly diverged from the mybA homolog of AMV and even less from the cellular proto-myb sequence with no characteristic mutation that sets apart the two viruses from proto-myb. The U5 region of the long terminal repeat (LTR) of E26 and AMV are colinear and differ only in scattered point mutations. The U3 region of the E26 LTR is different from that of AMV but is colinear and closely related with that of avian carcinoma virus MH2 and also with that of Prague Rous sarcoma virus (RSV), except for an unexpected 16-nucleotide substitution of 22 RSV nucleotides. Upstream of the 3' LTR, the c region of E26 appears to be the same as that of RSV for 70 nucleotides and very similar to those of AMV and MH2 for about 20 to 30 nucleotides. Since the U3s of E26, MH2 and RSV are very closely related and neither MH2 nor RSV show a particular erythroblast tropism, it is possible that the U3 does not play a critical role in the erythroblast tropism of E26. Electrophoretic size analyses of chicken DNA digested with restriction enzymes indicate that DNA fragments totaling over 50 kb hybridize with viral ets DNA.