Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Drings

Publications and source records attributed to P Drings.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Role of vindesine in induction chemotherapy in locally-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in most cases is not curable at the present time. Owing to the local extent of the tumor, the rate of complete resections is low and, therefore, survival in these patients is poor. For this reason, induction chemotherapy is being investigated in patients expected to have a poor prognosis after standard surgery and radiotherapy. The rationale for induction chemotherapy is to increase the rate of complete resections and achieve early elimination of micrometastases. Clinical investigations have reported an improvement of survival in stage III NSCLC after induction chemotherapy by using different combinations of cytotoxic drugs. Vindesine ranks among the most active single agents in this disease and has been part of a number of combination regimens in induction chemotherapy. The combination of mitomycin, vindesine or vinblastine and cisplatin has produced encouraging results in several studies, indicating a possible improvement of survival in stage III NSCLC, although its superiority to other combinations yet has to be demonstrated.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1998

Prognostic value of ERBB-1, VEGF, cyclin A, FOS, JUN and MYC in patients with squamous cell lung carcinomas.

Patients with previously untreated squamous cell lung carcinomas were evaluated to see if combining the expression of molecular and cellular factors with the most important clinical prognostic factors could improve the diagnostic ability to predict prognosis. For this reason, immunohistochemistry was used to examine the squamous cell lung carcinomas from 121 patients for their expression of ERBB-1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cyclin A, FOS, JUN and MYC. Median survival was shorter for patients with ERBB-1-, VEGF-, cyclin A-, FOS-, or JUN-positive tumours. For those patients with positive lymph node involvement, the survival times were also shorter in the VEGF-positive, cyclin A-positive and FOS-positive groups. Multivariate analysis independently demonstrated a significant prognostic value for lymph node involvement, VEGF and FOS.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Ifosfamide and gemcitabine: a phase II trial in advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

The novel nucleoside agent gemcitabine has demonstrated antitumor activity against a variety of solid tumors and is associated with low toxicity. A phase I trial in Germany of gemcitabine combined with the alkylating agent ifosfamide has shown encouraging activity against non-small cell lung cancer. The efficacy and toxicity of this combination was further evaluated in a phase II trial involving chemotherapy-naive patients with non-small cell lung cancer (mostly stage IV disease). Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, followed by a 1-week rest, while ifosfamide was given at a dose of 1,500 mg/m2 on days 8 through 12. Fifty-five patients were treated, 49 of whom are evaluable for response. Six patients were not evaluable because they had not received sufficient therapy (less than one complete cycle) because of early disease progression or early death. Twelve patients responded, for an overall objective response rate of 24.5%. The median survival time was 8.9 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 30.9%. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 30.2% and 24.5% of patients, respectively, but the incidence of infection was low. These results indicate that the combination of gemcitabine and ifosfamide is active against non-small cell lung cancer and has a mild toxicity profile, and suggest that further evaluation of this combination is warranted.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1998

Ifosfamide and docetaxel in non-small cell lung cancer.

Ifosfamide has been in use for several decades and is generally considered to be one of the most effective drugs for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). At the same time, docetaxel is one of the new, promising drugs with high antitumor activity in various solid tumors. In NSCLC, an objective remission rate of 33% could be achieved in chemotherapy-naive patients. Currently, clinical research with docetaxel in NSCLC patients focuses on various combinations of this drug with radiotherapy and a number of different cytostatic chemicals. There are good reasons for combining docetaxel with ifosfamide. In addition to the promising antitumor activity in NSCLC displayed by both drugs, it is an advantage that docetaxel and ifosfamide have only minimal overlapping nonhematologic toxicity. Moreover, the combination seems to be well founded due to the lack of cross-resistance between docetaxel and alkylators such as ifosfamide of the oxazaphosphorine type, which have shown synergistic antitumor activity in vivo. Based on this background, two phase I studies of docetaxel and ifosfamide have been initiated.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

[Pneumonitis after radiotherapy of bronchial carcinoma: incidence and influencing factors].

BACKGROUND: The most important side effect in radiotherapy of lung cancer is pneumonitis. The incidence of pneumonitis was evaluated in a retrospective study in the patient collective of the University of Heidelberg. Therapy related and therapy independent factors have been evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 348 of 392 cases with lung cancer who were treated by local irradiation between January 1989 and January 1992 the patient's records were evaluable for response and toxicity. All patients were treated by megavolt equipment with a conventional fractionation in most cases. Standard target volumes were irradiated including the lymphatic drainage. From a dose of above 30 Gy a technique sparing the spinal cord was chosen. Retrospectively pneumonitis was classified into 4 grades starting from slight symptoms to respiratory insufficiency requiring O2. Grade I and II were summarized to slight, grade III and IV to severe pneumonitis. RESULTS: Regarding the treatment prior to irradiation patients with primary irradiation were affected in 26.5% (17% slight, 9.5% severe), with postoperative irradiation in 14% (9.3% slight, 4.7% severe), with radiochemotherapy of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in 15.4% (12% slight, 3.4% severe) by this side effect. These differences were not significant (p = 0.32). The median onset of pneumonitis was 31 days after end of irradiation (severe 23 days, slight 44 days, p = 0.026). By a univariate analysis the total dose at the prescription point was the most important factor (30 to 50.5 Gy 11%, 52 to 59 Gy 15%, 60 to 74 Gy 26%, p = 0.007). High single doses (2.5 Gy) were only applied within a study of radiochemotherapy with a randomised sequential and alternating schedule. So that the increased rate of pneumonitis (42%) is not clearly separable from other influencing variables. A correlation between the applied techniques and the irradiated volume (measured by planimetric methods) was not demonstrable. Regarding the independent factors a high age, female sex and a low FeV1 were unfavourable. However, age and sex corrected FeV1 was not predictive. CONCLUSIONS: The observed incidence is within the range of literature. By a clinical point of view the total dose is an obvious factor. Also single doses above 2 Gy have to be seen critically (a total dose of 50 Gy). The results confirm the fact that patients with a low FeV1 are not suitable to a high dose irradiation of the chest. In this connection old patients and women also should be seen as patients at risk.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Tumour-derived, endocrine, exogenous and therapeutic factors differentially modulate cytokine secretion in whole blood cell culture.

Following our previous results which showed that TGF-beta 1 suppressed the secretion of certain cytokines, we investigated the effects of different endogenous and exogenous factors on cytokine secretion in whole blood cell culture by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for measurement of cytokine concentrations. Several molecules including dexamethasone, noradrenaline (NA) and ethanol differentially inhibited mitogen-induced cytokine secretion. Dexamethasone and noradrenaline suppressed secretion of IL-2, IFN alpha, IFN gamma, TNF alpha, IL-1 alpha and IL-1 beta. beta-Endorphin and Leu-Enkephalin had no significant influence on cytokine secretion. Suppression of cytokine secretion by TGF-beta 1 was further intensified significantly and dose dependently by addition of noradrenaline. GM-CSF stimulated the secretion of IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta and TNF gamma, but had no influence on the secretion of IL-2, IFN alpha and IFN gamma. G-CSF, IL-3 and SCF did not significantly influence secretion of all cytokines tested. Thus, endogenous and exogenous factors differentially influence cytokine secretion by immunocompetent cells.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Single-agent gemcitabine versus cisplatin-etoposide: early results of a randomised phase II study in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This randomised study was designed to determine the response rate survival and toxicity of single-agent gemcitabine and cisplatin-etoposide in chemo-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was given as a 30 min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 (following cisplatin), 2 and 3. Major eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed non-small-cell lung cancer, measurable disease, Zubrod PS 0-2; no prior chemotherapy, no prior radiation of the measured lesion, and no CNS metastases. RESULTS: 146 patients were enrolled, 71 patients on gemcitabine and 75 patients on cisplatin-etoposide. Patient characteristics were well matched across both arms. Sixty-six gemcitabine patients and 72 cisplatin-etoposide patients were evaluable. Partial responses were seen in 12 gemcitabine patients (18.2%; 95% CI: 9.8-30) and 11 cisplatin-etoposide patients (15.3%; 95% CI: 7.9-25.7). Early indications show no statistical differences between the two treatments with respect to time to disease progression or survival. Haematological and laboratory toxicity were moderate and manageable. However, hospitalisation because of neutropenic fever was required for 6 (8%) cisplatin-etoposide patients but not for any gemcitabine patients. Non-haematological toxicity was more pronounced with significant differences in nausea and vomiting (grade 3 and 4: 11% gemcitabine vs. 29% cisplatin-etoposide; despite the allowance for 5-HT3 antiemetics during the first cycle of cisplatin-etoposide), and alopecia (grade 3 and 4:3% gemcitabine vs. 62% cisplatin-etoposide). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomised study, single-agent gemcitabine was at least as active but better tolerated than the combination cisplatin-etoposide.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Decrease of interleukin-2 secretion is a new independent prognostic factor associated with poor survival in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that suppression of interleukin-2 (IL-2) secretion was mediated by transforming growth factor (TGF) beta 1 secreted by small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) tumor cells. We have also shown that IL-2 secretion was significantly impaired in patients with SCLC at the time of diagnosis. Reconstitution of cytokine secretion correlated with reduction of tumor load. These data suggested that the immune system was suppressed by the tumor. To address the clinical relevance of cytokine suppression in SCLC, we investigated the correlation of the level of IL-2 secretion with survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The significance of correlations between single parameters in the test groups was calculated by using the linear regression analysis, the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the exact test according to Fisher. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test and the Cox-regression model, we analysed the relation of IL-2 secretion in whole blood cell cultures from 52 patients with SCLC at the time of diagnosis to established prognostic factors relevant for survival in SCLC. RESULTS: Impairment of IL-2 secretion significantly correlates to survival in SCLC (P = 0.004). Further univariate and multivariate analysis showed that this prognostic factor is independent from other factors of prognostic relevance in SCLC, namely stage of disease, neurone specific enolase (NSE), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), age, and sex. More important, the prognostic value of IL-2 secretion is comparable to the most predominant prognostic factors for survival in SCLC identified so far. In the final model of the cox regression analysis, the P-value for IL-2 secretion in relation to stage of disease was 0.012 and 0.019, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IL-2 secretion at the time of diagnosis represents an independent prognostic factor for survival in SCLC. Although its prognostic value has to be confirmed in a larger group of patients, our results demonstrate that IL-2 secretion may play an important role in diagnosis and treatment of SCLC. Moreover, in contrast to other prognostic factors, impairment of IL-2 secretion may help to understand immunosuppression in SCLC and, thus, important elements of the pathogenesis of this disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Phase II trial of raltitrexed ('Tomudex') in advanced small-cell lung cancer.

Raltitrexed, a thymidylate synthase inhibitor, was given to 21 patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer, at a dose of 3 mg m(-2) as a 15-min intravenous infusion at 21-day intervals. All of the patients had extensive disease and 17 had received prior therapy. Patients with disease refractory to primary chemotherapy were excluded. Forty-one treatment cycles were given (median two, range one to four). The drug was well tolerated. No objective tumour response was documented. The patients had chemoresistant disease, as shown by a response in only one of ten patients who went on to receive alternative cytotoxic regimens. We conclude that raltitrexed given in this schedule is inactive as second line therapy for small-cell lung cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Cystine levels, cystine flux, and protein catabolism in cancer cachexia, HIV/SIV infection, and senescence.

Patients with skeletal muscle catabolism (cachexia) fail to conserve the skeletal muscle protein and release large amounts of nitrogen as urea. Previous studies suggest that the threshold for the conversion of amino acids into other forms of chemical energy and the concomitant production of urea are regulated by the plasma cystine level and hepatic cysteine catabolism. Studies of plasma amino acid exchange rates in the lower extremities now show that healthy young subjects regulate their plasma cystine level in a process that may be described as controlled constructive catabolism. The term controlled describes the fact that the release of cystine and other amino acids from the peripheral tissue is negatively correlated with (certain) plasma amino acid levels. The term constructive describes the fact that the release of cystine is correlated with an increase of the plasma cystine level. The regulation of the plasma cystine level is disturbed in conditions with progressive skeletal muscle catabolism including cancer, HIV infection, and old age. These conditions show also a low plasma glutamine:cystine ratio indicative of an impaired hepatic cystine catabolism. In HIV+ patients and SIV-infected macaques, a decrease of the plasma cystine level was found to coincide with the decrease of CD4+ T cells.

Adipose Tissue↗
PubMed1997

Randomized trial of alternating versus sequential radiotherapy/chemotherapy in limited-disease patients with small-cell lung cancer: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of alternating or sequential schedules of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CDE) chemotherapy and irradiation in patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 335 eligible patients were randomized between five courses of CDE chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation 50 Gy in 20 daily fractions (S) and the same total dose of chemotherapy and irradiation split into four courses of five daily fractions delivered on days 14 to 21 of the second and subsequent chemotherapy courses (A). Patients had a median age of 61 years (range, 33 to 75); 224 (66%) were male; the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was 0 or 1 in 311; and 254 had weight loss less than 10%. RESULTS: The overall median survival duration was 15 months, with 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57% to 67%) 1-year, 25% (95% CI, 20% to 30%) 2-year, and 14% (95% CI, 10% to 18%) 3-year survival rates. There was no significant difference between the arms. The median survival time was 14 months in A and 15 months in S. One-year survival was 60% in A (95% CI, 53% to 67%) and 64% in S (95% CI, 57% to 71%); 2-year survival was 26% in A (95% CI, 19% to 33%) and 23% in S (95% CI, 16% to 30%); and 3-year survival was 12% in A (95% CI, 6% to 18%) and 15% in S (95% CI, 9% to 21%). World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 90% of A and 77% of S patients (P < .001) and WHO grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 33% of A and 20% of S patients (P < .001). Rates of other acute and late toxicities were similar in both arms. Hematologic toxicity compromised treatment dose delivery; less than 50% of A patients received greater than 95% of prescribed chemotherapy and 77% their full radiation course, compared with 60% and 93% for arm S (P < .009). Local relapse was the site of first failure in 60% of all patients and 75% of these suffered an in-field relapse; no difference could be seen between the two arms. CONCLUSION: This trial failed to confirm the superiority of an alternating schedule of delivery. For this combination of chemotherapy and irradiation, hematologic toxicity compromised treatment delivery and could have contributed to the overall result. The poor rates of local control are disappointing and require intensification of the radiation therapy strategy.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

A randomized study of gemcitabine monotherapy versus etoposide/cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

This randomized, multinational, multicenter study was designed to determine the response rate of gemcitabine monotherapy and cisplatin/etoposide combination therapy in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (stage IIIA [if inoperable], IIIB, or IV). One group of patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 intravenously once a week for 3 weeks (days 1, 8, and 15) followed by a 1-week rest period. The second group received cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle in combination with etoposide 100 mg/m2, administered on days 1, 2, and 3 following the cisplatin infusion. Each patient was allowed to remain on study up to a maximum of six cycles. The planned interim analysis was based on the 117 patients in the study, 116 of whom were randomized up until November 20, 1995. The efficacy analysis was performed on the 107 patients who had data from a minimum of two cycles, whereas the safety analysis was based on data from all 116 randomized patients. In the gemcitabine arm there were 10 of 52 (19%) partial responders; in the cisplatin/etoposide arm there were four (7%) of 54 partial responders. There was a statistically significant difference in the response rates between the two arms, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.6% to 32.1% (P = .040). The median time to progressive disease was 4.2 months for gemcitabine patients and 3.7 months for cisplatin/etoposide patients. There was significantly more alopecia and nausea and vomiting in the cisplatin/etoposide arm compared with the gemcitabine arm, as well as two cases of neutropenic sepsis in the cisplatin/etoposide arm. These data indicate that single-agent gemcitabine is at least as effective as the combination of cisplatin/etoposide in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer and has an improved safety profile.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

A phase II trial of gemcitabine and ifosfamide in non-small cell lung cancer.

The novel nucleoside agent gemcitabine has demonstrated antitumor activity against a variety of solid tumors and is associated with low toxicity. A phase I trial in Germany of gemcitabine combined with the alkylating agent ifosfamide has shown encouraging activity against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy and toxicity of this combination was further evaluated in a phase II trial of chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC (mostly stage IV disease). Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 followed by a 1-week rest, while ifosfamide was given at a dose of 1,500 mg/m2 on day 8 and days 9 through 12. Fifty-one of 56 patients were evaluable for response. Eleven partial responses were seen, for an overall objective response rate of 22%. The 6- and 9-month survival rates are 62% and 41%, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 35.8% and 24.5% of patients, respectively, but the incidence of infection was low. These results indicate that the combination of gemcitabine and ifosfamide is active against NSCLC and has a mild toxicity profile, and suggest that further evaluation of this combination is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Do psychological factors modify survival of cancer patients? II: Results of an empirical study with bronchial carcinoma patients].

The present prospective test study of hypotheses addressed the question whether psychological factors are predictive of survival time in lung cancer patients. The hypotheses were: Emotional distress, depression and depressive coping are associated with shorter survival; hope and active coping with longer survival. The study was based on a sample of n = 103 patients who were investigated post-diagnosis and before the beginning of primary treatment. Emotional distress and hope were assessed by clinical scales (self-reports and interviewer ratings), depression by the Depression Scale of von Zerssen, depressive coping and active coping by the Freiburg Questionnaire on Coping with illness by Muthny. At follow-up, which took place three to five years later, n = 74 patients had died, for n = 29 patients the survival data are censored. The prediction of the survival time was performed applying multivariate analyses (Kaplan-Meier-method, Cox-Regression), adjusting for biological risk factors (histological classification, stage of the disease, type and amount of treatment, Karnofsky performance status, age). Results were as follows: Active coping and hope were associated with longer survival, emotional distress, depression and depressive coping with shorter survival, respectively. These associations were found consistently across assessment methods. The predictive effects of coping and distress were statistically independent of the influence of the somatic risk factors. The best psychological predictor was the interviewer rating of active coping. Its predictive power equalled that of the Karnofsky performance status. However, there was evidence that the effects of the psychological factors varied somewhat in interaction with treatment modalities. The findings are discussed from a methodological perspective. Possible causal models and mechanisms are presented which could account for interactions of psychological measures and the course of the disease: Thus, it can be conceived that psychological effects were mediated by patients' compliance with medical treatment. In addition, it cannot be ruled out that psychological factors themselves were influenced by the physical status of the patients at the time of entry to the study.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1996

Expression of CD44 splice variants in normal respiratory epithelium and bronchial carcinomas: no evidence for altered CD44 splicing in metastasis.

Expression of alternatively spliced CD44 adhesion molecules has been implicated in metastatic spread of various rodent and human tumors. To determine whether specific CD44 splice variants contribute to metastatic spread of bronchial cancers, we compared the expression of CD44 splice variants in normal bronchial epithelium and bronchial cancers, including tumors which already spread to regional lymph nodes or distant organs. Variant CD44 expression was analysed by immunohistochemistry using variant exon-specific monoclonal antibodies. The precise composition of CD44 transcripts was delineated by exon-specific RT-PCR. The concurring data obtained by both methods revealed that high levels of standard CD44 and variants v5 and v6 as well as low levels of variants v7 and v10 are expressed both in normal bronchial epithelium and squamous cell lung cancers. No CD44 expression was observed in the highly metastatic small cell lung cancers and adenocarcinomas with the exception of bronchioalveolar cancers showing weak expression of standard CD44. These data suggest that expression of alternatively spliced CD44 molecules in the bronchial tract is related to the distinct differentiation of the respiratory epithelium. No correlation between expression of specific CD44 splice variants and metastasis of bronchial cancers was observed.

Alternative Splicing↗
PubMed1996

A randomized study of high-dose split course radiotherapy preceded by high-dose chemotherapy versus high-dose radiotherapy only in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. An EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group trial.

BACKGROUND: The treatment results of radiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer are very poor. Several phase II studies showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy was feasible in this patient group and suggested that treatment outcome might improve. A randomized phase II study was performed addressing the response rate and morbidity of high-dose split course radiotherapy (RT) versus the same radiotherapy preceded by high-dose chemotherapy (CT) in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy eligible patients were randomized in this study. CT consisted of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 days 1 and 22, and vindesine 3 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 22 and 29. Radiotherapy started on day 43 in the combined arm and immediately in the RT-only arm. The primary tumour and the regional nodes were treated by 30 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks and after the split by a second course of 25 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks. In the combined arm a third CT cycle was planned during the split between RT courses. RESULTS: In the CT + RT arm 34 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity and 30 patients in the RT only arm. After completion of treatment 7 patients had a complete response (2 in the CT plus RT arm, 5 in the RT alone arm) and 26 patients a partial response (13 in the CT plus RT arm, 13 in the RT alone arm) for an overall response rate of 52% (95% CI 39%-65%). Acute toxicity was worse in the combined treatment arm with grade 4 leucocytopenia in 8 patients and thrombocytopenia grade 4 in one patient. Three patients had reversible renal toxicity grade 2. There was one toxic death in the RT plus CT arm. There was no enhancement of acute or late radiation pulmonary or oesophageal toxicity. Time to progressive disease (median 30 vs. 35 weeks) and overall survival time (median 12 months) were equal in both treatment arms. CONCLUSION: High-dose radiotherapy preceded by high-dose chemotherapy was more toxic than radiotherapy alone and did not result in this study in any benefit in terms of response rate, time to progressive disease and overall survival.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Oral ifosfamide/mesna versus intravenous ifosfamide/mesna in non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the EORTC lung cancer cooperative group.

BACKGROUND: Chronic oral administration of anticancer drugs may offer therapeutic advantages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 68 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, not previously treated by chemotherapy, were randomized to receive either ifosfamide given orally (OSI) at a dose of 1 g/day for 14 days every 4 weeks, or as a 1-hour intravenous infusion (IVI) at a dose of 1.6 g/m2/day for 5 days every 4 weeks. According to the route of ifosfamide administration, patients received either mesna i.v. or mesna film-coated tablets for uroprotection. RESULTS: Eight patients were found to be ineligible for the study and therefore excluded for all analyses. Thirty-three patients received IVI, and 27 patients OSI. One patient randomized to OSI died before treatment was initiated, leaving 59 patients fully evaluable for toxicity. Hematological toxicity was less severe for patients on OSI, but CNS toxicity was reported more frequently on OSI (39%; 12% grade III/IV), than on IVI (15%; 9% grade III/IV), which caused the premature close of the study. Other non-hematological adverse events were of modest clinical significance and comparable in both arms. Forty-nine patients were considered evaluable for response: in the IVI arm, 5 (17%) of the 29 evaluable patients obtained a partial remission, and 7 patients a no change (24%). In the OSI arm, 2 (10%) of the 20 evaluable patients obtained a partial remission, and 11 (52%) a stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Both arms have some activity in non-small-cell lung cancer; while OSI was less myelosuppressive than IVI, it was associated with a higher incidence of CNS toxicity. Oral administration of ifosfamide, in the schedule and daily dose tested here cannot be recommended.

Administration, Oral↗