This study compared the analgesic efficacy and safety of the cyclo-oxygenase-2 specific inhibitor celecoxib with the non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, naproxen, in patients with acute shoulder pain. Adult patients with shoulder pain, onset within the previous 14 days and shoulder pain of > or = 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), were treated with oral doses of celecoxib or naproxen for 14 days and followed by a visit at day 42 in a double-blind, randomized study. The primary efficacy assessment was change in maximum pain at rest on a 100 mm VAS at day 14 compared with baseline. In addition, secondary efficacy pain and functional assessments were analysed at baseline, day 14 and day 42. A total of 202 patients were included in the trial (99 celecoxib 400 mg/day; 103 naproxen 1 g/day). The difference in change from baseline at day 14 in maximum pain at rest was not statistically significant between the two treatment groups, but was numerically higher for celecoxib than for naproxen (-47.9 +/- 2.5 versus -42.3 +/- 2.5, respectively). According to the limits of the 95% confidence interval of the difference between groups (-12.52; 1.38), celecoxib appeared to be at least as effective as naproxen. All secondary efficacy measures followed the same pattern, showing similarity between the two treatments with a trend in favour of celecoxib. The incidences of adverse events were similar for both groups. Fewer patients experienced epigastric pain with celecoxib (seven patients versus 14 with naproxen). This adverse event led to discontinuation in two patients receiving celecoxib and five receiving naproxen. Celecoxib 400 mg/day was at least as effective as naproxen 1 g/day in managing pain in this condition.

Acute Disease↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Morphine and neuropathic pain].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Strong opioids for chronic non-cancer pain].

A CHALLENGING SITUATION: A number of patients experiencing chronic noncancer pain are unsatisfied with standard treatment modalities. This raises the question of whether there may be a place for strong opioids in the management of these patients. Randomised placebo-controlled trials of strong opioids generated rather disappointing results in this type of pain. Observational studies have indicated that strong opioids may improve comfort and function in some patients with intractable nociceptive or neuropathic pain. However, opioids may be ineffective in others and intolerable side effects, heightened pain and functional impairment as well as drug addiction may also occur. A PROMISING SOLUTION: Finally, strong opioids do not appear to be the issue to all intractable chronic nonmalignant pain states, but they may be a possible issue to a subset of selected and informed patients who agree on the goals of the treatment and accept regular monitoring.

Chronic Disease↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Preoperative and postoperative cholangiography in children].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Age Factors↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Preventive therapy for nausea and vomiting in patients on opioid therapy for non-malignant pain in rheumatology].

OBJECTIVE: To determine if systematic use of metoclopramide associated with opioids (Morphine sulfate SR) decreases the incidence of nausea and vomiting (N&V), established adverse effects of opioids. METHOD: Open randomised study with 132 patients treated for non malignant pain (71 women, 61 men, mean age 53.4 years). One group (n = 76) was treated with morphine alone; the other (n = 56) with morphine plus metoclopramide. Mean duration of therapy: 6 days; mean dosage: 60 mg/d RESULTS: In the 2 groups, N&V were present in the first 72 hours. The frequency of N&V in the morphine group was 38.1% (conform with the literature). The systematic use of metoclopramide decreases the frequency of N&V: p < 0.005. However the use of morphine > 60 mg/d decreases N&V: p = 0.036. High dosages of morphine can have an antiemetic effect by interaction with the mu receptors in the antiemetic center and not in the trigger zone which has an emetic effect. CONCLUSION: The systematic use of metoclopramide with opioid therapy for non malignant pain in rheumatology decreases the risk of nausea and vomiting.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Intra-articular injections of hylan G-F 20 in patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis: an open-label, multicentre, pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain prospective data on feasibility and safety of intra-articular injections of hylan G-F20 in patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with primary hip OA, Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III, aged > or = 40 and walking pain 50-90 mm on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were enrolled in an open-label, multicentre pilot trial. Hylan G-F20 (2 ml) was injected intra-articularly (IA) in the hip under fluoroscopy at D0, and follow-up visits were performed at D7-30-60-90. The possibility of a second injection at D30-60 or 90 was considered if the reported pain level was equivalent to baseline. Adverse events, walking pain (VAS), WOMAC index, patient and physician's global assessment were recorded at each visit. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients 1 injection and 32 received 2 injections. Transient hip pain was reported following 10.1% of injections, but no patient withdrew from the study because of this. Two mild synovial fluid aseptic effusions occurred after the first injection. No systemic device-related adverse event was reported. Walking pain decreased from 69.3 mm at entry to 39.5 mm at the end point (p < 0.0001). All other outcome measures decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: Viscosupplementation with hylan G-F20 is feasible, easy to perform and well-tolerated in hip OA. A double-blind, controlled study should be performed to confirm data on its efficacy.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Prospective study of the analgesic action of clomipramine versus placebo in refractory lumbosciatica (68 cases)].

The authors sought to determine the analgesic activity of clomipramine (CMP) versus placebo, efficacy and side-effects according to the time of administration, long term clinical results and the relationship between plasma levels and analgesic effect. This double-blind randomised trial involved the infusion of 250 ml of glucose solution morning and evening versus placebo. CMP was administered at progressive doses for 8 days (maximum dosage 75 mg), either in the morning at 8 a.m. or in the evening at 6 p.m. Sixty eight patients accepted to be treated, all suffering from low back pain with or without sciatica. Maintenance treatment at the dose of 75 mg/day was then administered. CMP had a statistically significant analgesic action independent (rapidity of action) of its antidepressant activity. CMP was more effective and better tolerated (sedative and tranquilizer effect) in the evening. Long term results were poor (75% of cases). There was no link between plasma levels and clinical response. The authors noted that the analgesic activity of CMP was rapid, but for a duration limited to the short term and that this efficacy compared with the quite good results obtained with the placebo could be explained by a possible methodological bias (patients hospitalised and treated by intravenous infusions). The finding that CMP was better tolerated in the evening, without any loss of efficacy, is a positive feature (chronotherapeutic trial). Poor long term results could be partially explained by side-effects (66%). There was no relationship between analgesic effect and plasma levels.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Bone insufficiency fractures in osteoporotic patients treated with sodium fluoride].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Oxyurid granuloma of the mesentery].

A 44-year-old woman presented with an acute abdominal syndrome associated with fever. Laparotomy revealed a mesenteric mass; pathology demonstrated a granuloma containing an adult threadworm (Enterobius vermicularis) and its eggs. Ectopic oxyuriasis is rare, and only three cases of peritoneal granuloma distant from the pelvis or the appendix have been reported previously. Our observation is the first case to which a clinical symptomatology could be ascribed. The pathogenesis and the treatment of this particular localization of oxyuriasis are discussed.

Adult↗