Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Baskett

Publications and source records attributed to P Baskett.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2000 for Adult Advanced Life Support. A statement from the Advanced Life Support Working Group(1) and approved by the Executive Committee of the European Resuscitation Council.

The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) last issued guidelines for Basic Life Support (BLS) in 1998 [1]. These were based on the 1997 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Advisory Statements [2]. In 1999 and 2000 representatives of ILCOR, at the invitation of the American Heart Association, met on a number of occasions in Dallas to agree a Consensus on Science upon which future guidelines would be based. Representatives from the ERC played a prominent role in the deliberations, which culminated in the publication of "Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care--A Consensus on Science" in August 2000 [3]. The consensus was evidence-based wherever possible. The ERC ALS Working Group has considered this document and has recommended some changes in the guidelines that will be suitable for European practice. These changes, together with a summary of the Sequence of Actions in ALS, are presented in this paper.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

In this issue

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1998

The study of the effectiveness of chest compressions using the CPR-plus.

Effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) requires a high level of skill from both healthcare professionals and the lay public. Inadequate chest compressions are a common cause of ineffective CPR. The CPR-plus is a non-invasive, hand-held, simple to use CPR adjunct designed to assist the rescuer to monitor and modify the compression technique during CPR, hopefully resulting in improved rescuer performance and more effective CPR. Forty qualified nurses were evaluated while they performed chest compressions on a training manikin. During simulated two-rescuer CPR (compression/ventilation ratio 5:1) the participants performed 150 compressions at a rate of 80-100 min. Compressions were performed with and without the CPR-plus and the results compared. The use of the CPR-plus was randomised with regard to whether the adjunct or the standard method was used first. The average number of correctly applied compressions was significantly better when the CPR-plus was used: 138.35/150 versus 110.70/150 (p = 0.0001). Improvements in techniques associated with the use of the CPR-plus also included a reduction in excessive application of pressure and incorrect hand position. The device provided reassurance of satisfactory compressions and an indication of impending fatigue in the rescuer.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗
PubMed1998

The United Kingdom pre-hospital study of active compression-decompression resuscitation.

This prospective, controlled trial with crossover group design compares the effectiveness of active compression-decompression (ACD) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and standard CPR on the outcomes of victims of prehospital cardiac arrest. In three UK cities, victims of non-traumatic, out of hospital cardiac arrest, over the age of 8 years received either standard or ACD-CPR on arrival of ambulance personnel. Main outcome measures were return of spontaneous circulation, survival to be admitted to the intensive care unit, survival to hospital discharge, and neurological outcome. A total of 576 patients (STD-CPR, n=309; ACD-CPR, n=267) were analysed. The treatment groups were similar with respect to age, gender, proportion of witnessed arrests, initial cardiac rhythm, and call to advanced life support interval. The proportion of patients receiving bystander CPR was higher in the ACD group (37.1% vs. 28.5%; P=0.028). The interval between collapse and defibrillation was longer in the ACD group (12.3 min vs. 10.4 min; P=0.028). There was no difference between the STD-CPR and ACD-CPR groups in survival to admission to the intensive care unit (13.6% vs. 13.8%; P=0.93) or hospital discharge (4.8% vs. 6.0%; P=0.67). There was no difference between the groups with respect to the neurological outcome of those patients surviving to hospital discharge. Analysis of important subgroups also showed no benefit for ACD-CPR. We conclude that there was no improvement in outcome with ACD-CPR when used by ambulance personnel in Cardiff and Portsmouth.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Tidal volumes which are perceived to be adequate for resuscitation.

Observers trained in basic life support assessed chest rise in 34 patients who were anaesthetised and paralysed and whose lungs were being mechanically ventilated prior to routine surgery. Making 67 independent assessments, the observers indicated the tidal volume that they considered produced adequate chest rise for resuscitation. The mean tidal volume perceived to be adequate was 384 ml with 95% confidence limits of 362-406 ml. The perceived volumes correlated with the Body Mass Index. Guidelines by various authorities recommend that tidal volumes sufficient to make the chest rise normally should be used during resuscitation. The volumes perceived as adequate by the observers are much lower than the numerical values recommended by the American Heart Association (800-1200 ml). High tidal volumes are associated with an increased risk of gastric regurgitation in patients with an unprotected airway, CO2 delivery to the lungs is likely to be low during cardiac arrest obviating the need for high tidal volumes. In the light of present knowledge and the findings in this study, we would recommend that resuscitation training manikins are recalibrated to indicate satisfactory ventilation at tidal volumes of 400-600 ml. These volumes should reduce the risk of gastric inflation and permit more chest compressions to be carried out in a minute because the ventilation fraction of the CPR sequence is shorter. Adequate CO2 elimination should still be assured.

Adult↗