Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

Onur Mutlu

Publications and source records attributed to Onur Mutlu.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Rawsamble: overlapping raw nanopore signals using a hash-based seeding mechanism.

MOTIVATION: Raw nanopore signal analysis is a common approach in genomics to provide fast and resource-efficient analysis without translating the signals to bases (i.e. without basecalling). However, existing solutions cannot interpret raw signals directly if a reference genome is unknown due to a lack of accurate mechanisms to handle increased noise in pairwise raw signal comparison. Our goal is to enable the direct analysis of raw signals without a reference genome. To this end, we propose Rawsamble, the first mechanism that can identify regions of similarity between all raw signal pairs, known as all-vs-all overlapping, using a hash-based search mechanism. RESULTS: We use these overlaps to construct de novo assembly graphs with an existing assembler, miniasm, off-the-shelf. To our knowledge, these are the first de novo assemblies ever constructed directly from raw signals without basecalling. Our extensive evaluations across multiple genomes of varying sizes show that Rawsamble provides a significant speedup (on average by 5.01× and up to 23.10×) and reduces peak memory usage (on average by 5.74× and up to by 22.00×) compared to a conventional genome assembly pipeline using the state-of-the-art tools for basecalling (Dorado's fastest mode) and overlapping (minimap2) on a CPU. We find that around one-third of Rawsamble's overlapping pairs are also found by minimap2. We find that when we use overlapping reads from Rawsamble, we can construct unitigs that are (i) as accurate as those built from minimap2's overlaps and (ii) up to half a chromosome in length (e.g. 2.3 million bases for E. coli). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Rawsamble is available at https://github.com/CMU-SAFARI/RawHash. We also provide the scripts to fully reproduce our results on our GitHub page.

Nanopores

A decentralized future for the open-science databases.

The continuous and reliable open access to curated biological data repositories is indispensable for accelerating rigorous scientific inquiry and fostering reproducible research outcomes. However, the current paradigm, which relies heavily on centralized infrastructure for the storage and distribution of foundational biomedical datasets, inherently introduces significant vulnerabilities. This centralized model is susceptible to single points of failure, including cyberattacks, technical malfunctions, natural disasters, and even political or funding uncertainties. Such disruptions can lead to widespread data unavailability, data loss, integrity compromises, and substantial delays in critical research, ultimately impeding scientific progress. The downstream effect of such interruptions can be the widespread paralysis of diverse research activities, including computational, clinical, molecular, and climate studies. This scenario vividly illustrates the inherent dangers of consolidating essential scientific resources within a single geopolitical or institutional locus. As data generation is accelerating and the global landscape continues to fluctuate, the sustainability of centralized models must be critically re-evaluated. A shift toward federated and decentralized architectures may offer a robust and forward-looking approach to enhancing the resilience of scientific data infrastructures by reducing exposure to governance instability, infrastructural fragility, and funding volatility, while also promoting equity and global accessibility. Inspired by established models such as ELIXIR's federated infrastructure and the policy and funding frameworks developed by CODATA and the Global Biodata Coalition (GBC), emerging Decentralized Science (DeSci) initiatives can contribute to building more resilient, fair, and incentive-aligned data ecosystems. The future of open science depends on integrating these complementary approaches to establish a globally distributed, economically sustainable, and institutionally robust infrastructure that safeguards scientific data as a public good, further ensuring continued accessibility, interoperability, and preservation for generations to come. Here, we examine the structural limitations of centralized repositories, evaluate federated and decentralized models, and propose a hybrid framework for resilient, fair, and sustainable scientific data stewardship.

data accessibility