Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ole Rahbek

Publications and source records attributed to Ole Rahbek.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Bone compaction enhances implant fixation in a canine gap model.

A new bone preparation technique, compaction, has increased fixation of implants inserted with exact-fit or press-fit to bone. Furthermore, a demonstrated spring-back effect of compacted bone might be of potential value in reducing the initial gaps that often exist between clinical inserted implants and bone. However, it is unknown whether the compression and breakage of trabeculae during the compaction procedure results in impaired gap-healing of compacted bone. Therefore, we compared compaction with conventional drilling in a canine gap model. Grit-blasted titanium implants (diameter 6 mm) were bilaterally inserted into cavities initially expanded to 8 mm diameters in the proximal humeri. Each dog served as its own control; thus, one humerus had the implant cavity prepared with compaction, the other with drilling. Eight dogs were euthanized after 2 weeks, and 7 dogs after 4 weeks. Humeri from additional 7 dogs represented time 0. At time 0 a spring-back effect of compacted bone was demonstrated as cavities, initially expanded to 8 mm by compaction, were reduced to a median cavity diameter of 6.6 mm. In contrast, cavities initially expanded to 8 mm by drilling, had a median cavity diameter of 8.0 mm at time 0. Compaction significantly increased all push-out parameters at 2 weeks. Compaction significantly increased peri-implant bone density at 0 and 2 weeks, and bone implant contact at 2 and 4 weeks. The faster mechanical and histological fixation with compaction indicates that the beneficial effect of reduced gap size, as compacted bone springs back, is not eliminated by an impaired gap-healing of compacted bone.

Animals↗

The influence of surface porosity on gap-healing around intra-articular implants in the presence of migrating particles.

The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of two different porous coatings on bone ongrowth and on the peri-implant migration of polyethylene (PE) particles. Porous-coated cylindrical implants with an either plasma-sprayed closed-pore coating (Pl) or titanium fiber metal open-pore coating (Fi) were inserted intra-articular in exact fit or with a 0.75 mm peri-implant gap. A weight-loaded implant device in the distal femur was used. We used a randomized paired design in eight dogs. PE particles were injected repeatedly intra-articular in the knee until the dogs were killed after 8 weeks. Fi implants had significantly more bone ongrowth 8 (0-21)% compared with Pl implants 0 (0-0)% in gap situations and reduced the number of peri-implant PE particles significantly. Among exact-fitted implants we found that peri-implant tissue around Pl implants consisted of significantly more fibrous tissue than around Fi implants. A sealing effect against the migration of PE particles was found for both Fi and Pl implants in exact fit.

Alloys↗

Bone compaction enhances fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in a canine gap model.

Primary cementless joint replacement depends partly on the ability of bone to heal into those areas of an inserted implant where a gap to surrounding bone initially exists. A new bone preparation technique, compaction, has enhanced gap-healing around grit-blasted implants without osteo-conductive properties. However, hydroxyapatite (HA) porous-coated implants with osteo-conductive properties are often inserted clinically to enhance gap healing and implant fixation. It is unknown whether the osteo-conductive properties of HA porous-coated implants might overwhelm the beneficial effects of compaction on gap healing. Therefore, we compared the compaction technique with the conventional bone-removing technique, drilling, using HA porous-coated implants in a canine gap model. HA porous-coated titanium implants were bilaterally inserted into oversized cavities of the proximal humeri of seven dogs. Each dog served as its own control. Thus, one humerus had the implant cavity prepared with compaction, the other with drilling. Two weeks after surgery push-out test and histomorphometry was performed. Compaction significantly increased ultimate shear strength, energy absorption, apparent shear stiffness, bone implant contact, and peri-implant bone density. The results of this study suggest that compaction may enhance gap healing when osteo-conductive HA porous coated implants are inserted in joint replacements.

Absorbable Implants↗

Bone compaction enhances fixation of weightbearing titanium implants.

Implant stability is crucial for implant survival. A new surgical technique, compaction, has increased in vitro implant stability and in vivo fixation of nonweightbearing implants. However, the in vivo effects of compaction on weightbearing implants are unknown. As implants inserted clinically are weightbearing, the effects of compaction on weightbearing implants were examined. The hypothesis was that compaction would increase implant fixation compared with conventional drilling. Porous-coated titanium implants were inserted bilaterally into the weightbearing portion of the femoral condyles of dogs. In each dog, one knee had the implant cavity prepared with drilling, and the other knee was prepared with compaction. Eight dogs were euthanized after 2 weeks, and eight dogs were euthanized after 4 weeks. Femoral condyles from an additional eight dogs represented Time 0. Compacted specimens had higher bone-implant contact and periimplant bone density at 0 and 2 weeks, but not at 4 weeks. A biphasic response of compaction was found with a pushout test, as compaction increased ultimate shear strength and energy absorption at 0 and 4 weeks, but not at 2 weeks. This biphasic response indicates that compaction enhances implant fixation by mechanical and biological mechanisms. Therefore, compaction might have potential value in total joint replacement in the future.

Animals↗

Compacted cancellous bone has a spring-back effect.

A new surgical technique, compaction, has been shown to improve implant fixation. It has been speculated that the enhanced implant fixation with compaction could be due to a spring-back effect of compacted bone. However, such an effect has yet to be shown. Therefore we investigated in a canine model whether implant cavities prepared with compaction had spring back. Before killing the animals, we used one of two surgical techniques to make implant cavities of identical dimensions in both lateral femoral condyles of 7 dogs. One side had the implant cavity prepared with compaction, the other side with drilling. The cavities were left empty in vivo for 10 minutes before the dogs were killed. Postoperative micro-CT scanning showed that the diameters of the compacted cavities were significantly smaller than those of the drilled cavities, although they had had identical dimensions initially. Thus we found a spring-back effect of compacted bone, which may be important for increasing implant fixation by reducing initial gaps between the implant and bone.

Animals↗

Osteogenic protein 1 device increases bone formation and bone graft resorption around cementless implants.

In each femoral condyle of 8 Labrador dogs, a non weight-bearing hydroxyapatite-coated implant was inserted surrounded by a 3 mm gap. Each gap was filled with bone allograft or ProOsteon with or without OP-1 delivered in a bovine collagen type I carrier (OP-1 device). 300 microg OP-1 was used in the 0.75 cc gap surrounding the implant. After 3 weeks, the OP-1 device enhanced implant fixation by 800% (p <0.05) in the ProOsteon group, but OP-1 bad no significant effect on implant fixation in the allograft group. By adding the OP-1 device, the volume fraction of woven bone close to the implant increased from 12% to 20% (p < 0.05) in the bone allograft group and from 6% to 25% (p < 0.05) in the ProOsteon group. The volume fraction of bone allograft decreased from 29% to 9% (p < 0.05) in the OP-1 treated group versus 33% to 30% in the allograft group not treated with OP-1. No resorption of ProOsteen was found. In conclusion, OP-1 accelerates resorption of bone allograft and enhances new bone formation around cementless implants grafted with bone allograft or semisynthetic hydroxyapatite bone substitute. Our findings do not support the use of ProOsteon alone around cementless implants.

Analysis of Variance↗