Biomedical subjects

Ole A Andreassen

Publications and source records attributed to Ole A Andreassen.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Beyond exons: Linking noncoding heritability and polygenicity across complex human traits and disorders.

The genetic architecture of complex traits spans a continuum of polygenicity, yet it remains unclear how differences in polygenicity relate to the functional localization of SNP heritability across the genome. We use a MiXeR-based framework to partition heritability across 74 functional annotations covering exonic, intronic, and intergenic regions for 34 complex traits and introduce a likelihood-based annotation contribution score that quantifies annotation-specific impact on heritability. Exons account for a minority of heritability, and their contribution decreases with increasing polygenicity, from an average of 22% in less-polygenic somatic diseases and biomarkers to 13% in highly polygenic psychiatric and cognitive phenotypes. Intergenic fractions show the opposite trend, whereas intronic fractions remain relatively stable. Analysis of the broader set of functional annotations also reveals systematic differences along the polygenicity axis: highly polygenic traits show stronger contributions from comparative genomics and variant-effect scores, whereas less-polygenic traits show stronger contributions from promoter, transcription, and chromatin annotations. Together, these results indicate that the functional partitioning of heritability systematically varies with polygenicity, shifting from gene-proximal regulatory architectures to architectures shaped by numerous dispersed regulatory effects.

MiXeR↗

PubMed2026

Distinguishing different psychiatric disorders using DDx-PRS.

Despite great progress on case-control polygenic prediction, an unmet need remains for a method that genetically distinguishes clinically related disorders (e.g., schizophrenia (SCZ) versus bipolar disorder (BIP) versus major depressive disorder (MDD) versus controls). We introduce differential diagnosis-polygenic risk score (DDx-PRS), which jointly estimates the posterior probabilities of each diagnostic category (e.g., SCZ = 50%, BIP = 25%, MDD = 15%, control = 10%) by modeling variance-covariance structure across disorders, leveraging case-control polygenic risk scores and prior clinical probabilities for each diagnostic category. We applied DDx-PRS to Psychiatric Genomics Consortium SCZ, BIP, MDD and control data, including summary-level training data from three case-control genome-wide association studies (n = 41,917-173,140 cases; total n = 1,048,683) and held-out test data from different cohorts with equal numbers for each diagnostic category (total n = 11,460). DDx-PRS was well calibrated and well powered (consistent with simulations) and produced comparable results to methods that require tuning data. True diagnosis probabilities in the top deciles of predicted diagnosis probabilities were considerably larger than prior baseline probabilities, implying appreciable potential for clinical utility in certain settings.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Family genetic designs in MoBa provide insights into health and functioning.

Genome-wide association studies using large, population-based samples of unrelated individuals have discovered thousands of genetic associations with health and disease1. These studies can help explain genetic and environmental risks. However, increasing evidence suggests that population-based estimates, while precise, can also reflect confounding that affects their use and interpretation. This confounding can be overcome using data from genotyped family members, such as nuclear mother-father-child trios2,3. However, samples of genotyped families are rare4-11. Here we illustrate some of the advantages of familial data using the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), a population-based cohort of parents and offspring with extensive genotype data (n ≈ 230,000) (ref. 3), along with broad and longitudinal phenotyping of health and functioning. We provide an overview of MoBa and describe the quality control of genotype data tailored to this extensively related sample. We then use trio data to illustrate how family-based genomic designs can identify distinct direct and indirect sources of genetic influence and structural confounding. As examples, we analyse children's height, educational achievement, depressive symptoms and sleep duration. These demonstrations highlight MoBa as a broadly valuable resource for advancing understanding of health and functioning across the lifecourse and generations.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Large-Scale Neuroimaging and Genetic Analyses of the Human Thalamus in Loneliness.

BACKGROUND: Although loneliness is prevalent and significantly impacts society globally, its neural and genetic bases remain poorly understood. The thalamus, which receives sensory information from the environment, may have a more significant role in social interactions than previously recognized. Here, we integrate neuroimaging and genetic approaches to characterize structural differences within the thalamus associated with loneliness. METHODS: We obtained thalamic nuclei volumes on brain scans from 45,834 individuals (age range: 45-82 years) in the UK Biobank and grouped them into 6 anatomical groups. We investigated effects of loneliness and social isolation using self-reported data. Then, we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis on the genetic overlap between thalamic volumes and loneliness. RESULTS: The volumes of the whole thalamus and its medial, lateral, and posterior nuclei are significantly reduced in individuals with loneliness compared with those who do not feel lonely. Loneliness with frequent social contact is associated with smaller volumes, whereas social isolation without loneliness shows no such reduction in thalamus volumes. Leveraging data from GWASs on thalamic volumes (n = 30,114) and loneliness (n = 370,342) in the UK Biobank, we identified shared loci between thalamus structure and loneliness. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the emerging view that the thalamus plays important roles in social interactions and in the experience of loneliness.

Genetic architecture↗

PubMed2026

Genomic relationship between polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome and bipolar disorder.

Women with bipolar disorder (BIP) have a higher risk of developing polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS). Shared genetic architecture may underlie this comorbidity. Valproate, a mood-stabilizer commonly used to treat BIP, increases the risk of PMOS. Still, the mechanism underlying PMOS in BIP remains unknown. Here, we aimed to identify genetic variants shared between BIP and PMOS, as well as their interaction with valproate. We used the results of large-scale genome-wide association studies of BIP (41,510 cases and 354,340 controls), and PMOS (3609 cases and 229,788 controls). Using conditional false discovery rate, we discovered genetic variants jointly associated with BIP and PMOS. Gene mapping of identified variants was performed using the Open Targets platforms. We analyzed the tissue-specific expression, interaction with valproate, and involvement in biological pathways of the mapped genes. We identified two loci shared between BIP and PMOS. Among the 10 genes mapped to the locus on chromosome 8:11,444,837-11,463,015, GATA4, NEIL2, and FDFT1 showed expression profiles suggesting their role in the observed comorbidity. Mapped to the locus on chromosome 12:2499,849-2514,270, CACNA1C, FKBP4, DCP1B, and ITFG2 are expressed in both the ovaries and the brain. Valproate interacts with CACNA1C, and CACNA1C is part of biological pathways that also include other genes interacting with valproate. We identified shared genetic underpinnings of BIP and PMOS and highlighted genes that may potentially contribute to the biological mechanisms underlying their comorbidity and to a hypothesized role of valproate in these mechanisms.

Female↗

PubMed2026

Beyond Exons: Linking Noncoding Heritability and Polygenicity across Complex Human Traits and Disorders.

The genetic architecture of complex traits spans a continuum of polygenicity, yet it remains unclear how differences in polygenicity relate to the functional localization of SNP heritability across the genome. We use a MiXeR-based framework to partition heritability across exonic, intronic, and intergenic regions for 34 traits and introduce a likelihood-based annotation contribution score that quantifies annotation-specific impact on heritability. Exons explain a minority of heritability, and their contribution decreases with increasing polygenicity, from an average of 22% in less polygenic somatic diseases and biomarkers to 13% in highly polygenic psychiatric and cognitive phenotypes. Intergenic fractions show the opposite trend, whereas intronic fractions remain relatively stable. Analysis of a broader set of functional annotations reveals systematic differences along the polygenicity axis: highly polygenic traits show stronger contributions from comparative genomics and variant-effect scores, whereas less polygenic traits show stronger contributions in promoter, transcription, and chromatin annotations. Together, these results indicate that the functional partitioning of heritability systematically varies with polygenicity, pointing to a shift from gene-proximal regulatory architectures to architectures shaped by numerous dispersed regulatory effects as a key determinant of differences in polygenicity across traits.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Leveraging the genetics of psychiatric disorders to prioritize potential drug targets and compounds.

Genetics can inform biologically relevant drug development and repurposing, which may improve patient care. Here, we leverage the genetics of psychiatric disorders to prioritize potential drug targets and compounds. We used the genome-wide association studies of four psychiatric disorders [attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), bipolar disorder, depression, and schizophrenia] and genes encoding drug targets. We conducted drug enrichment analyses incorporating the novel and biologically specific GSA-MiXeR tool. We conducted multiple molecular trait analyses using large-scale transcriptomic and proteomic datasets sampled from brain and blood tissue. This included the novel use of the UK Biobank proteomic data for a proteome-wide association study of psychiatric disorders. With the accumulated evidence, we prioritize potential drug targets and compounds for each disorder. We reveal candidate drug targets associated with a single or multiple disorders that implicate glutamate signaling. Drug prioritization indicated genetic support for psychotropic medications, including several top-ranked antipsychotics for schizophrenia. We also observed genetic support for commonly used psychotropics for psychiatric treatment (e.g., clozapine, duloxetine, and lithium). Revealed opportunities for drug repurposing included cholinergic drugs for ADHD, estrogen modulators for depression, and matrix metalloproteinases for ADHD and depression. Our findings indicate the genetic liability to schizophrenia is associated with reduced brain and blood expression of CYP2D6, a gene encoding a metabolizer of drugs and neurotransmitters, suggesting a genetic risk for poor drug response and altered neurotransmission. Our extensive analyses highlight the utility of genetics for informing drug development and repurposing for psychiatric disorders, providing novel opportunities for improving patient outcomes. Depicted is the series of analyses conducted to generate a list of prioritized drug targets and compounds. First pairings of genome-wide association study (GWAS) traits with drugs are generated using enrichment analyses. Next, a series of molecular trait analyses is conducted to generate and rank a list of potential drug targets for each GWAS trait. Finally, enrichment and molecular trait results are combined to generate a ranked list of prioritized drugs for each GWAS trait based on supporting genetic evidence. ADHD = Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, BIP = Bipolar disorder, DEP = Depression, SCZ = Schizophrenia, DBP = Diastolic blood pressure, T2D = Type 2 diabetes, RNA = ribonucleic acid, XWAS = both transcriptome and proteome-wide association studies, MR = Mendelian randomization, coloc = colocalization.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Big data and psychiatry: advances, constraints and future directions.

Early work in psychiatry research, often involving single sites, small samples, and limited variables, has shifted to contemporary research involving multiple sites, large samples, and many variables. Such research raises important questions, including concerns about data quality and methodological rigor, uncertainty about its key lessons, issues regarding clinical relevance, and questions about how to optimize future advances. Here we consider these questions and concerns against the context of big data work on community and register-based surveys, cohort and biobank studies, electronic health records, digital phenotyping, brain imaging, genomics and other -omics, and randomized controlled trials. The development of large datasets allowing well-powered analyses is a major milestone, but sample size alone does not guarantee more precise estimates, and ongoing attention to the quality and rigor of big data collation and analysis is needed. Big data research has fostered trans-disciplinarity and given insights into mechanisms underlying psychiatric disorders, but also emphasizes the intricacy, heterogeneity and variability of such mechanisms, and the importance of triangulating between large-scale and small-scale research. The complexity of psychiatric phenotypes and psychobiological mechanisms contributes to the difficulty in bridging from big data to clinical application; big data research reinforces the importance of holding our diagnoses of psychiatric disorders lightly and providing explanations of these conditions humbly; and future work needs to be more attentive to clinical issues. There is enormous scope for further building databases relevant to psychiatry, but advances in conceptual models and asking the right questions are equally valuable. The full impact of big data, including artificial intelligence analyses, remains to be seen, but overenthusiastic support should be tempered by a better understanding of its strengths and limitations. At its best, such work will contribute in an iterative and integrative way to advancing our knowledge of psychiatric disorders and mental health.

Big data↗

PubMed2025

A genome-wide analysis of the shared genetic risk architecture of complex neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Although neurological and psychiatric disorders have historically been considered to reflect distinct pathogenic entities, recent findings suggest shared pathophysiological mechanisms. However, the extent to which these heritable disorders share genetic influences remains unclear. Here we performed a comprehensive analysis of genome-wide association study data, involving nearly 1 million cases across ten neurological diseases and ten psychiatric disorders, to compare their common genetic signal and biological associations. Using complementary statistical tools, we demonstrate that a large set of common genetic variants impacts the risk of multiple neurological and psychiatric disorders, even in the absence of genetic correlations. Furthermore, genome-wide association studies on psychiatric disorders consistently implicate neuronal biology, whereas neurological diseases are associated with diverse neurobiological processes. Together, this study elucidates the genetic relationship between complex neurological and psychiatric disorders, indicating a larger degree of genetic pleiotropy than previously recognized. The findings have implications for disease classification, precision medicine and clinical practice.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Optimizing genetic ancestry adjustment in DNA methylation studies: a comparative analysis of approaches.

BACKGROUND: Genetic ancestry is an important factor to account for in DNA methylation studies because genetic variation influences DNA methylation patterns. One approach uses principal components (PCs) calculated from CpG sites that overlap with common SNPs to adjust for ancestry when genotyping data is not available. However, this method does not remove technical and biological variations, such as sex and age, prior to calculating the PCs. The first PC is therefore often associated with factors other than ancestry. METHODS: We developed and adapted the adapted EpiAnceR+ approach, which includes (1) residualizing the CpG data overlapping with common SNPs for control probe PCs, sex, age, and cell type proportions to remove the effects of technical and biological factors, and (2) integrating the residualized data with genotype calls from the SNP probes (commonly referred to as rs probes) present on the arrays, before calculating PCs and evaluated the clustering ability and relationship to genetic ancestry. RESULTS: The PCs generated by EpiAnceR+ led to improved clustering for repeated samples from the same individual and stronger associations with genetic ancestry groups predicted from genotype information compared to the original approach. EpiAnceR+ also outperformed the use of DNA methylation PCs or surrogate variables for ancestry adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: We show that the EpiAnceR+ approach improves the adjustment for genetic ancestry in DNA methylation studies. EpiAnceR+ can be integrated into existing R pipelines for commercial methylation arrays, such as 450 K, EPIC v1, and EPIC v2. The code is available on GitHub ( https://github.com/KiraHoeffler/EpiAnceR ).

DNA Methylation↗

PubMed2025

Genome-wide analysis of screen behaviors among adolescents identifies novel loci and overlap with educational attainment and mental disorders.

Technological devices play a central role in adolescents' life. Despite concerns about negative effects of excessive screen time, there is little knowledge of screen behaviors' genetic architecture. Using self-reports from adolescents in the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (n = 18,490), we performed genome-wide association analysis for four screen behaviors: time spent (1) watching television; (2) gaming; (3) sitting/lying down with a screen device; and (4) using social media. The resulting summary statistics were analysed using the conditional false discovery rate (condFDR) approach to increase genetic discovery. We also estimated SNP-heritabilities of the screen behaviors and genetic correlations with eight psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anorexia nervosa, cannabis use disorder and alcohol use disorder), and educational attainment. Screen behaviors displayed significant SNP-heritabilities (0.048-0.12). We observed significant genetic correlations between screen behaviors and psychiatric disorders (rg range: 0.21-0.42). Educational attainment demonstrated negative genetic correlation with screen behaviors, most strongly with social media use (rg = - 0.69). CondFDR analysis identified three novel loci associated with social media use. Thus, we show that screen behaviors are heritable, polygenic traits that partly share genetic signal with mental disorders and educational attainment.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Genome-wide association study of adolescent-onset depression.

Adolescent depression is a heritable psychiatric condition with rising global prevalence and severe long-term outcomes, yet its biological underpinnings remain poorly understood. We conducted the first genome-wide association study of adolescent-onset depression, comprising 102,428 cases (diagnosis or clinical symptom thresholds) and 286,911 controls, including diverse ancestries. Cross-ancestry meta-analysis identified 52 independent variants across 17 loci; European-only analysis found 61 variants at 29 loci, with a SNP-based heritability of 9.8%. Comparative analyses revealed two genes unique to adolescent-onset versus lifetime depression, enriched in neuronal subtypes, and two genes as potential drug repurposing targets. Polygenic scores were associated with adolescent-onset depression across ancestries, persistent depression trajectories, more severe outcomes, as well as reduced cortical volume, surface area and white matter integrity. Genetic correlation and Mendelian randomisation analyses support shared genetic liability and causal links with early puberty and modifiable health and behavioural risk factors. These findings uncover novel genetic loci and refine biological pathways underlying adolescent-onset depression, revealing age-specific mechanisms and early intervention opportunities.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2025

Genomic relationship between polycystic ovary syndrome and bipolar disorder.

Women with bipolar disorder (BIP) have a higher risk of developing polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Shared genetic architecture may underlie this comorbidity. Valproate, a mood-stabilizer commonly used to treat BIP, increases the risk of PCOS. Still, the mechanism underlying PCOS in BIP remains unknown. Here, we aimed to identify genetic variants shared between BIP and PCOS, as well as their interaction with valproate. We used the results of large-scale genome-wide association studies of BIP (41,510 cases and 354,340 controls), and PCOS (3,609 cases and 229,788 controls). Using conditional false discovery rate, we discovered genetic variants jointly associated with BIP and PCOS. Gene mapping of identified variants was performed using the Open Targets platforms. We analyzed the tissue-specific expression, interaction with valproate, and involvement in biological pathways of the mapped genes. We identified two loci shared between BIP and PCOS. Among the 10 genes mapped to the locus on chromosome 8:11455262, GATA4, NEIL2, and FDFT1 showed expression profiles suggesting their role in the observed comorbidity. Mapped to the locus on chromosome 12:2499849, CACNA1C, FKBP4, DCP1B, and ITFG2 are expressed in both the ovaries and the brain. CACNA1C expression is affected by valproate, and CACNA1C plays a role in biological pathways involving other valproate-affected genes. We identified shared genetic underpinnings of BIP and PCOS, and implicated genes which may explain the biological mechanisms of the comorbidity between these disorders and a potential mechanism for the role of valproate.

bipolar disorder↗

PubMed2025

Comorbidity alters the genetic relationship between anxiety disorders and major depression.

BACKGROUND: Comorbid anxiety disorders (ANX) and major depression (MD) have worse clinical outcomes than either disorder alone. Analysis of genomic data based on comorbidity status may reveal more precise biological pathways and causal relationships with potential clinical implications. We investigated the genetic relationship between ANX and MD with and without mutual comorbidity. METHODS: We leveraged data from UK Biobank to perform disorder-specific genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of ANX-only (n=189,422) and MD-only (n=194,339) and generate polygenic risk scores (PRS). The Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort (MoBa, n = 130,992) served to test the associations of PRS with diagnoses. MD and ANX GWAS, including comorbidities (MD-comorbid and ANX-comorbid), were used for comparison. Genetic correlations were compared by comorbidity status, and Mendelian randomization was employed to assess causal relationships. RESULTS: The MD-only PRS showed a stronger association with MD-only compared to ANX-only cases (Z=3.74; Padjusted=0.002); however, MD-comorbid PRS did not show a significant difference (Z=2.71; Padjusted=0.08). The genetic correlation between ANX-only and MD-only was 0.53, lower than between ANX-comorbid and MD-comorbid (0.90). ANX-only showed a causal relationship with MD-only (Padjusted=0.015), but not vice versa, and contrasted the bidirectional causal relationship (Padjusted=2.9e-12, and Padjusted=9.3e-06) when comorbidity was included. Gene sets of MD-comorbid, ANX-comorbid, and MD-only, but not of ANX-only, were enriched for immune regulation pathways such as interleukin production. CONCLUSIONS: ANX and MD show more distinct genetics when comorbid cases are excluded, and ANX may be causal for MD. Disorder-specific genetic studies help uncover more relevant biological mechanisms and guide tailored clinical interventions.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2025

Separating direct, indirect and parent-of-origin genetic effects in the human population.

Here, we present a novel approach to estimate the degree to which the phenotypic effect of a DNA locus is attributable to four components: alleles in the child (direct genetic effects), alleles in the mother and the father (indirect genetic effects), or is dependent upon the parent from which it is inherited (parent-of-origin, PofO effects). Applying our model, JODIE, to 30,000 child-mother-father trios with phased DNA information from the Estonian Biobank (EstBB) and the Norwegian Mother, Father, Child Cohort (MoBa), we jointly estimate the phenotypic variance attributable to these four effects unbiased of assortative mating (AM) for height, body mass index (BMI) and childhood educational test score (EA). For all three traits, direct effects make the largest contribution to the genetic effect variance. But we find that parental indirect genetic effects make an equivalent combined contribution, and that there is a non-zero PofO effect variance for all traits. We calculate the heritability that would be obtained at the population-level in the absence of AM for common DNA loci, and show that the proportional contribution of direct effects to these heritability values can be calculated as 64.0% for EA in MoBa, 77.1% and 63.4% for height in MoBa and EstBB, and 81.2% and 88.0% for BMI in MoBa and EstBB. Additionally, using within-family genome-wide association testing, we identify 276 independently associated DNA regions that replicate across two additional biobanks, which all show a genotype-phenotype relationship that reflects an interplay of direct, indirect and PofO effects. Determining how direct, parental and PofO genetic effects combine across loci genome-wide to influence human phenotypic variation requires joint modeling of parental and child genotypes alongside the parental origin of loci and here, we make the first attempt to do this in the human population.

EstBB↗

PubMed2025

Mapping Cerebellar Morphology in 15q11.2 CNV Carriers Using Normative Modeling.

Copy number variations (CNVs) at the 15q11.2 locus of the human genome have been associated with altered brain structure and increased risk for neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. The cerebellum is increasingly seen as a crucial brain region for neurodevelopmental conditions, yet the effects of 15q11.2 CNVs on cerebellar morphology remain largely unclear. Importantly, 15q11.2 CNVs shows reduced or incomplete penetrance (meaning that not all CNV carriers are affected) and variable expressivity (meaning that symptoms may differ between individuals with the same genetic alteration). Thus, there is a need to not only assess group differences, but also to quantify anatomical variability at the individual level. Here, we address these issues using normative models of brain anatomy trained on large datasets (n > 52k, age range: 3-85) to assess both group and individual-level deviations in cerebellar anatomy in carriers of 15q11.2 deletions (n = 120, mean [SD] age= 64.95 [7.58]) and duplications (n = 149, mean [SD] age=64.31 [7.21]), compared to non-carriers (n = 19,028, mean [SD] age=64.31 [7.58]). Group-level case-control analyses revealed significantly smaller total and regional cerebellar volumes in both deletion and duplication carriers, though with small effect sizes. Individual-level deviation analyses, capturing pronounced alterations in specific individuals, revealed a heterogeneous pattern among carriers. Overall, our findings suggest that CNVs at the 15q11.2 locus exert modest and highly individualized effects on cerebellar morphology.

15q11.2↗

PubMed2025

Genome-wide association studies of binge eating behaviour and anorexia nervosa yield insights into the unique and shared biology of eating disorder phenotypes.

Eating disorders -including anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder-are clinically distinct but exhibit symptom overlap and diagnostic crossover. Genomic analyses have mostly examined AN. We conducted the first genomic meta-analysis of binge eating behaviour (BE; 39,279 cases, 1,227,436 controls), alongside new analyses of AN (24,223 cases, 1,243,971 controls) and its subtypes (all European ancestries). We identified six loci associated with BE, including loci associated with higher body mass index (BMI) and impulse-control behaviours. AN GWAS yielded eight loci, validating six loci. Subsequent polygenic risk score analysis demonstrated an association with AN in two East Asian ancestry cohorts. BE and AN exhibited similar positive genetic correlations with psychiatric disorders, but opposing genetic correlations with anthropometric traits. Most of the genetic signal in BE and AN was not shared with BMI. We have extended eating disorder genomics beyond AN; future work will incorporate multiple diagnoses and global ancestries.

Journal Article↗